Zum Inhalt

The role of probiotics in promoting systemic immune tolerance in systemic lupus erythematosus

  • Open Access
  • 01.12.2025
  • Review
Erschienen in:

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disorder branded via over-activation of the immune system, resulting in atypical roles of natural and adaptive immune cells and the making of numerous autoantibodies against nuclear components. The causes and pathogenesis of this disease are not completely realized. The gut microbiota plays a significant character in human health and disorder, particularly in autoimmune diseases.
Gut microbiome dysbiosis can affect the host immune system as suggested by several recent studies, balance and activity of the gut microbiome, which are influenced by daily diet, might be associated with disease activity in SLE. There are rising signs to support the immunomodulatory abilities of certain probiotics. Numerous investigational and clinical surveys have demonstrated the useful effects of certain probiotic bacteria, mainly strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, in patients with SLE. Various species of bacteria were found to be positively or negatively associated with SLE gut microbiomes. A better comprehension of the Studying the gut microbiota will provide a good opportunity to identify microbes involved in tolerance in systemic lupus patients. The purpose of this study is to review the existing literature on probiotics that have the ability to restore tolerance and modulate the levels of inflammatory or anti-inflammatory cytokines that play a role in SLE.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

The immune system is an intricate net of innate and adaptive components that can adapt and respond to different antigens [1]. Autoimmune diseases happen once the immune system loses tolerance and attacks auto-antigens in either cells or organs [2]. Immune tolerance is performed through central tolerance(mainly clonal deletion( and peripheral tolerance mechanisms(activation-induced cell death (AICD) and anergy) [3]. About 5% of the world’s people are affected by autoimmune disorders [4]. SLE is a long-lasting autoimmune disorder considered via the construction of autoantibodies and immune complexes [5, 6].
SLE is a complex progressive inflammatory autoimmune disease, in which various pro-inflammatory immune cells are activated. Chronic inflammation and hyperactive immune responses in SLE patients play a determinant role in the pathogenesis of the disease [7]. The prevalence of SLE varies widely between regions, with the current global prevalence estimated to be between 50 and 241 per 100,000 adults [8, 9]. Having lupus can make everyday life challenging. When lupus is active, symptoms like joint stiffness, pain, fatigue, confusion, or depression can make simple tasks difficult — and sometimes impossible [10]. In most cases, lupus is not lethal. In fact, 80–90% of people who have this autoimmune disease will likely live a normal life span [11]. To complement the management of SLE along with current treatments, nutritional intervention may offer a hopeful option. A diversity of dietary components such as vitamin D, omega-3 fish oils, curcumin, Glycaemic index (GI), and sodium have been reported to play a role in SLE management, as described by improvements in immunological function and bone mass density [12, 13]. However, the way nutritional interventions and specific dietary patterns modulate immune functions in SLE and whether they can improve disease activity remains unclear. SLE is characterized by multiple system and organ involvement, recurrent relapses and remissions, and the expansion of a huge reservoir of autoantibodies to double-stranded (ds) DNA [5, 14, 15]. The pathogenesis of SLE involves both non-specific and specific immunity, and its etiology is not fully unstated [16].
The pathogenesis of SLE includes a complex interaction between the exposome (environmental influence) and genome to produce an epigenetic alteration that alters the expression of specific genes that contribute to disease development [17, 18].
SLE exhibits a broad spectrum of presentations ranging from mild symptoms to severe, life-threatening conditions (Musculoskeletal, Central and peripheral nervous system, Gastrointestinal, Hematological, Pulmonary, Cardiovascular and Renal complication). Environmental factors, for example, cigarette smoking, UV light, and different infections may contribute to lupus [1921]. Genome-wide association surveys (GWAS) have recognized approximately 180 lupus vulnerability positions in the human genome, the greatest of which are associated with three biological procedures: lymphocyte signaling, type 1 interferon (IFN), and toll-like receptor signaling making, and apoptotic cell processing [22, 23]. The identified 330 risk loci represent a host of human biological processes and many potentially and possibly environmental processes involved in SLE pathogenesis [24].
SLE is characterized by the formation of autoantibodies, accumulation of self-reactive and inflammatory T cells, and nonstandard manufacture of cytokines with inflammatory cells and pro-inflammatory character [25, 26]. SLE is measured to be a predominantly B-cell-related disorder [27, 28]. An amount of T cell subgroups by immunoregulatory actions have been defined, and their role in defined autoimmune disorder models has been demonstrated [27, 29]. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) show a vital character in preserving tolerance and equilibrium in the immune system, and their depletion and dysfunction are related to the initiation and growth of autoimmune disease [30, 31]. Surveys have shown that boosting Treg cells can suppress unusual responses of functional T cells, which can effectively diminish autoimmune and inflammatory responses [32, 33]. Studies have exposed those disturbances in the number and function of CD4 + T helper cell subgroups, for example, Th17, Th2, Th1, and T follicular helper cells, occur in SLE [27, 34, 35]. In addition, an amplified number and function of Th17 cells have been revealed to perform an important character as the primary trigger of autoimmune responses in SLE [36, 37]. IL-17, the major moderator of Th17 cells, can influence the creation of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines(IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, growth-related oncogene protein-α), and by raising the quantity of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, it increases the stimulation of neutrophils at sites of inflammation [38, 39].
Also, different studies have revealed abnormal pro/anti-inflammatory cytokine release or function in SLE, which may indicate the disparity between various immune cell subsets, which show a significant character in SLE pathogenesis. Anti-inflammatory cytokines, for example, TGF-β, and pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IFN-γ, IL-23/IL-17, and IL-6, have been shown to be dramatically elevated at diverse stages of SLE progress [40, 41]. Numerous investigational and medical surveys have revealed that IL-6 in serum is meaningfully raised in SLE-affected areas, resulting in the expansion of plasma cells and Th17 and inhibiting the differentiation of Tregs [4244]. In addition, signal transducer and activator of transcription 4 (STAT4), interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5), IRF7, toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7), and TLR9 are complicated in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by monocytes/macrophages, and IFN-I making via DCs that stimulate and exacerbate limited and general inflammation in SLE [45, 46]. The immunoregulatory impacts of TGF-β contribute to the diversity of Treg cells via stimulating Foxp3 appearance and inhibiting cytotoxic, Th1, and Th2 responses by reducing IL-2 production [47, 48].
A potential strategy to alleviate the symptoms of SLE may be to restore cytokine balance and repair defective immune cells. The treatments aim to reduce the mechanism of inflammatory cytokine production, interfere with cell-to-cell signaling, and inhibit cellular proliferation [49]. The most commonly used methods to treat lupus contain the utilization of immunosuppressive drugs, hydroxychloroquine, glucocorticoids, and biologic agents. These have been shown to advance long-term patient results [50, 51]. However, it is significant to note that there are significant undesirable effects related to these treatments. Adverse effects, which can even result in various clinical outcomes in patients with SLE: Renal impairment, opportunistic infections, and ocular complications. It is important to recognize new interferences that are effective, for example, targeted medications, or methods to decrease the opposing effects of these disadvantages.
The gut microbiota shows a character in the expansion and balance of systemic and mucosal immune response to enhance tolerance to innocuous bacteria although providing an appropriate reply to pathogens [52]. Variations in the host microbiota have been recognized as a significant environmental factor in susceptibility to metabolic and immunological diseases, including malnutrition [53], obesity [54], autoimmune diseases [55, 56], and neurological diseases [57, 58]. Recent evidence proposes that alterations in the structure of the gut microbiota might have a character in the pathogenesis of SLE [52, 59] (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
The pathogenesis of SLE and the effect of tolerogenic probiotics. In SLE patients, different factors such as autoantibodies, autoreactive or inflammatory T cells, and proinflammatory cytokines resulted in different organ damage. Also, in this disease, the decreased Treg cells, laterally by the growth of Th17 and Th1, could react in contradiction of tissue straightly and abolish them or irritate the making of proinflammatory cytokines. However, the use of tolerogenic probiotics causes the healing of tissue damage and also causes a rise in Treg cells and a reduction in Th1 and Th17 cells. In this disease, pro-inflammatory cytokines are also reduced, and anti-inflammatory cytokines induced by probiotics, for example, TGF-β and interleukin 10, are increased
Bild vergrößern
Earlier surveys have revealed that gut microbiota dysbiosis is related to SLE pathogenesis through immune system inequity, damaged intestinal barrier purpose, molecular mimicry, sex hormones, and biofilms [56, 60]. Several surveys in humans and mice have established the impact of gut microbiota dysbiosis on the onset and progression of SLE [59, 61, 62]. The lasting use of probiotics is thought to deactivate gut microbiota dysbiosis, leading in fewer severe symptoms of SLE [63, 64]. Immunoregulatory probiotics have no significant side effects and are considered boosters for the progression of Treg, controlling inflammatory responses and inducing tolerance [65, 66]. This review proposes to offer an impression of the immunoregulatory impacts of probiotics that can induce tolerance and modulate cytokines that contribute to the symptoms of SLE.

Probiotics: mechanisms of action and clinical implications

The vertebrate skin surface and mucosa are occupied via a variety of microorganisms, including bacteria and fungal, constituting the commensal microbiota [67]. The gut microbiota performs a critical role in providing numerous vital procedures, including homeostasis, immune regulation, epithelial barrier maintenance, and metabolic functions [68, 69]. Therefore, any factor that disrupts the host-microbe balance may affect microbiota homeostasis, which has an important influence on the regulation of host immune functions [70, 71].
Probiotics are well-defined as viable microorganisms that exert numerous advantageous impacts on the host when ingested at a suitable concentration [72]. There have been extensive studies in both animal and human experiments to determine their potential to avoid or treat an extensive range of diseases, including infections, autoimmune diseases, and inflammation [52, 73]. A sole aspect of probiotics is their ability to reduce pro-inflammatory situations by improving tolerogenic mechanisms [74, 75]. As identified probiotic microorganisms, class of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), for example, Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, and Enterococcus, as well as Bifidobacterium, have an extended history of safe usage [76, 77]. Ex vivo and in vitro surveys have revealed that certain Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus strains can regulate the Th/Treg axis by persuading Treg production from innocent progenitors [49, 78, 79].
Lactobacillus can enhance non-specific cellular immunity by triggering macrophages and NK cells and liberating various cytokines. It can also enhance the immune system of the intestinal mucosa by increasing the quantity of IgA + cells [80]. Lactobacillus adhere to the gastrointestinal mucosa through interaction with TLRs [81], and proteinaceous surface layer components to stimulate the host immune response [82]. They can also increase the appearance of MUC1, 2, 3, and tight junction (TJ) proteins in colonic epithelial cells, increase butyrate levels, and modulate the microbiome [83, 84]. Lactobacilli can also produce cytoprotective mixtures, for example, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) [85, 86]. SFCAs can induce the creation of retinoic acid by epithelial cells [87]. This interaction with TGF-β promotes Treg diversity [88, 89] and prevents Th17 cell differentiation [90]. Tolerogenic probiotics have been shown to reduce inflammation and increase regulatory mediators by reducing Th1/Th17 cell numbers and IFN-γ/IL-17 levels while increasing Treg frequency and TGF-β levels [91, 92]. Lactobacillus supplementation reduces inflammatory cytokines, increases anti-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-10), and increases the number of Tregs [91, 93]. Certain Lactobacillus species have been shown to prevent neutrophil extracellular trap development(such as Lactobacillus rhamnosus), improve antioxidant position( such as Lactobacillus helveticus), and increase adhesion molecule expression in the gut (such as Lactobacillus fermentum) [7].
The quantitative contributions of environmental factors, host genetics, and diet to shaping the gut microbiota remain basically unknown. Important relations among host genotypes and their gut microbiota composition have been described in both human and mouse studies [94]. dietary effects on the gut microbiota and health are often confounded by variation in host genotypes and environmental exposures. However, accumulating evidence has proposed that long-term diet is a primary driver of the gut microbiota. As an extreme instance, two co-evolution studies of mammals and their gut microbiota has found that both gut microbiota composition and functions are adapted to their diet [95, 96]. In another more current study, the convergently evolved structure of the gut microbiome in ant-eating mammals, despite their phylogenetic diversity, powerfully proposes that diet is the major force shaping their microbiota [97].
Diet is among the most easily controlled factors that can potentially manipulate the gut microbiota. Studying the flexibility of the microbiota and its outlines of change, during and after dietary intervention, could permit the design of effective nutrition therapy. Ley et al. have shown that the ratio of Bacteroidetes: Firmicutes increases in the gut microbiota of people consuming either a fat-restricted or a carbohydrate-restricted low-energy diet for a year and that people who lost more weight displayed larger variations in the ratios of these taxa [98].
As a broad range of evidence has demonstrated that some diets and nutrients have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects on immunoinflammatory diseases. Nutritional therapy including restrictions on carbohydrate and protein and the use of nutritional supplements (i.e., vitamins, minerals and polyphenols) is a promising way to control inflammatory responses in SLE [13, 99]. Nutritional supplements may exert potentially prophylactic effects with fewer or no side effects than those of the classic pharmacological therapies besides reducing co-morbidities and improving the quality of life of patients with SLE. Islam et al. study showed, Because dietary supplementation of various macronutrients and micronutrients has showed immunomodulatory effects counting maintenance of homeostasis and improvement of physical and mental well-being of patients with SLE, it is suggested that these patients consume a balanced diet [12]. A Western diet low in fiber, high in sugar and fat, and rich in processed foods can worsen SLE activity by changing the diversity of the gut microbiome and disrupting the intestinal barrier [100, 101]. The nutrient-gut microbiome association has a significant role in the pathology of SLE. Resistant starch (RS) diet from fibrous foods can be fermented by the gut microbiome into several types and amounts of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and have a beneficial effect on SLE outcomes in lupus-prone mice models. Furthermore, polyphenols, particularly from apples and oranges, can increase beneficial microorganisms in SLE patients [102].
Several probiotic studies have recently been conducted in patients with SLE [63, 103]. Studies have described important reductions in species richness, variety, and Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes proportion compared to healthy groups, as well as variations in the metabolic character of the gut microbiota [104106]. It has been proved that commensal microorganisms by Treg inducible capacity can be considered suitable strains to modulate excessive inflammatory responses and restore immune homeostasis in SLE [103]. Inflammation can be downregulated by several means, including removal of cell debris and apoptotic cells, removal of oxidized lipids, and hindering the motivation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and other pro-inflammatory cytokines [107, 108].
Lactobacillus delbrueckii and Lactobacillus rhamnosus have been revealed to be useful in growing Tregs and reducing proinflammatory cytokines and the harshness of the disease in mice with SLE [91]. Matching to the previous study, short-chain fatty acids produced via bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, and symbiotic bacteria activate receptors (FFAR2, FFAR3) on enterocytes and prevent inflammatory responses via hindering the nuclear factor-κ-light chain enhancer of B-cell stimulation path [109]. SCFAs overwhelm histone deacetylases, simplify the accumulation of Tregs, and affect gut balance and motility [110]. They too, stimulate tolerogenic DCs that stimulate immature T CD4 + cells to convert into Tregs [88, 89]. Histamine formed via L. reuteri 6475 responds with the H2 receptor on macrophages and intestinal epithelial cells, reducing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-12, and MCP-1 [111, 112]. The tolerogenic impacts of lactobacilli are supported via several molecular mechanisms. The peptidoglycan-related muropeptide stated via L. salivarius Ls33 has been suggested to induce anti-inflammatory effects [113, 114]. Lipoteichoic acid D-alanylation reduces anti-inflammatory situations related to Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus plantarum [115]. Studies have shown that the appearance of many secretory proteins, for example, p40 and p70, and low levels of histamine produced via L. rhamnosus strains have defensive immunological impacts, whereas increased levels of histamine made via certain L. saerimneri strains may stimulate a proinflammatory response in the gut [116118]. Atypical release or function of anti-inflammatory cytokines, containing IL-10 and TGF-β, and inflammatory cytokines, counting IFN-γ, IL-23/IL-17and IL-6, have been shown to play a dramatic character in different stages of SLE [40, 119, 120].
B. bifidum has been found to decrease the making of IFN-γ in NK and PBMC cells [121]. In addition, B. breve and L. rhamnosus GG were observed to reduce IL-23 and IL-17 manufacture in PBMCs co-cultured with human intestinal cells [122]. While there is information on the impact of L. casei Shirota probiotics on IL-6 combination in B cells, it is necessary to reduce IL-6 in PBMCs [123]. The study found that certain bacteria, including Bacteroides, Parabateroides, Bilophila, and Succinivibrio, were completely associated with IL-21, IL-2R, IL-35, IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-17, and TWEAK. Gemmiger and Dialister were harmfully associated with IL-35, IL-2R, and IL-17 [124]. Additionally, the plenty of Roseburia and Faecali bacterium was contrarywise associated with IL-6, while the plenty of Roseburia had an adverse association with IL-2. Finally, the plenty of Bacteroides had a confident connection with IL-2 [125]. L. casei strain NIZO B255 and L. reuteri strain ASM20016 have been found to interact with DC-SIGN, which primes DCs to express increased titers of IL-10 and suppress the propagation of effector T-cells [126]. In addition, B. breve Yakult strain and L. rhamnosus strain JB-1 have been initiated to induce IL-10 making by a diverse mechanism involving the nomination of TLR2 on CD103 + DCs [127, 128]. Stimulation of TLR2 pathways is identified to stimulate the fast production of IL-10, which finally overwhelms the Th1-related cytokine IL-12 [127, 129]. Studies have shown that B. longum and B. lactis can encourage the appearance of TGF-β in PBMCs. This is related to the oppressive valance of Treg cells [130, 131]. B. longum restored tolerance by inducing the differentiation of Treg cells, maintained via the anti-inflammatory cytokines TGF-β and IL-10 [132]. Bifidobacterium has also been reported to prevent extreme activation of CD4 + T cells, thus maintaining the equilibrium of Th1, Th17, and Treg cells in patients with SLE [103, 133]. In addition, supplementation with Bifidobacterium bifidum avoids TCD4 + hyperactivation in patients with SLE [134, 135]. Firmicutes bacteria are primary creators of butyrate, which acting a dominant character in the production and conservation of Treg cells in several tissues, particularly in the gut [136]. These bacteria prevent the trans differentiation of T cells into Th1 and Th17 effectors cells, ensuring a well-adjusted manufacture of both inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines [134] (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Potential beneficial functions of probiotics and their bioactive derived metabolites, for example, short-chain fatty acids, can improve the symptoms of SLE disease in different ways. SCFAs, Short-chain fatty acids; Th17: T helper
Bild vergrößern

SLE-nutrition/Probiotics-inflammation

Lupus patients often experience heightened immune responses due to triggers in the gut. Probiotics may help by: Reducing Inflammatory Responses, Strengthening the Gut Lining, Supporting Immune Health [109, 137]. in particular, an anti-inflammatory plant-based diet that is high in fruits, vegetables, whole grains (such as wild rice, quinoa, or barley), beans, and nuts has been associated with better health [138, 139]. No overarching diet exists for people with lupus. However, lupus is a systemic disease, so maintaining good nutritional habits will help your body remain as healthy as possible. Generally, doctors recommend a diet composed of about 50% carbohydrates, 15% protein, and 30% fat. Studies have shown that the initiator of immune responses may be Lactobacillus stains, while Bifidobacterium strains induce anti-inflammatory and Treg cells [140]. Both experimental and clinical trials have revealed that selective strains of probiotics(B. bifidum, Ruminococcue obeum, Blautia coccoids and L. casei stain Shirota) can reduce [49].

Animal studies

Animal models have suggested that gut microbiota, comprising B. bifidum, Ruminococcus obeum, Lactobacillus, and Blautia coccoides, may be directly complicated in disease expansion, and certain gut microbiota have been related to autoimmune diseases [141, 142]. Animal models have proven to be suitable tools in the survey of SLE, and between these models, pristane-induced mice are a reliable animal model of SLE, as they develop numerous of the characteristics of human lupus, in any strain of normal mice, irrespective of their genomic contextual [143, 144].
Lactobacillus has diverse effects on different lupus mouse models representing various genetic or environmental situations. This suggests that probiotic supplementation for lupus treatment should be tailored to individual genetic and environmental factors. Certain strains of Lactobacillus species have been exposed to have beneficial immunomodulatory or tolerogenic effects on the immune system [145]. It has been shown that lactobacilli have an immunoregulatory effect in pristane-induced mice, lupus-prone Murphy-Roth Large (MLR)/Mp-Faslpr (lpr) mice, and NZB/W F1 mouse models by increasing Tregs and decreasing Th17 and Th1 cells [146, 147].
Administration of Lactobacillus supplements has been revealed to elevate Treg cells and decrease Th17 cells, thereby restoring the Th17/Treg equilibrium [148, 149]. In another study, the harshness of pristane-stimulated lupus in mice was ameliorated by the administration of L. delbrueckii and L. rhamnosus, which upregulated Treg cells and reduced anti-dsDNA, the Abundance of Th1 cells, Th17 and their major cytokines, including IL-17a and proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 [91, 92]. The study establishes that enteral management of L. reuteri or lactobacilli alone or in combination in MRL/LPR mice can shift the equilibrium of Treg-Th17 towards Treg cell dominance in kidneys, decrease endotoxemia, reduce amounts of dsDNA-reactive IgG, reduce urinary protein, and advance patient existence [7, 147] (Table 1).
In previous studies, oral using of L. reuteri (GMNL-89), L. paracasei (GMNL-32), or L. reuteri (GMNL-263) successfully reduced hepatic programmed cell death and several inflammatory pointers in lupus-prone mice, containing matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) action, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) appearance and CRP appearance [150]. Furthermore, treatment with these probiotic strains reduced Treg expression and the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in the liver due to embarrassment of NF-κB and MAPK pathway [150, 151]. In addition, a study displayed that a diet containing L. casei prolonged the lifetime of MRL/lpr mice and prevented the extension of B220 + T cells in the mesenteric lymph nodes and spleen [152]. Consumption of Lactobacillus resulted in an anti-inflammatory environment by decreasing IL-6 and raising IL-10 production in the gut of SLE mice [147]. Furthermore, supplementing with L. reuteri amplified the distinction of CD4 + CD25 + FoxP3 + T cells in MRL/lpr mice [153]. Another survey displayed that the direction of L. paracasei and L. reuteri to mice (NZB/W) with severe lupus resulted in an important rise in antioxidant activity and a decrease in cytokines, for example, TNF-α and IL-6. In addition, Tregs were restored [109, 153].
Another survey has revealed that oral direction of a combination of all five types (L. gasseri, L. rhamnosus, L. oris, L. johnsonii, and L. reuteri) to three-week-old female MRL/Mp mice had anti-inflammatory impacts and reduced renal lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly [147, 154]. L. plantarum is a lactic acid bacterium. It has regulatory impacts, containing an elevation in Treg and IL-10 [155]. Researchers have revealed that using L. plantarum, L. reuteri, or L. casei in mice has anti-inflammatory properties, including IL-10 production, anti-apoptotic effects, and modulatory effects involving Treg cells, and also prolongs the life of SLE mice [148, 156]. When 30, 10 or 5% of the SLE gut microbiota was substituted with equal amounts of a combination of two Clostridia strains (CI: Blautia coccoides DSM935 and Ruminococcus obeum DSM25238), or Bifidobacterium bifidum LMG13195 (Bb), Bb and CI meaningfully decreased TCD4 + hyperactivation and Th17/Th1 balance, respectively [103]. In addition, B. fragilis ATCC 25,285 was established to help restore Th17/Treg hemostasis and improve lupus activity in MRL/lpr mouse [157]. Certain strains of lactobacilli convert tryptophan into potent immunomodulating compounds that bind to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). Stimulation of the AhR has been detected to control the methylation situation of the IL-17 and FoxP3 gene promoters [158, 159] (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
The effect of probiotics in improving autoimmune disease. Probiotics, via increasing the manufacture of regulatory T cells, show a significant character in reducing inflammation caused by autoimmune diseases. Probiotics reduce cytokines created by Th1 cells and increase cytokines via Th2 cells, thereby reducing inflammation caused by autoimmune diseases
Bild vergrößern

Human studies

Several species of lactobacilli have been revealed to have useful effects on the host in SLE. Previous human surveys have demonstrated the immunomodulatory impacts of Lactobacillus species on T cells and their controlling impacts on immune and inflammatory responses [7, 160].
Several trials have described the immunoregulatory impacts of convinced probiotics, counting L. reuteri, L. casei, L. acidophilus, L. delbrueckii, L. rhamnosus, L. plantarum, B. breve, B. infantis, and B. longum, in patients with inflammatory and autoimmune diseases [161163]. One research investigated stool examples from uncured patients with SLE and found that their gut microbiota had an inflammatory and autoimmune outline in contrast to normal peoples [105]. Previous studies have shown that SLE patients in active form, have a lesser Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes proportion than normal persons [106]. The same study mentioned above found that synbiotics supplementation increased the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes proportion and enhanced butyrate metabolism [164]. Butyrate has anti-inflammatory features by preventing the translocation of NF-kB to the nucleus, leading to reduced transcription of genes responsible for the manufacture of pro-inflammatory molecules [165](Table 2).
One study exhibited that the combination of L. delbrueckii and L. rhamnosus increased the appearance of the FoxP3 + cells in the culture of PBMCs from patients with SLE [166]. Several studies on autoimmune disorders have revealed that L. delbrueckii and L. rhamnosus can increase the amounts of repressive cytokines in PBMCs and T cells, while decreasing the manufacture of inflammatory molecules [122, 167, 168]. In vitro, lactobacilli, when cultured with undeveloped DCs from SLE patients in progressive stage, decrease the appearance of costimulatory molecules and increase the amount of IL-10 and IDO, proposing that they may enhance immune tolerance [169]. One study inspected the consequence of gut dysbiosis on the differentiation of Th1, Treg, and Th17 cells in SLE patients and healthy controls in vitro. The results showed a significant reduction in the Th17/Th1 balance and induction of Th17 differentiation [103]. Another study found that supplementation with Lactobacillus spp reduced IL-6 and amplified IL-10 manufacture in the gut, suggesting an anti-inflammatory effect [147]. Bifidobacterium may help maintain the stability of Th1/Th17/Treg via overwhelming extreme activation of TCD4 + cells in SLE patients [103, 170, 171], and supplementation with B. bifidum LMG13195 has been shown to prevent TCD4 + overactivation in SLE patients. However, Ruminococcus obeum DSM25238, Blautia coccoides DSM935, and Clostridia, meaningfully decreased the IL-17/IFN-γ (Th17/Th1) equilibrium, thereby recovering the Th1 prejudice [103].
The use of A. muciniphila and L. plantarum probiotics promoted an anti-inflammatory situation, which was attained via decreasing the appearance of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-17 and IL-6 while increasing the titers of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in the circulation [172]. In conclusion, probiotics have anti-inflammatory characteristics and improve intestinal barrier function throughout the disease.
Table 1
Animal study of probiotics in SLE
Model of study
SLE model in compare to control group
Effect on immune responses
Ref
using of L. plantarum and Akkermansia muciniphila
Mice
- Reducing IL-17 and IL-6
- Growing IL-10 titers
- Restored the intestinal barrier integrity
- Decreased the sediment of IgG in the kidney
- Enhanced renal job
[172]
L. casei
MRL/lpr Mice
-Prolong the lifespan
-Avoid the extension of B220 + T cells in the spleen and MLN
[152]
Pretreatment with L. reuteri DSM 17,509
NZB/WF1 Mice
-Extended the remission period of lupus
-Improved the survival rate
-Increased the manufacture of IL-10 via DCs
-Signifying the preventive and healing effects in SLE
[173]
supplement with L. reuteri GMNL-89 or L. reuteri GMNL-263
NZB/WF1 Mice
-Lessened liver inflammation
-prohibited hepatocyte apoptosis -Lower of liver proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1 β
-Inhibition of the NF-kB and MAPK signaling pathways
[150]
L. paracasei MCC1849
BALB/c Mice
-Elevated IgA secretion -Induced Follicular T(Tfh) -Increased the appearance of genes complicated in Tfh cell advancement, for example IL-21, IL-10, Bcl-6, STAT4
[174]
L. GMNL 263(GMNL 263)
NZB/W F1Mice
-Improve the making of Treg cellss and FoxP3 levels
-Decreased TLR-4, TLR-5, TLR-7, and TLR-9
-Antioxidant activity was increased under probiotic treatment
[150, 153]
L. acidophilus
Mice
-Reduced dsDNA antibodies
-Decreased Th17 cells
-Growing Treg cells in peripheral blood and spleen
[93]
L. rhamnosus and L. delbrueckii in pristane stimulated lupus
Mice
-Decreased the level of lipogranuloma, ANA, and anti-dsDNA
-Increased Tregs and appearance level of Foxp3
-Decreased IL-6
-Decrease of inflammatory cytokines and disease severity
[91]
L. rhamnosus GG(LGG) in SLE
Mice
-Reduction of inflammatory responses
-Production of repressive cytokines, TGF-β
-Propagation of Treg cells.
-Decrease the titers of IL-17 and IL‐23 in the PBMCs
[122, 127]
Feeding of lactobacilli (L. reuteri DSM 17509, L. casei B255, L. plantarum LP299v,) before establishing
(NZBxNZW)F1 (BWF1) Mice
-Postponement of the beginning of lupus
-Up-regulated the making of IL-10
-Induction of Treg cells
-Up-regulation of B7-1 and B7-2 by APCs
[148]
Feeding L. fermentum for 8, 13, and 15 weeks
Mice
-Lesser levels of proinflammatory cytokines
-Lower levels ds-DNA), NADPH oxidase activity -Lower levels Th1, and Th17 cells
[175]
Table 2
Human study of probiotic in SLE
Model of study
Route of probiotic use
level of SLE activity
Effect on immune responses
Ref
L. rhamnosus in SLE
Ex vivo
Active
- Control the equilibrium among Tregs and Th1/17 cells - Raised IL-10 via improving Th cells
- IL-10 prevents extreme inflammatory condition
[166]
L. delbrueckii in SLE
Ex vivo
Active
- Increased antimicrobial peptides
- Decreased pro-inflammatory cytokines.22
- Making of IL-12, IL-6, and TGF-β in the colon
[176]
L. rhamnosus and L. delbrueckii in SLE
Ex vivo
Active
- Reduced appearance of CRs: CCR3, CCR5, CCR4 and CXCR3
- Decrease inflammation via hindrance of cell migration to inflammatory sites
[177]
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) clinical trial in SLE patients (ChiCTR2000036352)
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT)
Active
-Decreased the SLEDAI-2 K score -Reduced titer of serum anti-dsDNA Ab -Raise in SCFAs-producing bacterial -Reduced in inflammation-associated bacterial -Decrease CD4 + memory/naive proportion -Decreasing of IL-6 in the peripheral blood
[178]
L. rhamnosus and L. delbrueckii on DCs in SLE
Ex vivo
Active
-Higher expression levels of inflammatory chemokine receptors on the tolerogenic DCs in individuals with SLE
-Increase in IL- 10
-Increase indoleamine IDO levels
-Decrease in IL-12 levels
[169, 177]
Lactobacilli and L. reuteri among Egyptian patient with SLE
Ex vivo
Active
-Reduction in the plenty of L. reuteri and Lactobacilli
-Inverse correlation with SLEDAI‑2k scores
[179]
L. delbrueckii
and L.s rhamnosus on inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines
Ex vivo
Active
-Increased levels of IL-2, FOXP3, IL-10, and TGF-β
-Decreased level of IL-6
[166]

Concluding remarks

Probiotics in the gut play numerous physiological roles in the body, primarily metabolic and immunological functions. Also, probiotic have role in they have in metabolism: nutrient absorption, short-chain fatty acids. Gut microbiota dysbiosis can induce autoimmunity through possible mechanisms such as translocation and molecular mimicry, leading to immune cell and cytokine dysregulation and contributing to the advancement and progression of SLE. Studying the gut microbiota will provide a good opportunity to identify microbes involved in tolerance in systemic lupus patients. Probiotic use has been shown to be effective in producing anti-inflammatory or regulatory cytokines and anti-inflammatory metabolites that play a role in improving the clinical symptoms of SLE. By producing Treg cells and anti-inflammatory cytokines such as TGF-β and IL-10, probiotics are effective in improving SLE disease. Based on this documented evidence, the above probiotic strains could be proposed for additional clinical trials in SLE patients. Additional studies and clinical trials are essential to acquire a deeper understanding of the fundamental mechanisms accountable for the efficacy of probiotic regimens in SLE therapy.

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies at King Khalid University for funding this work through Large Research Project under grant number RGP-2/205/45. Fuzail Ahmad would like to thanks AlMareefa University for supporting this research.

Declarations

Not applicable.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Download
Titel
The role of probiotics in promoting systemic immune tolerance in systemic lupus erythematosus
Verfasst von
Asma’a H. Mohamed
Alaa Shafie
Rithab Ibrahim Al-Samawi
Mohammad Chand Jamali
Amal Adnan Ashour
Mohammed Fareed Felemban
Ali Alqarni
Irshad Ahmad
Nasrin Mansuri
Fuzail Ahmad
Adil Abdelrahim Mohammed Yousif
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2025
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Gut Pathogens / Ausgabe 1/2025
Elektronische ISSN: 1757-4749
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-025-00702-7
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Levy M, et al. Dysbiosis and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(4):219–32.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Davidson A, Diamond B. General features of autoimmune disease, in The autoimmune diseases. Elsevier; 2020. pp. 17–44.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Brackmann HH, et al. Immune tolerance induction: what have we learned over time? Haemophilia. 2018;24:3–14.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bieber K, et al. Autoimmune pre-disease. Autoimmun Rev. 2023;22(2):103236.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Basta F, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) therapy: the old and the new. Rheumatol Therapy. 2020;7(3):433–46.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ameer MA et al. An overview of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) pathogenesis, classification, and management. Cureus. 2022;14(10).
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mu Q, Zhang H, Luo XM. SLE: another autoimmune disorder influenced by microbes and diet? Front Immunol. 2015;6:166179.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber MR, et al. Global epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021;17(9):515–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nikolopoulos DS, et al. Transition to severe phenotype in systemic lupus erythematosus initially presenting with non-severe disease: implications for the management of early disease. Lupus Sci Med. 2020;7(1):e000394.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mani A, et al. Temperament and character in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Compr Psychiatr. 2018;80:104–8.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Beckerman NL, Auerbach C, Blanco I. Psychosocial dimensions of SLE: implications for the health care team. J Multidisciplinary Healthc. 2011;4:63–72.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Islam MA, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of diet and nutrients in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): a systematic review. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1477.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Aparicio-Soto M, Sánchez-Hidalgo M, Alarcón-de-la-Lastra. An update on diet and nutritional factors in systemic lupus erythematosus management. Nutr Res Rev. 2017;30(1):118–37.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fava A, Petri M. Systemic lupus erythematosus: diagnosis and clinical management. J Autoimmun. 2019;96:1–13.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fanouriakis A, et al. Update Οn the diagnosis and management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(1):14–25.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolouri N, et al. Role of the innate and adaptive immune responses in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Inflamm Res. 2022;71(5):537–54.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Demirkaya E, et al. New horizons in the genetic etiology of systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus-like disease: monogenic lupus and beyond. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):712.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Woo JM, et al. The role of environmental exposures and gene–environment interactions in the etiology of systemic lupus erythematous. J Intern Med. 2022;291(6):755–78.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez-Quintial R, et al. Silica exposure and chronic virus infection synergistically promote lupus-like systemic autoimmunity in mice with low genetic predisposition. Clin Immunol. 2019;205:75–82.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Illescas-Montes R, et al. Infectious processes and systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunology. 2019;158(3):153–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu JL, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus risk: the role of environmental factors. Rheumatic Disease Clin. 2022;48(4):827–43.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ha E, Bae S-C, Kim K. Large-scale meta-analysis across East Asian and European populations updated genetic architecture and variant-driven biology of rheumatoid arthritis, identifying 11 novel susceptibility loci. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(5):558–65.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwon Y-C, et al. Update on the genetics of systemic lupus erythematosus: genome-wide association studies and beyond. Cells. 2019;8(10):1180.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Laurynenka V, Harley JB. The 330 risk loci known for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): a review. Front Lupus. 2024;2:1398035.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Han S, et al. Mechanisms of autoantibody production in systemic lupus erythematosus. Front Immunol. 2015;6:144713.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ching KH, et al. Two major autoantibody clusters in systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2):e32001.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Talaat RM, et al. Th1/Th2/Th17/Treg cytokine imbalance in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients: correlation with disease activity. Cytokine. 2015;72(2):146–53.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Buckner JH. Mechanisms of impaired regulation by CD4 + CD25 + FOXP3 + regulatory T cells in human autoimmune diseases. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10(12):849–59.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Maloy KJ, Powrie F. Regulatory T cells in the control of immune pathology. Nat Immunol. 2001;2(9):816–22.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Eggenhuizen PJ, Ng BH, Ooi JD. Treg enhancing therapies to treat autoimmune diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(19):7015.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Olsen N, Zheng SG. The progress and prospect of regulatory T cells in autoimmune diseases. J Autoimmun. 2020;111:102461.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang R, Miao J, Zhu P. Regulatory T cell heterogeneity and therapy in autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev. 2021;20(5):102715.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Lavi Arab F, et al. Assessment of 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 effects on Treg cells in a mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2015;37(1):12–8.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolff S, et al. Disturbed Th1, Th2, Th17 and Treg balance in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Immunol. 2011;141(2):197–204.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Muhammad Yusoff F, Wong KK, Mohd Redzwan N. Th1, Th2, and Th17 cytokines in systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmunity. 2020;53(1):8–20.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Araújo JAP, et al. Th17 cells and CD4 + multifunctional T cells in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Revista Brasileira De Reumatologia. 2016;56:28–36.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Qu N et al. Pivotal roles of T-helper 17-related cytokines, IL-17, IL-22, and IL-23, in inflammatory diseases. J Immunol Res. 2013;2013.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong CK, et al. Hyperproduction of IL-23 and IL-17 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: implications for Th17-mediated inflammation in auto-immunity. Clin Immunol. 2008;127(3):385–93.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Larosa M, et al. IL-12 and IL-23/Th17 axis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Experimental Biology Med. 2019;244(1):42–51.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Rojas M, et al. Cytokines and inflammatory mediators in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology. 2018;11:1–5.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Idborg H, Oke V. Cytokines as biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus: value for diagnosis and drug therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(21):11327.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Lino AC, et al. Cytokine-producing B cells: a translational view on their roles in human and mouse autoimmune diseases. Immunol Rev. 2016;269(1):130–44.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Pandiyan P, Zhu J. Origin and functions of pro-inflammatory cytokine producing Foxp3 + regulatory T cells. Cytokine. 2015;76(1):13–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Su D-L et al. Roles of pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of SLE. Biomed Res Int. 2012;2012.
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Teruel M, Alarcón-Riquelme ME. The genetic basis of systemic lupus erythematosus: what are the risk factors and what have we learned. J Autoimmun. 2016;74:161–75.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang J, et al. Association study of TLR-9 polymorphisms and systemic lupus erythematosus in Northern Chinese Han population. Gene. 2014;533(1):385–8.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen W, et al. Conversion of peripheral CD4 + CD25–naive T cells to CD4 + CD25 + regulatory T cells by TGF-β induction of transcription factor Foxp3. J Exp Med. 2003;198(12):1875–86.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolfraim LA, et al. p21Cip1 and p27Kip1 act in synergy to alter the sensitivity of Naive T cells to TGF-β-mediated G1 arrest through modulation of IL-2 responsiveness. J Immunol. 2004;173(5):3093–102.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Esmaeili SA, et al. Tolerogenic probiotics: potential immunoregulators in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232(8):1994–2007.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiong W, Lahita RG. Pragmatic approaches to therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014;10(2):97–107.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Fanouriakis A, et al. 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(6):736–45.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoo JY, et al. Gut microbiota and immune system interactions. Microorganisms. 2020;8(10):1587.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Turnbaugh PJ, et al. The human microbiome project. Nature. 2007;449(7164):804–10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuevas-Sierra A, et al. Diet, gut microbiota, and obesity: links with host genetics and epigenetics and potential applications. Adv Nutr. 2019;10:S17–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruff WE, Greiling TM, Kriegel MA. Host–microbiota interactions in immune-mediated diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18(9):521–38.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Zhao L-d, Li H. The gut microbiota: emerging evidence in autoimmune diseases. Trends Mol Med. 2020;26(9):862–73.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Grochowska M, Laskus T, Radkowski M. Gut microbiota in neurological disorders. Arch Immunol Ther Exp. 2019;67:375–83.CrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Castillo-Álvarez F, Marzo-Sola M. Role of the gut microbiota in the development of various neurological diseases. Neurología (English Edition). 2022;37(6):492–8.CrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo XM, et al. Gut microbiota in human systemic lupus erythematosus and a mouse model of lupus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84(4):e02288–17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Mu Q, et al. Leaky gut as a danger signal for autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. 2017;8:269575.CrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalayci FNC, Ozen S. Possible role of dysbiosis of the gut microbiome in Sle. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2023;25(12):247–58.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruiz L, et al. The role of gut microbiota in lupus: what we know in 2018? Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018;14(10):787–92.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo X, et al. The microbiota in systemic lupus erythematosus: an update on the potential function of probiotics. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:759095.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat de Oliveira GL. Probiotic applications in autoimmune diseases. Probiotics-Current Knowledge and Future Prospects. 2018;Chapter 4:69–89.
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Azad MAK, Sarker M, Wan D. Immunomodulatory effects of probiotics on cytokine profiles. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018.
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Raheem A, et al. Modulatory effects of probiotics during pathogenic infections with emphasis on immune regulation. Front Immunol. 2021;12:616713.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang H, Luo XM. Control of commensal microbiota by the adaptive immune system. Gut Microbes. 2015;6(2):156–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Perez-Lopez A, et al. Mucosal immunity to pathogenic intestinal bacteria. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(3):135–48.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Webb CR, et al. Protective and pro-inflammatory roles of intestinal bacteria. Pathophysiology. 2016;23(2):67–80.CrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat De Filippo C, et al. Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(33):14691–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Delzenne NM, et al. Targeting gut microbiota in obesity: effects of prebiotics and probiotics. Nat Reviews Endocrinol. 2011;7(11):639–46.CrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta V, Garg R. Probiotics. Ind J Med Microbiol. 2009;27(3):202–9.CrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Giraud J, Saleh M. Host–Microbiota interactions in liver inflammation and cancer. Cancers. 2021;13(17):4342.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazmanian SK, Round JL, Kasper DL. A microbial symbiosis factor prevents intestinal inflammatory disease. Nature. 2008;453(7195):620–5.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Round JL, Mazmanian SK. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(5):313–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Doron S, Snydman DR. Risk and safety of probiotics. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(suppl2):S129–34.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Soccol CR, et al. Current developments in probiotics. J Microb Biochem Technol. 2014;7(1):011–20.
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Calvo-Barreiro L, et al. Gut microbial-derived metabolites as immune modulators of T helper 17 and regulatory T cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(2):1806.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat López P, et al. Interaction of bifidobacterium bifidum LMG13195 with HT29 cells influences regulatory-T-cell-associated chemokine receptor expression. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(8):2850–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Ashraf R, Shah NP. Immune system stimulation by probiotic microorganisms. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2014;54(7):938–56.PubMedCrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Rescigno M. The intestinal epithelial barrier in the control of homeostasis and immunity. Trends Immunol. 2011;32(6):256–64.PubMedCrossRef
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Yadav AK, et al. Adhesion of indigenous Lactobacillus plantarum to gut extracellular matrix and its physicochemical characterization. Arch Microbiol. 2015;197:155–64.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Das JK, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus binds to MUC3 component of cultured intestinal epithelial cells with highest affinity. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016;363(8):fnw050.PubMedCrossRef
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohland CL, MacNaughton WK. Probiotic bacteria and intestinal epithelial barrier function. Am J physiology-gastrointestinal Liver Physiol. 2010;298(6):G807–19.CrossRef
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Fock E, Parnova R. Mechanisms of blood–brain barrier protection by microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids. Cells. 2023;12(4):657.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed S, et al. In vitro characterization of gut microbiota-derived bacterial strains with neuroprotective properties. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:402.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Woo V, Alenghat T. Host–microbiota interactions: epigenomic regulation. Curr Opin Immunol. 2017;44:52–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Meng Y, et al. Lactobacillus paracasei L9 affects disease progression in experimental autoimmune neuritis by regulating intestinal flora structure and arginine metabolism. J Neuroinflamm. 2023;20(1):122.CrossRef
89.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, et al. All-trans retinoic acid prevents the development of type 1 diabetes by affecting the levels of interferon gamma and interleukin 4 in streptozotocin-induced murine diabetes model. Genet Mol Res. 2016;15(1):104238.CrossRef
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Juang J-H et al. Prevention and reversal of diabetes by all-trans retinoid acid and exendin-4 in NOD mice. Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014.
91.
Zurück zum Zitat Khorasani S, et al. Amelioration of regulatory T cells by Lactobacillus delbrueckii and Lactobacillus rhamnosus in pristane-induced lupus mice model. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(6):9778–86.PubMedCrossRef
92.
Zurück zum Zitat Mardani F, et al. In vivo study: Th1–Th17 reduction in pristane-induced systemic lupus erythematosus mice after treatment with tolerogenic Lactobacillus probiotics. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(1):642–9.CrossRef
93.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim DS, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation exerts a synergistic effect on tacrolimus efficacy by modulating Th17/Treg balance in lupus-prone mice via the SIGNR3 pathway. Front Immunol. 2021;12:696074.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
94.
Zurück zum Zitat Spor A, Koren O, Ley R. Unravelling the effects of the environment and host genotype on the gut microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9(4):279–90.PubMedCrossRef
95.
Zurück zum Zitat Ley RE, et al. Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science. 2008;320(5883):1647–51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
96.
Zurück zum Zitat Muegge BD, et al. Diet drives convergence in gut microbiome functions across mammalian phylogeny and within humans. Science. 2011;332(6032):970–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
97.
Zurück zum Zitat Delsuc F, et al. Convergence of gut microbiomes in myrmecophagous mammals. Mol Ecol. 2014;23(6):1301–17.PubMedCrossRef
98.
Zurück zum Zitat Ley RE, et al. Human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature. 2006;444(7122):1022–3.PubMedCrossRef
99.
Zurück zum Zitat Constantin MM, et al. Significance and impact of dietary factors on systemic lupus erythematosus pathogenesis. Experimental Therapeutic Med. 2019;17(2):1085–90.
100.
Zurück zum Zitat Desai MS, et al. A dietary fiber-deprived gut microbiota degrades the colonic mucus barrier and enhances pathogen susceptibility. Cell. 2016;167(5):1339–53. e21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
101.
Zurück zum Zitat Maslowski KM, Mackay CR. Diet, gut microbiota and immune responses. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(1):5–9.PubMedCrossRef
102.
Zurück zum Zitat Putri PZ, Hamijoyo L, Sahiratmadja E. The role of diet in influencing the diversity of gut microbiome related to lupus disease activities: a systematic review. Int J Microbiol. 2022;2022(1):6908677.PubMedPubMedCentral
103.
Zurück zum Zitat López P, et al. Th17 responses and natural IgM antibodies are related to gut microbiota composition in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):24072.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
104.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerges MA, et al. Altered profile of fecal microbiota in newly diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus Egyptian patients. Int J Microbiol. 2021;2021:1–7.CrossRef
105.
Zurück zum Zitat Azzouz D, et al. Lupus nephritis is linked to disease-activity associated expansions and immunity to a gut commensal. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(7):947–56.PubMedCrossRef
106.
Zurück zum Zitat Hevia A, et al. Intestinal dysbiosis associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. MBio. 2014;5(5):01548–14. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbioCrossRef
107.
Zurück zum Zitat Grönwall C, et al. MAPK phosphatase-1 is required for regulatory natural autoantibody-mediated inhibition of TLR responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(48):p19745–19750.CrossRef
108.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirk SG, Samavati L, Liu Y. MAP kinase phosphatase-1, a gatekeeper of the acute innate immune response. Life Sci. 2020;241:117157.PubMedCrossRef
109.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Alookaran JJ, Rhoads JM. Probiotics in autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. Nutrients. 2018;10(10):1537.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
110.
Zurück zum Zitat Fellows R, et al. Microbiota derived short chain fatty acids promote histone crotonylation in the colon through histone deacetylases. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):105.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
111.
Zurück zum Zitat Gao C, et al. Histamine H2 receptor-mediated suppression of intestinal inflammation by probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri. MBio. 2015;6(6):01358–15. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbioCrossRef
112.
Zurück zum Zitat Greifová G, et al. Analysis of antimicrobial and immunomodulatory substances produced by heterofermentative Lactobacillus reuteri. Folia Microbiol. 2017;62:515–24.CrossRef
113.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez EM, et al. Anti-inflammatory capacity of selected lactobacilli in experimental colitis is driven by NOD2-mediated recognition of a specific peptidoglycan-derived muropeptide. Gut. 2011;60(8):1050–9.CrossRef
114.
Zurück zum Zitat Meijerink M, et al. Identification of genetic loci in Lactobacillus plantarum that modulate the immune response of dendritic cells using comparative genome hybridization. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(5):e10632.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
115.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan MW, et al. Modulating intestinal immune responses by lipoteichoic acid-deficient Lactobacillus acidophilus. Immunotherapy. 2012;4(2):151–61.PubMedCrossRef
116.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferstl R, et al. Histamine receptor 2 is a key influence in immune responses to intestinal histamine-secreting microbes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(3):744–6. e3.PubMedCrossRef
117.
Zurück zum Zitat Frei R, et al. Histamine receptor 2 modifies dendritic cell responses to microbial ligands. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(1):194–204. e12.PubMedCrossRef
118.
Zurück zum Zitat Yan F, et al. Colon-specific delivery of a probiotic-derived soluble protein ameliorates intestinal inflammation in mice through an EGFR-dependent mechanism. J Clin Investig. 2011;121(6):2242–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
119.
Zurück zum Zitat Sule S, et al. Abnormal production of pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines by lupus monocytes in response to apoptotic cells. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(3):e17495.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
120.
Zurück zum Zitat Fattahi EJ, Nouruzi V, Mahboobi L. The levels of mRNA for pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines and B cell amounts in patients with lupus erythematosus. Biomed Res. 2023;1(1):4.
121.
Zurück zum Zitat Fink LN, et al. Distinct gut-derived lactic acid bacteria elicit divergent dendritic cell-mediated NK cell responses. Int Immunol. 2007;19(12):1319–27.PubMedCrossRef
122.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghadimi D, et al. Epigenetic imprinting by commensal probiotics inhibits the IL-23/IL-17 axis in an in vitro model of the intestinal mucosal immune system. J Leukoc Biol. 2012;92(4):895–911.PubMedCrossRef
123.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong H, et al. Selective effects of Lactobacillus casei Shirota on T cell activation, natural killer cell activity and cytokine production. Clin Experimental Immunol. 2010;161(2):378–88.CrossRef
124.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo M, et al. Alteration in gut microbiota is associated with dysregulation of cytokines and glucocorticoid therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Gut Microbes. 2020;11(6):1758–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
125.
Zurück zum Zitat Yao H, et al. Gut microbiome and fecal metabolic alteration in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with depression. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:1040211.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
126.
Zurück zum Zitat Smits HH, et al. Selective probiotic bacteria induce IL-10–producing regulatory T cells in vitro by modulating dendritic cell function through dendritic cell–specific intercellular adhesion molecule 3–grabbing nonintegrin. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115(6):1260–7.PubMedCrossRef
127.
Zurück zum Zitat Konieczna P, et al. Human dendritic cell DC-SIGN and TLR-2 mediate complementary immune regulatory activities in response to Lactobacillus rhamnosus JB-1. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0120261.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
128.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeon SG, et al. Probiotic Bifidobacterium breve induces IL-10-producing Tr1 cells in the colon. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(5):e1002714.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
129.
Zurück zum Zitat Round JL, et al. The toll-like receptor 2 pathway establishes colonization by a commensal of the human microbiota. Science. 2011;332(6032):974–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
130.
Zurück zum Zitat Donkor O, et al. Cytokine profile and induction of T helper type 17 and regulatory T cells by human peripheral mononuclear cells after microbial exposure. Clin Experimental Immunol. 2012;167(2):282–95.CrossRef
131.
Zurück zum Zitat Pizano JM et al. Probiotics and disease: a comprehensive summary—part 7, immune disorders. Integrative Medicine: a Clinician’s Journal. 2017;16(5):46.
132.
Zurück zum Zitat Sapra L, et al. Bifidobacterium longum ameliorates ovariectomy-induced bone loss via enhancing anti-osteoclastogenic and immunomodulatory potential of regulatory B cells (Bregs). Front Immunol. 2022;13:875788.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
133.
Zurück zum Zitat Moleón J, et al. Targeting the gut microbiota with dietary fibers: a novel approach to prevent the development cardiovascular complications linked to systemic lupus erythematosus in a preclinical study. Gut Microbes. 2023;15(2):2247053.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
134.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang L, et al. Gut microbiome and metabolites in systemic lupus erythematosus: link, mechanisms and intervention. Front Immunol. 2021;12:686501.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
135.
Zurück zum Zitat de la Visitación N, et al. Protective effects of probiotic consumption in cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Nutrients. 2019;11(11):2676.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
136.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin-Gallausiaux C, et al. Butyrate produced by commensal bacteria down-regulates indolamine 2, 3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO-1) expression via a dual mechanism in human intestinal epithelial cells. Front Immunol. 2018;9:421934.CrossRef
137.
Zurück zum Zitat Toral M et al. Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716: a novel alternative for the prevention of vascular disorders in a mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus. FASEB J 2019;33(9):10005–10018.
138.
Zurück zum Zitat Morze J, et al. Diet quality as assessed by the healthy eating index, alternate healthy eating index, dietary approaches to stop hypertension score, and health outcomes: a second update of a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Acad Nutr Dietetics. 2020;120(12):1998–2031. e15.CrossRef
139.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlos S, et al. Mediterranean diet and health outcomes in the SUN cohort. Nutrients. 2018;10(4):439.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
140.
Zurück zum Zitat Mu Q, Tavella VJ, Luo XM. Role of Lactobacillus reuteri in human health and diseases. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:757.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
141.
Zurück zum Zitat Shi Y, Mu L. An expanding stage for commensal microbes in host immune regulation. Cell Mol Immunol. 2017;14(4):339–48.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
142.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukata M, Arditi M. The role of pattern recognition receptors in intestinal inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. 2013;6(3):451–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
143.
Zurück zum Zitat Reeves WH, et al. Induction of autoimmunity by pristane and other naturally occurring hydrocarbons. Trends Immunol. 2009;30(9):455–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
144.
Zurück zum Zitat Rottman J, Willis C. Mouse models of systemic lupus erythematosus reveal a complex pathogenesis. Vet Pathol. 2010;47(4):664–76.PubMedCrossRef
145.
Zurück zum Zitat Özdemir Ö. Any role for probiotics in the therapy or prevention of autoimmune diseases? Up-to-date review. J Complement Integr Med. 2013;10(1):229–50.CrossRef
146.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeh Y-L, et al. Heat-killed Lactobacillus reuteri GMNL-263 inhibits systemic lupus erythematosus–induced cardiomyopathy in NZB/W F1 mice. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2021;13:51–9.PubMedCrossRef
147.
Zurück zum Zitat Mu Q, et al. Control of lupus nephritis by changes of gut microbiota. Microbiome. 2017;5:1–12.CrossRef
148.
Zurück zum Zitat Manirarora JN, Kosiewicz MM, Alard P. Feeding lactobacilli impacts lupus progression in (NZBxNZW) F1 lupus-prone mice by enhancing immunoregulation. Autoimmunity. 2020;53(6):323–32.PubMedCrossRef
149.
Zurück zum Zitat Toral M, et al. Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716: a novel alternative for the prevention of vascular disorders in a mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus. FASEB J. 2019;33(9):10005–18.PubMedCrossRef
150.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu T-C, et al. Lactobacillus paracasei GMNL-32, Lactobacillus reuteri GMNL-89 and L. reuteri GMNL-263 ameliorate hepatic injuries in lupus-prone mice. Br J Nutr. 2017;117(8):1066–74.PubMedCrossRef
151.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu W-S, et al. Lactobacillus paracasei GMNL-32 exerts a therapeutic effect on cardiac abnormalities in NZB/W F1 mice. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(9):e0185098.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
152.
Zurück zum Zitat Mike A, et al. Prevention of B220 + T cell expansion and prolongation of lifespan induced by Lactobacillus casei in MRL/lpr mice. Clin Experimental Immunol. 1999;117(2):368–75.CrossRef
153.
Zurück zum Zitat Tzang B-S, et al. Effects of oral Lactobacillus administration on antioxidant activities and CD4 + CD25 + forkhead box P3 (FoxP3) + T cells in NZB/W F1 mice. Br J Nutr. 2017;118(5):333–42.PubMedCrossRef
154.
Zurück zum Zitat Cabana-Puig X, et al. Lactobacillus spp. Act in synergy to attenuate splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy in lupus-prone MRL/lpr mice. Front Immunol. 2022;13:923754.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
155.
Zurück zum Zitat Seddik HA, et al. Lactobacillus plantarum and its probiotic and food potentialities. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2017;9:111–22.PubMedCrossRef
156.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng L, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum HFY15 on lupus nephritis in mice by regulation of the TGF-β1 signaling pathway. Drug Design, Development and Therapy; 2022. pp. 2851–60.
157.
Zurück zum Zitat Li D, et al. Bacteroides fragilis alleviates the symptoms of lupus nephritis via regulating CD1d and CD86 expressions in B cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2020;884:173421.PubMedCrossRef
158.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JiYeun KJ, Park PM, MyeongSoo, Ji JG, GeunEog. Probiotic modulation of dendritic cells co-cultured with intestinal epithelial cells. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18(12):1308–18.
159.
Zurück zum Zitat Zelante T, et al. Tryptophan catabolites from microbiota engage aryl hydrocarbon receptor and balance mucosal reactivity via interleukin-22. Immunity. 2013;39(2):372–85.PubMedCrossRef
160.
Zurück zum Zitat Ludwig IS, et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG-derived soluble mediators modulate adaptive immune cells. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1546.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
161.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolpady J et al. Oral probiotic VSL# 3 prevents autoimmune diabetes by modulating microbiota and promoting indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase-enriched tolerogenic intestinal environment. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016.
162.
Zurück zum Zitat Pronio A, et al. Probiotic administration in patients with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis is associated with expansion of mucosal regulatory cells. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14(5):662–8.PubMedCrossRef
163.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Mahony L, et al. Lactobacillus and bifidobacterium in irritable bowel syndrome: symptom responses and relationship to cytokine profiles. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(3):541–51.PubMedCrossRef
164.
Zurück zum Zitat Widhani A, et al. Changes in gut microbiota and systemic inflammation after synbiotic supplementation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Cells. 2022;11(21):3419.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
165.
Zurück zum Zitat Meijer K, de Vos P, Priebe MG. Butyrate and other short-chain fatty acids as modulators of immunity: what relevance for health? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metabolic Care. 2010;13(6):715–21.
166.
Zurück zum Zitat Alaei A, et al. The effects of Lactobacillus delbrueckii and Lactobacillus rhamnosus on cytokines and their related molecules: an ex vivo study on patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Archives Rheumatol. 2023;38(4):642.CrossRef
167.
Zurück zum Zitat Santos Rocha C, et al. Local and systemic immune mechanisms underlying the anti-colitis effects of the dairy bacterium Lactobacillus delbrueckii. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e85923.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
168.
Zurück zum Zitat Santos Rocha C, et al. Anti-inflammatory properties of dairy lactobacilli. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18(4):657–66.PubMedCrossRef
169.
Zurück zum Zitat Esmaeili SA, et al. Generation of tolerogenic dendritic cells using Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii as tolerogenic probiotics. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(9):7865–72.PubMedCrossRef
170.
Zurück zum Zitat Konieczna P, et al. Portrait of an immunoregulatory Bifidobacterium. Gut Microbes. 2012;3(3):261–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
171.
Zurück zum Zitat Rousseaux A, Brosseau C, Bodinier M. Immunomodulation of B lymphocytes by prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics: application in pathologies. Nutrients. 2023;15(2):269.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
172.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo M, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila and Lactobacillus plantarum ameliorate systemic lupus erythematosus by possibly regulating immune response and remodeling gut microbiota. Msphere. 2023;8(4):e00070–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
173.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu F, et al. Distinct microbiomes of gut and saliva in patients with systemic lupus erythematous and clinical associations. Front Immunol. 2021;12:626217.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
174.
Zurück zum Zitat Arai S, et al. Orally administered heat-killed Lactobacillus paracasei MCC1849 enhances antigen-specific IgA secretion and induces follicular helper T cells in mice. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(6):e0199018.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
175.
Zurück zum Zitat de la Visitación N, et al. Probiotics prevent hypertension in a murine model of systemic lupus erythematosus induced by toll-like receptor 7 activation. Nutrients. 2021;13(8):2669.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
176.
Zurück zum Zitat Vahidi Z, et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ameliorate the expression of miR-155 and miR-181a in SLE patients. J Funct Foods. 2018;48:228–33.CrossRef
177.
Zurück zum Zitat Esmaeili S-A, et al. Inhibitory effects of tolerogenic probiotics on migratory potential of lupus patient-derived DCs. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2021;24(11):1509.PubMedPubMedCentral
178.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang C, et al. Safety and efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation for treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: an EXPLORER trial. J Autoimmun. 2022;130:102844.PubMedCrossRef
179.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaaban A, et al. Gut lactobacilli profile among a cohort of Egyptian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Menoufia Med J. 2022;35(2):543.CrossRef

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Innere Medizin (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Süßungsmittel Erythritol könnte Thromboserisiko erhöhen

Weniger Zuckerkonsum ist ein großer Hebel für die Prävention kardiovaskulärer Erkrankungen. Stattdessen auf Süßstoffe zu setzen, scheint aber nicht der richtige Weg zu sein.

„Bei KHK routinemäßig auf Niereninsuffizienz screenen!“

Ein internationales Forschungsteam drängt, Menschen mit koronarer Herzkrankheit routinemäßig auf eine chronische Nierenerkrankung zu screenen, um so ein stark erhöhtes kardiovaskuläres Risiko rechtzeitig zu erkennen. Dafür soll nicht nur die eGFR, sondern auch der Albumin-Kreatinin-Quotient im Urin herangezogen werden.

Wie „digitale Zwillinge“ die Arrhythmie-Therapie optimieren können

Mithilfe sogenannter „digitaler Zwillinge“ konnten in einer kleinen Studie zur Ablationstherapie bei Patienten mit ventrikulären Tachykardien sehr gute Behandlungsergebnisse erzielt werden.

ASS als Option zur Thromboseprophylaxe nach Gelenkersatz

Zur medikamentösen Thromboseprophylaxe nach Gelenkersatz kann in bestimmten Fällen die Einnahme von Azetylsalizylsäure (ASS) als kostengünstige Alternative zu Heparinspritzen oder DOAK (direkten oralen Antikoagulanzien) erwogen werden. Dazu müssen allerdings bestimmte Voraussetzungen erfüllt sein.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Bildnachweise
Die Leitlinien für Ärztinnen und Ärzte, Medizinisches Personal untersucht das Bein eines Erkankten/© Stratocaster / Stock.adobe.com (Symbolbild mit Fotomodellen), Blutprobe wird bei Patient abgenommen/© Tashi-Delek / Getty Images / iStock (Symbolbild mit Fotomodellen), Patientin im Klinikbett spricht mit Arzt/© © sturti / Getty Images / iStock (Symbolbild mit Fotomodellen)