Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 4/2016

13.04.2016 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The type of preoperative biliary drainage predicts short-term outcome after major hepatectomy

verfasst von: Yoji Kishi, Kazuaki Shimada, Satoshi Nara, Minoru Esaki, Tomoo Kosuge

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) is increasingly preferred to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) for patients undergoing major hepatectomy including hemihepatectomy or trisectorectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection. The study was aimed to evaluate whether postoperative outcomes differed according to the types of biliary drainage.

Methods

Patients who underwent major hepatectomy with bile duct resection for biliary tract cancer between December 2000 and March 2015 were classified into four groups according to their initial biliary drainage type. The preoperative management and postoperative morbidity were compared.

Results

Totally, 280 patients were classified into the following groups: no biliary drainage (n = 109), PTBD (n = 99), ENBD (n = 28), and endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD; n = 44). Preoperative catheter management including tube exchange or additional tube placement due to cholangitis or poor drainage was most frequently required in the ERBD group (PTBD, 18 %; ENBD, 14 %; ERBD, 43 %; P < 0.01). By the time of hepatectomy, 141 patients underwent at least one PTBD (PTBD(+)) and 30 patients were managed only with endoscopic biliary drainage (PTBD(−)). The incidence of major postoperative morbidities (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III) in PTBD(+) and PTBD(−) group was 23 and 3 %, respectively (P = 0.01). A multivariate analysis among 171 patients with biliary drainage showed PTBD(+) (P = 0.04; odds ratio = 8.50; 95 % confidential interval [CI], 1.10–65.45) and red blood cells transfusion (P < 0.01; odds ratio = 2.72; 95 % CI, 1.22–6.09) were independent predictors of major morbidity.

Conclusion

The type of preoperative biliary drainage was associated with the perioperative outcomes of major hepatectomy. Sticking to endoscopic biliary drainage was associated with lower risk of postoperative major morbidity.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Povoski SP, Karpeh MS Jr, Conlon KC, Blumgart LH, Brennan MF (1999) Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 230(2):131–142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Povoski SP, Karpeh MS Jr, Conlon KC, Blumgart LH, Brennan MF (1999) Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 230(2):131–142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisters PW, Hudec WA, Hess KR et al (2001) Effect of preoperative biliary decompression on pancreaticoduodenectomy-associated morbidity in 300 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234(1):47–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pisters PW, Hudec WA, Hess KR et al (2001) Effect of preoperative biliary decompression on pancreaticoduodenectomy-associated morbidity in 300 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234(1):47–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Martignoni ME, Wagner M, Krahenbuhl L et al (2001) Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 181(1):52–59, discussion 87 CrossRefPubMed Martignoni ME, Wagner M, Krahenbuhl L et al (2001) Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on surgical outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 181(1):52–59, discussion 87 CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Coates JM, Beal SH, Russo JE et al (2009) Negligible effect of selective preoperative biliary drainage on perioperative resuscitation, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 144(9):841–847. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.152 CrossRefPubMed Coates JM, Beal SH, Russo JE et al (2009) Negligible effect of selective preoperative biliary drainage on perioperative resuscitation, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 144(9):841–847. doi:10.​1001/​archsurg.​2009.​152 CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mezhir JJ, Brennan MF, Baser RE et al (2009) A matched case–control study of preoperative biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: routine drainage is not justified. J Gastrointest Surg 13(12):2163–2169. doi:10.1007/s11605-009-1046-9 CrossRefPubMed Mezhir JJ, Brennan MF, Baser RE et al (2009) A matched case–control study of preoperative biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: routine drainage is not justified. J Gastrointest Surg 13(12):2163–2169. doi:10.​1007/​s11605-009-1046-9 CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hatfield AR, Tobias R, Terblanche J et al (1982) Preoperative external biliary drainage in obstructive jaundice. A prospective controlled clinical trial. Lancet 2(8304):896–899CrossRefPubMed Hatfield AR, Tobias R, Terblanche J et al (1982) Preoperative external biliary drainage in obstructive jaundice. A prospective controlled clinical trial. Lancet 2(8304):896–899CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat McPherson GA, Benjamin IS, Hodgson HJ et al (1984) Pre-operative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: the results of a controlled trial. Br J Surg 71(5):371–375CrossRefPubMed McPherson GA, Benjamin IS, Hodgson HJ et al (1984) Pre-operative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: the results of a controlled trial. Br J Surg 71(5):371–375CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pitt HA, Gomes AS, Lois JF et al (1985) Does preoperative percutaneous biliary drainage reduce operative risk or increase hospital cost? Ann Surg 201(5):545–553CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pitt HA, Gomes AS, Lois JF et al (1985) Does preoperative percutaneous biliary drainage reduce operative risk or increase hospital cost? Ann Surg 201(5):545–553CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hochwald SN, Burke EC, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, Blumgart LH (1999) Association of preoperative biliary stenting with increased postoperative infectious complications in proximal cholangiocarcinoma. Arch Surg 134(3):261–266CrossRefPubMed Hochwald SN, Burke EC, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, Blumgart LH (1999) Association of preoperative biliary stenting with increased postoperative infectious complications in proximal cholangiocarcinoma. Arch Surg 134(3):261–266CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cherqui D, Benoist S, Malassagne B et al (2000) Major liver resection for carcinoma in jaundiced patients without preoperative biliary drainage. Arch Surg 135(3):302–308CrossRefPubMed Cherqui D, Benoist S, Malassagne B et al (2000) Major liver resection for carcinoma in jaundiced patients without preoperative biliary drainage. Arch Surg 135(3):302–308CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrero A, Lo Tesoriere R, Vigano L et al (2009) Preoperative biliary drainage increases infectious complications after hepatectomy for proximal bile duct tumor obstruction. World J Surg 33(2):318–325. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9830-3 CrossRefPubMed Ferrero A, Lo Tesoriere R, Vigano L et al (2009) Preoperative biliary drainage increases infectious complications after hepatectomy for proximal bile duct tumor obstruction. World J Surg 33(2):318–325. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-008-9830-3 CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Seyama Y, Kubota K, Sano K et al (2003) Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate. Ann Surg 238(1):73–83PubMedPubMedCentral Seyama Y, Kubota K, Sano K et al (2003) Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate. Ann Surg 238(1):73–83PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirano S, Kondo S, Tanaka E et al (2010) Outcome of surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a special reference to postoperative morbidity and mortality. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17(4):455–462. doi:10.1007/s00534-009-0208-1 CrossRefPubMed Hirano S, Kondo S, Tanaka E et al (2010) Outcome of surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a special reference to postoperative morbidity and mortality. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17(4):455–462. doi:10.​1007/​s00534-009-0208-1 CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawashima H, Itoh A, Ohno E et al (2013) Preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in 164 consecutive patients with suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective study of efficacy and risk factors related to complications. Ann Surg 257(1):121–127. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318262b2e9 CrossRefPubMed Kawashima H, Itoh A, Ohno E et al (2013) Preoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in 164 consecutive patients with suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective study of efficacy and risk factors related to complications. Ann Surg 257(1):121–127. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e318262b2e9​ CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawakami H, Kuwatani M, Onodera M et al (2011) Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage is the most suitable preoperative biliary drainage method in the management of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol 46(2):242–248. doi:10.1007/s00535-010-0298-1 CrossRefPubMed Kawakami H, Kuwatani M, Onodera M et al (2011) Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage is the most suitable preoperative biliary drainage method in the management of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol 46(2):242–248. doi:10.​1007/​s00535-010-0298-1 CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirano S, Tanaka E, Tsuchikawa T et al (2014) Oncological benefit of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(8):533–540. doi:10.1002/jhbp.76 CrossRefPubMed Hirano S, Tanaka E, Tsuchikawa T et al (2014) Oncological benefit of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(8):533–540. doi:10.​1002/​jhbp.​76 CrossRefPubMed
25.
33.
Metadaten
Titel
The type of preoperative biliary drainage predicts short-term outcome after major hepatectomy
verfasst von
Yoji Kishi
Kazuaki Shimada
Satoshi Nara
Minoru Esaki
Tomoo Kosuge
Publikationsdatum
13.04.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1427-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.