Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2018

02.03.2018 | Melanomas

The Rationale and Emerging Use of Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Solid Malignancies

verfasst von: Emily Z. Keung, MD, Esosa U. Ukponmwan, MD, MPH, Alexandria P. Cogdill, M.Eng, Jennifer A. Wargo, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Unprecedented advances in the treatment of cancer have occurred through the use of immunotherapy, with several agents currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of widespread metastatic disease across cancer types. Immune checkpoint blockade represents a particularly promising class of agents that block inhibitory molecules on the surface of T cells, resulting in their activation and propagation of an immune response. Treatment with these agents may re-invigorate anti-tumor immunity, resulting in therapeutic responses, and use of these agents currently is being studied in the adjuvant setting. Additionally, a strong rationale exists for their use in the neoadjuvant setting for high-risk resectable disease (e.g., regional nodal disease in the case of melanoma). This rationale is based on the relatively high risk of relapse for these patients, as well as on scientific evidence suggesting that long-term immunologic memory and tumor control may be superior in the setting of treatment for an intact tumor (i.e., neoadjuvant therapy) as opposed to treatment in the setting of micrometastatic disease (e.g., adjuvant treatment). The potential advantages of this approach and the current landscape for neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade is discussed in this report, as well as caveats that should be considered by clinicians contemplating this strategy.
Literatur
1.
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Baksh K, Weber J. Immune checkpoint protein inhibition for cancer: preclinical justification for CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade and new combinations. Semin Oncol. 2015;42:363–77.CrossRefPubMed Baksh K, Weber J. Immune checkpoint protein inhibition for cancer: preclinical justification for CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade and new combinations. Semin Oncol. 2015;42:363–77.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma P, Allison JP. Immune checkpoint targeting in cancer therapy: toward combination strategies with curative potential. Cell. 2015;161:205–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sharma P, Allison JP. Immune checkpoint targeting in cancer therapy: toward combination strategies with curative potential. Cell. 2015;161:205–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Brunet JF, Denizot F, Luciani MF, et al. (1987) A new member of the immunoglobulin superfamily–CTLA-4. Nature. 328:267–70.CrossRefPubMed Brunet JF, Denizot F, Luciani MF, et al. (1987) A new member of the immunoglobulin superfamily–CTLA-4. Nature. 328:267–70.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Walunas TL, Lenschow DJ, Bakker CY, et al. Pillars article: CTLA-4 can function as a negative regulator of T cell activation. . 1994. 1: 405–413.CrossRefPubMed Walunas TL, Lenschow DJ, Bakker CY, et al. Pillars article: CTLA-4 can function as a negative regulator of T cell activation. . 1994. 1: 405–413.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Krummel MF, Allison JP. CD28 and CTLA-4 have opposing effects on the response of T cells to stimulation. J Exp Med. 1995;182:459–65.CrossRefPubMed Krummel MF, Allison JP. CD28 and CTLA-4 have opposing effects on the response of T cells to stimulation. J Exp Med. 1995;182:459–65.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Leach DR, Krummel MF, Allison JP. Enhancement of antitumor immunity by CTLA-4 blockade. Science. 1996;271:1734–6.CrossRefPubMed Leach DR, Krummel MF, Allison JP. Enhancement of antitumor immunity by CTLA-4 blockade. Science. 1996;271:1734–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Keir ME, Butte MJ, Freeman GJ, Sharpe AH. PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26:677–704.CrossRefPubMed Keir ME, Butte MJ, Freeman GJ, Sharpe AH. PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26:677–704.CrossRefPubMed
11.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolchok JD, Saenger Y. The mechanism of anti-CTLA-4 activity and the negative regulation of T cell activation. Oncologist. 2008;13(Suppl 4):2–9.CrossRefPubMed Wolchok JD, Saenger Y. The mechanism of anti-CTLA-4 activity and the negative regulation of T cell activation. Oncologist. 2008;13(Suppl 4):2–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:711–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:711–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2521–32.CrossRefPubMed Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2521–32.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:23–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:23–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Robert C, Ribas A, Wolchok J. Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial. Lancet. 2014;384:1109–17.CrossRefPubMed Robert C, Ribas A, Wolchok J. Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial. Lancet. 2014;384:1109–17.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, et al. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:320–30.CrossRefPubMed Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, et al. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:320–30.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma P, Retz M, Siefker-Radtke A, et al. Nivolumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum therapy (CheckMate 275): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:312–22.CrossRefPubMed Sharma P, Retz M, Siefker-Radtke A, et al. Nivolumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum therapy (CheckMate 275): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:312–22.CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Balar AV, Catellano D, O’Donnell PH, et al. Pembrolizumab as first-line therapy in cisplatin-ineligible advanced urothelial cancer: results from the total KEYNOTE-052 study population (abstract). J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(Suppl):284.CrossRef Balar AV, Catellano D, O’Donnell PH, et al. Pembrolizumab as first-line therapy in cisplatin-ineligible advanced urothelial cancer: results from the total KEYNOTE-052 study population (abstract). J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(Suppl):284.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg JE, Hoffman-Censits J, Powles T, et al. Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1909–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rosenberg JE, Hoffman-Censits J, Powles T, et al. Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1909–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Balar A V., Galsky MD, Rosenberg JE, et al. Atezolizumab as first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2017;389:67–76.CrossRefPubMed Balar A V., Galsky MD, Rosenberg JE, et al. Atezolizumab as first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2017;389:67–76.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Fehrenbacher L, Spira A, Ballinger M, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non–small cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1837–46.CrossRefPubMed Fehrenbacher L, Spira A, Ballinger M, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non–small cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1837–46.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1627–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1627–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:123–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:123–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Garon EB, Rizvi NA, Hui R, et al. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2018–28.CrossRefPubMed Garon EB, Rizvi NA, Hui R, et al. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2018–28.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1540–50.CrossRefPubMed Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1540–50.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Langer CJ, Gadgeel SM, Borghaei H, et al. Carboplatin and pemetrexed with or without pembrolizumab for advanced, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a randomised, phase 2 cohort of the open-label KEYNOTE-021 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1497–508.CrossRefPubMed Langer CJ, Gadgeel SM, Borghaei H, et al. Carboplatin and pemetrexed with or without pembrolizumab for advanced, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a randomised, phase 2 cohort of the open-label KEYNOTE-021 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1497–508.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexander W. The checkpoint immunotherapy revolution: what started as a trickle has become a flood, despite some daunting adverse effects: new drugs, indications, and combinations continue to emerge. Pharm Ther 2016;41:185–91. Alexander W. The checkpoint immunotherapy revolution: what started as a trickle has become a flood, despite some daunting adverse effects: new drugs, indications, and combinations continue to emerge. Pharm Ther 2016;41:185–91.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin DS, Ribas A. The evolution of checkpoint blockade as a cancer therapy: what’s here, what’s next? Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;33:23–35.CrossRefPubMed Shin DS, Ribas A. The evolution of checkpoint blockade as a cancer therapy: what’s here, what’s next? Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;33:23–35.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoos A. Development of immuno-oncology drugs—from CTLA4 to PD1 to the next generations. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15:235–47.CrossRefPubMed Hoos A. Development of immuno-oncology drugs—from CTLA4 to PD1 to the next generations. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15:235–47.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Eggermont AMM, Chiarion-Sileni V, Grob JJ, et al. Adjuvant ipilimumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma (EORTC 18071): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:522–30.CrossRefPubMed Eggermont AMM, Chiarion-Sileni V, Grob JJ, et al. Adjuvant ipilimumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma (EORTC 18071): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:522–30.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1824–35.CrossRefPubMed Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1824–35.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Grossman HB, Natale RB, Tangen CM, et al. (2003) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:859–66CrossRefPubMed Grossman HB, Natale RB, Tangen CM, et al. (2003) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:859–66CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Brown A. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2483–93.CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Brown A. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2483–93.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:778–85.CrossRefPubMed Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:778–85.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1796–804.CrossRef Von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1796–804.CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384:164–72.CrossRefPubMed Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384:164–72.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JPA. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:188–94.CrossRefPubMed Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JPA. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:188–94.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Salvador-Coloma C, Cohen E. Multidisciplinary care of laryngeal cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2016;12:717–24.CrossRefPubMed Salvador-Coloma C, Cohen E. Multidisciplinary care of laryngeal cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2016;12:717–24.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long–term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090–8.CrossRefPubMed Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long–term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1090–8.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Franco P, Arcadipane F, Strignano P, et al. Preoperative treatments for adenocarcinoma of the lower oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction: a review of the current evidence from randomized trials. Med Oncol. 2017;34:1–7.CrossRef Franco P, Arcadipane F, Strignano P, et al. Preoperative treatments for adenocarcinoma of the lower oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction: a review of the current evidence from randomized trials. Med Oncol. 2017;34:1–7.CrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderegg MCJ, van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus perioperative chemotherapy for patients with resectable esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017. 24:2282-2290CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Anderegg MCJ, van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus perioperative chemotherapy for patients with resectable esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017. 24:2282-2290CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Zurück zum Zitat van Hagen P, Hulshof MCCM, van Lanschot JJB, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.CrossRefPubMed van Hagen P, Hulshof MCCM, van Lanschot JJB, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–84.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernández-Martos C, Pericay C, Aparicio J, et al. Phase II, randomized study of concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) compared with induction CAPOX followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in magnetic resonance imaging-defined, l. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:859–65.CrossRefPubMed Fernández-Martos C, Pericay C, Aparicio J, et al. Phase II, randomized study of concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) compared with induction CAPOX followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in magnetic resonance imaging-defined, l. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:859–65.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Cercek A, Goodman KA, Hajj C, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy first, followed by chemoradiation and then surgery, in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2014;12:513–9.CrossRef Cercek A, Goodman KA, Hajj C, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy first, followed by chemoradiation and then surgery, in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2014;12:513–9.CrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Melero I, Berraondo P, Rodríguez-Ruiz ME, Pérez-Gracia JL. Making the most of cancer surgery with neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Cancer Discov. 2016;6:1312–4.CrossRefPubMed Melero I, Berraondo P, Rodríguez-Ruiz ME, Pérez-Gracia JL. Making the most of cancer surgery with neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Cancer Discov. 2016;6:1312–4.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Davar D, Tarhini AA, Kirkwood JM. Adjuvant immunotherapy of melanoma and development of new approaches using the neoadjuvant approach. Clin Dermatol. 2013;31:237–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Davar D, Tarhini AA, Kirkwood JM. Adjuvant immunotherapy of melanoma and development of new approaches using the neoadjuvant approach. Clin Dermatol. 2013;31:237–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu J, Blake SJ, Yong MCR, et al. Improved efficacy of neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant immunotherapy to eradicate metastatic disease. Cancer Discov 2016; 6(12): 1382-1399CrossRefPubMed Liu J, Blake SJ, Yong MCR, et al. Improved efficacy of neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant immunotherapy to eradicate metastatic disease. Cancer Discov 2016; 6(12): 1382-1399CrossRefPubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat van Zeijl MCT, van den Eertwegh AJ, Haanen JB, Wouters MWJM. (Neo)adjuvant systemic therapy for melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43:534–43.CrossRefPubMed van Zeijl MCT, van den Eertwegh AJ, Haanen JB, Wouters MWJM. (Neo)adjuvant systemic therapy for melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43:534–43.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen P-L, Roh W, Reuben A, et al. Analysis of immune signatures in longitudinal tumor samples yields insight into biomarkers of response and mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Cancer Discov. 2016;6:827–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen P-L, Roh W, Reuben A, et al. Analysis of immune signatures in longitudinal tumor samples yields insight into biomarkers of response and mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Cancer Discov. 2016;6:827–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassel JC, Heinzerling L, Aberle J, et al. Combined immune checkpoint blockade (anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4): evaluation and management of adverse drug reactions. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;57:36–49.CrossRefPubMed Hassel JC, Heinzerling L, Aberle J, et al. Combined immune checkpoint blockade (anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4): evaluation and management of adverse drug reactions. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;57:36–49.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The Rationale and Emerging Use of Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Solid Malignancies
verfasst von
Emily Z. Keung, MD
Esosa U. Ukponmwan, MD, MPH
Alexandria P. Cogdill, M.Eng
Jennifer A. Wargo, MD
Publikationsdatum
02.03.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6379-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

Annals of Surgical Oncology 7/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Health Services Research and Global Oncology

Changing the Status Quo, Including How We Measure It

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.