The aim of this study was to quantify surface roughness of carious dentine using noncontact optical profilometry (NCOP) in vitro.
A total of 20 extracted teeth with root caries were examined according to clinical assessment criteria. NCOP (Proscan 2000, Scantron, Taunton, UK) was used to carry out the surface roughness measurements in vitro. Selection of sampling rate measurements were subsequently performed.
Results showed that the surface roughness (Ra) values were most accurately obtained at a sampling rate of 30 Hz. All lesions had rough texture, with cavitation ranging from 0.5 to 4 mm. Most lesions were leathery, whilst remaining few were soft. There was a significant difference in surface roughness between the carious and sound dentine (p < 0.05). Pearson’s correlation coefficient tests failed to show any significant linear correlation between surface roughness measurements and cavitation (r 0.39; p > 0.05) whilst there was a significant correlation between the hardness and surface roughness (r 0.47, p = 0.04). There was an inverse relationship trend between surface roughness measurements and severity of root caries.
There are limitations due to the sophisticated layout of collage network within the root carious dentine especially cavitated lesions. The NCOP could be considered for the quantification of surface roughness on noncavitated carious dentine in a laboratory setting.
The effect of different oral health care products on root caries using the NCOP without causing any potential damage to the noncavitated root surface could be assessed prior to the large-scale clinical studies.
National Institute on Aging, https://www.nia.nih.gov/2010
Ekstrand KR, Ricketts DN, Kidd EA (1997) Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth of the occlusal surface: an in vitro examination. Caries Res 31:224–231 CrossRef
Nyvad B, Fejerskov O (1997) Assessing the stage of caries lesion activity on the basis of clinical and microbiological examination. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 25:69–75 CrossRef
Fejerskov O (2015) Pathology of dental caries. In: Fejerskov O, Nyvad B, Kidd EA (eds) Dental caries: the disease and its clinical management, 3rd edn. Whiley Blackwell, Oxford, pp 40–81
Banting DW (1993) Diagnosis and prediction of root caries. Adv Dent Res 7:80–86 CrossRef
Bader JD, Shugars DA, Bonito AJ (2001) Systematic reviews of selected dental caries diagnosis and management methods. J Dent Educ 65(10):960–968 ISSN 0022-0337 PubMed
Ismail AI (2004) Visual and visuo-tactile detection of dental caries. J Dent Res 83(Spec Iss C):C56–C66 CrossRef
Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V (1999) Reliability of a new caries diagnostic system differentiating between active and inactive caries lesions. Caries Res 33:252–260 CrossRef
Baysan A, Lynch E, Ellwood R, Davies R, Petersson L, Borsboom P (2001) Reversal of primary root caries using dentifrices containing 5,000 and 1,100 ppm fluoride. Caries Res 35:41–46 CrossRef
Brailsford SR, Shah B, Simons D, Gilbert S, Clark D, Ines I, Adams SE, Allison C, Beighton D (2001) The predominant aciduric microflora of root-caries lesions. J Dent Res 80:1828–1833 CrossRef
Lynch E, Beighton D (1993) Relationships between mutans streptococci and perceived treatment need of primary root-caries lesions. Gerodontol 10:98–104 CrossRef
Schüpbach P, Osterwalder V, Guggenheim B (1995) Human root caries: microbiota in plaque covering sound, carious and arrested carious root surfaces. Caries Res 29:382–395 CrossRef
Marshall GW Jr, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M (1997) The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent 25:441–458 CrossRef
Ashmore H, Van Abbe NY, Wilson SY (1972) Measurement in vitro of dentin abrasion by toothpaste. Brit Dent J 133:60–66 CrossRef
Jones RS, Darling CL, Featherstone JD, Fried D (2006) Imaging artificial caries on the occlusal surfaces with polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Caries Res 40:81–89 CrossRef
Paepegaey A-M, Barker ML, Bartlett DW, Mistry M, West NX, Hellin N, Brown LJ, Bellamy PG (2013) Measuring enamel erosion: a comparative study of contact profilometry, non-contact profilometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Dent Mat 29:1265–1272 CrossRef
Sleibi A, Tappuni AR, Davis GR, Anderson P, Baysan A (2018) Comparison of efficacy of dental varnish containing fluoride either with CPP-ACP or bioglass on root caries: ex vivo study. J Dent 73:2018–2096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.009 CrossRef
Schlueter N, Jung K, Ganss C (2016) Profilometric quantification of erosive tissue loss in dentine: a systematic evaluation of the method. Caries Res 50:443–454 CrossRef
Zhang XZ, Anderson P, Dowker SE, Elliott JC (2000) Optical profilometric study of changes in surface roughness of enamel during in vitro demineralisation. Caries Res 34:164–174 CrossRef
- The quantification of surface roughness on root caries using Noncontact Optical Profilometry—An in vitro study
- Springer International Publishing
Lasers in Dental Science
Elektronische ISSN: 2367-2587
Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin
Mail Icon II