Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Hernia 4/2021

26.07.2021 | Review

The postpartum abdomen: psychology, surgery and quality of life

verfasst von: S-J. Edmondson, D. A. Ross

Erschienen in: Hernia | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The postpartum abdomen presents significant challenges to the surgeon. It is anatomically complex, with often substantial symptomatic divarication of the rectus abdominis, affecting all anterior abdominal wall layers. This may lead to profound functional sequelae, and often, of more importance to patients, a significant physical deformity. The complex interplay of functional/physical symptoms can result in reduced quality of life (QoL) as well as negative body image/self-esteem. Postpartum women may seek abdominoplasty to address the whole scope of these concerns. Whilst techniques have evolved achieving such goals operatively, the impact of such surgery on QoL/mental health has yet to be established.

Methods

We perform a comprehensive review of potential options of validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for consideration of use in postpartum women seeking abdominoplasty; in addition to discussing current driving factors for seeking surgery and associated ethics.

Results

Pressure on postpartum women to return their abdominal wall contour to a pre-pregnant state is high. This poses important ethical considerations for surgeons. There are several well-established/validated PROMs used in body contouring in massive weight loss/bariatric population groups, including Body-Q and Body-QoL scales, but none yet specific to postpartum women.

Conclusion

PROMs use to enable establishment of the true value of abdominoplasty in postpartum women, not just in terms of functional/physical restoration, but also in terms of delivering a positive impact on patients’ mental health and QoL, are important. Further research is needed to determine if those already developed are appropriate or whether a postpartum-specific PROM would be beneficial.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Danilla S, Cuevas P, Aedo S, Dominguez C, Jara R, Calderón ME, Al-Himdani S, Rios MA, Taladriz C, Rodriguez D, Gonzalez R, Lazo Á, Erazo C, Benitez S, Andrades P, Sepúlveda S (2016) Introducing the Body-QoL®: a new patient-reported outcome instrument for measuring body satisfaction-related quality of life in aesthetic and post-bariatric body contouring patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 40(1):19–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0586-5CrossRefPubMed Danilla S, Cuevas P, Aedo S, Dominguez C, Jara R, Calderón ME, Al-Himdani S, Rios MA, Taladriz C, Rodriguez D, Gonzalez R, Lazo Á, Erazo C, Benitez S, Andrades P, Sepúlveda S (2016) Introducing the Body-QoL®: a new patient-reported outcome instrument for measuring body satisfaction-related quality of life in aesthetic and post-bariatric body contouring patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 40(1):19–29. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00266-015-0586-5CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Semer NB, Ho WC, Mills S, Rajashekara B, Taylor JR, Trung NB, Young H, Kivuls J (2008) Abdominal lipectomy: a prospective outcomes study. Perm J 12(2):23–27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Semer NB, Ho WC, Mills S, Rajashekara B, Taylor JR, Trung NB, Young H, Kivuls J (2008) Abdominal lipectomy: a prospective outcomes study. Perm J 12(2):23–27CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRefPubMed Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg M (1989) Society and the adolescent self-image, Rev. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown Rosenberg M (1989) Society and the adolescent self-image, Rev. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Fahrenberg J, Hampel R, Selg H (2001) Freiburger Personlichkeitsinventar (FPI). Revidierte Fassung (FPI-R) und teilweise geanderte Fassung (FPI-A1). Gottingen: Hogrefe Fahrenberg J, Hampel R, Selg H (2001) Freiburger Personlichkeitsinventar (FPI). Revidierte Fassung (FPI-R) und teilweise geanderte Fassung (FPI-A1). Gottingen: Hogrefe
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Soldin M, Mughal M, Al-Hadithy N (2014) Department of Health; British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons; Royal College of Surgeons England. Department of Health; British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons; Royal College of Surgeons England National commissioning guidelines: body contouring surgery after massive weight loss. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(8):1076–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.04.031CrossRefPubMed Soldin M, Mughal M, Al-Hadithy N (2014) Department of Health; British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons; Royal College of Surgeons England. Department of Health; British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons; Royal College of Surgeons England National commissioning guidelines: body contouring surgery after massive weight loss. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(8):1076–1081. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​bjps.​2014.​04.​031CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, Leidy NK, Martin ML, Molsen E, Ring L (2011) Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1–eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health 14(8):967–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014CrossRefPubMed Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, Leidy NK, Martin ML, Molsen E, Ring L (2011) Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1–eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health 14(8):967–977. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2011.​06.​014CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, Leidy NK, Martin ML, Molsen E, Ring L (2011) Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2–assessing respondent understanding. Value Health 14(8):978–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013CrossRefPubMed Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, Leidy NK, Martin ML, Molsen E, Ring L (2011) Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2–assessing respondent understanding. Value Health 14(8):978–988. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2011.​06.​013CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Suijker J, Troncoso E, Pizarro F, Montecinos S, Villarroel G, Erazo C, Cisternas JP, Andrades P, Benítez S, Sepúlveda S, Danilla S (2018) Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after body contouring surgery: phase iv results for the Body-QoL® Cohort. Aesthet Surg J 38(3):279–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx090CrossRefPubMed Suijker J, Troncoso E, Pizarro F, Montecinos S, Villarroel G, Erazo C, Cisternas JP, Andrades P, Benítez S, Sepúlveda S, Danilla S (2018) Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after body contouring surgery: phase iv results for the Body-QoL® Cohort. Aesthet Surg J 38(3):279–288. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​asj/​sjx090CrossRefPubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Poulsen L, Simonsen N, Klassen AF, Cano S, Rose M, Juhl CB, Stoving RK, Andries A, Sorensen JA (2020) Comparison of the Moorehead-Ardelt quality of life questionnaire and the BODY-Q in Danish patients undergoing weight loss and body contouring surgery. Clin Obes 10(2):e12351. https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12351CrossRefPubMed Poulsen L, Simonsen N, Klassen AF, Cano S, Rose M, Juhl CB, Stoving RK, Andries A, Sorensen JA (2020) Comparison of the Moorehead-Ardelt quality of life questionnaire and the BODY-Q in Danish patients undergoing weight loss and body contouring surgery. Clin Obes 10(2):e12351. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​cob.​12351CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The postpartum abdomen: psychology, surgery and quality of life
verfasst von
S-J. Edmondson
D. A. Ross
Publikationsdatum
26.07.2021
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
Hernia / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Elektronische ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02470-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Hernia 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.