Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2017

06.09.2016

The novel appearance of low rectal anastomosis on contrast enema following laparoscopic anterior resection: discriminating anastomotic leaks from “dog-ears” on water-soluble contrast enema and flexible sigmoidoscopy

verfasst von: Mark Katory, Ross McLean, Khalid Osman, Mukhtar Ahmad, Tracey Hughes, Mike Newby, Christopher Dennison, Paul O’Loughlin

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Interpretation of water-soluble contrast enema following laparoscopic low anterior resection can be very challenging for both radiologists and colorectal surgeons. Discriminating the radiological appearances secondary to anastomotic configuration from those caused by actual anastomotic dehiscence is a common problem and may be made worse with the advent of laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study is to identify potential novel appearances of the water-soluble contrast enema (WSCE) images of rectal anastomosis following laparoscopic low anterior resection to radiologists and surgeons.

Methods

We enrolled 45 patients who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection with proximal de-functioning loop ileostomy within a specialized colorectal unit. The water-soluble contrast enema reports were reviewed. Two blinded colorectal radiologists independently reviewed the images of patients suspected of anastomotic leak. All of these patients also underwent a flexible sigmoidoscopy to confirm or exclude anastomotic leak before reversal of loop ileostomy. Inter-observer concordance was calculated.

Results

Seven out of eighteen patients (38.9%) were found to have true anastomotic leaks on flexible sigmoidoscopy (15% overall leak rate). In the remaining eleven patients the image appearances were attributed to the appearance of the anastomotic ‘dog-ear effect’, created by the anastomotic configuration due to multiple firing of the intra-corporeal laparoscopic stapling device. Radiologist inter-observer concordance was 83%. Sensitivity was 100%, specificity 71%, positive-predictive value (38.9%) and negative-predictive value (100%).

Conclusions

The novel appearances of laparoscopic-stapled rectal anastomoses in WSCE can be mistaken for anastomotic leak. To avoid delay in reversal of ileostomy, a flexible sigmoidoscopy can be used to confirm or exclude a leak.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Taflampas P, Christodoulakis M, Tsiftsis DD (2009) Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: facts, obscurity, and fiction. Surg Today 39(3):183–188CrossRefPubMed Taflampas P, Christodoulakis M, Tsiftsis DD (2009) Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: facts, obscurity, and fiction. Surg Today 39(3):183–188CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJ, et al. (2004) Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 240:255–259CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJ, et al. (2004) Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 240:255–259CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ (2005) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:1150–1154CrossRefPubMed McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ (2005) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:1150–1154CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Den Dulk M, Marijnen CAM, Collette L, et al. (2009) Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 96(9):1066–1075CrossRef Den Dulk M, Marijnen CAM, Collette L, et al. (2009) Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 96(9):1066–1075CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Fung C, et al. (1995) Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 38:480–487CrossRefPubMed Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Fung C, et al. (1995) Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 38:480–487CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Brannigan AE, De Buck S, Suetens P, Penninckx F, D’Hoore A (2006) Intracorporeal rectal stapling following laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: overcoming a challenge. Surg Endosc 20(6):952–955CrossRefPubMed Brannigan AE, De Buck S, Suetens P, Penninckx F, D’Hoore A (2006) Intracorporeal rectal stapling following laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: overcoming a challenge. Surg Endosc 20(6):952–955CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams LA, Sagar PM, Finan PJ, Burke D (2008) The outcome of loop ileostomy closure: a prospective study. Colorectal Dis 10(5):460–464CrossRefPubMed Williams LA, Sagar PM, Finan PJ, Burke D (2008) The outcome of loop ileostomy closure: a prospective study. Colorectal Dis 10(5):460–464CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicksa GA, Dring RV, Johnson KH, et al. (2007) Anastomotic leaks: what is the best diagnostic imaging study? Dis Colon Rectum 50(2):197–203CrossRefPubMed Nicksa GA, Dring RV, Johnson KH, et al. (2007) Anastomotic leaks: what is the best diagnostic imaging study? Dis Colon Rectum 50(2):197–203CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Karsten BJ, King JB, Kumar RR (2009) Role of water-soluble enema before takedown of diverting ileostomy for low pelvic anastomosis. Am Surg 75(10):941–944PubMed Karsten BJ, King JB, Kumar RR (2009) Role of water-soluble enema before takedown of diverting ileostomy for low pelvic anastomosis. Am Surg 75(10):941–944PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Habib K, Gupta A, White D, Mazari FA, Wilson TR (2015) Utility of contrast enema to assess anastomotic integrity and the natural history of radiological leaks after low rectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 30(8):1007–1014CrossRefPubMed Habib K, Gupta A, White D, Mazari FA, Wilson TR (2015) Utility of contrast enema to assess anastomotic integrity and the natural history of radiological leaks after low rectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 30(8):1007–1014CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Khair G, Alhamarneh O, Avery J, et al. (2007) Routine use of gastrograffin enema prior to the reversal of a loop ileostomy. Dig Surg 24(5):338–341CrossRefPubMed Khair G, Alhamarneh O, Avery J, et al. (2007) Routine use of gastrograffin enema prior to the reversal of a loop ileostomy. Dig Surg 24(5):338–341CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis OA, McCallum IJ, Dixon S, Katory M (2015) Long-term -ostomy as a quality marker: comparison of outcomes from a 6 year series of laparoscopic surgery in MRI defined low rectal cancer. Int J Sur 23:108–114CrossRef Lewis OA, McCallum IJ, Dixon S, Katory M (2015) Long-term -ostomy as a quality marker: comparison of outcomes from a 6 year series of laparoscopic surgery in MRI defined low rectal cancer. Int J Sur 23:108–114CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The novel appearance of low rectal anastomosis on contrast enema following laparoscopic anterior resection: discriminating anastomotic leaks from “dog-ears” on water-soluble contrast enema and flexible sigmoidoscopy
verfasst von
Mark Katory
Ross McLean
Khalid Osman
Mukhtar Ahmad
Tracey Hughes
Mike Newby
Christopher Dennison
Paul O’Loughlin
Publikationsdatum
06.09.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0885-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Abdominal Radiology 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The leaping dolphin sign

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The round belly sign

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.