nach oben

Surgery Today

Erschienen in:

01.02.2013 | Review Article

The “tele” factor in surgery today and tomorrow: implications for surgical training and education

verfasst von: Pietro Gambadauro, Rafael Torrejón

Erschienen in: Surgery Today | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

New technological developments in the field of telecommunications have allowed a wide range of potentially novel surgical applications. The introduction of the World Wide Web in 1991 has been followed by a steep rise of the relevance of telemedicine, as it is witnessed in the latest scientific literature. There has been a consistent, positive trend in publications dealing, respectively, with telemedicine and the Internet. This article reviews telemedicine and other surgery-related innovations that benefit from telecommunication advances, and presents data from a quantitative bibliographic analysis. A number of applications, such as telementoring, teleproctoring and robotic telesurgery are described and their huge potentials are discussed. The integration between surgery and telecommunications could constitute one of the major achievements of modern medicine, and its safe integration into clinical practice should be a priority for modern surgeons.

Magos A, Gambadauro P. Desktop search engines: a modern way to hand search in full text. Lancet. 2005;366(9481):203–4.PubMedCrossRef

Gambadauro P, Magos A. Office 2.0: a web 2.0 tool for international collaborative research. Lancet. 2008;371(9627):1837–8.PubMedCrossRef

Rosser JC, Wood M, Payne JH, Fullum TM, Lisehora GB, Rosser LE, Barcia PJ, Salvagi RS. Telementoring: a practical option in surgical training. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:852–5.PubMedCrossRef

Rosser JC, Gabriel N, Herman B, Murayama M. Telementoring and Teleproctoring. Worl J Surg. 2001;25:1438–48.CrossRef

Angood PB. Telemedicine, the Internet, and World Wide Web: overview, current status, and relevance to surgeons. World J Surg. 2001;25:1449–57.PubMed

Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Guidelines for the surgical practice of telemedicine. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:975–9.CrossRef

Go PMNYH, Payne JH, Satava RM, Rosser JC. Teleconferencing bridges two oceans and shrinks the surgical world. Surg Endosc. 1996;10:105–6.PubMedCrossRef

Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW, Docimo SG, Kavoussi LR. Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc. 1996;10(2):107–10.PubMedCrossRef

Marescaux J, Mutter D, Soler L, Vix M, Leroy J. The virtual university applied to telesurgery: from tele-education to tele-manipulation. Bull Acad Natl Med. 1999;183:509–21.PubMed

10.

Rosser JC, Wood M, Payne JH, Fullum TM, Lisehora GB, Rosser LE, et al. Telementoring. A practical option in surgical training. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(8):852–5.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Schulam PG, Docimo SG, Saleh W, Breitenbach C, Moore RG, Kavoussi L. Telesurgical mentoring. Initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:1001–5.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Lee BR, Bishoff JT, Janetschek G, Bunyaratevej P, Kamolpronwijit W, Cadeddu JA, et al. A novel method of surgical instruction: international telementoring. World J Urol. 1998;16(6):367–70.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Cubano M, Poulose BK, Salamini MA, Stewart R, Antosek LE, Lentz R, et al. Long distance telementoring. A novel tool for laparoscopy aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:673–8.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Lee BR, Png DJ, Liew L, Fabrizio M, Li MK, Jarrett JW, et al. Laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2000;29:665–8.PubMed

15.

Bauer JJ, Lee BR, Bishoff JT, Janetschek G, Bunyaratevej P, Kamolpronwijit W, et al. International surgical telementoring using a robotic arm: our experience. Telemed J. 2000;6:25–31.CrossRef

16.

Micali S, Virgili G, Vannozzi E, Grassi N, Jarrett TW, Bauer JJ, et al. Feasibility of telementoring between Baltimore (USA) and Rome (Italy): the first five cases. J Endourol. 2000;14:493–6.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Gambadauro P, Magos A. Digital video technology and surgical training. Eur Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;3:31–4.CrossRef

18.

Hahm JS, Lee HL, Choi HS, Shimizu S. Telemedicine system using a high-speed network: past, present, and future. Gut Liver. 2009;3(4):247–51.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Gambadauro P, Magos A. NEST (network enhanced surgical training): a PC-based system for telementoring in gynaecological surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;139(2):222–5.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Notte D, Mimouna R, Cadiere GB, Bruyns, Degueldre M, Mols P. Human factor’s in telemedicine: training surgeons by telementoring. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2009;5619:1033–41.CrossRef

21.

Gambadauro P, Chapman L, Makris A, Papalampros P, Polyzos D, Papadopoulos N, et al. Simulating telementoring using NEST (network enhanced surgical training) in an endoscopic skills laboratory. Gynecol Surg. 2006;3:S41.CrossRef

22.

Darzi A, Smith S, Taffinder N. Assessing operative skills. BMJ. 1999;318:887–8.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Sarker SK, Chang A, Vincent C, Darzi AW. Development of assessing generic and specific technical skills in laparoscopic surgery. Am J Surg. 2006;191:238–44.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Moorthy K, Muntz Y, Sarker SK, Darzi A. Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ. 2003;327:1032–7.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Gambadauro P, Magos A. Digital video recordings for training, assessment, and revalidation of surgical skills. Surg Technol Int. 2010;20:36–9.PubMed

26.

Cheah WK, Lee B, Lenzi JE, Goh PM. Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy between two countries. Surg Endosc. 2000;14(11):1085.PubMed

27.

Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature. 2001;413:379–80.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Pugin F, Bucher P, Morel P. History of robotic surgery: from AESOP^® and ZEUS^® to da Vinci^®. J Visc Surg. 2011;148:e3–8.

29.

Yim GW, Kim SW, Nam EJ, Kim YT. Role of robot-assisted surgery in cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(1):173–81.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Lehr EJ, Rodriguez E, Chitwood WR. Robotic cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24(1):77–85.PubMedCrossRef

31.

van Dam P, Hauspy J, Verkinderen L, Trinh XB, van Dam PJ, Van Looy L, et al. Are costs of robot-assisted surgery warranted for gynecological procedures? Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011;2011:973830.PubMed

32.

Haidegger T, Sándor J, Benyó Z. Surgery in space: the future of robotic telesurgery. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(3):681–90.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Suzuki S, Suzuki N, Hattori A, Hayashibe M, Konishi K, Kakeji Y, et al. Tele-surgery simulation with a patient organ model for robotic surgery training. Int J Med Robot. 2005;1(4):80–8.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Suzuki S, Suzuki N, Hayashibe M, Hattori A, Konishi K, Kakeji Y, et al. Tele-surgical simulation system for training in the use of da Vinci surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;111:543–8.PubMed

35.

Nguan C, Miller B, Patel R, Luke PP, Schlachta CM. Pre-clinical remote telesurgery trial of a da Vinci telesurgery prototype. Int J Med Robot. 2008;4(4):304–9.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Sterbis JR, Hanly EJ, Herman BC, Marohn MR, Broderick TJ, Shih SP, et al. Transcontinental telesurgical nephrectomy using the da Vinci robot in a porcine model. Urology. 2008;71(5):971–3.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Brockbank W. Old anatomical theatres and what took place therein. Med Hist. 1968;12(4):371–84.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Ward JP, Gordon J, Field MJ, Lehmann HP. Communication and information technology in medical education. Lancet. 2001;10(357):792–6.CrossRef

39.

Khan N, Coppola W, Rayne T, Epstein O. Medical student access to multimedia devices: most have it, some don’t and what’s next? Inform Health Soc Care. 2009;34(2):100–5.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Gormley GJ, Collins K, Boohan M, Bickle IC, Stevenson M. Is there a place for e-learning in clinical skills? A survey of undergraduate medical students’ experiences and attitudes. Med Teach. 2009;31(1):e6–12.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Alvarez RS, Rodríguez JL, Alonso AC. Teaching surgery: new times, new methods. Cir Esp 2012;90:17–23.

42.

Kleinpell R, Ely EW, Williams G, Liolios A, Ward N, Tisherman SA. Web-based resources for critical care education. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(3):541–53.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Davies BS, Rafique J, Vincent TR, Fairclough J, Packer MH, Vincent R, et al. Mobile Medical Education (MoMEd)—how mobile information resources contribute to learning for undergraduate clinical students: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12(1):1–12.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Wiecha J, Barrie N. Collaborative online learning: a new approach to distance CME. Acad Med. 2002;77(9):928–9.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Butterworth K, Hayes B, Zimmerman M. Remote and rural: do mentors enhance the value of distance learning continuing medical education? Educ Health (Abingdon). 2011;24(3):539.

46.

Casebeer L, Allison J, Spettell CM. Designing tailored Web-based instruction to improve practicing physicians’ chlamydial screening rates. Acad Med. 2002;77(9):929.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Sargeant J, Curran V, Allen M, Jarvis-Selinger S, Ho K. Facilitating interpersonal interaction and learning online: linking theory and practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26(2):128–36.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Pawson R. Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Med Educ. 2010;2(10):12.CrossRef

49.

Klock C, Gomes Rde P. Web conferencing systems: skype and MSN in telepathology. Diagn Pathol. 2008;3:S13.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Genzen JR, for the Education Committee of the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists. Pathology consultation on reporting of critical values. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135(4):505–13.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Rocha R, Vassallo J, Soares F, Miller K, Gobbi H. Digital slides: present status of a tool for consultation, teaching, and quality control in pathology. Pathol Res Pract. 2009;205(11):735–41.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Ewers R, Schicho K, Wagner A, Undt G, Seemann R, Figl M, et al. Seven years of clinical experience with teleconsultation in craniomaxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(10):1447–54.PubMedCrossRef

53.

Narenthiranathan NR, Adnan JS, Haspani MS. Tailoring teleconsultation to meet the current needs of neurosurgical services: a multimodality oriented neurosurgical consultation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;161:112–21.PubMed

54.

Seemann R, Guevara G, Undt G, Ewers R, Schicho K. Clinical evaluation of tele-endoscopy using UMTS cellphones. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(11):2855–9.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Eranki V, Munt J, Lim MJ, Atkinson R. Consultation of orthopaedics cases using multimedia messaging services. Open Orthop J. 2010;23(4):164–8.CrossRef

56.

Zetterman CV, Sweitzer BJ, Webb B, Barak-Bernhagen MA, Boedeker BH. Validation of a virtual preoperative evaluation clinic: a pilot study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;163:737–9.PubMed

57.

Gambadauro P, Magos A. Surgical videos for accident analysis, performance improvement and complication prevention: time for a surgical black box? Surg Innov. 2012;19:76–80. doi:10.1177/1553350611415424.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Brahams D. The medicolegal implications of teleconsulting in the UK. J Telemed Telecare. 1995;1(4):196–201.PubMed

59.

DeBakey ME. Telemedicine has now come of age. Telemed J. 1995;1(1):3–4.CrossRef

60.

Shimizu S, Han HS, Okamura K, Yamaguchi K, Tanaka M. Live demonstration of surgery across international borders with uncompressed high-definition quality. HPB (Oxford). 2007;9(5):398–9.CrossRef

61.

Grech V, Muscat HA, Cassar B. Videoconferencing: live procedures during conferences—practical problems and solutions. J Vis Commun Med. 2009;32:53–4.PubMedCrossRef

62.

Hollick EJ, Allan BD. Live surgery: national survey of United Kingdom ophthalmologists. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(6):1029–32.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Augestad KM, Lindsetmo RO. Overcoming distance: video-conferencing as a clinical and educational tool among surgeons. World J Surg. 2009;33(7):1356–65.PubMedCrossRef

64.

Holland AJ, Soundappan SV, Oldmeadow W. Videoconferencing surgical tutorials: bridging the gap. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78(4):297–301.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Gul YA, Wan AC, Darzi A. Undergraduate surgical teaching utilizing telemedicine. Med Educ. 1999;33(8):596–9.PubMedCrossRef

66.

McIntyre TP, Monahan TS, Villegas L, Doyle J, Jones DB. Teleconferencing surgery enhances effective communication and enriches medical education. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;18(1):45–8.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: The “tele” factor in surgery today and tomorrow: implications for surgical training and education
verfasst von: Pietro Gambadauro
Rafael Torrejón
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2013
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Surgery Today / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0941-1291
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-2813
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0267-9

Leitlinien kompakt für die Allgemeinmedizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Facharzt-Training Allgemeinmedizin

Die ideale Vorbereitung zur anstehenden Prüfung mit den ersten 24 von 100 klinischen Fallbeispielen verschiedener Themenfelder

Mehr erfahren

Neu im Fachgebiet Allgemeinmedizin

22.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Update Allgemeinmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

The “tele” factor in surgery today and tomorrow: implications for surgical training and education

Abstract

Leitlinien kompakt für die Allgemeinmedizin

Facharzt-Training Allgemeinmedizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Allgemeinmedizin

Krebspatienten impfen: Was? Wen? Und wann nicht?

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

Update Allgemeinmedizin

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Preoperative arterial blood lactate levels as a predictor of hospital mortality in patients with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Validation of online calculators to predict the non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients

Pancreatic thickness as a predictive factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy using an endopath stapler

Evaluation of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: a comparison of the directionality of lymph node metastasis and the total number of metastatic lymph nodes

Pattern of initial metastasis in the cervical lymph node from papillary thyroid carcinoma

Lung metastasis from an ovarian granulosa cell tumor 36 years after the initial diagnosis: report of a case

Leitlinien kompakt für die Allgemeinmedizin

Facharzt-Training Allgemeinmedizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Allgemeinmedizin

Krebspatienten impfen: Was? Wen? Und wann nicht?

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

Update Allgemeinmedizin