Background
Atherosclerosis (AS) is a chronic and progressive inflammatory disease characterized by the accumulation of lipids and fibrous lesions in the large arterial intima. Mechanisms governing AS continue to draw extensive research interest. Among proposed mechanisms, the immuno-inflammation hypothesis has become accepted by most researchers[
1‐
3]. Macrophages are important in both the initiation and progression of AS[
4,
5]. Macrophages can differentiate into two subtypes (M1 and M2) in response to micro-environmental changes. Considered the classical activated subtype, M1 exerts pro-inflammatory effects that promote the progression of AS. In contrast, the M2 activated subtype exerts anti-inflammatory effects and is regarded as a repressor of AS[
6,
7].
Hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy, abnormally high physiological levels of homocysteine, Hcy) is regarded as an independent risk factor in coronary heart disease, although the exact mechanism of how Hcy induces AS is unclear. Studies have shown that Hcy can promote AS occurrence and progression through oxidative stress damage, endothelial damage, and activation of inflammatory and immune responses[
8,
9]. A positive correlation between HHcy, endothelial dysfunction, and accelerated AS has been demonstrated by using gene-induced and diet-induced HHcy animal models[
10]. The results of some studies also reveal that Hcy could induce monocyte/macrophage localization in inflammatory lesions and exert pro-AS effects. Additionally, researchers have found that Hcy can influence the differentiation of macrophages both in vivo and in vitro[
11]. However, it is unclear if the effect of Hcy on macrophage polarization and subtype conversion correlates to its pathogenic role in AS.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
The RAW264.7 macrophage cell line was provided by the Cardiology Institute of the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Xi’an Jiaotong University[
12]. RAW264.7 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) FBS, penicillin (100 U/mL) and streptomycin (100 μg/mL). In a 6-well round bottom plate, 1 × 10
6 cells per well were seeded and incubated at 37°C for 12 hours. Before stimulation by Hcy and LPS, cells were serum-starved by culturing in DMEM without 10% FBS for 12 hours.
Reagents
Hcy and LPS were from Sigma (Milwaukee, USA). IL-4 was from Peprotech (Rocky Hill, USA). The upstream and downstream primers of GAPDH, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, iNOS, Arg-1, and MMR (shown in Table
1) were synthesized by Beijing Augct Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The RNA Fast 200 kit was from Shanghai Flytech Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). The RevertAid™ First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit was from Fermentas (Vilnius, Lithuania). SYBR
Premix Ex Taq™ II was from TaKaRa (Dalian, China).
Table 1
Sequences of real-time PCR primers
GAPDH | F (5′-3′) | TCA ACG GCA CAG TCA AGG |
R (5′-3′) | ACT CCA CGA CAT ACT CAG C |
IL-6 | F (5′-3′) | AGC CAG AGT CCT TCA GAG AGA TAC |
R (5′-3′) | AAT TGG ATG GTC TTG GTC CTT AGC |
TNF-α | F (5′-3′) | GCT CTT CTG TCT ACT GAA CTT CGG |
R (5′-3′) | ATG ATC TGA GTG TGA GGG TCT GG |
iNOS | F (5′-3′) | CCC TTC CGA AGT TTC TGG CAG CAG C |
R (5′-3′) | CCA AAG CCA CGA GGC TCT GAC AGC C |
IL-10 | F (5′-3′) | GGT TGC CAA GCC TTA TCG TA |
R (5′-3′) | ACC TGC TCC ACT GCC TTG CT |
Arg-1 | F (5′-3′) | ATG CTC ACA CTG ACA TCA ACA CTC |
R (5′-3′) | CTC TTC CAT CAC CTT GCC AAT CC |
MMR | F (5′-3′) | CAT GAG GCT TCT CCT GCT TCT G |
| R (5′-3′) | TTG CCG TCT GAA CTG AGA TGG |
RNA isolation and real-time PCR
Total RNA was isolated with the RNA Fast 200 kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First-strand cDNA was synthesized with the RevertAid™ First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit and analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR with SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ II. PCR was performed on the IQ5™ Multicolor real-time PCR and detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Data were analyzed on the basis of relative expression method using the formula ΔΔC expression = 2–ΔΔCt, where ΔΔCt = ΔCt (treated group) – ΔCt (control group), ΔCt = Ct (target gene) – Ct (GAPDH), and Ct = cycle at which the threshold is reached.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed with SPSS for Windows (version 18.0) using one-way ANOVA. Unless otherwise stated, graphs show mean ± SD. For each dataset, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Discussion
Macrophages are considered to be important immune effector cells. Recent studies have uncovered plasticity and heterogeneity in their differentiation pathways, as demonstrated by changes in cellular phenotype and physiology in response to micro-environmental stimuli. Mirroring the Th1/Th2 nomenclature, polarized macrophages are categorized into M1 and M2 subtypes. The classical subtype of activated macrophages, M1, can initiate adaptive immune responses and produce various pro-inflammatory cytokines. These biochemical responses are often involved in killing microorganisms and tumor cells. Moreover, M1 macrophages can promote atherosclerosis (AS). The alternative activated subtype, M2, also plays various roles, such as directing Th2 humoral response, killing parasites, repairing tissues, and producing anti-inflammatory cytokines. M2 macrophages are regarded as inhibitors of AS. However, it is noteworthy that the distinction between M1 and M2 macrophages may not be absolutely definitive; many researchers consider the M1 and M2 subtypes as opposing extremes of the macrophage spectrum[
13].
The classical activation of M1 macrophages by interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and LPS creates cells that can produce various pro-inflammatory chemokines and cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α. M2 macrophages, usually activated by IL-4, produce anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10. Aside from their differential expression of opposing effector molecules, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is expressed more in M1 macrophages, whereas arginase-1 (Arg-1) and mannose membrane receptor (MMR) are expressed more in M2 macrophages, reflecting the different immunological roles of these two populations[
7]. In this study, we chose IL-6, TNF-α, and iNOS as M1 macrophage markers, whose expression was induced by IFN-γ and LPS. We chose IL-10, Arg-1, and MMR as M2 macrophage markers, whose expression was induced by IL-4. These results are consistent with our previous work[
12].
LPS, the primary glycolipid component found in the outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria, can induce inflammatory responses, activate the complement system, and initiate the coagulation pathway[
14]. Many studies have confirmed that in the presence of IL-1 or IFN-γ, the LPS-induced defense reaction and killing ability could be augmented. Conversely, the pro-inflammatory effect of IFN-γ can be enhanced by the presence of LPS[
15,
16]. Because we had been unable to stimulate macrophage subtype polarization using Hcy alone (data not shown), we decided to use a combination of Hcy and LPS.
In the presence of LPS, Hcy led to up-regulated expression of M1 macrophage markers (IL-6, TNF-α, and iNOS); the optimal Hcy concentration was 50 μmol/L. However, Hcy and LPS elicited no significant effects on the expression of M2 macrophage markers (IL-10, Arg-1, and MMR). No correlation between the concentration of Hcy and the expression of marker genes was observed. This was possibly due to higher Hcy concentrations leading to more cell death. We also found that a combination of Hcy and LPS could transform M2 subtype into M1. This phenomenon may help to explain the pro-atherosclerotic effects of Hcy.
Many studies have shown that Hcy can act as a promoter of AS by activating inflammatory immune reactions. The immuno-inflammation hypothesis is a generally accepted explanation for the mechanism of AS, and macrophages are believed to be important in this process. The differentiation of macrophages into different sub-populations has become a new exploratory area in the initiation and progression of AS. Zhang
et al. have demonstrated that Hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy) could accelerate AS and enhance Ly-6C Monocyte/Macrophage accumulation in the lesions of Tg-hCBS apoE
−/−Cbs
−/− mice. They also found that monocyte/macrophage accumulation in the lesions of Ly-6C-positive mice correlated positively with Hcy levels. However, little is known about the influence of Hcy on the polarization of cultured macrophages[
17]. In this study, we used a cell-based assay to demonstrate that Hcy could induce macrophage polarization into the pro-inflammatory phenotype, thereby providing further evidence in support of the model for Hcy-induced AS.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
SG carried out the main body of this work and drafted the manuscript. WL, YW and LW participated in designing the studies. ZY participated in the design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.