Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2017

01.10.2016 | Original Article

The significance of extramural venous invasion in R1 positive rectal cancer

verfasst von: N. M. Ormsby, H. N. Bermingham, H. M. Joshi, M. Chadwick, A. Samad, D. Maitra, M. Scott, S. Kelly, K. Whitmarsh, R. Rajaganeshan

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and aims

Evidence has shown that a positive resection margin (R1) is a key determinant of subsequent local recurrence and a poor prognostic factor in rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and prognosticators in patients with R1 resection of rectal cancer.

Material and methods

Retrospective study of all patients operatively managed within our institution between April 2008 and April 2013 for rectal cancer. Baseline demographics and multiple outcome measures recorded. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence were the primary outcome measures.

Results

Overall, there were 306 primary rectal cancers. Seventy-six percent were grade T3/4 tumours. OS was 30 months. R1 rate was 16 % (48 patients). Thirty-one patients underwent APR and 17 AR. In patients who responded to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), overall survival was 55 months, with no extramural venous invasion (EMV) seen in this cohort. In non-responders OS was 29 months, with EMV in 48 %. In patients who did not receive NAC, OS was 23 months, with EMV in 74 %. EMV is a strong predictor for poor survival following R1 (p = 0.001). We also found a correlation between number of positive nodes and OS/DFS (p = 0.004).

Conclusions

In this small cohort of patients with R1 positive rectal cancers, response to NAC is the strongest predictor of poor overall and disease-free survival. In patients who respond to NAC, OS and DFS has been shown to be positive, with a reduced rate of EMV.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhangu A, Beynon J, Brown G, Chang G, Das P, Desai A et al. 2013 Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes. 100:1009–1014 Bhangu A, Beynon J, Brown G, Chang G, Das P, Desai A et al. 2013 Consensus statement on the multidisciplinary management of patients with recurrent and primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes. 100:1009–1014
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Luna-Pérez P, Bustos-Cholico E, Alvarado I, Maffuz A, Rodríguez-Ramírez S, Gutiérrez de la Barrera M et al (2005) Prognostic significance of circumferential margin involvement in rectal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection. J Surg Oncol. United States 90:20–25CrossRef Luna-Pérez P, Bustos-Cholico E, Alvarado I, Maffuz A, Rodríguez-Ramírez S, Gutiérrez de la Barrera M et al (2005) Prognostic significance of circumferential margin involvement in rectal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection. J Surg Oncol. United States 90:20–25CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bujko K, Rutkowski A, Chang GJ, Michalski W, Chmielik E, Kusnierz J (2012) Is the 1-cm rule of distal bowel resection margin in rectal cancer based on clinical evidence? A systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol United States 19:801–808CrossRef Bujko K, Rutkowski A, Chang GJ, Michalski W, Chmielik E, Kusnierz J (2012) Is the 1-cm rule of distal bowel resection margin in rectal cancer based on clinical evidence? A systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol United States 19:801–808CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Debove C, Maggiori L, Chau A, Kanso F, Ferron M, and Panis Y. 2014 What happens after R1 resection in patients undergoing laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer? A study in 333 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis 25 Debove C, Maggiori L, Chau A, Kanso F, Ferron M, and Panis Y. 2014 What happens after R1 resection in patients undergoing laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer? A study in 333 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis 25
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mawdsley S, Glynne-Jones R, Grainger J, Richman P, Makris A, Harrison M et al (2005) Can histopathologic assessment of circumferential margin after preoperative pelvic chemoradiotherapy for T3-T4 rectal cancer predict for 3-year disease-free survival? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys United States 63:745–752CrossRef Mawdsley S, Glynne-Jones R, Grainger J, Richman P, Makris A, Harrison M et al (2005) Can histopathologic assessment of circumferential margin after preoperative pelvic chemoradiotherapy for T3-T4 rectal cancer predict for 3-year disease-free survival? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys United States 63:745–752CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhangu A, Ali SM, Cunningham D, Brown G, Tekkis P (2013) Comparison of long-term survival outcome of operative vs nonoperative management of recurrent rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis England 15:156–163CrossRef Bhangu A, Ali SM, Cunningham D, Brown G, Tekkis P (2013) Comparison of long-term survival outcome of operative vs nonoperative management of recurrent rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis England 15:156–163CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhangu A, Ali SM, Darzi A, Brown G, Tekkis P (2012) Meta-analysis of survival based on resection margin status following surgery for recurrent rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. England 14:1457–1466CrossRef Bhangu A, Ali SM, Darzi A, Brown G, Tekkis P (2012) Meta-analysis of survival based on resection margin status following surgery for recurrent rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. England 14:1457–1466CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons W, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP et al (2002) Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg United States 235:449–457CrossRef Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons W, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP et al (2002) Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg United States 235:449–457CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Radcliffe A (2006) Can the results of anorectal (abdominoperineal) resection be improved: are circumferential resection margins too often positive? Colorectal Dis. England 8:160–167CrossRef Radcliffe A (2006) Can the results of anorectal (abdominoperineal) resection be improved: are circumferential resection margins too often positive? Colorectal Dis. England 8:160–167CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chambers W, Khan A, Waters R, Lindsey I, George B, Mortensen N et al (2010) Examination of outcome following abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma in Oxford. Colorectal Dis. England 12:1192–1197CrossRef Chambers W, Khan A, Waters R, Lindsey I, George B, Mortensen N et al (2010) Examination of outcome following abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma in Oxford. Colorectal Dis. England 12:1192–1197CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rullier E, Denost Q, Vendrely V, Rullier A, Laurent C (2013) Low rectal cancer: classification and standardization of surgery. Dis Colon rectum United States 56:560–567 Rullier E, Denost Q, Vendrely V, Rullier A, Laurent C (2013) Low rectal cancer: classification and standardization of surgery. Dis Colon rectum United States 56:560–567
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fekete Z, Muntean A, Irimie A, Hica S, Resiga L, Todor N et al (2013) What is the significance of a microscopically positive resection margin in the curative-intent treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma? A retrospective study. J BUON Greece 18:989–995 Fekete Z, Muntean A, Irimie A, Hica S, Resiga L, Todor N et al (2013) What is the significance of a microscopically positive resection margin in the curative-intent treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma? A retrospective study. J BUON Greece 18:989–995
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hyngstrom JR, Tzeng CW, Beddar S, Das P, Krishnan S, Delclos ME et al (2014) Intraoperative radiation therapy for locally advanced primary and recurrent colorectal cancer: ten-year institutional experience. J Surg Oncol United States 109:652–658CrossRef Hyngstrom JR, Tzeng CW, Beddar S, Das P, Krishnan S, Delclos ME et al (2014) Intraoperative radiation therapy for locally advanced primary and recurrent colorectal cancer: ten-year institutional experience. J Surg Oncol United States 109:652–658CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan J, Heriot AG, Mackay J, Van Dyk S, Bressel MA, Fox CD et al (2013) Prospective single-arm study of intraoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol Australia 57:617–625CrossRef Tan J, Heriot AG, Mackay J, Van Dyk S, Bressel MA, Fox CD et al (2013) Prospective single-arm study of intraoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol Australia 57:617–625CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Platell C, Spilsbury K (2014) Influence of local recurrence on survival in patients with rectal cancer. ANZ J Surg Australia 84:85–90CrossRef Platell C, Spilsbury K (2014) Influence of local recurrence on survival in patients with rectal cancer. ANZ J Surg Australia 84:85–90CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Simpson GS, Eardley N, McNicol F, Healey P, Hughes M, Rooney PS (2014) Circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity after MRI assessment and adjuvant treatment in 189 patients undergoing rectal cancer resection. Int J Colorectal Dis Germany 29:585–590CrossRef Simpson GS, Eardley N, McNicol F, Healey P, Hughes M, Rooney PS (2014) Circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity after MRI assessment and adjuvant treatment in 189 patients undergoing rectal cancer resection. Int J Colorectal Dis Germany 29:585–590CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Junginger T, Gönner U, Trinh TT, Lollert A, Oberholzer K, Berres M (2010) Permanent stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon rectum. United States 53:1632–1639 Junginger T, Gönner U, Trinh TT, Lollert A, Oberholzer K, Berres M (2010) Permanent stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon rectum. United States 53:1632–1639
Metadaten
Titel
The significance of extramural venous invasion in R1 positive rectal cancer
verfasst von
N. M. Ormsby
H. N. Bermingham
H. M. Joshi
M. Chadwick
A. Samad
D. Maitra
M. Scott
S. Kelly
K. Whitmarsh
R. Rajaganeshan
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2658-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.