Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 6/2022

09.04.2022 | Original Article

The role of Ga68 PSMA PET/CT imaging in Lu177 PSMA treatment planning in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

verfasst von: Mehmet Erdogan, Sevim S. Sengul, Bulent Cetin, Mustafa Avcı, Samet Yagci, Ismail Ozkoç, Damla Ezgi Barikan, Mustafa Yildiz

Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Ausgabe 6/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

Lutetium-177 (Lu177) prostate-specific membrane antigen (Lu177 PSMA) is a novel targeted treatment for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The purpose of the study was to determine the molecular volumetric Gallium-68 (Ga68) PSMA PET/CT parameters that can predict patients who will respond to treatment.

Methods

These single-center retrospective data were obtained from metastatic CRPC patients receiving intravenous 6.0–8.5 GBq Lu177 PSMA treatment every 6–8 weeks for a maximum of 3–8 cycles, with baseline Ga68 PSMA PET/CT scan, clinical data, and information on treatment responses. All lesions were divided into two groups according to the increase and decrease in PSMA expression levels of 600 bone lesions and 85 lymph nodes that were compatible with metastasis of 23 patients after the treatment. The primary endpoint of our study was the evaluation of the relation between the baseline SUVmax, PSMA TV, TL PSMA values, and the treatment response of the two groups. The threshold values were determined for the parameters that had significant relations. In the present study, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and treatment-induced toxicities were also evaluated as the secondary endpoint.

Results

It was found that SUVmax, PSMA TV, and TL PSMA values in bone metastases showed significant differences between the groups with decreased and increased PSMA expression levels after the treatment. The AUC value for SUVmax was significant (AUC = 0.677; p < 0.001). The cutoff value was > 10.50 (sensitivity = 91.8%, Specificity = 41.5%) for SUVmax, > 1.50 cm3 (sensitivity = 49.1%, specificity = 70%) for PSMA TV and > 8.50 g (sensitivity = %60.9, specificity = %72.2) for TL PSMA. The median SUVmax value before the treatment in all metastatic lymph nodes was found to be 7.1 (5.4–12.4), and the median SUVmax after the treatment was 2.5 (1.6–12.1) (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

It was shown in the present study that Lu177 PSMA treatment response may be higher in CRPC patients with metastatic bone lesion with high baseline PSMA expression level, and better treatment response may be achieved in patients with lymph node metastases than in bone metastases.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Emmett L, Willowson K, Violet J, Shin J, Blanksby A, Lee J. Lutetium (177) PSMA radionuclide therapy for men with prostate cancer: a review of the current literature and discussion of practi- cal aspects of therapy. J Med Radiat Sci. 2017;64(1):52–60.CrossRef Emmett L, Willowson K, Violet J, Shin J, Blanksby A, Lee J. Lutetium (177) PSMA radionuclide therapy for men with prostate cancer: a review of the current literature and discussion of practi- cal aspects of therapy. J Med Radiat Sci. 2017;64(1):52–60.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Perner S, Hofer MD, Kim R, Shah RB, Li H, Möller P, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression as a predictor of prostate cancer progression. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:696–701.CrossRef Perner S, Hofer MD, Kim R, Shah RB, Li H, Möller P, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression as a predictor of prostate cancer progression. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:696–701.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hofman MS, Violet J, Hicks RJ, Ferdinandus J, Thang SP, Akhurst T, et al. [Lu177]-PSMA-617 radionuclide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (LuPSMA trial): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:825–33.CrossRef Hofman MS, Violet J, Hicks RJ, Ferdinandus J, Thang SP, Akhurst T, et al. [Lu177]-PSMA-617 radionuclide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (LuPSMA trial): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:825–33.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Heck MM, Tauber R, Schwaiger S, Retz M, Alessadria CD, Maurer T, et al. Treatment outcome, toxicity, and predictive factors for radioligand therapy with Lu177-PSMA-I&T in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;75:920–6.CrossRef Heck MM, Tauber R, Schwaiger S, Retz M, Alessadria CD, Maurer T, et al. Treatment outcome, toxicity, and predictive factors for radioligand therapy with Lu177-PSMA-I&T in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;75:920–6.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hofman MS, Emmett L, Sandhu S, Iravani A, Joshua AM, Goh JC, et al. [Lu177]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021;397:797–804.CrossRef Hofman MS, Emmett L, Sandhu S, Iravani A, Joshua AM, Goh JC, et al. [Lu177]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021;397:797–804.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cytawa W, Seitz AK, Kircher S, Fukushima K, Tran-Gia J, Schirbel A, et al. Ga68-PSMA I&T PET/CT for primary staging of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(1):168–77.CrossRef Cytawa W, Seitz AK, Kircher S, Fukushima K, Tran-Gia J, Schirbel A, et al. Ga68-PSMA I&T PET/CT for primary staging of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(1):168–77.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Okudan B, Coşkun N, Seven B, Atalay MA, Yıldırım A, Görtan FA. Assessment of volumetric parameters derived from Ga68-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence: an institutional experience. Nucl Med Commun. 2021;42(11):1254–60.CrossRef Okudan B, Coşkun N, Seven B, Atalay MA, Yıldırım A, Görtan FA. Assessment of volumetric parameters derived from Ga68-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence: an institutional experience. Nucl Med Commun. 2021;42(11):1254–60.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Grubmüller B, Senn D, Kramer G, Baltzer P, Andreal DD, Grubmüller KH, et al. Response assessment using Ga68-PSMA ligand PET in patients undergoing Lu177-PSMA radioligand therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(5):1063–72.CrossRef Grubmüller B, Senn D, Kramer G, Baltzer P, Andreal DD, Grubmüller KH, et al. Response assessment using Ga68-PSMA ligand PET in patients undergoing Lu177-PSMA radioligand therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(5):1063–72.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinzel A, Boghos D, Mottaghy FM, Gaertner F, Essler M, Mallek D, et al. Ga68-PSMA PET/CT for monitoring response to Lu177-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(5):1054–62.CrossRef Heinzel A, Boghos D, Mottaghy FM, Gaertner F, Essler M, Mallek D, et al. Ga68-PSMA PET/CT for monitoring response to Lu177-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(5):1054–62.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Acar E, Özdoğan Ö, Aksu A, Derebek E, Bekiş R, Kaya GÇ. The use of molecular volumetric parameters for the evaluation of Lu-177 PSMA I&T therapy response and survival. Ann Nucl Med. 2019;33(9):681–8.CrossRef Acar E, Özdoğan Ö, Aksu A, Derebek E, Bekiş R, Kaya GÇ. The use of molecular volumetric parameters for the evaluation of Lu-177 PSMA I&T therapy response and survival. Ann Nucl Med. 2019;33(9):681–8.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JH. Comparison of the EORTC criteria and PERCIST in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review. Oncotarget. 2016;7(36):58105–10.CrossRef Kim JH. Comparison of the EORTC criteria and PERCIST in solid tumors: a pooled analysis and review. Oncotarget. 2016;7(36):58105–10.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinker K, Riedl C, Weber WA. Evaluating tumor response with FDG PET: updates on PERCIST, comparison with EORTC crite- ria and clues to future developments. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag- ing. 2017;44(Suppl 1):55–66.CrossRef Pinker K, Riedl C, Weber WA. Evaluating tumor response with FDG PET: updates on PERCIST, comparison with EORTC crite- ria and clues to future developments. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag- ing. 2017;44(Suppl 1):55–66.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Seifert R, Seitzer K, Herrmann K, Kessel K, Schäfers M, Kleesiek J, et al. Analysis of PSMA expression and outcome in patients with advanced Prostate Cancer receiving Lu177-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy. Theranostics. 2020;10(17):7812–20.CrossRef Seifert R, Seitzer K, Herrmann K, Kessel K, Schäfers M, Kleesiek J, et al. Analysis of PSMA expression and outcome in patients with advanced Prostate Cancer receiving Lu177-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy. Theranostics. 2020;10(17):7812–20.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nioche C, Orlhac F, Boughdad S, Reuze S, Goya-Outi J, Robert C, et al. LIFEx: a freeware for radiomic feature calculation in multimodality imaging to accelerate advances in the characterization of tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res. 2018;78(16):4786–9.CrossRef Nioche C, Orlhac F, Boughdad S, Reuze S, Goya-Outi J, Robert C, et al. LIFEx: a freeware for radiomic feature calculation in multimodality imaging to accelerate advances in the characterization of tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res. 2018;78(16):4786–9.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmuck S, von Klot CA, Henkenberens C, Sohns JM, Christian-sen H, Wester HJ, et al. Initial experience with volumetric (68) Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT for assessment of whole-body tumor bur- den as a quantitative imaging biomarker in patients with prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(12):1962–8.CrossRef Schmuck S, von Klot CA, Henkenberens C, Sohns JM, Christian-sen H, Wester HJ, et al. Initial experience with volumetric (68) Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT for assessment of whole-body tumor bur- den as a quantitative imaging biomarker in patients with prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(12):1962–8.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Khurshid Z, Ahmadzadehfar H, Gaertner FC, Papp L, Zsoter N, Essler M, et al. Bundschuh Role of textural heterogeneity parameters in patient selection for Lu177-PSMA therapy via response prediction. Oncotarget. 2018;9(70):33312–21.CrossRef Khurshid Z, Ahmadzadehfar H, Gaertner FC, Papp L, Zsoter N, Essler M, et al. Bundschuh Role of textural heterogeneity parameters in patient selection for Lu177-PSMA therapy via response prediction. Oncotarget. 2018;9(70):33312–21.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Emmett L, Crumbaker M, Ho B, Willowson K, Eu P, Ratnayake L, et al. Results of a prospective phase 2 pilot trial of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer including imaging predictors of treatment response and patterns of progression. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019;17(1):15–22.CrossRef Emmett L, Crumbaker M, Ho B, Willowson K, Eu P, Ratnayake L, et al. Results of a prospective phase 2 pilot trial of 177 Lu-PSMA-617 therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer including imaging predictors of treatment response and patterns of progression. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019;17(1):15–22.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidkonz C, Cordes M, Schmidt D, Bäuerle T, Goetz TI, Beck M, et al. Ga68-PSMA-11 PET/CT derived metabolic parameters for determination of whole-body tumor burden and treatment response in prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(11):1862–72.CrossRef Schmidkonz C, Cordes M, Schmidt D, Bäuerle T, Goetz TI, Beck M, et al. Ga68-PSMA-11 PET/CT derived metabolic parameters for determination of whole-body tumor burden and treatment response in prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(11):1862–72.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidkonz C, Cordes M, Goetz TI, Prante O, Kuwert T, Ritt P, et al. Ga68-PSMA-11 PET/CT derived quantitative volumetric tumor parameters for classification and evaluation of therapeutic response of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients. Ann Nucl Med. 2019;33(10):766–75.CrossRef Schmidkonz C, Cordes M, Goetz TI, Prante O, Kuwert T, Ritt P, et al. Ga68-PSMA-11 PET/CT derived quantitative volumetric tumor parameters for classification and evaluation of therapeutic response of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients. Ann Nucl Med. 2019;33(10):766–75.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmadzadehfar H, Rahbar K, Baum RP, Seifert R, Kessel K, Bögemann M, et al. Prior therapies as prognostic factors of overall survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with (Lu177) Lu-PSMA-617 A WARMTH multicenter study (the 617 trial). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:113–22.CrossRef Ahmadzadehfar H, Rahbar K, Baum RP, Seifert R, Kessel K, Bögemann M, et al. Prior therapies as prognostic factors of overall survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with (Lu177) Lu-PSMA-617 A WARMTH multicenter study (the 617 trial). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:113–22.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmadzadehfar H, Matern R, Baum RP, Seifert R, Kessel K, Bögemann M, et al. The impact of the extent of the bone involvement on overall survival and toxicity in mCRPC patients receiving (Lu177) Lu-PSMA-617:a WARMTH multicentre study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:4067–76.CrossRef Ahmadzadehfar H, Matern R, Baum RP, Seifert R, Kessel K, Bögemann M, et al. The impact of the extent of the bone involvement on overall survival and toxicity in mCRPC patients receiving (Lu177) Lu-PSMA-617:a WARMTH multicentre study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:4067–76.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The role of Ga68 PSMA PET/CT imaging in Lu177 PSMA treatment planning in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
verfasst von
Mehmet Erdogan
Sevim S. Sengul
Bulent Cetin
Mustafa Avcı
Samet Yagci
Ismail Ozkoç
Damla Ezgi Barikan
Mustafa Yildiz
Publikationsdatum
09.04.2022
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Ausgabe 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Elektronische ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-022-01739-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2022

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 6/2022 Zur Ausgabe