nach oben

Osteoporosis International

Erschienen in:

01.05.2005 | Position Paper

The perspective of the International Osteoporosis Foundation on the official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry

verfasst von: John A. Kanis, Ego Seeman, Olof Johnell, Rene Rizzoli, Pierre Delmas

Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International | Ausgabe 5/2005

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) has published position statements on topics relating to the use and interpretation of measurements of bone mineral density (BMD). The most recent appeared in the Journal of Clinical Densitometry [1] and was republished in the Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism and in Osteoporosis International [2, 3]. The topics included the indications for testing with BMD, the use of central dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the use of the Z-score and some recommendations for the spelling of the T-score and Z-score. Although these topics were chosen in an attempt to produce international consistency and consensus, most of the position statements lack a scientific basis. …

Lieb E, Lewiecki EM, Binkley N, Hamdy RC (2004) Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. J Clin Densitometry 7:1–5

Lewiecki EM, Watts NB, McClung MR, et al for the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (2004) Official position of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:3651–3655CrossRefPubMed

Lewiecki EM, Kandler DL, Kiebzak GM, Schmeer P, Prince RL, El Hajj Fuleihan G, Hans D (2004) Special report on the official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Osteoporos Int 15:779–784

Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference (2004) Indications and reporting for dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitometry 7:37–44

National Osteoporosis Foundation (2003) Physicians’ guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. NOF, Washington DC

US Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 137:526–528PubMed

European Community (1998) Report on osteoporosis in the European Community. EC, Strasbourg

World Health Organisation (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Technical Report Series 843. WHO, Geneva

Royal College of Physicians (1999) Osteoporosis: clinical guidelines for the prevention and treatment. RCP, London

10.

Pitt FA, Lloyd-Jones M, Brazier JE, McGrother CW, Kanis JA, Wallace WA, et al (1990) The costs and benefits of screening for and preventing osteoporosis in Trent Region: a report of the Trent Regional Osteoporosis Working Party. Trent Health, UK

11.

Hailey D, Sampietro-Colon L, Marshall D, Rico R, Granados A, Ausna J, Sheldon T (1996) INAHTA project on the effectiveness of bone density measurement and associated treatments for prevention of fractures. International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Edmonton, Alberta

12.

Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. Br Med J 312:1254–1259

13.

Stone KL, Seeley DG, Lui LY, et al (2003) BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18:1947–1954PubMed

14.

Siris E, Miller P, Barrett-Connor E, Faulkner K, Welvien L, Abbot T, Berger M, Santora A, Sherwood L (2001) Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. JAMA 286:2815–2822CrossRefPubMed

15.

Schnit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE, de Laet CE, Burger H, Seeman E, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, van Leeuwen JP, Pols HA (2004) Fracture incidence and association with bone density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone 34:195–202CrossRefPubMed

16.

Rose G (1992) The strategy of preventive medicine. Chapter 4. Prevention for individuals and the ‘high’ risk strategy. Oxford University Press, London, pp 29–52

17.

Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, De Laet C, Jonsson B, Dawson A (2002) Ten year risk of osteoporotic fracture and the effect of risk factors on screening strategies. Bone 30:251–258CrossRefPubMed

18.

World Health Organization (2004) World health report: changing history. WHO, Geneva

19.

Melton LJ III, Johnell O, Lau E, Mautalen CA, Seeman E (2004) Osteoporosis and the global competition for health care resources. J Bone Miner Res 19:1055–1058

20.

Bacon WE, Maggi S, Looker A, Harris T, Navi CR, Giaconi J, et al (1996) International comparison of hip fracture rates in 1988–1989. Osteoporos Int 6; 69–75

21.

Ellfors L, Allander E. Kanis JA et al (1994) The variable incidence of hip fracture in Southern Europe, the MEDOS Study. Osteoporos Int 4:253–263PubMed

22.

Johnell O, Gullberg B, Allander E, Kanis JA (1992) The apparent incidence of hip fracture in Europe: A study of national register sources. MEDOS Study Group. Osteoporos Int 2:298–302PubMed

23.

Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jonsson B, Oden A, Ogelsby AK (2002) International variations in hip fracture probabilities. Implications for risk assessment. J Bone Miner Res 17:1237–1244PubMed

24.

Kanis JA, Black D, Cooper C, Dargent P, Dawson-Hughes B, De Laet C, et al (2002) A new approach to the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int 13:527–536CrossRef

25.

Kanis JA, Glüer CC for the Committee of Scientific Advisors, International Osteoporosis Foundation (2000) An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Osteoporosis Int 11:192–202CrossRef

26.

Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, De Laet C, Delmas PD, et al (2004) Predictive value of bone mineral density for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res (in press)

27.

Looker AC, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC, Lindsay RL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, et al (1997) Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older US adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 12:1761–1768PubMed

28.

Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–486CrossRefPubMed

29.

Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Kroger H, Melton III LJ, O’Neill T, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (in press) Why measure femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD for diagnosing osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int

30.

Blake GM, Patel R, Knapp KM, Fogelman I (2003) Does the combination of two BMD measurements improve fracture discrimination? J Bone Miner Res 18:1955–1963PubMed

31.

Kanis JA, Barton I, Johnell O (2004) Risedronate decreases fracture risk in patients selected solely on the basis of prior vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int (in press)

32.

Wasnich RD, Davis JW, Ross PD (1994) Spine fracture risk is predicted by non spine fractures. Osteoporos Int 4:1–5

33.

Lunt M, Felsenberg D, Reeve J, Benevolenskaya L, Cannata J, Dequeker J (1997b) Bone density variation and its effects on risk of vertebral deformity in men and women studied in 13 European centres: The EVOS study. J Bone Miner Res 12:1883–1894PubMed

34.

DeLaet CEDH, Van Hout BA, Burger H, Hofman A, Weel AEAM, Pols HAP (1998) Hip fracture prediction in elderly men and women: validation in the Rotterdam Study. J Bone Miner Res 13:1587–1593PubMed

35.

Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, De Laet C, Mellstrom D (2001) Diagnosis of osteoporosis and fracture threshold in men. Calcified Tissue Int 69:218–221

36.

Hui SL, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC (1998) Age and bone mass predictors of fracture in a prospective study. J Clin Invest 81:1804–1809

37.

Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Dawson A, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2001) Ten year probabilities of osteoporotic fractures according to BMD and diagnostic thresholds. Osteoporosis Int 12:989–995

Titel: The perspective of the International Osteoporosis Foundation on the official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry
verfasst von: John A. Kanis
Ego Seeman
Olof Johnell
Rene Rizzoli
Pierre Delmas
Publikationsdatum: 01.05.2005
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International / Ausgabe 5/2005
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1861-0

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

The perspective of the International Osteoporosis Foundation on the official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry

Excerpt

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2005

Association of low general health status, measured prospectively by Euroqol EQ5D, with osteoporosis, independent of a history of prior fracture

Safety profile of raloxifene as used in general practice in England: results of a prescription-event monitoring study

Forearm bone mineral density in an unselected population of 2,779 men and women—The HUNT Study, Norway

Significance of Bio-intact PTH(1–84) assay in hemodialysis patients

Contributions of bone density and structure to fracture risk assessment in men and women

Lifestyle factors affecting heel ultrasound in Greek females across different life stages

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie