Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

07.12.2018

The treatment indication and optimal management of fluid collection after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy

verfasst von: Ki Byung Song, Jaewoo Kwon, Young-Joo Lee, Dae Wook Hwang, Jae Hoon Lee, Sang Hyun Shin, Myung-Hwan Kim, Sung Koo Lee, Dong-Wan Seo, Sang Soo Lee, Do Hyun Park, Tae Jun Song, Guisuk Park, Yejong Park, Seung Jae Lee, Song Cheol Kim

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Recently, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has become the standard procedure for resection of left-sided pancreatic tumors. Fluid collection (FC) at the resection margin of the pancreatic stump after LDP is a frequent radiological finding. However, there have been few treatment guidelines and the optimal management for this clinical finding is unclear. The aim of present study is to define the incidence of FC and suggest the optimal management for FC after LDP.

Methods

A total of 1227 patients who underwent LDP between March 2005 and December 2015 were collected. FC was considered present when the longest diameter of the lesion on CT scan was > 3 cm.

Results

A follow-up with at least two CT image was available for 1102 patients. Of these, 689 (62.5%) patients showed initial fluid collection (IFC) at the pancreas resection site in immediate postoperative CT. IFC (+) group had higher proportion of men, BMI, and higher rate of concomitant splenectomy than IFC (−) group. Among patients with FC after LDP, the treatment group had more frequent leukocytosis and accompanying symptoms than the observation group. Seventy-seven patients underwent therapeutic interventions for FC after LDP. Among them, 55 (71.4%) patients underwent endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastrocystostomy (EUS-GC). EUS-GC group had a higher success rate (85.6 vs. 63.6%, p < 0.033) and shorter hospital stay after the intervention (5.2 vs. 13.3 days, p < 0.001) than those who underwent other procedures.

Conclusions

High BMI, male, and concomitant splenectomy contribute to the occurrence of FC after LDP. In most cases, FC after LDP resolved spontaneously over time with observation. The patients with symptomatic FC ultimately required treatment. EUS-GC is the optimal intervention therapy for FC after LDP.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Song KB et al (2011) Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection. Surg Endosc 25(10):3364–3372CrossRef Song KB et al (2011) Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection. Surg Endosc 25(10):3364–3372CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie K et al (2012) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is as safe and feasible as open procedure: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 18(16):1959–1967CrossRef Xie K et al (2012) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is as safe and feasible as open procedure: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 18(16):1959–1967CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Xia T et al (2017) Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy using stapler closure technique from one single surgeon. PLoS ONE 12(2):e0172857CrossRef Xia T et al (2017) Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy using stapler closure technique from one single surgeon. PLoS ONE 12(2):e0172857CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura M et al (2011) Prolonged peri-firing compression with a linear stapler prevents pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 25(3):867–871CrossRef Nakamura M et al (2011) Prolonged peri-firing compression with a linear stapler prevents pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 25(3):867–871CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyasaka Y et al (2017) Attempts to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Surg Today 47(4):416–424CrossRef Miyasaka Y et al (2017) Attempts to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Surg Today 47(4):416–424CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161(3):584–591CrossRef Bassi C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161(3):584–591CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin SH et al (2015) A comparative study of laparoscopic vs. open distal pancreatectomy for left-sided ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Am Coll Surg 220(2):177–185CrossRef Shin SH et al (2015) A comparative study of laparoscopic vs. open distal pancreatectomy for left-sided ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Am Coll Surg 220(2):177–185CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Pomp A, Herrera MF (1996) Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors. Surgery 120(6):1051–1054CrossRef Gagner M, Pomp A, Herrera MF (1996) Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors. Surgery 120(6):1051–1054CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kooby DA et al (2008) Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg 248(3):438–446PubMed Kooby DA et al (2008) Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg 248(3):438–446PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mabrut JY et al (2005) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 137(6):597–605CrossRef Mabrut JY et al (2005) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 137(6):597–605CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang S, Hameed U, Jayaraman S (2014) Laparoscopic pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 20(39):14246–14254CrossRef Liang S, Hameed U, Jayaraman S (2014) Laparoscopic pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 20(39):14246–14254CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bauman MD et al (2017) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer is safe and effective. Surg Endosc 32(1):53–61CrossRef Bauman MD et al (2017) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer is safe and effective. Surg Endosc 32(1):53–61CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang YR et al (2017) Prediction of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy based on cross-sectional images. World J Surg 41(6):1610–1617CrossRef Chang YR et al (2017) Prediction of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy based on cross-sectional images. World J Surg 41(6):1610–1617CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh BK et al (2008) Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution. Arch Surg 143(10):956–965CrossRef Goh BK et al (2008) Critical appraisal of 232 consecutive distal pancreatectomies with emphasis on risk factors, outcome, and management of the postoperative pancreatic fistula: a 21-year experience at a single institution. Arch Surg 143(10):956–965CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Moskovic DJ et al (2010) Drain data to predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula. HPB (Oxford) 12(7):472–481CrossRef Moskovic DJ et al (2010) Drain data to predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula. HPB (Oxford) 12(7):472–481CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sierzega M et al (2013) Natural history of intra-abdominal fluid collections following pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 17(8):1406–1413CrossRef Sierzega M et al (2013) Natural history of intra-abdominal fluid collections following pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 17(8):1406–1413CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tjaden C et al (2016) Fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy: a frequent finding. HPB (Oxford) 18(1):35–40CrossRef Tjaden C et al (2016) Fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy: a frequent finding. HPB (Oxford) 18(1):35–40CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Seeliger H et al (2010) Risk factors for surgical complications in distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 200(3):311–317CrossRef Seeliger H et al (2010) Risk factors for surgical complications in distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg 200(3):311–317CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrone CR et al (2008) Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates. J Gastrointest Surg 12(10):1691–1697; discussion 1697–8 CrossRef Ferrone CR et al (2008) Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates. J Gastrointest Surg 12(10):1691–1697; discussion 1697–8 CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang CW et al (2014) Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy or distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy?: Perioperative and patient-reported outcome analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 48(7):e62–e66CrossRef Tang CW et al (2014) Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy or distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy?: Perioperative and patient-reported outcome analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 48(7):e62–e66CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Shoup M et al (2002) The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 137(2):164–168CrossRef Shoup M et al (2002) The value of splenic preservation with distal pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 137(2):164–168CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pendola F et al (2017) Distal pancreatectomy for benign and low grade malignant tumors: short-term postoperative outcomes of spleen preservation—a systematic review and update meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol 115(2):137–143CrossRef Pendola F et al (2017) Distal pancreatectomy for benign and low grade malignant tumors: short-term postoperative outcomes of spleen preservation—a systematic review and update meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol 115(2):137–143CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Trevino JM, Christein JD (2009) EUS for the management of peripancreatic fluid collections after distal pancreatectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 70(6):1260–1265CrossRef Varadarajulu S, Trevino JM, Christein JD (2009) EUS for the management of peripancreatic fluid collections after distal pancreatectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 70(6):1260–1265CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Raijman I et al (2015) Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections using a fully covered expandable metal stent with antimigratory fins. Endosc Ultrasound 4(3):213–218CrossRef Raijman I et al (2015) Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections using a fully covered expandable metal stent with antimigratory fins. Endosc Ultrasound 4(3):213–218CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwon YM et al (2013) Management of peripancreatic fluid collections following partial pancreatectomy: a comparison of percutaneous versus EUS-guided drainage. Surg Endosc 27(7):2422–2427CrossRef Kwon YM et al (2013) Management of peripancreatic fluid collections following partial pancreatectomy: a comparison of percutaneous versus EUS-guided drainage. Surg Endosc 27(7):2422–2427CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The treatment indication and optimal management of fluid collection after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy
verfasst von
Ki Byung Song
Jaewoo Kwon
Young-Joo Lee
Dae Wook Hwang
Jae Hoon Lee
Sang Hyun Shin
Myung-Hwan Kim
Sung Koo Lee
Dong-Wan Seo
Sang Soo Lee
Do Hyun Park
Tae Jun Song
Guisuk Park
Yejong Park
Seung Jae Lee
Song Cheol Kim
Publikationsdatum
07.12.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06621-w

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Verbände und Cremes gegen Dekubitus: „Wir wissen nicht, was sie bringen!“

Die Datenlage zur Wirksamkeit von Verbänden oder topischen Mitteln zur Prävention von Druckgeschwüren sei schlecht, so die Verfasser einer aktuellen Cochrane-Studie. Letztlich bleibe es unsicher, ob solche Maßnahmen den Betroffenen nutzen oder schaden.

Nackenschmerzen nach Bandscheibenvorfall: Muskeltraining hilft!

Bei hartnäckigen Schmerzen aufgrund einer zervikalen Radikulopathie schlägt ein Team der Universität Istanbul vor, lokale Steroidinjektionen mit einem speziellen Trainingsprogramm zur Stabilisierung der Nackenmuskulatur zu kombinieren.

US-Team empfiehlt Gastropexie nach Hiatushernien-Op.

Zur Vermeidung von Rezidiven nach Reparatur einer paraösophagealen Hiatushernie sollte einem US-Team zufolge der Magen bei der Op. routinemäßig an der Bauchwand fixiert werden. Das Ergebnis einer randomisierten Studie scheint dafür zu sprechen.

Mit Lidocain kommt der Darm nicht schneller in Schwung

Verzögertes Wiederanspringen der Darmfunktion ist ein Hauptfaktor dafür, wenn Patientinnen und Patienten nach einer Kolonresektion länger als geplant im Krankenhaus bleiben müssen. Ob man diesem Problem mit Lidocain vorbeugen kann, war Thema einer Studie.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.