Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 8/2019

Open Access 21.06.2019 | Letter to the Editor

The standardized definition of high myopia

verfasst von: Andrzej Grzybowski, Piotr Kanclerz

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 8/2019

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Dear Editor,
We have read the article by Sanz Diez et al. [1]; however, we believe that some discussion is required. The authors have analyzed the axial length growth trend during the refractive development of Chinese schoolchildren.
In their analysis, high myopia was defined as a spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) of ≤ − 5.0 D. Using such a definition is controversial, as several organizations e.g., the American Academy of Ophthalmology, the American Optometric Association or the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus define high myopia as a SER of ≤ − 6.0 D [2, 3]. Using a cut-off value of − 5.0 D is not an error and is infrequently used, although the rationale for this approach is unclear. For example, Holden et al. state that they employed the cut-off value of ≤ − 5.0 D, as it was the most frequently used definition in studies included in their meta-analysis [4]. However, the online supplementary material clearly states that the cut-off value of ≤ − 6.0 D or < −6.0 D was used in 61.0% of the included publications. We believe that employing various definitions of refractive errors in future investigations can result in an even greater inconsistency in epidemiological studies. If we agree that an atypical threshold value of − 5.0 D can be applied, this might encourage other researchers to use different cut-off values when seeking for statistical significance in their results. Moreover, in such case, one might ask why should not we define high myopia as a SER greater than − 4.0 D or − 7.0 D.
It is obvious that even small changes of threshold definitions of refractive errors can affect frequency estimates in epidemiological studies. Applying various cut-off values can also create both false-positive and false-negative associations with risk factors [5]. Subsequently, these associations can significantly influence conclusions of epidemiological studies. Thus, we postulate employing the standardized definition of high myopia as a SER of − 6.0 D or greater in future studies.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. Grzybowski reports non-financial support from Bayer, non-financial support from Novartis, non-financial support from Alcon, personal fees and non-financial support from Valeant, grants from Zeiss, and personal fees and non-financial support from Santen, outside the submitted work. Dr. Kanclerz reports non-financial support from Visim and Optopol Technologies. The authors have no proprietary interest within the presented subject.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Gräfes Archiv

Online-Abonnement

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanz Diez P, Yang L-H, Lu M-X, Wahl S, Ohlendorf A (2019) Growth curves of myopia-related parameters to clinically monitor the refractive development in Chinese schoolchildren. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257:1045–1053CrossRefPubMed Sanz Diez P, Yang L-H, Lu M-X, Wahl S, Ohlendorf A (2019) Growth curves of myopia-related parameters to clinically monitor the refractive development in Chinese schoolchildren. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257:1045–1053CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chuck RS, Jacobs DS, Lee JK, Afshari NA, Vitale S, Shen TT, Keenan JD, American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Refractive Management/Intervention Panel (2018) Refractive errors & refractive surgery preferred practice pattern®. Ophthalmology 125:P1–P104CrossRefPubMed Chuck RS, Jacobs DS, Lee JK, Afshari NA, Vitale S, Shen TT, Keenan JD, American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Refractive Management/Intervention Panel (2018) Refractive errors & refractive surgery preferred practice pattern®. Ophthalmology 125:P1–P104CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Wong TY, Naduvilath TJ, Resnikoff S (2016) Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 123:1036–1042CrossRefPubMed Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Wong TY, Naduvilath TJ, Resnikoff S (2016) Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 123:1036–1042CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cumberland PM, Bountziouka V, Rahi JS (2018) Impact of varying the definition of myopia on estimates of prevalence and associations with risk factors: time for an approach that serves research, practice and policy. Br J Ophthalmol 102:1407–1412CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cumberland PM, Bountziouka V, Rahi JS (2018) Impact of varying the definition of myopia on estimates of prevalence and associations with risk factors: time for an approach that serves research, practice and policy. Br J Ophthalmol 102:1407–1412CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
The standardized definition of high myopia
verfasst von
Andrzej Grzybowski
Piotr Kanclerz
Publikationsdatum
21.06.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04397-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2019

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 8/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the Editor (by invitation)

The standardized definition of high myopia

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.