Dislocation is one of the most frequent causes of failure of hemiarthroplasties of the hip, which is the most common treatment for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. A revision with conversion to total hip arthroplasty is the gold standard in case of failure of closed reduction: however, the use of standard or modular components shows variable outcomes. The use of a dual mobility cup has been evaluated in patients with unstable implants, given the good outcomes obtained in primary and revision surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the results of revisions by dual mobility cups in unstable hemiarthroplasties.
Thirty-one patients (mean age 75.4 years) were retrospectively evaluated between 2006 and 2010 after conversion to total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility cups for recurrent dislocations. The mean number of dislocations was 2.6 (range 2–5). The evaluation was performed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical function score (ASA) and the Harris hip score, and several radiologic criteria.
The mean follow-up was 3.8 years. No recurrence of dislocation was recorded. The ASA score remained unchanged, and the mean Harris hip score improved from 62.2 before dislocation to 76.0 points postoperatively.
Dual mobility cups may be a useful option in the treatment of a hemiarthroplasty dislocation. No risk of a new revision due to instability after insertion of dual mobility cups resulted in our experience, and this option may be strongly considered in cases of revisions of unstable hemiarthroplasties.
Level of evidence IV.
Holmes JD, House AO (2000) Psychiatric illness predicts poor outcome after surgery for hip fracture: a prospective cohort study. Psycol Med 30:921–929 CrossRef
Daly PJ, Morrey BF (2002) Operative correction of an unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:1334–1343
Berry DJ (2001) Unstable total hip arthroplasty: detailed overview. Instr Course Lect 50:265–274 PubMed
McGann WA, Welch RB (2001) Treatment of the unstable total hip arthroplasty using modularity, soft tissue, and allograft reconstruction. J Arthroplast 16(Suppl. 1):19–23 CrossRef
Toomey SD, Hopper RH Jr, McAuley JP, Engh CA (2001) Modular component exchange for treatment of recurrent dislocation of a total hip replacement in selected patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1529–1533 PubMed
Shapiro GS, Weiland DE, Markel DC, Padgett DE, Sculco TP, Pellicci PM (2003) The use of a constrained acetabular component for recurrent dislocation. J Arthroplast 18:250–258 CrossRef
Ekelund A (2003) Trochanteric osteotomy for recurrent dislocation of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:629–632 CrossRef
Weber M, Berry DJ (1997) Abductor avulsion after primary total hip arthroplasty: results of repair. J Arthroplast 12:202–206 CrossRef
Ali Khan MA, Brakenbury PH, Reynolds I (1981) Dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 63:214–218 PubMed
Llinas A, Sarmiento A, Ebramzadeh E, Gogan WJ, McKellop HA (1991) Total hip replacement after failed hemiarthroplasty or mould arthroplasty. Comparison of results with those of primary replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:902–907 PubMed
Diwanji SR, Kim SK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Yoon TR (2008) Clinical results of conversion total hip arthroplasty after failed bipolar hemiarthroplasty. J Arthroplast 23:1009–1015 CrossRef
Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755 PubMed
Loudon JR, Charnley J (1980) Subsidence of the femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement in relation to the design of the stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 62:450–453 PubMed
Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 257:107–128 PubMed
DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32 PubMed
Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27 PubMed
Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632 PubMed
Liu X, Zhang X, Chen Y, Wang Q, Jiang Y, Zeng B (2011) Hidden blood loss in hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 26:1100–1105 CrossRef
Chatrath V, Beaulé PE (2013) The changing paradigm of revision of total hip replacement in the presence of osteolysis. Instr Course Lect 62:215–227 PubMed
Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplast 9:33–44 CrossRef
Adam P, Philippe R, Ehlinger M, Roche O, Bonnomet F, Molé D, Fessy MH (2012) Dual mobility cups hip arthroplasty as a treatment for displaced fracture of the femoral neck in the elderly. A prospective, systematic, multicenter study with specific focus on postoperative dislocation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:296–300 CrossRefPubMed
Lecuire F, Bernareau I, Rubini J, Basso M (2004) Intra-prosthetic dislocation of Bousquet dual mobility socket. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice App Mot 90:249–255 CrossRef
Banzhof JA, Robbins CE, van der Ven A, Talmo CT, Bono JV (2012) Femoral head dislodgement complicating use of a dual mobility prosthesis for recurrent instability. J Arthroplast 28:543.e1–543.e3 CrossRef
- The use of a dual mobility cup in the management of recurrent dislocations of hip hemiarthroplasty
- Springer International Publishing
Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
e.Med Kampagnen-Visual, Mail Icon II