Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2019

27.02.2019 | KNEE

The medial epicondyle of the distal femur is the optimal location for MRI measurement of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon cross-sectional area

verfasst von: Clayton T. Hodges, Trevor J. Shelton, Cyrus P. Bateni, Stephen S. Henrichon, Alton W. Skaggs, Robert D. Boutin, Cassandra A. Lee, Brian M. Haus, Richard A. Marder

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 11/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Graft diameter ≥ 8 mm reduces the risk of failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ALCR) with hamstring tendon autograft. Pre-operative measurement of gracilis (GT) and semitendinosus (ST) cross-sectional area using MRI has been utilized but the optimal location for measurement is unknown. The main purpose of this study was to examine the cross-sectional areas of GT + ST at different locations and develop a model to predict whether a doubled hamstring graft of GT + ST will be of sufficient cross-sectional area for ACLR.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of 154 patients who underwent primary ACLR using doubled hamstring autograft. Cross-sectional area measurements of GT + ST on pre-operative MRI axial images were made at three locations: medial epicondyle (ME), tibiofemoral joint line (TJL), and tibial physeal scar (TPS) and calculated the correlation of intra-operative graft size for each location using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) established a threshold that would predict graft diameter ≥ 8 mm.

Results

Measurement of GT + ST at the ME had a stronger correlation (r = 0.389) to intra-operative graft diameter than measurements at the TJL (r = 0.256) or TPS (r = 0.240). The ROC indicated good predictive value for hamstring graft diameter ≥ 8 mm based on MRI measurement at the ME with the optimal threshold with the highest sensitivity and specificity as 18 mm2.

Conclusion

Cross-sectional area measurement of GT + ST at the ME correlated most closely to intra-operative diameter of a doubled hamstring autograft compared to measurements at the TJL or the TPS. As graft diameter < 8 mm is correlated with higher failure rates of ACL surgery, the ability to pre-operatively predict graft diameter is clinically useful.

Level of evidence

Level III, prognostic study.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Astur DDC, Novaretti JV, Liggieri AC, Janovsky C, Nicolini AP, Cohen M (2018) Ultrasonography for evaluation of hamstring tendon diameter: is it possible to predict the size of the graft? Rev Bras Ortop 53:404–409CrossRef Astur DDC, Novaretti JV, Liggieri AC, Janovsky C, Nicolini AP, Cohen M (2018) Ultrasonography for evaluation of hamstring tendon diameter: is it possible to predict the size of the graft? Rev Bras Ortop 53:404–409CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Beyzadeoglu T, Akgun U, Tasdelen N, Karahan M (2012) Prediction of semitendinosus and gracilis autograft sizes for ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1293–1297CrossRef Beyzadeoglu T, Akgun U, Tasdelen N, Karahan M (2012) Prediction of semitendinosus and gracilis autograft sizes for ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1293–1297CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bickel BA, Fowler TT, Mowbray JG, Adler B, Klingele K, Phillips G (2008) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging cross-sectional area for the measurement of hamstring autograft diameter for reconstruction of the adolescent anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 24:1336–1341CrossRef Bickel BA, Fowler TT, Mowbray JG, Adler B, Klingele K, Phillips G (2008) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging cross-sectional area for the measurement of hamstring autograft diameter for reconstruction of the adolescent anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 24:1336–1341CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Conte EJ, Hyatt AE, Gatt CJ Jr, Dhawan A (2014) Hamstring autograft size can be predicted and is a potential risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure. Arthroscopy 30:882–890CrossRef Conte EJ, Hyatt AE, Gatt CJ Jr, Dhawan A (2014) Hamstring autograft size can be predicted and is a potential risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure. Arthroscopy 30:882–890CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Erickson BJ, Harris JD, Fillingham YA, Frank RM, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach BR Jr et al (2014) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy 30:731–738CrossRef Erickson BJ, Harris JD, Fillingham YA, Frank RM, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach BR Jr et al (2014) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy 30:731–738CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Erquicia JI, Gelber PE, Doreste JL, Pelfort X, Abat F, Monllau JC (2013) How to improve the prediction of quadrupled semitendinosus and gracilis autograft sizes with magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography. Am J Sports Med 41:1857–1863CrossRef Erquicia JI, Gelber PE, Doreste JL, Pelfort X, Abat F, Monllau JC (2013) How to improve the prediction of quadrupled semitendinosus and gracilis autograft sizes with magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography. Am J Sports Med 41:1857–1863CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Goyal S, Matias N, Pandey V, Acharya K (2016) Are pre-operative anthropometric parameters helpful in predicting length and thickness of quadrupled hamstring graft for ACL reconstruction in adults? A prospective study and literature review. Int Orthop 40:173–181CrossRef Goyal S, Matias N, Pandey V, Acharya K (2016) Are pre-operative anthropometric parameters helpful in predicting length and thickness of quadrupled hamstring graft for ACL reconstruction in adults? A prospective study and literature review. Int Orthop 40:173–181CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Grawe BM, Williams PN, Burge A, Voigt M, Altchek DW, Hannafin JA et al (2016) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous hamstring: can preoperative magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict graft diameter? Orthop J Sports Med 4:2325967116646360CrossRef Grawe BM, Williams PN, Burge A, Voigt M, Altchek DW, Hannafin JA et al (2016) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous hamstring: can preoperative magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict graft diameter? Orthop J Sports Med 4:2325967116646360CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15:155–163CrossRef Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15:155–163CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mariscalco MW, Flanigan DC, Mitchell J, Pedroza AD, Jones MH, Andrish JT et al (2013) The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study. Arthroscopy 29:1948–1953CrossRef Mariscalco MW, Flanigan DC, Mitchell J, Pedroza AD, Jones MH, Andrish JT et al (2013) The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study. Arthroscopy 29:1948–1953CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehran N, Moutzouros VB, Bedi A (2015) A review of current graft options for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. JBJS Rev 3:11CrossRef Mehran N, Moutzouros VB, Bedi A (2015) A review of current graft options for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. JBJS Rev 3:11CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Momaya AM, Beicker C, Siffri P, Kissenberth MJ, Backes J, Bailey L et al (2018) Preoperative Ultrasonography is unreliable in predicting hamstring tendon graft diameter for ACL reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 6:2325967117746146CrossRef Momaya AM, Beicker C, Siffri P, Kissenberth MJ, Backes J, Bailey L et al (2018) Preoperative Ultrasonography is unreliable in predicting hamstring tendon graft diameter for ACL reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 6:2325967117746146CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Serino J, Murray R, Argintar EH (2017) Use of magnetic resonance imaging to predict quadrupled semitendinosus graft diameter in all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthopedics 40:e617–e622CrossRef Serino J, Murray R, Argintar EH (2017) Use of magnetic resonance imaging to predict quadrupled semitendinosus graft diameter in all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthopedics 40:e617–e622CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Steiger JH (1980) Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol Bull 87:245–251CrossRef Steiger JH (1980) Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol Bull 87:245–251CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wernecke G, Harris IA, Houang MT, Seeto BG, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ (2011) Using magnetic resonance imaging to predict adequate graft diameters for autologous hamstring double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:1055–1059CrossRef Wernecke G, Harris IA, Houang MT, Seeto BG, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ (2011) Using magnetic resonance imaging to predict adequate graft diameters for autologous hamstring double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:1055–1059CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yasumoto M, Deie M, Sunagawa T, Adachi N, Kobayashi K, Ochi M (2006) Predictive value of preoperative 3-dimensional computer tomography measurement of semitendinosus tendon harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 22:259–264CrossRef Yasumoto M, Deie M, Sunagawa T, Adachi N, Kobayashi K, Ochi M (2006) Predictive value of preoperative 3-dimensional computer tomography measurement of semitendinosus tendon harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 22:259–264CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zakko P, van Eck CF, Guenther D, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2017) Can we predict the size of frequently used autografts in ACL reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3704–3710CrossRef Zakko P, van Eck CF, Guenther D, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2017) Can we predict the size of frequently used autografts in ACL reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3704–3710CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeng C, Gao SG, Li H, Yang T, Luo W, Li YS et al (2016) Autograft versus allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and systematic review of overlapping systematic reviews. Arthroscopy 32:153–163 e118CrossRef Zeng C, Gao SG, Li H, Yang T, Luo W, Li YS et al (2016) Autograft versus allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and systematic review of overlapping systematic reviews. Arthroscopy 32:153–163 e118CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The medial epicondyle of the distal femur is the optimal location for MRI measurement of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon cross-sectional area
verfasst von
Clayton T. Hodges
Trevor J. Shelton
Cyrus P. Bateni
Stephen S. Henrichon
Alton W. Skaggs
Robert D. Boutin
Cassandra A. Lee
Brian M. Haus
Richard A. Marder
Publikationsdatum
27.02.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 11/2019
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05421-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2019

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.