The use of 3′-deoxy-3′-¹⁸F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET in the assessment of long-term survival in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

To assess the role of serial FLT-PET scans during early neoadjuvant treatment as a prognostic marker of response to treatment and survival.

This study is a prospective cohort study which draws from a larger original study which examined the utility of FLT-PET imaging across multiple cancers. Our cohort consisted of patients who had biopsy-confirmed breast cancer amenable to surgical resection. These patients underwent serial FLT-PET scans: the first scan prior to starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and a second scan shortly after starting NAC. SUV_mean was derived using an isocontour ROI drawn approximately half way between the SUV_max and background on three planes for each scan. The change in mean standardized uptake value (SUV_mean) for the primary tumor between these two scans was then calculated, and patients were stratified into “responder” and “non-responder” groups based on a cut-off of 20% arithmetic decrease in SUV_mean between the two scans. The rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) on subsequent surgical excision, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were then compared between the two groups to assess for significant difference between responders and non-responders.

16 patients (n = 16) met criteria for inclusion and successfully underwent FLT-PET scans in the prescribed sequence of events. Seven of these patients had a decrease of 20% or larger between the two serial PET scans, making them “responders”. The remaining nine patients were “non-responders” to NAC based on PET imaging. Between responders and non-responders, there was no significant difference in median PFS (7.9 years versus 3.7 years; p = 0.425) and median OS (7.5 years versus 5.0 years; p = 0.944). In the 14 patients who underwent surgical resection (n = 14), there was no significant difference in the rate of achieving pCR (33% vs. 14%; p = 0.5846) between responders and non-responders.

Further study of a larger sample size is needed to examine the potential role for FLT-PET in predicting response to neoadjuvant treatment, particularly in correlating with long-term overall and progression-free survival. Our study is limited by small sample size, but does suggest that FLT-PET has a role in the long-term prognosis of breast cancer treated with NAC and surgical resection which is worthy of further study.