Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 4/2014

01.04.2014 | Editorial

The POP-Q classification system: looking back and looking forward

verfasst von: Paul Riss, Peter L. Dwyer

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Pelvic organ prolapse is one of the most common problems facing every urogynecologist. Understandably, terminology is very important when describing vaginal or uterine descent, for two reasons. First, the physician’s notes must represent the clinical problem so that the physician knows what has been seen and can relate it to a colleague. The second reason is quality assurance and research, where exact terminology is needed to accurately describe changes in pelvic organ prolapse and to be able to make comparisons between institutions and studies. In 1996 Bump et al. published a classification developed by several societies [1]. This POP-Q has been widely adopted and become the de facto standard in clinical medicine and research [2]. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bump R, Mattiasson A, BO K, Brubaker L, DeLancey JOL, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith ARB (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMedCrossRef Bump R, Mattiasson A, BO K, Brubaker L, DeLancey JOL, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith ARB (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Auwad W, Freeman RM, Swift S (2004) Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15(5):324–327PubMed Auwad W, Freeman RM, Swift S (2004) Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15(5):324–327PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Manonai J, Mouritsen L, Palma P, Contreras-Ortiz O, Korte JE, Swift S (2011) The inter-system association between the simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (S-POP) and the standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) in describing pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 22(3):347–352. doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1286-y PubMedCrossRef Manonai J, Mouritsen L, Palma P, Contreras-Ortiz O, Korte JE, Swift S (2011) The inter-system association between the simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (S-POP) and the standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) in describing pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 22(3):347–352. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-010-1286-y PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Geiss IM, Riss PA, Hanzal E, Dungl A (2007) A simple teaching tool for training the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(9):1003–1005PubMedCrossRef Geiss IM, Riss PA, Hanzal E, Dungl A (2007) A simple teaching tool for training the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(9):1003–1005PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Baden WF, Walker TA (1972) Physical diagnosis in the evaluation of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 15(4):1055–1069PubMedCrossRef Baden WF, Walker TA (1972) Physical diagnosis in the evaluation of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 15(4):1055–1069PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietz HP, Mann KP. What is ‘clinically relevant prolapse’? An attempt at defining cutoffs for the clinical assessment of pelvic organ descent. Int Urogynecol J. doi:10.1007/s00192-013-2307-4 Dietz HP, Mann KP. What is ‘clinically relevant prolapse’? An attempt at defining cutoffs for the clinical assessment of pelvic organ descent. Int Urogynecol J. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-013-2307-4
Metadaten
Titel
The POP-Q classification system: looking back and looking forward
verfasst von
Paul Riss
Peter L. Dwyer
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2014
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2311-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

International Urogynecology Journal 4/2014 Zur Ausgabe

EditorialNotes

Urogynecology digest

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.