The interactions of novel mononuclear platinum-based complexes with DNA

Cisplatin and the ligand, RR-DACH, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The novel platinum-based compounds, [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂], [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂] and [Pt(4FH)Cl₂], were synthesised and provided as a kind gift by Janice Aldrich Wright of the Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia. All compounds were dissolved in dimethylformamide (DMF) to give working stock solutions of 5 mM prior to use.

DH5α E. coli cells transfected with pUC19, with an insert of seven telomeric repeat sequences (pUC19/T7) between the BamHI and HindIII restriction enzyme sites [32], were utilised for this study. Purified pUC19/T7 plasmid derived DNA was used for all experiments involving DNA-drug interactions. The 5’ FAM-labelled reverse sequencing primer (FAM-REV) 5’-AACAGCTATGACCATG-3’ [32] used in the LAR procedure was purchased HPLC purified from Invitrogen.

The pUC19/T7 DNA was extracted and purified from the DH5α E. coli cells, using a Qiagen Plasmid Maxi purification kit. The purified plasmid pUC19/T7 DNA was linearised with a PvuII restriction enzyme prior to the DNA damage reactions for the LAR and interstrand cross-linking assays. The native undigested pUC19/T7 DNA was used in the DNA unwinding assay.

DNA damage reactions were carried out by treating 500 or 800 ng of the native or PvuII-cleaved pUC19/T7 DNA, respectively, with increasing concentrations of each compound. The samples were prepared in a final reaction volume of 40 μL, consisting of 2 mM N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N′-2-ethane sulfonic acid (HEPES) (pH 7.8), 10 mM NaCl and 10 μM EDTA, incubated at 37 °C for 18 h in the dark. A DMF solvent control was prepared and incubated under the same conditions as the drug-treated samples by substituting the drug with 5% (v/v) DMF. Following incubation, an ethanol precipitation was performed on all samples and the DNA pellets were re-dissolved in 20 μL of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 0.1 mM Na₂EDTA. The PvuII-cleaved pUC19/T7 DNA samples were used in the LAR and interstrand cross-linking assays as previously described [33]. All assays were reproduced in triplicate to give consistent results, representative examples are shown.

Native agarose gels were prepared at 1% (w/v) and submerged in TAE running buffer, comprising of 40 mM Tris-acetate and 1 mM EDTA (pH 8). The gel loading buffer consisted of 30% (v/v) glycerol and 0.25% (w/v) bromophenol blue in DNase-free water. The loading buffer was combined with ~ 500 ng of drug-treated native (un-cleaved) pUC19 DNA sample in a 1:5 ratio, made up to a final volume of 6.25 μL. The 1% (w/v) agarose gel were cast and run on a Bio-Rad Wide Mini-Sub Cell GT System with 6.25 μL drug-treated plasmid DNA samples or untreated plasmid DNA sample (DMF solvent control) and 5 μL of an Axygen Biosciences ready-to-use 1 kb DNA molecular weight ladder. Gel electrophoresis was carried out at 5.5 V/cm for 3 h, followed by staining in 1 x GelRed stain (diluted in 1 x TAE buffer, pH 8) for at least 30 min. The gel was visualised under UV light with a BioRad Gel Doc 2000 imager and compound-induced apparent molecular weight changes of the plasmid DNA were analysed against the 1 kb ladder standard, using BioRad Quantity One gel imaging software.

HeLa cells were cultured as subconfluent monolayers in 75 cm² culture flasks and maintained at 37 °C in 5% (v/v) CO₂. The cells were subcultured in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM), supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 4.5 g/L D-Glucose, L-Glutamine, 110 mg/L Sodium Pyruvate, 200 U/mL Penicillin and 200 μg/mL Streptomycin. The HeLa cells were harvested after 3 days or when at 90% confluence. Following trypsinisation the cell pellet was washed with 10 mL of Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS) and centrifugation at 500 x g for 5 min. The DPBS was decanted and the cell pellet was resuspended in 10 mL of fresh DMEM media. A 10 μL aliquot was combined with 10 μL of 0.4% (w/v) trypan blue solution for cell counting, cells were diluted with DMEM media to yield a final concentration of 100,000 cells/mL. 100 μL aliquots were pipetted into the wells of a flat-bottomed 96-well microtitre plate and incubated at 37 °C with 5% (v/v) CO₂, for 24 h. The DMEM culture media was replaced with 100 μL of fresh DMEM media containing the platinum-based compound at concentrations of 1, 3, 5, 10, 30, 50 and 100 μM. In the case of 4FH, the drug concentration was extended further to 150 and 200 μM. All drug treatments were carried out in triplicate and untreated cell controls (cells in DMEM without drug) were included for each experiment. 2% (v/v) DMF solvent controls were included in triplicate for each experiment. Triplicate blank controls (no cells) contained 100 μL DMEM media. The 96-well plate was incubated at 37 °C with 5% (v/v) CO₂ for 24 h. Following drug treatment, 50 μL of a 5 mg/mL MTT-DPBS solution was added and cells incubated for 2 h at 37 °C with 5% (v/v) CO₂, the media was removed from the wells by pipette and the resulting formazan crystals were solubilised in 100 μL of DMSO [34]. The plate was placed on a plate shaker for 30 min to ensure thorough solubilisation of the formazan crystals prior to measuring the optical density at 550 nm with a Thermo Scientific Multiskan EX microplate reader.

The degree of drug-induced DNA cross-linking was determined by measuring the band intensity of the large fragment of the PvuII-cleaved (linearised) pUC19, occurring as ssDNA and dsDNA forms in each lane of the denaturing agarose gels. The drug concentration that prevents 50% of the dsDNA from being denatured on the denaturing agarose gel was determined through the application of non-linear regression analysis using GraphPad Prism software. The frequency of interstrand cross-linking was calculated according to the formula; %ICL/Pt = XL/5408 x r_b [35]. Where %ICL/Pt refers to the percentage of interstrand crosslinks per platinum adduct and XL is the number of interstrand crosslinks per template molecule, XL = −ln A (A is the fraction of DNA molecules corresponding to the non-cross-linked ssDNA band) and 5408 corresponds to the number of nucleotide residues of the linearised DNA template. The r_b ratios were estimated from the molarity of platinum compound and nucleotides present in the solution at which 50% of the DNA was resistant to denaturing. This assumes that all of the drug has reacted with the DNA. This assumption is supported by the fact that whilst determining the sequence specificity there were still undamaged DNA sequences present and adding more platinum compound led to further damage [13].

The extent to which a compound could unwind the supercoiled conformation of pUC19 plasmid was observed through changes in the electrophoretic mobility of undigested plasmid conformations on the native agarose gels. The drug concentrations that caused open and supercoiled plasmid conformations to merge at a point of coalescence was determined by a linear regression analysis. The point of coalescence of the plasmid conformations was determined from the forecasted x-coordinates at which the two slopes intercepted each other. The experimentally determined coalescence points were used to calculate the associated DNA unwinding angle of the supercoiled conformation, induced by each compound, which were calculated using the formula, ϕ = 18σ / r_b(c) [36]; whereby ϕ is the DNA unwinding angle, σ is the super-helical density of the supercoiled conformation and r_b(c) is the drug to nucleotide ratio at the point of coalescence.

The degree of compound cytotoxicity (the IC₅₀ value) was determined from analysis of the dose response curve. This involved the application of a non-linear regression analysis to identify the drug concentration that induced a 50% inhibition of cell viability using GraphPad Prism software.

The pUC19/T7 sequence contains seven telomeric repeats consisting of GGGATT (T1-T7), a site of five consecutive guanine bases (G5), a site of four consecutive guanine bases (G4) and two sites of three consecutive guanine bases (G3I and G3II). These features and the annealing site of the FAM-REV primer are shown in Fig. 2. After treating the PvuII-cleaved pUC19/T7 DNA samples with each compound, the LAR procedure was carried out with the FAM-REV primer, which yields a full length single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) product of 186 bp.

The LAR experimental conditions were optimised by treating the DNA template with an increasing concentration of each compound. Damage peaks in the electropherogram traces were identified by comparison to peaks in the untreated G dideoxy sequencing lane, as shown in Fig. 3a. Note that the LAR was not carried out for [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂] as its sequence specificity has already been characterised [37]. For cisplatin, [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] and [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂] an optimal concentration of 0.3 μM was found to yield an even distribution of damage across the entire length of the DNA template, whilst maintaining a strong signal corresponding to the full length extension product of 186 bp, as shown in Fig. 3c-e. However, a hundred-fold higher compound concentration of 30 μM was required for [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] in order for it to produce observable DNA damage, as shown in Fig. 3f. Compound induced damage is predominantly observed at the telomeric repeat sequences, and other G-rich sites in the PvuII-cleaved pUC19/T7 sequence, as shown in Fig. 3c-f. There was negligible damage in the DMF control sample as shown by the absence of background peaks in the DMF trace, shown in Fig. 3b. However, DNA damage could not be interpreted at the first telomeric repeat (T1) as a result of artefact peaks in close proximity to the primer annealing site, in some replicates there was also a lesser degree of interference at the T2 site.

Overall, the collective sum of T2-T7 telomeric repeats accounting for 32–65% of total damage within the pUC19/T7 sequence. All tested compounds, with the exception of [Pt(4FH)Cl₂], exhibited the highest damage intensities at the T2-T4 telomeric sites (Fig. 4). [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] induced the highest level of DNA damage at the first five telomeric repeats, T2-T6, compared to the other tested compounds. In comparison, less damage was observed at the two G3 sites for all compounds with damage not exceeding 3%, whereas the G5 site yielded a similar damage to the T6 and T7 sites for most compounds. Cisplatin induced the highest levels of DNA damage at the G4 and G5 sites, both accounting for over 8% of the total damage. Interestingly 4FH induced the highest proportion of DNA damage (approximately 6%) at the G4 site.

A subsequent analysis was conducted to further characterise the sequence specificity of adduct formation at the telomeric repeat sites. The damage intensities of each compound was averaged across the nucleotides in the telomeric repeat sites, T4, T5 and T6, since these produced the most consistent damage intensity across three repeat experiments. Cisplatin was found to induce the highest damage intensity at the third guanine (G₃), followed by (in decreasing order) the second guanine (G₂), first guanine (G₁), first thymine (T₁) and adenine (A), as shown in Fig. 5a. It can be noted that no damage was detected for cisplatin at the second thymine (T₂). The novel compounds, [Pt(4FH)Cl₂], [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] and [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂], were found to exhibit a unique damage intensity profile compared to cisplatin, whereby G₂ yielded the highest intensity of DNA damage rather than G₃, as shown in Fig. 5b-d. It can be noted that [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] and [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂] have almost identical profiles, with G₂ yielding the highest damage intensity, followed by G₃, G₁, T₁ and A, as depicted in Fig. 5b, c. Interestingly, the DNA damage profile of [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] was the most distinct to that of cisplatin whereby the highest intensity was induced at G₂, followed by G₃, A, G₁ and T₁, as shown in Fig. 5d. Furthermore, only [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] gave a damage intensity greater than 0.4 at the adenine (A) within the telomeric sequence.

The ability of each compound to induce DNA cross-linking was determined by measuring the extent to which treated dsDNA could be separated into ssDNA in the denaturing agarose gel assay, since cross-linking inhibits the separation of the dsDNA into ssDNA. DNA samples treated with only 5% (v/v) DMF solvent were included as controls and as expected exhibited complete separation into ssDNA in the denaturation assay. The interstrand cross-linking efficiency (ICLE) of each compound is shown in Table 1, whereby a higher ICLE value indicates a greater cross-linking efficiency. All tested compounds were found to induce DNA interstrand cross-linking to some extent, as seen in Fig. 6. Cisplatin treatment of approximately 1 μM completely inhibited the separation of the dsDNA, which correlated with an absence of the ssDNA form, shown in Fig. 6a. An analysis of the denaturing agarose gel revealed that 50% of the dsDNA form was retained at a cisplatin concentration of 0.09 ± 0.01 μM, correlating to a calculated ICLE value of 6.8 ± 0.5%, as shown in Table 1.

The compounds, [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂], [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] and [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂], exhibited similar DNA cross-linking activity to that of cisplatin. Like cisplatin, [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂] caused a complete absence of the ssDNA form at a drug concentration of 1 μM, see Fig. 6b. RR-DACH was found to induce a 50% retention of the dsDNA form at a drug concentration of 0.13 ± 0.05 μM, yielding an ICLE value of 5.6 ± 2.1%, as shown in Table 1. [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] and [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂], were both found to induce a complete reduction in band intensity of the ssDNA form at a drug concentration of 3 μM, as seen in Fig. 6c, d, respectively. A 50% retention of the dsDNA form was attained by [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] and [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂] at drug concentrations of 0.21 ± 0.02 μM and 0.12 ± 0.01 μM, respectively; correlating to ICLE values of 3.1 ± 0.3% and 5.1 ± 0.2%. The weakest interstrand cross-linking activity was exhibited by [Pt(4FH)Cl₂]; inducing a 50% retention of the dsDNA form at a drug concentration of 23.52 ± 8.94 μM and yielding an ICLE value of 0.04 ± 0.02%. Furthermore, a complete reduction of the ssDNA form was not attained by [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] until a drug concentration of over 100 μM was implemented; over 10-fold higher than that observed for the other tested compounds, as shown in Fig. 6e. Additionally there was DNA trapped in the loading wells of the denaturing agarose gels that was probably caused by extensive DNA cross-linking that resulted high molecular weight DNA or highly adducted DNA that was difficult to re-dissolve. This was particularly evident for [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂], where a visible band at the top of the denaturing gel (at a drug concentration of 3 μM) can be seen in Fig. 6b. Further high molecular weight DNA cross-linking can be observed for [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂] whereby a smearing and an additional band can be seen above the dsDNA form in Fig. 6d at a drug concentration of 3 μM. Further densitometry of these high molecular weight forms was not carried out and they were not seen in lanes where the 50% retention of the dsDNA form was noted.

The ability of each compound to unwind the supercoiled conformation of pUC19 was determined by electrophoretic mobility on native agarose gels. As expected, three different pUC19 conformations were observed on the agarose gels. These were the relaxed open circular form (OC) and the supercoiled forms I and II (SC I and SC II). It is thought that SC II is probably a dimer of SC I since its apparent molecular weight is approximately double that of the SC I form. These conformations resolve on agarose gels as distinct bands, as shown in Fig. 7.

Plasmid treatment with increasing concentrations of Cisplatin, [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂], [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] or [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂] up to 0.1 to 3 μM was found to induce a proportional decrease in electrophoretic mobility for the SC forms and an increase in that of the OC form, as shown in Fig. 7a-d. In contrast, [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] caused minimal change to the electrophoretic mobility of the plasmid conformations across a broad concentration gradient ranging from 0.1 to 100 μM, as shown in Fig. 7e. Cisplatin and [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂] caused the OC and SC I conformations to merge at a point of coalescence at drug concentrations of 2.5 and 2.4 μM, respectively. A similar trend was observed for [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂] and [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] treated plasmid, although band intensity at the point of coalescence was faint within the treatment range, as shown in Fig. 7b, c. Again, this is because higher concentrations of compound treatment caused a build-up of DNA in the wells and reduced sample mobility. Again this may be due to extensive cross-linking or reduced solubility as mentioned earlier.

For the analyses of these data, the molar ratio of drug to nucleotide was calculated for the point of coalescence, this is referred to as r_b(c). These r_b(c) values were used to calculate the DNA unwinding angle induced by each compound. Cisplatin is known to induce an unwinding angle (ϕ) of 13° in plasmid DNA [36, 38], this value along with the experimentally determined r_b(c) value was used to calculate that the SC I plasmid had a super-helical density value (σ) of − 0.073, using the formula described in the methods. This super-helical density value was used along with each r_b(c) value to calculate the DNA unwinding angle induced by each compound, listed in Table 2. [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] induced the largest DNA unwinding angle (since its migration in the gel was reduced to a greater extent) followed by [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂] and [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂]. Minimal unwinding of the super-helical structure of the SC I plasmid was caused by [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] under the experimental conditions. Although the point of coalescence was not observed on the gel, it was possible to calculate a small change in the DNA unwinding angle for [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] by extrapolation of the data. However this value is reflective of an increase in migration of the OC band since little decrease in the migration of the SC I band was observed.

The cytotoxicity was assessed in the cervical cancer-derived HeLa cells which are commonly used as an indicator of cellular activity. Cisplatin was utilised as a reference compound, with an IC₅₀ value of 9.3 ± 0.2 μM being obtained in this investigation, which was similar to that previously determined for cisplatin in HeLa cells [39]. [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] was found to exhibit the highest degree of cytotoxic activity, having an IC₅₀ value of 6.9 ± 1.0. The compounds, [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂] and [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂] were found to be less cytotoxic with IC₅₀ values approximately twice that of [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂], as shown in Table 3. [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] was found to exhibit the weakest cytotoxic activity with an IC₅₀ value of 28.8 ± 1.6 μM, which is approximately 4-fold higher than for [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂]. Both the SS and RR isomer of [Pt(DACP)Cl₂] were found to induce a complete loss in cell viability at a drug concentration of 50 μM whereas [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂] required 100 μM. [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] did not induce a complete loss in cell viability until a drug concentration of over 200 μM was applied. Cisplatin induced a complete loss in cell viability at a concentration of 30 μM which was the most effective of these compounds, as shown in Table 3.

All novel platinum-based compounds tested in this study similarly demonstrated a preference to covalently bind to guanine bases within the T7/PvuII sequence, particularly at the telomeric repeats (T2 to T7), G4, G3I and G3II and G5 sites. This binding pattern is in agreement with a previous investigation which reported that telomeric repeats (as well as other G-rich sequences) are effective binding targets for cisplatin [13]. This infers the presence of abundant 1,2 intrastrand GG DNA adducts, which is consistent with literature [4]. However, it was found that these compounds exhibit binding affinity with a preference for the G₂ base of the telomeric repeats (as shown in Fig. 5), which was not observed for cisplatin. Both DACP isomers produced comparable DNA damage intensities to cisplatin, whereby a drug concentration of 0.3 μM was optimal to attain even DNA damage profiles distributed across the entire sequence. This could be because these compounds contain chloride groups in the cis-configuration and this trend has previously been observed for a cis-configured [Pt(1,2-diaminoethane)(Cl₂)] [40]. Furthermore, [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] and [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂] exhibited almost identical sequence specificity profiles at the telomeric repeats, shown in Fig. 5b, c. This was not surprising, since these compounds differ only in the conformation of the cyclopentane rings. A similar trend has been noted regarding the sequence specificity for the RR and SS-conformations of DACH [41]. The damage profiles of the two DACP isomers (and to a lesser extent cisplatin) exhibit a preference to bind the first three telomeric repeats in the T7/PvuII sequence, resulting in higher DNA damage intensities detected at the T2, T3 and T4 sites. It was intuitively thought that this bias towards the first cluster of telomeric repeats was due to excessive adduct formation inhibiting the Taq polymerase, which has previously been demonstrated for successively higher doses of cisplatin [12, 42]. However, it has been postulated that this may be because the 3′ end of the telomeric DNA repeats have an unusual conformation that exhibit an enhanced nucleophilicity [13]. This could explain the higher damage intensities detected at the T2, T3 and T4 sites in this current study, since they are situated proximally to the 3′ end of the T7/PvuII sequence in comparison to the other telomeric repeat sites.

Within the telomeric repeats, [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] displayed a higher damage intensity at the A base that suggests a bias towards forming 1,2 GA intrastrand adducts. Additionally [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] exhibited the weakest ability to form adducts and approximately 100-fold more, with respect to cisplatin, was required to obtain a detectable level of damage in the T7/PvuII sequence. The limited covalent binding ability of [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] to DNA maybe due to steric hindrance of the bulky fluorobenzoic hydrazide-based ligands.

Drug resistance during cancer treatment has been correlated to cisplatin-based DNA adducts being commonly recognised and processed by DNA repair pathways [43]. Therefore, adducts of [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂], [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂] and[Pt(4FH)Cl₂] may evade detection and overcome drug resistance. For instance, a human endometrial cancer cell line deficient in the repair protein hMSH2 exhibited less resistance to oxaliplatin than cisplatin and components of the mismatch repair protein complex were shown to bind with increased affinity to cisplatin-DNA adducts compared to oxaliplatin-adducts [44]. Additionally, it has been shown that MutS is able to recognise DNA adducts induced by cisplatin but not those of oxaliplatin [45].

In this study the ICLE value of cisplatin was 6.8% ± 0.5% which is in agreement with that previously determined [46]. [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂], [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂] and [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂] were found to induce interstrand cross-links less efficiently and exhibited values of 3.1, 5.1 and 5.6%, respectively. [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂] was most similar to cisplatin, consistent with values of 6% reported in a previous study [47]. The [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] isomer exhibited lower ICLE values than cisplatin and the [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂] isomer in contrast to a previous investigation where the RR-isomer was marginally more active than the SS-isomer, with reported ICLE values of 5.7% ± 0.4 and 5.5% ± 0.5%, respectively [48]. Furthermore [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] was found to be more cytotoxic than [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂] in HeLa cells suggesting that a high ICLE alone does not necessarily correlate to a high cytotoxicity.

The compound [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] exhibited a poor interstrand cross-linking efficiency which is consistent with the previously described sequence specificity data whereby its DNA adducts were not detectable at low drug concentrations. This is possibly because it contains bulkier ligand groups that prevents the aquated ligands from binding to residues in the DNA helix. Steric hindrance of platinum drugs containing bulky ligand is a common drawback associated with their clinical development. Previously, the kinetic activity of sterically-hindered platinum(II) complexes were found to impede their nucleophilic substitution-based reactivity [49]. It is possible that similarly the bulky ligands of [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] inhibit the nucleophilic substitution reaction at the N7 of the purine imidazole ring.

Cisplatin, [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂], [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] and [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂] were each able to induce unwinding of the SC I conformation of the pUC19 plasmid decreasing its electrophoretic mobility. Furthermore, these compounds were found to cause an increase in the electrophoretic mobility of the OC plasmid conformation. This trend has been previous reported [50] and it is thought that such bifunctional adducts cause the native OC DNA helix to condense [51] and migrate faster through the agarose gel.

The point of coalescence of the SC I and OC plasmids conformations were detected for cisplatin at an r_b(c) value of approximately 0.1. This value is marginally higher than those previously reported of 0.076 [36] and 0.08 [52]. The higher r_b(c) determined for cisplatin in this study can be attributed to the high super helical density of the template. For instance, pUC19 template in this study had a super helical density of − 0.073 which is larger than the − 0.055 value previously reported [36]. A higher density would require a higher concentration of cisplatin to induce unwinding.

The compounds [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂], [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] and [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂] exhibited DNA unwinding angles of 16.9° and 15.5° and 13.8°, respectively. These were larger than the 13° unwinding angle known for cisplatin. The unwinding angle determined for [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂] in this study is in agreement with that of 15° previously reported [47]. Additionally, it was suggested that the unwinding ability of [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂] may impede the removal of these bulky adducts by the DNA repair system. [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂] was found to be more effective than the SS-isomer by a factor of approximately 1.2. This trend has also been observed for the RR-DACH isomer over its SS-counterpart [53]. Molecular modelling analysis has shown that the two ammonia ligands of the [Pt(SS-DACH)Cl₂] complex are more prone to clashes with the DNA structure than the [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂] complex [53]. A similar mechanism may explain the differing DNA unwinding efficiencies of the DACP isomers reported here.

Weak DNA unwinding was exhibited by [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] which caused only minimal changes to the electrophoretic mobility of pUC19. The chemical structure of [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] consists of two bifunctional chloride groups so that it could covalently bind to DNA to induce unwinding. However, the reduced unwinding ability of [Pt(4FH)Cl₂] may be attributed to its bulky fluorobenzoic hydrazide-based ligand, which physically hinders its ability interact with DNA. This is in keeping with reduced DNA unwinding as a consequence of steric hindrance for compounds containing bulky naphthalene moieties around the platinum group [54].

In this investigation the IC₅₀ value of cisplatin was determined to be 9.3 ± 0.2 μM which is consistent with that of 11.42 μM determined for cisplatin in HeLa cells [39]. Generally, [Pt(RR-DACP)Cl₂], [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂] and [Pt(SS-DACP)Cl₂] induced IC₅₀ values within the same order of magnitude as cisplatin, at 6.9, 12.3 and 13.7 μM, respectively. This is likely attributed to the fact that they are all cis-configured covalent binders containing cyclohexane or cyclopentane ligands. [Pt(RR-DACH)Cl₂] was slightly less cytotoxic to HeLa cells than cisplatin which is in agreement with a previous study, whereby DACH-derived compounds were tested in four different cancer cell lines [55]. The complex of the RR-isomer of DACP was approximately 2-fold more active than the SS-isomer. Similarly it has been shown that the RR-isomer of oxaliplatin is more active than its SS-isomer [56]. This is not surprising considering that both DACP isomers contain a comparable cycloalkane ligand to oxaliplatin, albeit that the DACP cyclic ligand contains five carbons whereas the DACH ligand of oxaliplatin contains six. Furthermore, it has been reported that the cytotoxic activity of platinum-based complexes containing RR-DACP-based ligands in mouse leukemia cells exhibited greater cytotoxicity activity than the SS-isomers [57]. However, this trend does not hold true for all RR-configured platinum-based compounds; for instance [(1,10-phenthronline)(1R,2R-diaminocyclohexane) platinum(II) dichloride] (PHENRR), [(5-methyl-1,10-phenthronline)(1R,2R-diaminocyclohexane) platinum(II) dichloride] (5MERR) and [(3,4,7,8-tetramethyl-1,10-phenthronline)(1R,2R-diaminocyclohexane) platinum(II) dichloride] (3478MERR) are less active than their respective SS-configured isomers, PHENSS, 5MESS and 3478MESS in human colon and ovarian cell lines [56]. Clearly, it is not possible to predict with certainty the cytotoxic effects of novel platinum-based compounds and each needs to be tested empirically. Such an approach is crucial for the future design and development of novel chemotherapeutic compounds.