Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2016

17.07.2015

The role of single-balloon colonoscopy for patients with previous incomplete standard colonoscopy: Is it worth doing it?

verfasst von: Michael Christian Sulz, Remus Frei, Gian-Marco Semadeni, Mikael Sawatzki, Jan Borovicka, Christa Meyenberger

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The rate of cecal intubation is a well-recognized quality measure of successful colonoscopy. Infrequently, the standard colonoscopy techniques fail to achieve complete examination. The role of single-balloon overtube-assisted colonoscopy (SBC) in these situations has only been sparsely studied. This prospective single-center study aimed to investigate the technical success (rate of cecal intubation) and the diagnostic gain of SBC.

Methods

The study recruited consecutive patients with previous incomplete standard colonoscopy who were admitted for SBC at our tertiary center in Eastern Switzerland between February 2008 and October 2014. The primary outcome was defined as successful cecal intubation. Data on patient characteristics, indication, technical details of procedure, and outcome were collected prospectively. The Olympus enteroscope SIF-Q180 was used.

Results

The study included 100 consecutive patients (median age 70 years; range 38–87 years; 54 % female) who were examined using a single-balloon overtube-assisted technique. The cecal intubation rate was 98 % (98/100). The median time of total procedure was 54 min (range 15–119 min); the median time to reach the cecal pole was 27.5 min (range 4–92 min). Passage of the sigmoid colon was not possible in two cases with a fixed, angulated sigmoid colon. The diagnostic gain was 21 % regarding adenomatous polyps in the right colon. The complication rate was 2 % (2/100, minor) without need for surgery.

Conclusions

This prospective patient cohort study shows that single-balloon colonoscopy is a safe and effective procedure to achieve a complete endoscopic examination in patients with a previous failed standard colonoscopy. A significant diagnostic and therapeutic gain in the right colon justifies additional procedure time.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Davila RE, Rajan E, Baron TH, Adler DG, Egan JV, Faigel DO, Gan SI, Hirota WK, Leighton JA, Lichtenstein D, Qureshi WA, Shen B, Zuckerman MJ, VanGuilder T, Fanelli RD (2006) ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc 63:546–557CrossRefPubMed Davila RE, Rajan E, Baron TH, Adler DG, Egan JV, Faigel DO, Gan SI, Hirota WK, Leighton JA, Lichtenstein D, Qureshi WA, Shen B, Zuckerman MJ, VanGuilder T, Fanelli RD (2006) ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc 63:546–557CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, Hoffman B, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Petersen BT, Safdi MA, Faigel DO, Pike IM, ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy, (2006) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101:873–885PubMed Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, Hoffman B, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Petersen BT, Safdi MA, Faigel DO, Pike IM, ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy, (2006) Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101:873–885PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall JB, Barthel JS (1993) The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s. Gastrointest Endosc 39:518–520CrossRefPubMed Marshall JB, Barthel JS (1993) The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s. Gastrointest Endosc 39:518–520CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Aslinia F, Uradomo L, Steele A, Greenwald BD, Raufman JP (2006) Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital. Am J Gastroenterol 101:721–731CrossRefPubMed Aslinia F, Uradomo L, Steele A, Greenwald BD, Raufman JP (2006) Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital. Am J Gastroenterol 101:721–731CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson JC, Messina CR, Cohn W, Gottfried E, Ingber S, Bernstein G, Coman E, Polito J (2001) Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 545:558–562CrossRef Anderson JC, Messina CR, Cohn W, Gottfried E, Ingber S, Bernstein G, Coman E, Polito J (2001) Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 545:558–562CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Loffeld RJ, van der Putten AB (2009) The completion rate of colonoscopy in normal daily practice: factors associated with failure. Digestion 80:267–270CrossRefPubMed Loffeld RJ, van der Putten AB (2009) The completion rate of colonoscopy in normal daily practice: factors associated with failure. Digestion 80:267–270CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson JC, Gonzalez JD, Messina CR, Pollack BJ (2000) Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better. Am J Gastroenterol 95:2784–2787CrossRefPubMed Anderson JC, Gonzalez JD, Messina CR, Pollack BJ (2000) Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better. Am J Gastroenterol 95:2784–2787CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R, Friedland S (2006) Use of a double balloon enteroscope facilitates caecal intubation after incomplete colonoscopy with a standard colonoscope. Dig Liver Dis 38:921–925CrossRefPubMed Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R, Friedland S (2006) Use of a double balloon enteroscope facilitates caecal intubation after incomplete colonoscopy with a standard colonoscope. Dig Liver Dis 38:921–925CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kita H, Yamamoto H (2007) New indications of double balloon endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 66(3 Suppl):S57–S59CrossRefPubMed Kita H, Yamamoto H (2007) New indications of double balloon endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 66(3 Suppl):S57–S59CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mönkemüller K, Knippig C, Rickes S, Fry LC, Schulze A, Malfertheiner P (2007) Usefulness of the double-balloon enteroscope in colonoscopies performed in patients with previously failed colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 42:277–278CrossRefPubMed Mönkemüller K, Knippig C, Rickes S, Fry LC, Schulze A, Malfertheiner P (2007) Usefulness of the double-balloon enteroscope in colonoscopies performed in patients with previously failed colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 42:277–278CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pasha SF, Harrison ME, Das A, Corrado CM, Arnell KN, Leighton JA (2007) Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 65:848–853CrossRefPubMed Pasha SF, Harrison ME, Das A, Corrado CM, Arnell KN, Leighton JA (2007) Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 65:848–853CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreels TG, Macken EJ, Roth B, Van Outryve MJ, Pelckmans PA (2010) Cecal intubation rate with the double-balloon endoscope after incomplete conventional colonoscopy: a study in 45 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:80–83CrossRefPubMed Moreels TG, Macken EJ, Roth B, Van Outryve MJ, Pelckmans PA (2010) Cecal intubation rate with the double-balloon endoscope after incomplete conventional colonoscopy: a study in 45 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:80–83CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Keswani R (2011) Single-balloon colonoscopy versus repeat standard colonoscopy for previous incomplete colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 73:507–512CrossRefPubMed Keswani R (2011) Single-balloon colonoscopy versus repeat standard colonoscopy for previous incomplete colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 73:507–512CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Teshima C, Aktas H, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ, Mensink PB (2010) Single-balloon-assisted colonoscopy in patients with previously failed colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 71:1319–1323CrossRefPubMed Teshima C, Aktas H, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ, Mensink PB (2010) Single-balloon-assisted colonoscopy in patients with previously failed colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 71:1319–1323CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat May A, Nachbar L, Ell C (2006) Push-and-pull enteroscopy using a single-balloon technique for difficult colonoscopy. Endoscopy 38:395–398CrossRefPubMed May A, Nachbar L, Ell C (2006) Push-and-pull enteroscopy using a single-balloon technique for difficult colonoscopy. Endoscopy 38:395–398CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ridolfi TJ, Valente MA, Church JM (2014) Achieving a complete colonic evaluation in patients with incomplete colonoscopy is worth the effort. Dis Colon Rectum 57:383–387CrossRefPubMed Ridolfi TJ, Valente MA, Church JM (2014) Achieving a complete colonic evaluation in patients with incomplete colonoscopy is worth the effort. Dis Colon Rectum 57:383–387CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rembacken B, Hassan C, Riemann JF, Chilton A, Rutter M, Dumonceau JM, Omar M, Ponchon T (2012) Quality in screening colonoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Endoscopy 44:957–968CrossRefPubMed Rembacken B, Hassan C, Riemann JF, Chilton A, Rutter M, Dumonceau JM, Omar M, Ponchon T (2012) Quality in screening colonoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Endoscopy 44:957–968CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Stukel TA, Rabeneck L (2007) Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population based study. Gastroenterology 132:2297–2303CrossRefPubMed Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Stukel TA, Rabeneck L (2007) Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population based study. Gastroenterology 132:2297–2303CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Brahmania M, Park J, Svarta S, Tong J, Kwok R, Enns R (2012) Incomplete colonoscopy: maximizing completion rates of gastroenterologists. Can J Gastroenterol 26:589–592CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brahmania M, Park J, Svarta S, Tong J, Kwok R, Enns R (2012) Incomplete colonoscopy: maximizing completion rates of gastroenterologists. Can J Gastroenterol 26:589–592CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsieh YH, Koo M, Leung FW (2014) A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 109:1390–1400CrossRefPubMed Hsieh YH, Koo M, Leung FW (2014) A patient-blinded randomized, controlled trial comparing air insufflation, water immersion, and water exchange during minimally sedated colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 109:1390–1400CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamada A, Watabe H, Takano N, Togo G, Yamaji Y, Yoshida H, Kawabe T, Omata M, Koike K (2013) Utility of single and double balloon endoscopy in patients with difficult colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 19:4732–4736CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yamada A, Watabe H, Takano N, Togo G, Yamaji Y, Yoshida H, Kawabe T, Omata M, Koike K (2013) Utility of single and double balloon endoscopy in patients with difficult colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 19:4732–4736CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
The role of single-balloon colonoscopy for patients with previous incomplete standard colonoscopy: Is it worth doing it?
verfasst von
Michael Christian Sulz
Remus Frei
Gian-Marco Semadeni
Mikael Sawatzki
Jan Borovicka
Christa Meyenberger
Publikationsdatum
17.07.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4405-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.