Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Die Ophthalmologie
Erschienen in: Die Ophthalmologie 2/2021

22.03.2021 | Leitthema

The urgency of surgical treatment for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

verfasst von: Prof. Dr. Nicolas Feltgen, Josep Callizo, Lars-Olof Hattenbach, Hans Hoerauf

Erschienen in: Die Ophthalmologie | Sonderheft 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The ideal timing of surgery in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment has been discussed for decades. The study situation has improved in recent years so that recommendations can now be made. When the macula is detached, surgical treatment of the retinal detachment should be undertaken within a few days. When the macula is still attached, the near fovea and bullous superotemporal detachment should be classified as an emergency. When planning the operation environmental factors must also be considered, meaning that the performance of the intervention by an experienced surgical team is usually more important for the final result than the retinal condition alone. Influencing factors are discussed in this article and recommendations for dealing with these emergency patients are discussed.
Literatur
1.
Ahmadieh H, Moradian S, Faghihi H et al (2005) Anatomic and visual outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment: six-month follow-up results of a single operation—report no. 1. Ophthalmology 112:1421–1429PubMedCrossRef
2.
American Academy of Ophthalmology (1996) The repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 103:1313–1324CrossRef
3.
Angermann R, Bechrakis NE, Rauchegger T et al (2020) Effect of timing on visual outcomes in fovea-involving retinal detachments verified by SD-OCT. J Ophthalmol 2020:2307935PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
Brazitikos PD, Androudi S, Christen WG, Stangos NT (2005) Primary pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle surgery for the treatment of pseudophakic retinal detachment: a randomized clinical trial. Retina 25:957–964PubMedCrossRef
5.
Burton TC (1977) Preoperative factors influencing anatomic success rates following retinal detachment surgery. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 83:OP499–OP505PubMed
6.
Burton TC (1982) Recovery of visual acuity after retinal detachment involving the macula. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 80:475–497PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
van Bussel EM, van der Valk R, Bijlsma WR, La Heij EC (2014) Impact of duration of macula-off retinal detachment ON visual outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature. Retina 34(10):1917–1925PubMedCrossRef
8.
Callizo J, Pfeiffer S, Lahme E et al (2017) Risk of progression in macula-on rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255(8):1559–1564PubMedCrossRef
9.
Cheng K‑C, Cheng K‑Y, Cheng K‑H et al (2016) Using optical coherence tomography to evaluate macular changes after surgical management for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 32:248–254PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
Das T (1993) Guidelines for the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Indian J Ophthalmol 41:37–40PubMed
12.
Delolme MP, Dugas B, Nicot F et al (2012) Anatomical and functional macular changes after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macula off. Am J Ophthalmol 153:128–136PubMedCrossRef
13.
Diederen RMH, La Heij EC, Kessels AGH et al (2007) Scleral buckling surgery after macula-off retinal detachment: worse visual outcome after more than 6 days. Ophthalmology 114:705–709PubMedCrossRef
14.
Dorrepaal SJ, Gale J (2014) Using patient positioning to promote resorption of subretinal fluid in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment before pneumatic retinopexy. Retina 34:477–482PubMedCrossRef
15.
Ehrlich R, Ahmad N, Welch S et al (2011) Vitreoretinal fellow surgical outcome of small gauge pars plana vitrectomy for acute rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:1147–1152PubMedCrossRef
16.
Ehrlich R, Niederer RL, Ahmad N, Polkinghorne P (2013) Timing of acute macula-on rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Retina 33:105–110PubMedCrossRef
17.
Eijk ESV, Busschbach JJV, Timman R et al (2016) What made you wait so long? Delays in presentation of retinal detachment: knowledge is related to an attached macula. Acta Ophthalmol 94(5):434–440PubMedCrossRef
18.
Feltgen N, Walter P (2014) Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment-an ophthalmologic emergency. Dtsch Arztebl Int 111:12–22PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Fischer CV, Kulanga M, Hoerauf H (2017) Correction: trends in retinal detachment surgery : what has changed compared to 2001? Ophthalmologe 115(8):663–668CrossRef
20.
Friberg TR, Eller AW (1992) Prediction of visual recovery after scleral buckling of macula-off retinal detachments. Am J Ophthalmol 114:715–722PubMedCrossRef
21.
Frings A, Markau N, Katz T et al (2016) Visual recovery after retinal detachment with macula-off: is surgery within the first 72 h better than after? Br J Ophthalmol 100(11):1466–1469PubMedCrossRef
22.
Geiger M, Smith JM, Lynch A et al (2020) Predictors for recovery of macular function after surgery for primary macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Int Ophthalmol 40(3):609–616PubMedCrossRef
23.
Gharbiya M, Grandinetti F, Scavella V et al (2012) Correlation between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography findings and visual outcome after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Retina 32:43–53PubMedCrossRef
24.
Goezinne F, La Heij EC, Berendschot TTJM et al (2009) Patient ignorance is the main reason for treatment delay in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in The Netherlands. Eye 23:1393–1399PubMedCrossRef
25.
Greven MA, Leng T, Silva RA et al (2019) Reductions in final visual acuity occur even within the first 3 days after a macula-off retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 103(10):1503–1506PubMedCrossRef
26.
Grizzard WS, Hilton GF, Hammer ME, Taren D (1994) A multivariate analysis of anatomic success of retinal detachments treated with scleral buckling. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232:1–7PubMedCrossRef
27.
Gundry MF, Davies EW (1974) Recovery of visual acuity after retinal detachment surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 77:310–314PubMedCrossRef
28.
Hajari JN, Bjerrum SS, Christensen U et al (2014) A nationwide study on the incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Denmark, with emphasis on the risk of the fellow eye. Retina 34(8):1658–1665PubMedCrossRef
29.
Haritoglou C, Brandlhuber U, Kampik A, Priglinger SG (2010) Anatomic success of scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment—a retrospective study of 524 cases. Ophthalmologe 224:312–318CrossRef
30.
Hartz AJ, Burton TC, Gottlieb MS et al (1992) Outcome and cost analysis of scheduled versus emergency scleral buckling surgery. Ophthalmology 99:1358–1363PubMedCrossRef
31.
Hassan TS, Sarrafizadeh R, Ruby AJ et al (2002) The effect of duration of macular detachment on results after the scleral buckle repair of primary, macula-off retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 109:146–152PubMedCrossRef
32.
Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N et al (2007) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 114:2142–2154PubMedCrossRef
33.
Henrich PB, Priglinger S, Klaessen D et al (2009) Macula-off retinal detachment—a matter of time? Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 226:289–293PubMedCrossRef
34.
Ho SF, Fitt A, Frimpong-Ansah K, Benson MT (2006) The management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment not involving the fovea. Eye 20:1049–1053PubMedCrossRef
35.
Joe SG, Kim YJ, Chae JB et al (2013) Structural recovery of the detached macula after retinal detachment repair as assessed by optical coherence tomography. Korean J Ophthalmol 27:178–185PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
de Jong JH, de Koning K, den Ouden T et al (2019) The effect of compliance with preoperative posturing advice and head movements on the progression of macula-on retinal detachment. Transl Vis Sci Technol 8(2):4PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
de Jong JH, Vigueras-Guillén JP, Simon TC et al (2017) Preoperative posturing of patients with macula-on retinal detachment reduces progression toward the fovea. Ophthalmology 124:1510–1522PubMedCrossRef
38.
de Jong JH, Vigueras-Guillén JP, Wubbels RJ et al (2019) The influence of prolongation of interruptions of preoperative posturing and other clinical factors on the progress of macula-on retinal detachment. Ophthalmol Retina 3:938–946PubMedCrossRef
39.
Kang HM, Lee SC, Lee CS (2015) Association of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography findings with visual outcome of macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery. Ophthalmologica 234(2):83–90PubMedCrossRef
40.
Kawamura H, Fujikawa M, Sawada O et al (2016) Contrast sensitivity after pars plana vitrectomy: comparison between macula-on and macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmic Res 56:74–78PubMedCrossRef
41.
Kobayashi M, Iwase T, Yamamoto K et al (2016) Association between photoreceptor regeneration and visual acuity following surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57:889–898PubMedCrossRef
42.
Koch KR, Hermann MM, Kirchhof B, Fauser S (2012) Success rates of retinal detachment surgery: routine versus emergency setting. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 250:1731–1736PubMedCrossRef
43.
Kontos A, Williamson TH (2017) Rate and risk factors for the conversion of fovea-on to fovea-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment while awaiting surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 101:1011–1015PubMedCrossRef
44.
Kreissig I (1977) Prognosis of return of macular function after retinal reattachment. Mod Probl Ophthalmol 18:415–429PubMed
45.
Kusaka S, Toshino A, Ohashi Y, Sakaue E (1998) Long-term visual recovery after scleral buckling for macula-off retinal detachments. Jpn J Ophthalmol 42:218–222PubMedCrossRef
46.
Lai WW, Leung GYO, Chan CWS et al (2010) Simultaneous spectral domain OCT and fundus autofluorescence imaging of the macula and microperimetric correspondence after successful repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 94:311–318PubMedCrossRef
47.
Lecleire-Collet A, Muraine M, Menard J‑F, Brasseur G (2005) Predictive visual outcome after macula-off retinal detachment surgery using optical coherence tomography. Retina 25:44–53PubMedCrossRef
48.
Lee IT, Lampen SIR, Wong TP et al (2019) Fovea-sparing rhegmatogenous retinal detachments: impact of clinical factors including time to surgery on visual and anatomic outcomes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257(5):883–889PubMedCrossRef
49.
Lewis GP, Charteris DG, Sethi CS, Fisher SK (2002) Animal models of retinal detachment and reattachment: identifying cellular events that may affect visual recovery. Eye 16:375–387PubMedCrossRef
50.
Li JQ, Welchowski T, Schmid M et al (2019) Incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Europe—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 242:81–86CrossRef
51.
Liem AT, Keunen JE, van Meel GJ, van Norren D (1994) Serial foveal densitometry and visual function after retinal detachment surgery with macular involvement. Ophthalmology 101:1945–1952PubMedCrossRef
52.
Liu F, Meyer CH, Mennel S et al (2006) Visual recovery after scleral buckling surgery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmologica 220:174–180PubMedCrossRef
53.
Malosse L, Rousseau H, Baumann C et al (2019) Prevalence and risk factors for outer retinal layer damage after macula-off retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 104(5):660–665PubMedCrossRef
54.
Mazinani BAE, Rajendram A, Walter P, Roessler GF (2012) Does surgical experience have an effect on the success of retinal detachment surgery? Retina 32:32–37PubMedCrossRef
55.
McPherson AR, O’Malley RE, Butner RW, Beltangady SS (1982) Visual acuity after surgery for retinal detachment with macular involvement. Ann Ophthalmol 14:639–645PubMed
56.
Narala R, Scarinci F, Shaarawy A et al (2016) longitudinal quantitative evaluation of photoreceptor volume following repair of macula-off retinal detachment. Retina 36:1432–1438PubMedCrossRef
57.
58.
Okuda T, Higashide T, Sugiyama K (2018) Metamorphopsia and outer retinal morphologic changes after successful vitrectomy surgery for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 38:148–154PubMedCrossRef
59.
dell’Omo R, Viggiano D, Giorgio D et al (2015) Restoration of foveal thickness and architecture after macula-off retinal detachment repair. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:1040–1050PubMedCrossRef
60.
Park DH, Choi KS, Sun HJ, Lee SJ (2018) Factors associated with visual outcome after macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery. Retina 38:137–147PubMedCrossRef
61.
Pastor JC, Fernandez I, Rodriguez de la Rua E et al (2008) Surgical outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in phakic and pseudophakic patients: the Retina 1 Project—report 2. Br J Ophthalmol 92:378–382PubMedCrossRef
62.
Potic J, Bergin C, Giacuzzo C et al (2018) Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: risk factors for macular involvement. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256:489–494PubMedCrossRef
63.
van de Put MAJ, Croonen D, Nolte IM et al (2014) Postoperative recovery of visual function after macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Plos One 9:e99787PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
van de Put MAJ, Hoeksema L, Wanders W et al (2014) Postoperative vision-related quality of life in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment patients and its relation to visual function. Plos One 9:e114489PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
65.
van de Put MAJ, Vehof J, Hooymans JMM, Los LI (2015) Postoperative metamorphopsia in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: associations with visual function, vision related quality of life, and optical coherence tomography findings. PLoS ONE 10:e120543PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
66.
Quintyn JC, Benouaich X, Pagot-Mathis V, Mathis A (2006) Retinal detachment, a condition little known to patients. Retina 26:1077–1078PubMedCrossRef
67.
Ranta P, Kivela T (2002) Functional and anatomic outcome of retinal detachment surgery in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology 109:1432–1440PubMedCrossRef
68.
69.
Rezar S, Sacu S, Blum R et al (2016) Macula-on versus macula-off pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment following primary 23-gauge vitrectomy plus endotamponade. Curr Eye Res 41:543–550PubMed
70.
Ross WH, Kozy DW (1998) Visual recovery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 105:2149–2153PubMedCrossRef
71.
Sakamoto T, Kawano S, Kawasaki R et al (2020) Japan-retinal detachment registry report I: preoperative findings in eyes with primary retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol 64(1):1–12PubMedCrossRef
72.
Saleh M, Debellemanière G, Meillat M et al (2014) Quantification of cone loss after surgery for retinal detachment involving the macula using adaptive optics. Br J Ophthalmol 98:1343–1348PubMedCrossRef
73.
Salicone A, Smiddy WE, Venkatraman A, Feuer W (2006) Visual recovery after scleral buckling procedure for retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 113:1734–1742PubMedCrossRef
74.
Shimoda Y, Sano M, Hashimoto H et al (2010) Restoration of photoreceptor outer segment after vitrectomy for retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 149:284–290PubMedCrossRef
75.
Tani P, Robertson DM, Langworthy A (1981) Prognosis for central vision and anatomic reattachment in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macula detached. Am J Ophthalmol 92:611–620PubMedCrossRef
76.
Terauchi G, Shinoda K, Matsumoto CS et al (2015) Recovery of photoreceptor inner and outer segment layer thickness after reattachment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol 99:1323–1327PubMedCrossRef
77.
78.
Vail D, Pershing S, Reeves M‑G, Afshar AR (2020) The relative impact of patient, physician, and geographic factors on variation in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment management. Ophthalmology 127:97–106PubMedCrossRef
79.
Wakabayashi T, Oshima Y, Fujimoto H et al (2009) Foveal microstructure and visual acuity after retinal detachment repair: imaging analysis by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 116:519–528PubMedCrossRef
80.
Walter P, Hellmich M, Baumgarten S et al (2017) Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment: VIPER Study Report No 2‑main results. Br J Ophthalmol 101(6):712–718PubMedCrossRef
81.
Wong CW, Yeo IYS, Loh BK et al (2015) Scleral buckling versus vitrectomy in the management of macula-off primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a comparison of visual outcomes. Retina 35(12):2552–2557PubMedCrossRef
82.
Wykoff CC, Smiddy WE, Mathen T et al (2010) Fovea-sparing retinal detachments: time to surgery and visual outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol 150:205–210e2PubMedCrossRef
83.
Zapf MAC, Kothari AN, Markossian T et al (2015) The “weekend effect” in urgent general operative procedures. Surgery 158:508–514PubMedCrossRef
84.
Metadaten
Titel
The urgency of surgical treatment for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
verfasst von
Prof. Dr. Nicolas Feltgen
Josep Callizo
Lars-Olof Hattenbach
Hans Hoerauf
Publikationsdatum
22.03.2021
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Die Ophthalmologie / Ausgabe Sonderheft 2/2021
Print ISSN: 2731-720X
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-7218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01364-x

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 2/2021

Die Ophthalmologie 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien, Stellungnahmen und Empfehlungen

Augenärztliche Screening-Untersuchung bei Frühgeborenen (S2k-Level, AWMF-Leitlinien-Register-Nr. 024/010, März 2020)

Erratum

Erratum zu: Plötzliche bilaterale Visusminderung und Gesichtsfeldausfälle

Leitlinien, Stellungnahmen und Empfehlungen

Statement of the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG), the Retinological Society (RG) and the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists in Germany (BVA) on the timing of treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Leitthema

Correlation of in vivo/ex vivo imaging of the posterior eye segment

Erratum

Erratum zu: Amotio-retinae-Versorgung während der Corona-Pandemie

Erratum

Erratum zu: Trübung der Intraokularlinse nach kombinierter Katarakt- und minimal-invasiver Glaukomchirurgie (MIGS)

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

08.04.2024 | Therapieverfahren in der Augenheilkunde | CME

Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft

08.03.2024 | Vitrektomie | Originalien

Operative Therapie und Keimnachweis bei endogener Endophthalmitis
Datenauswertung aus 5 Augenkliniken

04.03.2024 | Vitrektomie | Leitthema

Bakterielle endogene Endophthalmitis
Erregerspektrum und medikamentöse Therapie

27.02.2024 | Erkrankungen der Hornhaut | CME

So erreichen Sie eine bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen