Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 12/2017

14.06.2017 | Chest

The relationship of cancer characteristics and patient outcome with time to lung cancer diagnosis after an abnormal screening CT

verfasst von: Sushilkumar K. Sonavane, Paul Pinsky, Jubal Watts Jr, David S. Gierada, Reginald Munden, Satinder P. Singh, Hrudaya Nath

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 12/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated a reduction in lung cancer and all-cause mortality with low-dose CT (LDCT) screening. The aim of our study was to examine the time to diagnosis (TTD) of lung cancer in the LDCT arm of the NLST and assess its relationship with cancer characteristics and survival.

Methods

The subjects (N = 462) with a positive baseline screen and subsequent lung cancer diagnosis within 3 years were evaluated by data and image review to confirm the baseline abnormality. The cases were analysed for the relationship between TTD and imaging features, cancer type, stage and survival for 7 years from baseline screen.

Results

Cancer was judged to be present at baseline in 397/462 cases. The factors that showed significant association (p value trend less than 0.05) with longer TTD included smaller nodule size, pure ground glass nodules (GGNs), smooth/lobulated margins, stages I/II, adenocarcinoma, and decreasing lung cancer mortality. The logistic regression model for lung cancer death showed significant inverse relationships with size less than 20 mm (OR = 0.32), pure GGNs (OR = 0.24), adenocarcinoma (OR = 0.57) and direct relationship with age (OR = 1.4).

Conclusion

TTD after a positive LDCT screen in the NLST showed a strong association with imaging features, stage and mortality.

Key Points

NLST observed variable time to lung cancer diagnosis from positive baseline screen.
Time to diagnosis was associated with imaging features, cancer type and stage.
In univariate but not multivariate analysis, longer TTD correlated with decreased mortality.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM et al (2011) Reduced lung cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409CrossRef National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM et al (2011) Reduced lung cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Aberle DR, DeMello S, Berg CD et al (2013) Results of the two incidence screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial. N Engl J Med 369:920–931CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aberle DR, DeMello S, Berg CD et al (2013) Results of the two incidence screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial. N Engl J Med 369:920–931CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Berg CD et al (2011) The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 258:243–253CrossRefPubMedCentral National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Berg CD et al (2011) The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 258:243–253CrossRefPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsson JK, Schultz EM, Gould MK (2009) Timeliness of care in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review. Thorax 64:749–756CrossRefPubMed Olsson JK, Schultz EM, Gould MK (2009) Timeliness of care in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review. Thorax 64:749–756CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Koyi H, Hillerdal G, Brandén E (2002) Patient’s and doctors’ delays in the diagnosis of chest tumors. Lung Cancer 35:53–57CrossRefPubMed Koyi H, Hillerdal G, Brandén E (2002) Patient’s and doctors’ delays in the diagnosis of chest tumors. Lung Cancer 35:53–57CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Porta M, Gallén M, Malats N, Planas J (1991) Influence of ‘diagnostic delay’ upon cancer survival: an analysis of five tumour sites. J Epidemiol Community Health 45:225–230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Porta M, Gallén M, Malats N, Planas J (1991) Influence of ‘diagnostic delay’ upon cancer survival: an analysis of five tumour sites. J Epidemiol Community Health 45:225–230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pita-Fernández S, Montero-Martinez C, Pértega-Diaz S, Verea-Hernando H (2003) Relationship between delayed diagnosis and the degree of invasion and survival in lung cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 56:820–825CrossRefPubMed Pita-Fernández S, Montero-Martinez C, Pértega-Diaz S, Verea-Hernando H (2003) Relationship between delayed diagnosis and the degree of invasion and survival in lung cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 56:820–825CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Salomaa ER, Sällinen S, Hiekkanen H, Liippo K (2005) Delays in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Chest 128:2282–2288CrossRefPubMed Salomaa ER, Sällinen S, Hiekkanen H, Liippo K (2005) Delays in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Chest 128:2282–2288CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanashiki M, Satoh H, Ishikawa H, Yamashita YT, Ohtsuka M, Sekizawa K (2003) Time from finding abnormality on mass screening to final diagnosis of lung cancer. Oncol Rep 10:649–652PubMed Kanashiki M, Satoh H, Ishikawa H, Yamashita YT, Ohtsuka M, Sekizawa K (2003) Time from finding abnormality on mass screening to final diagnosis of lung cancer. Oncol Rep 10:649–652PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kashiwabara K, Koshi S, Itonaga K, Nakahara O, Tanaka M, Toyonaga M (2003) Outcome in patients with lung cancer found on lung cancer mass screening roentgenograms, but who did not subsequently consult a doctor. Lung Cancer 40:67–72CrossRefPubMed Kashiwabara K, Koshi S, Itonaga K, Nakahara O, Tanaka M, Toyonaga M (2003) Outcome in patients with lung cancer found on lung cancer mass screening roentgenograms, but who did not subsequently consult a doctor. Lung Cancer 40:67–72CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tørring ML, Frydenberg M, Hansen RP, Olesen F, Vedsted P (2013) Evidence of increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals for five common cancers: a cohort study in primary care. Eur J Cancer 49:2187–2198CrossRefPubMed Tørring ML, Frydenberg M, Hansen RP, Olesen F, Vedsted P (2013) Evidence of increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals for five common cancers: a cohort study in primary care. Eur J Cancer 49:2187–2198CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Myrdal G, Lambe M, Hillerdal G, Lamberg K, Agustsson T, Ståhle E (2004) Effect of delays on prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Thorax 59:45–49PubMedPubMedCentral Myrdal G, Lambe M, Hillerdal G, Lamberg K, Agustsson T, Ståhle E (2004) Effect of delays on prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Thorax 59:45–49PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Comber H, Cronin DP, Deady S, Lorcain PO, Riordan P (2005) Delays in treatment in the cancer services: impact on cancer stage and survival. Ir Med J 98:238–299PubMed Comber H, Cronin DP, Deady S, Lorcain PO, Riordan P (2005) Delays in treatment in the cancer services: impact on cancer stage and survival. Ir Med J 98:238–299PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Annakkaya AN, Arbak P, Balbay O, Bilgin C, Erbas M, Bulut I (2007) Effect of symptom-to-treatment interval on prognosis in lung cancer. Tumori 93:61–67PubMed Annakkaya AN, Arbak P, Balbay O, Bilgin C, Erbas M, Bulut I (2007) Effect of symptom-to-treatment interval on prognosis in lung cancer. Tumori 93:61–67PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kodama K, Higashiyama M, Yokouchi H et al (2001) Prognostic value of ground-glass opacity found in small lung adenocarcinoma on high-resolution CT scanning. Lung Cancer 33:17–25CrossRefPubMed Kodama K, Higashiyama M, Yokouchi H et al (2001) Prognostic value of ground-glass opacity found in small lung adenocarcinoma on high-resolution CT scanning. Lung Cancer 33:17–25CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat ELCAP Group, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, McGuinness G, McCauley D, Miettinen OS (2002) CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1053–1057CrossRef ELCAP Group, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, McGuinness G, McCauley D, Miettinen OS (2002) CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1053–1057CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Vazquez M, Carter D, Brambilla E et al (2009) Solitary and multiple resected adenocarcinomas after CT screening for lung cancer: histopathologic features and their prognostic implications. Lung Cancer 64:148–154CrossRefPubMed Vazquez M, Carter D, Brambilla E et al (2009) Solitary and multiple resected adenocarcinomas after CT screening for lung cancer: histopathologic features and their prognostic implications. Lung Cancer 64:148–154CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Heyneman LE, Patz EF (2002) PET imaging in patients with bronchioloalveolar cell carcinoma. Lung Cancer 38:261–266CrossRefPubMed Heyneman LE, Patz EF (2002) PET imaging in patients with bronchioloalveolar cell carcinoma. Lung Cancer 38:261–266CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu HB, Wang L, Wang QS et al (2015) Adenocarcinoma with BAC features presented as the nonsolid nodule is prone to be false-negative on 18 F-FDGPET/CT. Biomed Res Int 2015:243681PubMedPubMedCentral Wu HB, Wang L, Wang QS et al (2015) Adenocarcinoma with BAC features presented as the nonsolid nodule is prone to be false-negative on 18 F-FDGPET/CT. Biomed Res Int 2015:243681PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang B, Hwang JH, Choi YH et al (2013) Natural history of pure ground glass opacity lung nodules detected by low-dose CT scan. Chest 143:172–178CrossRefPubMed Chang B, Hwang JH, Choi YH et al (2013) Natural history of pure ground glass opacity lung nodules detected by low-dose CT scan. Chest 143:172–178CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yip R, Yankelevitz DF, Hu M et al (2016) Lung cancer deaths in the National Lung Screening Trial attributed to nonsolid nodules. Radiology 281:589–596CrossRefPubMed Yip R, Yankelevitz DF, Hu M et al (2016) Lung cancer deaths in the National Lung Screening Trial attributed to nonsolid nodules. Radiology 281:589–596CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM et al (2017) Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology. doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161659 MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM et al (2017) Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2017161659
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Guideline Development Group, Baldwin DR, Callister ME (2015) The British Thoracic Society guidelines on the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax 70:794–798CrossRef Guideline Development Group, Baldwin DR, Callister ME (2015) The British Thoracic Society guidelines on the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax 70:794–798CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lung-RADS™ Version 1.0 Assessment Categories. Release date April 28, 2014 Lung-RADS™ Version 1.0 Assessment Categories. Release date April 28, 2014
Metadaten
Titel
The relationship of cancer characteristics and patient outcome with time to lung cancer diagnosis after an abnormal screening CT
verfasst von
Sushilkumar K. Sonavane
Paul Pinsky
Jubal Watts Jr
David S. Gierada
Reginald Munden
Satinder P. Singh
Hrudaya Nath
Publikationsdatum
14.06.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4886-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2017

European Radiology 12/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.