Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2019

19.03.2019 | Breast Oncology

The Relationship of Breast Density and Positive Lumpectomy Margins

verfasst von: Jessica C. Gooch, MD, Esther Yoon, MD, Jennifer Chun, MPH, Elianna Kaplowitz, MPH, Talia Jubas, BA, Amber Guth, MD, Deborah Axelrod, MD, Richard Shapiro, MD, Farbod Darvishian, MD, Freya Schnabel, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

A positive lumpectomy margin after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a significant predictor for ipsilateral cancer recurrence. The MarginProbe, a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved device for intraoperative assessment of lumpectomy margins, is associated with a reduction in re-excision surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of mammographic breast density (MBD) and clinicopathologic characteristics with margin status in women undergoing BCS with the MarginProbe.

Methods

The institutional database was queried for patients with breast cancer who had BCS with the MarginProbe from 2013 to 2017. Clinicopathologic characteristics were collected. The study defined MBD as less dense (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] A and B) and more dense (BI-RADS C and D). A positive margin was defined as smaller than 1 mm. Pearson Chi square and uni- and multivariate logistic regression were performed.

Results

Of 1734 patients, 341 met the study criteria. The median patient age was 63 years. The patients with higher mammographic density were younger (p < 0.0001) and had a lower body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.0001). The patients with higher MBD were more likely to present with a palpable mass (p = 0.0360). Of the 341 patients, 135 (39.6%) had one or more positive margins on the main specimen, and 101 (74.8%) were converted to final negative margins after the MarginProbe directed re-excisions. Positive final margins were associated with larger tumor size (p = 0.0242) and more advanced stage of disease at diagnosis (p = 0.0255).

Conclusions

In this study of patients undergoing BCS, breast density was not correlated with the likelihood of a positive margin. The presence of positive final lumpectomy margins was associated with older age and more extensive disease.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnabel F, Boolbol SK, Gittleman M, Karni T, Tafra L, Feldman S et al. A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014:21:1589–95.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Schnabel F, Boolbol SK, Gittleman M, Karni T, Tafra L, Feldman S et al. A randomized prospective study of lumpectomy margin assessment with use of MarginProbe in patients with nonpalpable breast malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014:21:1589–95.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat A. C. Society. Breast cancer facts and figures 2017–2018. Atlanta: A.C. Society; 2017. p 1–44. A. C. Society. Breast cancer facts and figures 2017–2018. Atlanta: A.C. Society; 2017. p 1–44.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Thill M, Dittmer C, Baumann K, Friedrichs K, Blohmer JU. MarginProbe(R): final results of the German post-market study in breast-conserving surgery of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast. 2014;23:94–6.CrossRefPubMed Thill M, Dittmer C, Baumann K, Friedrichs K, Blohmer JU. MarginProbe(R): final results of the German post-market study in breast-conserving surgery of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast. 2014;23:94–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zysk AM, Chen K, Gabrielson E, Tafra L, May Gonzalez EA, Canner JK et al. Intraoperative assessment of final margins with a handheld optical imaging probe during breast-conserving surgery may reduce the reoperation rate: results of a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3356–62.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Zysk AM, Chen K, Gabrielson E, Tafra L, May Gonzalez EA, Canner JK et al. Intraoperative assessment of final margins with a handheld optical imaging probe during breast-conserving surgery may reduce the reoperation rate: results of a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3356–62.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards BL, Guidry CA, Larson KN, Novicoff WM, Harvey JA, Schroen AT. Does mammographic density have an impact on the margin re-excision rate after breast-conserving surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:782–8.CrossRefPubMed Edwards BL, Guidry CA, Larson KN, Novicoff WM, Harvey JA, Schroen AT. Does mammographic density have an impact on the margin re-excision rate after breast-conserving surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:782–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Blohmer JU, Tanko J, Kueper J, Groß J, Völker R, Machleidt A. MarginProbe(c) reduces the rate of re-excision following breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294:361–7.CrossRefPubMed Blohmer JU, Tanko J, Kueper J, Groß J, Völker R, Machleidt A. MarginProbe(c) reduces the rate of re-excision following breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294:361–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rivera RJ, Holmes DR, Tafra L. Analysis of the impact of intraoperative margin assessment with adjunctive use of MarginProbe versus standard of care on tissue volume removed. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:868623.PubMedCentralPubMed Rivera RJ, Holmes DR, Tafra L. Analysis of the impact of intraoperative margin assessment with adjunctive use of MarginProbe versus standard of care on tissue volume removed. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:868623.PubMedCentralPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Allweis TM, Kaufman Z, Lelcuk S, Pappo I, Karni T, Schneebaum S et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2008;196:483–9.CrossRefPubMed Allweis TM, Kaufman Z, Lelcuk S, Pappo I, Karni T, Schneebaum S et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study of a real-time, intraoperative probe for positive margin detection in breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2008;196:483–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Radiology ACo. ACR BI-RADS atlas. In: Mammography. 5th ed. 2013, pp. 121–140. Radiology ACo. ACR BI-RADS atlas. In: Mammography. 5th ed. 2013, pp. 121–140.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, Houssami N, Chavez-MacGregor M, Harris JR et al. Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology–American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3801–10.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, Houssami N, Chavez-MacGregor M, Harris JR et al. Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology–American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3801–10.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnabel FR, Allweis TA. Breast density and the risk for positive lumpectomy margins. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(28 Suppl):50.CrossRef Schnabel FR, Allweis TA. Breast density and the risk for positive lumpectomy margins. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(28 Suppl):50.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Police A, Lin E, Lane K. Intraoperative margin assessment with the MarginProbe at different mammographic breast densities. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(28 Suppl):47.CrossRef Police A, Lin E, Lane K. Intraoperative margin assessment with the MarginProbe at different mammographic breast densities. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(28 Suppl):47.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Relationship of Breast Density and Positive Lumpectomy Margins
verfasst von
Jessica C. Gooch, MD
Esther Yoon, MD
Jennifer Chun, MPH
Elianna Kaplowitz, MPH
Talia Jubas, BA
Amber Guth, MD
Deborah Axelrod, MD
Richard Shapiro, MD
Farbod Darvishian, MD
Freya Schnabel, MD
Publikationsdatum
19.03.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07295-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.