nach oben

Pediatric Radiology

Erschienen in:

01.04.2019 | Minisymposium: Quality and safety

The state of structured reporting: the nuance of standardized language

verfasst von: Lindsey A. G. Shea, Alexander J. Towbin

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Radiology reports are the principal form of communication with the referring provider. Unfortunately, they can be a form of communication riddled with errors and inscrutable statements burying the intended meaning, failing to achieve the main task for which it was made: communicating key imaging findings as they pertain to the clinical question being posed. Structured reporting is a multifaceted and modular solution to problematic reports, with variable iterations and benefits. Structured reports have been adapted across departments and even national societies, with standardized format, content and language. Newer developments include contextual reporting and common data elements. Herein, we discuss the various forms and levels of structured reporting and the latest advancements, as well as the general acceptance within radiology. We also discuss some areas for improvement as the practice of structured reporting matures.

Heitkamp DE, Cuskaden JH, Tahir B, Gunderman RB (2016) PACS and the erosion of professional relationships. Acad Radiol 23:905–907CrossRefPubMed

Larson DB, Froehle CM, Johnson ND, Towbin AJ (2014) Communication in diagnostic radiology: meeting the challenges of complexity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203:957–964CrossRefPubMed

Larson DB, Trout AT, Fierke SR, Towbin AJ (2015) Improvement in diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound of the pediatric appendix through the use of equivocal interpretive categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:849–856CrossRefPubMed

Hawkins CM, Hall S, Hardin J et al (2012) Prepopulated radiology report templates: a prospective analysis of error rate and turnaround time. J Digit Imaging 25:504–511CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Larson DB, Towbin AJ, Pryor RM, Donnelly LF (2013) Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting. Radiology 267:240–250CrossRefPubMed

Hawkins CM, Hall S, Zhang B, Towbin AJ (2014) Creation and implementation of department-wide structured reports: an analysis of the impact on error rate in radiology reports. J Digit Imaging 27:581–587CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Towbin AJ, Perry LA, Larson DB (2017) Improving efficiency in the radiology department. Pediatr Radiol 47:783–792CrossRefPubMed

Towbin AJ, Hawkins CM (2017) Use of a web-based calculator and a structured report generator to improve efficiency, accuracy, and consistency of radiology reporting. J Digit Imaging 30:584–588CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lee B, Whitehead MT (2017) Radiology reports: what you think you’re saying and what they think you’re saying. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 46:186–195CrossRefPubMed

10.

Powell DK, Silberzweig JE (2015) State of structured reporting in radiology, a survey. Acad Radiol 22:226–233CrossRefPubMed

11.

McBee MP, Laor T, Pryor RM et al (2018) A comprehensive approach to convert a radiology department from coding based on international classification of diseases, ninth revision, to coding based on international classification of diseases, tenth revision. J Am Coll Radiol 15:301–309CrossRefPubMed

12.

Mamloud MD, Chang PC, Saket RR (2018) Contextual radiology reporting: a new approach to neuroradiology structured templates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:1406–1414

13.

American College of Radiology (2018) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/Bi-Rads. Accessed 19 Aug 2018

14.

American College of Radiology (2018) Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS). https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/LI-RADS. Accessed 19 Aug 2018

15.

American College of Radiology (2018) Thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS). https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/TI-RADS. Accessed 19 Aug 2018

16.

American College of Radiology (2018) Prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS). https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/PI-RADS. Accessed 19 Aug 2018

17.

Tuddenham WJ (1984) Glossary of terms for thoracic radiology: recommendations of the nomenclature committee of the Fleischner Society. AJR Am J Roentgenol 143:509–517CrossRefPubMed

18.

Austin JH, Muller NL, Friedman PJ et al (1996) Glossary of terms for CT of the lungs: recommendations of the nomenclature committee of the Fleischner Society. Radiology 200:327–331CrossRefPubMed

19.

Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H et al (2008) Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 246:697–722CrossRefPubMed

20.

American College of Radiology (2014) ACR practice parameter for communication of diagnostic imaging findings. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/CommunicationDiag.pdf?la=en. Accessed 19 Aug 2018

21.

Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, De Schepper AM, Parizel PM (2011) The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys. Radiology 259:184–195CrossRefPubMed

22.

Trout AT, Towbin AJ, Fierke SR et al (2015) Appendiceal diameter as a predictor of appendicitis in children: improved diagnosis with three diagnostic categories derived from a logistic predictive model. Eur Radiol 25:2231–2238CrossRefPubMed

23.

Athans BS, Depinet HE, Towbin AJ et al (2016) Use of clinical data to predict appendicitis in patients with equivocal US findings. Radiology 380:557–567CrossRef

24.

Mangona KLM, Guillerman RP, Mangona VS et al (2017) Diagnostic performance of ultrasonography for pediatric appendicitis: a night and day difference? Acad Radiol 24:1616–1620CrossRefPubMed

25.

Carpenter JL, Orth RC, Zhang W et al (2017) Diagnostic performance of US for differentiating perforated from nonperforated pediatric appendicitis: a prospective cohort study. Radiology 282:835–841CrossRefPubMed

26.

Telesmanich ME, Orth RC, Zhang W et al (2016) Searching for certainty: findings predictive of appendicitis in equivocal ultrasound exams. Pediatr Radiol 46:1539–1545CrossRefPubMed

27.

Fallon SC, Orth RC, Guillerman RP et al (2015) Development and validation of an ultrasound scoring system for children with suspected acute appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol 45:1945–1952CrossRefPubMed

28.

Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Jurkovich GJ et al (1995) Organ injury scaling: spleen and liver (1994 revision). J Trauma 38:323–324CrossRefPubMed

29.

Bruining DH, Zimmermann EM, Loftus EV Jr et al (2018) Consensus recommendations for evaluation, interpretation, and utilization of computed tomography and magnetic resonance enterography in patients with small bowel Crohn’s disease. Radiology 286:776–799CrossRefPubMed

30.

Nguyen HT, Benson CB, Bromley B et al (2014) Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilatation (UTD classification system). J Pediatr Urol 10:982–998CrossRefPubMed

31.

Alkasab TK, Bizzo BC, Berland LL et al (2017) Creation of an open framework for point-of-care computer-assisted reporting and decision support tools for radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol 14:1884–1189CrossRef

32.

Rubin DL, Kahn CE Jr (2017) Common data elements in radiology. Radiology 283:837–844CrossRefPubMed

Titel: The state of structured reporting: the nuance of standardized language
verfasst von: Lindsey A. G. Shea
Alexander J. Towbin
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04345-0

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

23.04.2024 | Pankreaskarzinom | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

The state of structured reporting: the nuance of standardized language

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Arnold Shkolnik, MD (1930–2018)

Microwave ablation of osteoid osteoma: initial experience and efficacy

Machine learning concepts, concerns and opportunities for a pediatric radiologist

Quality and safety in pediatric radiology

Survey of peer review programs among pediatric radiologists: report from the SPR Quality and Safety Committee

Review of paraneoplastic syndromes in children

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Update Radiologie