Erschienen in:
01.01.2012 | Letter
The simple suture laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation without an omental patch
verfasst von:
M. Ates, A. Dirican
Erschienen in:
Surgical Endoscopy
|
Ausgabe 1/2012
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Excerpt
We were pleased to read the article entitled “Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature” by Bertleff and Lange [
1]. In the article, the authors state: “Ates et al. [
2] presented results with simple suture repair of peptic ulcer perforation without using pedicled omentoplasty; this significantly shortened operating time but the question remains of whether it is safe to abandon omentoplasty completely.” This point must be clarified. We absolutely agree with the authors that avoiding omentoplasty might shorten the operating time, but it might be the reason for the higher incidence of leakage at the repaired ulcer side. We prefer laparoscopic simple suture repair of peptic ulcer perforation, without an omental patch, based on criteria that include the duration of abdominal pain, mean Mannheim Peritoneal Index (MPI), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evolution II score, and size of the perforation [
2,
3]. If patients are at low risk for leakage, we perform laparoscopic simple suture repair of the peptic ulcer perforation without an omental patch. For three patients who had adhesions caused by chronic cholecystitis, technical difficulty because of inappropriate ulcer localization, or diabetes mellitus with a high MPI and a 12-mm perforation, the laparoscopic surgery was converted to conventional open surgery [
2,
3]. Although Seelig et al. [
4] did not use any selection criteria for laparoscopic repair without an omental patch, they observed one leak in the 21 patients in their study. …