Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 4/2021

20.10.2020 | Original Article

The role of the genital hiatus and prolapse symptom bother

verfasst von: Keila S. Muñiz, Kristin Voegtline, Sarah Olson, Victoria Handa

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and Hypothesis

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) severity is poorly correlated with prolapse symptoms. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between genital hiatus (GH) size and presence and severity of bulge symptoms.

Methods

This analysis utilized data from a longitudinal study of parous women. Women underwent annual assessment of POP, GH size, and bulge symptoms. “Bother” was scored by participants reporting bulge symptoms. Three analyses evaluated the association between GH size and bulge symptoms, each using linear mixed models. First, we compared case visits (bulge symptoms reported) to control visits (bulge symptoms never reported), matching for stage. Second, among women who reported bulge sensation at least once during the study, we compared GH size at visits with and without bulge symptoms. Third, among women who reported bulge sensation, we investigated whether GH size was associated with “bother” score, controlling for stage.

Results

Of 1528 women (7440 visits), 148 women (803 visits) reported bulge symptoms at ≥ 1 visit and 1380 women never reported bulge symptoms (6637 visits). Comparing 315 case visits (bulge symptoms reported) to 1260 control visits (bulge symptoms never reported), GH size was significantly greater among case visits (3.05 cm versus 2.85 cm, p ≤ 0.0001). In the case-crossover analysis, GH size was similar for visits with and without bulge symptoms (p = 0.63). When evaluating GH size and degree of bulge symptom bother, bother severity was significantly associated with GH size (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Independent of stage, GH size was significantly associated with prolapse bulge symptoms and bother severity.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber M, Walters M, Bump R. Association of the magnitude of pelvic organ prolapse and presence and severity of symptoms. Jrnl of Pelvic Med & Surg. 2003;9:208.4. Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A, Kahn M, Valley M, Bland D, et al. Pelvic organ support study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:795–806.CrossRef Barber M, Walters M, Bump R. Association of the magnitude of pelvic organ prolapse and presence and severity of symptoms. Jrnl of Pelvic Med & Surg. 2003;9:208.4. Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A, Kahn M, Valley M, Bland D, et al. Pelvic organ support study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:795–806.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber MD. Symptoms and outcome measures of pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;48:648–61.CrossRef Barber MD. Symptoms and outcome measures of pelvic organ prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;48:648–61.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, et al. Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(3):600–9.CrossRef Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, et al. Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(3):600–9.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Blomquist JL, Muñoz A, Carroll M, Handa VL. Association of delivery mode with pelvic floor disorders after childbirth. JAMA. 2018;320(23):2438–47.CrossRef Blomquist JL, Muñoz A, Carroll M, Handa VL. Association of delivery mode with pelvic floor disorders after childbirth. JAMA. 2018;320(23):2438–47.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley CS, Zimmerman MB, Wang Q, et al. Vaginal descent and pelvic floor symptoms in postmenopausal women: a longitudinal study. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(5):1148–53.CrossRef Bradley CS, Zimmerman MB, Wang Q, et al. Vaginal descent and pelvic floor symptoms in postmenopausal women: a longitudinal study. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(5):1148–53.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10–7.CrossRef Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10–7.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLancey JO. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1717–24.CrossRef DeLancey JO. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1717–24.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Delancey JO, Hurd WW. Size of the urogenital hiatus in the levator ani muscles in normal women and women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:364–8.CrossRef Delancey JO, Hurd WW. Size of the urogenital hiatus in the levator ani muscles in normal women and women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:364–8.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Carroll M, Roem J, Muñoz A. Longitudinal changes in the genital hiatus preceding the development of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Epidemiol. 2019;188(12):2196–201.CrossRef Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Carroll M, Roem J, Muñoz A. Longitudinal changes in the genital hiatus preceding the development of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Epidemiol. 2019;188(12):2196–201.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Knoepp LR, Hoskey KA, McDermott KC, Muñoz A. Pelvic floor disorders 5–10 years after vaginal or cesarean childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:777–84.CrossRef Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Knoepp LR, Hoskey KA, McDermott KC, Muñoz A. Pelvic floor disorders 5–10 years after vaginal or cesarean childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:777–84.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Roem J, Muñoz A. Longitudinal study of quantitative changes in pelvic organ support among parous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(3):320.e1–7.CrossRef Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Roem J, Muñoz A. Longitudinal study of quantitative changes in pelvic organ support among parous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(3):320.e1–7.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowder J, Oliphant S, Shepherd J, et al. Genital hiatus size is associated with and predictive of apical vaginal support loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(6):718.e1–8.CrossRef Lowder J, Oliphant S, Shepherd J, et al. Genital hiatus size is associated with and predictive of apical vaginal support loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(6):718.e1–8.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lukacz ES, Lawrence JM, Buckwalter JG, Burchette RJ, Nager CW, Luber KM. Epidemiology of prolapse and incontinence questionnaire: validation of a new epidemiologic survey. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16(4):272–84.CrossRef Lukacz ES, Lawrence JM, Buckwalter JG, Burchette RJ, Nager CW, Luber KM. Epidemiology of prolapse and incontinence questionnaire: validation of a new epidemiologic survey. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16(4):272–84.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Slieker-ten Hove MCP, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJC, et al. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and possible risk factors in a general population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:184.e1–7.CrossRef Slieker-ten Hove MCP, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Eijkemans MJC, et al. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and possible risk factors in a general population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:184.e1–7.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:372–7.CrossRef Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:372–7.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The role of the genital hiatus and prolapse symptom bother
verfasst von
Keila S. Muñiz
Kristin Voegtline
Sarah Olson
Victoria Handa
Publikationsdatum
20.10.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04569-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

International Urogynecology Journal 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.