nach oben

International Urogynecology Journal

Erschienen in:

10.06.2019 | Original Article

The resurrection of sacrospinous fixation: unilateral apical sling hysteropexy

verfasst von: Dmitry Shkarupa, Nikita Kubin, Ekaterina Shapovalova, Anastasya Zaytseva

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 2/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The apical compartment is a keystone in POP treatment. Sacrospinous fixation, suggested half a century ago, today is still one of the most popular and efficient methods of colpo-hysteropexy. However, it has specific side effects: chronic pain syndrome, dyspareunia and а high rate of cystocele de novo. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of unilateral sacrospinous hysteropexy with a synthetic apical sling combined with anterior subfascial colporrhaphy.

Methods

Following the suggested technique, 174 women with anterior-apical prolapse underwent surgery. The follow-up period took 12 months. Pre- and postoperative examination included: urogynecological examination (POP-Q), uroflowmetry, ultrasound of the bladder and filling in of validated questionnaires (PFDI-20, PISQ-12).

Results

The mean surgery time was 26 ± 7.84 min. No cases of damage of the bladder or rectum or of intraoperative clinically significant bleeding were noted. At the 12-month follow-up, the recurrence rate in the apical compartment was 0.7% (1/147) and in the anterior compartment 7.4% (11/147). The efficacy of the surgery reached 96.5%. During 12 months of follow-up, no cases of mesh exposure or chronic pelvic pain syndrome were detected. The incidence of dyspareunia de novo was observed in just one patient.

Conclusions

A unilateral sacrospinous fixation with a synthetic mesh (apical sling) combined with anterior subfascial colporrhaphy enhances the anatomical efficacy of surgery. It also helps to avoid specific side effects of traditional sacrospinous fixation.

Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse in the women’s health initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1160–6.CrossRef

Brubaker L, Glazener C, Jacquetin B, Maher C, Melgrem A, Norton P, Rajamaheshwari N, Von Theobald P. (2009) Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse// P. Abrams, L. Cordozo, S. Koury (Eds.) 4th International Consultation on Incontinence, Paris, ISBN: 0-9546956-8-2; Chapter 15:1278.

Forde J, Chughtai B, Stone B, Hsu W, Mao J, Te A, et al. Role of uterine preserving surgery in mesh based pelvic organ prolapse repair. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(8):1183–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3244-9.CrossRefPubMed

Maher C, Baessler K, Barber M, Cheon C, Consten E, Cooper K, et al. Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Wagg A, Wein A, editors. Incontinence 6th edition. Bristol: ICI-ICS. International Continence Society; 2017. ISBN: 978-0956960733; Chapter 15:1855.

Hefni MA, EL–Toukhy TA. Long-term outcome of vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for marked uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;127(2):257–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.11.028.CrossRefPubMed

Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL, Richter HE, Nygaard I, et al. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the optimal randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311(10):1023–34. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.1719.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Maggiore LR, Alessandri F, Valentino R, Venturini PL, Ferrero S. Vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy using the Capio suture-capturing device versus traditional technique: feasibility and outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287(2):267–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2540-y.CrossRef

Paraiso MFR, Ballard LA, Walters MD, Lee C, Mitchinson AR. Pelvic support defects and visceral and sexual function in women treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(6):1423–31.

Sze EH, Karram MM. Transvaginal repair of vault prolapse: a review. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(3):466–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(96)00337-7.CrossRef

10.

Unger CA, Walters MD. Gluteal and posterior thigh pain in the postoperative period and the need for intervention after sacrospinous ligament colpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(4):208–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000091.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Shkarupa DD, Kubin ND, Shapovalova EA, Zajceva AO, Pisarev AV. The hybrid technique of pelvic organ prolapse treatment: apical sling and subfascial colporraphy. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(9):1407–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3286-7.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Richardson DA, Scotti RJ, Ostergard DR. Surgical management of uterine prolapsed in young women. J Reprod Med. 1989;34(6):388–92.PubMed

13.

Ghoniem G, Hammett J. Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery practice patterns: IUGA member survey. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(10):1489–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2734-5.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Slopnick EA, Petrikovets A, Sheyn D, Kim SP, Nguyn CT, et al. Surgical trends and patient factors associated with the treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse from a national sample. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3769-1.CrossRef

15.

Betschart C, Cervigni M, Contreras OO, Doumouchtsis SK, Koyama M, Medina C, et al. Management of apical compartment prolapse (uterine and vault prolapse): a FIGO working group report. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(2):507–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22916.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Meriwether KV, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, Kim-Fine S, Balk EM, Murphy M, et al. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(2):129–146.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.018.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Kapoor S, Sivanesan K, Robertson JA, Veerasingham M, Kapoor V. Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(9):1285–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3291-x.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Tseng LH, Chen I, Chang SD, Lee CL. Modern role of sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse surgery—a systemic review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;52(3):311–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2012.11.002.CrossRefPubMed

19.

de Castro EB, Juliato CR, Piedemonte LA, dos Santos Junior LC. Impact of sacrospinous colpopexy associated with anterior colporrhaphy for the treatment of dome prolapse on all three vaginal compartments. Rev Bras Ginec Obst. 2016;38(2):77–81. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1571264.CrossRef

20.

Nager CW, Grimes CL, Nolen TL, Wai CY, Brubaker L, et al. Concomitant anterior repair, preoperative prolapse severity, and anatomic prolapse outcomes after vaginal apical procedures. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019;25(1):22–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000526.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Lo TS, Uy-Patrimonio MC, Hsieh WC, Yang JC, Huang SY, Chua S. Sacrospinous ligament fixation for hysteropexy: does concomitant anterior and posterior fixation improve surgical outcome? Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(6):811–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3487-0.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Beer M, Kuhn A. Surgical techniques for vault prolapse: a review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;119(2):144–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.06.042.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3717.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Mowat A, Wong V, Goh J, Krause H, Pelecanos A, Higgs P. A descriptive study on the efficacy and complications of the Capio (Boston Scientific) suturing device for sacrospinous ligament fixation. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;58(1):119–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12720.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Baumann KM, Salvisberg C, Mueller M. Sexual function after sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse: bad or mad. Surgical Endoscope. 2009;23(5):1013–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0108-5.CrossRef

26.

Senturk MB, Guraslan H, Cakmak Y, Ekin M. Bilateral sacrospinous fixation without hysterectomy: 18-month follow-up. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2015;16(2):102–6. https://doi.org/10.5152/jtgga.2015.15220.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Vu MK, Letko J, Jirschele K, Gafni-Kane A, Nguyen A, Du H, et al. Minimal mesh repair for apical and anterior prolapse: initial anatomical and subjective outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(12):1753–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1780-5.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Jirschele K, Seitz M, Zhou Y, Rosenblatt P, Culligan P, Sand P. A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh – augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(5):743–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2564-x.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Altman D, Mikkola TS, Bek KM, Rahkola-Soisalo P, Gunnarsson J, Engh ME, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse repair using the Uphold™ vaginal support system: a 1-year multicenter study. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(9):1337–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-2973-0.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Meriwether KV, Balk EM, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, Kim-Fine S, Murphy M, et al. Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Int Urogynecol J. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03876-2.CrossRef

Titel: The resurrection of sacrospinous fixation: unilateral apical sling hysteropexy
verfasst von: Dmitry Shkarupa
Nikita Kubin
Ekaterina Shapovalova
Anastasya Zaytseva
Publikationsdatum: 10.06.2019
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03964-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

23.04.2024 | Medikamente in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit | Nachrichten

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

The resurrection of sacrospinous fixation: unilateral apical sling hysteropexy

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2020

Autologous rectus fascial slings for stress urinary incontinence: can we see them on ultrasound?

Are women with cervical incompetence at a higher risk of experiencing urinary and pelvic organ prolapse symptoms?

Response to letter to the editor regarding “Utility of patient decision aids (PDA) in stress urinary incontinence surgery”

Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotic use to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections

Letter to Editor: “Utility of patient decision aids (PDA) in stress urinary incontinence surgery” by Jha and Duckett 2019

Reoperation rates for pelvic organ prolapse repairs with biologic and synthetic grafts in a large population-based cohort

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

Update Gynäkologie