nach oben

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine

Erschienen in:

23.01.2021 | Hot Topics

The Use of Biologics for Hip Preservation

verfasst von: Toufic R. Jildeh, Muhammad J. Abbas, Patrick Buckley, Kelechi R. Okoroha

Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

A wide array of nonoperative modalities to treat hip pain are aimed at restoring and maintaining the structural and physiologic characteristics of the joint. The purpose of this review is to describe the current understanding of biologics in hip pathology by providing an evidence-based overview of treatment modalities available for orthopedic surgeons.

Recent Findings

The use of biologics as a primary treatment or adjunct to traditional management has shown encouraging results for the treatment of hip pain. Studies have demonstrated safety with minimal complications when using platelet rich plasma, hyaluronic acid, or stem cells to treat hip pain caused by osteoarthritis, femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, tendinopathy, or osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Several studies have been able to demonstrate meaningful clinical results that can improve treatment standards for hip pain; however, more work must be performed to better delineate the appropriate protocols, indications, and limitations of each modality.

Summary

Recent advances have inspired renewed interest in biologics for patients with hip pain. We present a concise review of platelet rich plasma, hyaluronic acid, stem cells, and matrix metalloprotease inhibitors and their applicability to hip preservation surgery.

Moss AS, Murphy LB, Helmick CG et al. Annual incidence rates of hip symptoms and three hip OA outcomes from a U.S. population-based cohort study: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;24:9.

Poultsides LA, Asheesh Bedi BTK. An algorithmic approach to mechanical hip pain. HSS J. 2012;8:11.CrossRef

Birnbaum K, Prescher A, Hessler S, et al. The sensory innervation of the hip joint--an anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat. 1997;19:371–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01628504.CrossRefPubMed

Adler KL, Cook PC, Yen Y-M, et al. Current concepts in hip preservation surgery: part I. Sports Health. 2015;7:8.CrossRef

Griffin DR, Dickenson EJ, O'Donnell J et al. The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:8.

Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, et al. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;8.

Marx RE. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP): what is PRP and what is not PRP? Implant Dent. 2001;10:3.CrossRef

Bowman S, Awad ME, Hamrick MW, et al. Recent advances in hyaluronic acid based therapy for osteoarthritis. Clin Transl Med. 2018;7:6.CrossRef

Saltzman BM, Kuhns BD, Weber AE et al. Stem Cells in Orthopedics: A Comprehensive Guide for the General Orthopedist. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016;45:46.

10.

Benjamin M, Khalil R. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors as investigative tools in the pathogenesis and management of vascular disease. HSS J. 2011;80.

11.

Goldstein RY, Kaye ID, Slover J, et al. Hip dysplasia in the skeletally mature patient. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2014;72:14.

12.

Cooperman DR, Wallensten R, Stulberg SD. Acetabular dysplasia in the adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;175:6.

13.

Domb BG, Philippon MJ, Giordano BD. Arthroscopic capsulotomy, capsular repair, and capsular plication of the hip: relation to atraumatic instability. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:11.CrossRef

14.

Fujii M, Nakashima Y, Jingushi S, et al. Intraarticular findings in symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29:4.CrossRef

15.

Matheney T, Sandell L, Foucher K, et al. Motion analysis, cartilage mechanics, and biology in femoroacetabular impingement: current understanding and areas of future research. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21:5.

16.

Ecker TM, Tannast M, Puls M, et al. Pathomorphologic alterations predict presence or absence of hip osteoarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;8.

17.

Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, et al. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;8.

18.

Botser IB, Ozoude GC, Martin DE, et al. Femoral anteversion in the hip: comparison of measurement by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examination. Arthroscopy. 2012;28:8.CrossRef

19.

Albers CE, Wambeek N, Hanke MS, Schmaranzer F, Prosser GH, Yates PJ. Imaging of femoroacetabular impingement-current concepts. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2016;3:245–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnw035.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Dhillon MS, Behera P, Patel S, et al. Orthobiologics and platelet rich plasma. Indian J Orthop. 2014;48:8.

21.

Eppley BL, Pietrzak WS, Blanton M. Platelet-rich plasma: a review of biology and applications in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;12.

22.

Pavlovic V, Ciric M, Jovanovic V, et al. Platelet rich plasma: a short overview of certain bioactive components. Open Med (Wars). 2016;11:5.

23.

Engebretsen L, Steffen K, Alsousou J et al. IOC consensus paper on the use of platelet-rich plasma in sports medicine. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:9.

24.

Cavallo C, Roffi A. Grigolo B et al. The Choice of Activation Method Affects the Release of Bioactive Molecules. Biomed Res Int: Platelet-Rich Plasma; 2016.

25.

Eisinger F, Patzelt J. Langer HF. Front Med (Lausanne): The Platelet Response to Tissue Injury; 2018.

26.

Toyoda T, Isobe K, Tsujino T, Koyata Y, Ohyagi F, Watanabe T, et al. Direct activation of platelets by addition of CaCl 2 leads coagulation of platelet-rich plasma. Int J Implant Dent. 2018;4:23.CrossRef

27.

Yun S-H, Sim E-H. Goh R-Y et al. The Mechanisms and Potential Biomarkers. Biomed Res Int: Platelet Activation; 2016.

28.

Mannava S, Chahla J, Geeslin AG, et al. Platelet-rich plasma augmentation for hip arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6:5.

29.

DeLong JM, Russell RP, Mazzocca AD. Platelet-rich plasma: the PAW classification system. Arthroscopy. 2012;28:11.CrossRef

30.

Everts PA, Overdevest EP, Jakimowicz JJ, et al. The use of autologous platelet-leukocyte gels to enhance the healing process in surgery, a review. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:5.CrossRef

31.

Mishra A, Harmon K, Woodall J, et al. Sports medicine applications of platelet rich plasma. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13:10.CrossRef

32.

Hamid MSA, Ali MRM, Yusof A, et al. Platelet-rich plasma injections for the treatment of hamstring injuries: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:8.CrossRef

33.••

Fitzpatrick J, Bulsara MK, O'Donnell J et al. The effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma injections in gluteal Tendinopathy: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial comparing a single platelet-rich plasma injection with a single corticosteroid injection. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:6. Current level 1 evidence examining the use of PRP versus corticosteroid injections in the treatment of teninopathy. Patients in the PRP group saw symptomatic improvements over the corticosteroid group.

34.

Chahal J, Thiel GSV. 3rd RCM et al. The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State for the Modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score Among Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:5.

35.••

Fitzpatrick J, Bulsara MK, O'Donnell J et al. Leucocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment of Gluteus Medius and Minimus Tendinopathy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial With 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:7. Fitzpatrick et al. provided level 1 evidence in a randomized control trial examining PRP verus Corticosteroids in glute tendinopathy with two year follow and found patients in the PRP group had improved outcomes over the steroid group.

36.•

Thompson G, Pearson JF. No attributable effects of PRP on greater trochanteric pain syndrome. N Z Med J. 2019:10. An evaluation of the management of trochanteric pain with PRP or placebo. Demonstrated that at 12 month follow-up there was no significant difference in BPI pain scores between cohorts.

37.

Redmond JM, Gupta A, Stake CE, et al. Clinical results of hip arthroscopy for labral tears: a comparison between intraoperative platelet-rich plasma and bupivacaine injection. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:8.

38.

Rafols C, Monckeberg JE, Numair J, et al. Platelet-rich plasma augmentation of arthroscopic hip surgery for Femoroacetabular impingement: a prospective study with 24-month follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:6.CrossRef

39.

LaFrance R, Kenney R, Giordano B, et al. The effect of platelet enriched plasma on clinical outcomes in patients with femoroacetabular impingement following arthroscopic labral repair and femoral neck osteoplasty. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015;2:5.CrossRef

40.

Battaglia M, Guaraldi F, Vannini F, et al. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid for hip osteoarthritis. Orthopedics. 2013;36:7.CrossRef

41.

Sante LD, Villani C, Santilli V, et al. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid vs platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis. Med Ultrason. 2016;18:5.CrossRef

42.

Dallari D, Stagni C, Rani N, et al. Ultrasound-guided injection of platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid, separately and in combination, for hip osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:7.CrossRef

43.

Goa KL, Benfield P. Hyaluronic acid. A review of its pharmacology and use as a surgical aid in ophthalmology, and its therapeutic potential in joint disease and wound healing. Drugs. 1994;47:536–66. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199447030-00009.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Kogan G, Soltes L, Stern R, et al. Hyaluronic acid: a natural biopolymer with a broad range of biomedical and industrial applications. Biotechnol Lett. 2007;29:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-006-9219-z.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Gerecht S, Burdick JA, Ferreira LS, Townsend SA, Langer R, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Hyaluronic acid hydrogel for controlled self-renewal and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:11298–303. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703723104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Smith MM, Russell AK, Schiavinato A, Little CB. A hexadecylamide derivative of hyaluronan (HYMOVIS(R)) has superior beneficial effects on human osteoarthritic chondrocytes and synoviocytes than unmodified hyaluronan. J Inflamm (Lond). 2013;10:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-9255-10-26.CrossRef

47.

Band PA, Heeter J, Wisniewski HG, Liublinska V, Pattanayak CW, Karia RJ, et al. Hyaluronan molecular weight distribution is associated with the risk of knee osteoarthritis progression. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2015;23:70–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2014.09.017.CrossRef

48.

Migliore A, Frediani B, Gigliucci G, Foti C, Crimaldi S, de Lucia O, et al. Efficacy of a single intra-articular HYMOVIS ONE injection for managing symptomatic hip osteoarthritis: a 12-month follow-up retrospective analysis of the ANTIAGE register data. Orthop Res Rev. 2020;12:19–26. https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S239355.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.•

Pogliacomi F, Schiavi P, Paraskevopoulos A et al. When is indicated viscosupplementation in hip osteoarthritis? Acta Biomed. 2018;90:67–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i1-S.8000. A case series evaluating viscopplementation for hip osteoarthritis, that found improved patient reported outcome scores at 3 months and 6 months following treatment when compared to baseline measures.

50.

Migliore A, Massafra U, Bizzi E, Vacca F, Martin-Martin S, Granata M, et al. Comparative, double-blind, controlled study of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (Hyalubrix) injections versus local anesthetic in osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11:R183. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar2875.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.••

Ye Y, Zhou X, Mao S et al. Platelet rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid in patients with hip osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2018;53:279–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.078. A meta-analysis of RCTs comparing PRP and HA for patients with hip OA. They found that intraarticular PRP demonstrated statistically significant lower VAS scores at 2 months compared to HA.

52.••

Brander V, Skrepnik N, Petrella RJ et al. Evaluating the use of intra-articular injections as a treatment for painful hip osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group study comparing a single 6-mL injection of hylan G-F 20 with saline. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019;27:59–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2018.08.018. A multicenter, double-blind RCT with patients who had painful hip OA comparing a HA injection to a placebo injection. They demonstrated significant improvement in both the HA and saline cohorts according to the WOMAC-A1.

53.

Abate M, Scuccimarra T, Vanni D, Pantalone A, Salini V. Femoroacetabular impingement: is hyaluronic acid effective? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:889–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2581-1.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Lee YK, Lee GY, Lee JW, Lee E, Kang HS. Intra-articular injections in patients with Femoroacetabular impingement: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31:1822–7. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.11.1822.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Migliore A, Tormenta S, Lagana B, et al. Safety of intra-articular hip injection of hyaluronic acid products by ultrasound guidance: an open study from ANTIAGE register. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013;17:1752–9.PubMed

56.

Kolios G, Moodley Y. Introduction to stem cells and regenerative medicine. Respiration. 2013;85:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345615.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Saltzman BM, Kuhns BD, Weber AE, et al. Stem cells in orthopedics: a comprehensive guide for the general orthopedist. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016;45:280–326.

58.

Mohammadian M, Shamsasenjan K, Lotfi Nezhad P, Talebi M, Jahedi M, Nickkhah H, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells: new aspect in cell-based regenerative therapy. Adv Pharm Bull. 2013;3:433–7. https://doi.org/10.5681/apb.2013.070.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Chahla J, LaPrade RF, Mardones R, et al. Biological therapies for cartilage lesions in the hip: a new horizon. Orthopedics. 2016;39:e715–23. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20160623-01.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Murata Y, Uchida S, Utsunomiya H, Hatakeyama A, Nakashima H, Mori T, et al. Differentiation potential of synovial Mesenchymal stem cells isolated from hip joints affected by Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome versus osteoarthritis. Arthroscopy. 2020;36:2122–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2020.03.016.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Rajabzadeh N, Fathi E, Farahzadi R. Stem cell-based regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Investig. 2019;6:19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/sci.2019.06.04

62.

Sherman AB, Gilger BC, Berglund AK, Schnabel LV. Effect of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and stem cell supernatant on equine corneal wound healing in vitro. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8:120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-017-0577-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

63.•

Dall'Oca C, Breda S, Elena N et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cells injection in hip osteoarthritis: preliminary results. Acta Biomed. 2019;90:75–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i1-S.8084. A cohort study evaluating adipose derived MSC treatment in early-stage hip OA. At 6 months post-operatively, significant improvements were recorded in the patients HHS, WOMAC, and VAS scores.

64.

Rivera E, Seijas R, Rubio M, García-Balletbó M, Vilar JM, Boada PL, et al. Outcomes at 2-years follow-up after hip arthroscopy combining bone marrow concentrate. J Investig Surg. 2020;33:655–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2018.1535010.CrossRef

65.•

Wang Z, Sun QM, Zhang FQ et al. Core decompression combined with autologous bone marrow stem cells versus core decompression alone for patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2019;69:23–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.06.016. Meta-analysis of 14 RCTs comparing isolated surgical core decompression to bone marrow-derived MSC instilled into the core tract after decompression. Compared with core decompression alone, the MSC group demonstrated significant decrease in VAS score at 6 months.

66.

Malemud CJ. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in health and disease: an overview. Front Biosci. 2006;11:1696–701. https://doi.org/10.2741/1915.CrossRefPubMed

67.

Murphy G. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases. Genome Biol. 2011;12:233. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-11-233.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

68.

Bluteau G, Conrozier T, Mathieu P, Vignon E, Herbage D, Mallein-Gerin F. Matrix metalloproteinase-1, −3, −13 and aggrecanase-1 and -2 are differentially expressed in experimental osteoarthritis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1526:147–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4165(01)00122-2.CrossRefPubMed

69.

Schon J, Chahla J, Paudel S, Manandhar L, Feltham T, Huard J, et al. Expression profile of matrix metalloproteinases in the labrum of femoroacetabular impingement. Bone Joint Res. 2020;9:173–81. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.94.BJR-2019-0083.R1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Maffulli N, Del Buono A, Oliva F, et al. High-volume image-guided injection for recalcitrant patellar Tendinopathy in athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2016;26:12–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000242.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Karsdal MA, Michaelis M, Ladel C, Siebuhr AS, Bihlet AR, Andersen JR, et al. Disease-modifying treatments for osteoarthritis (DMOADs) of the knee and hip: lessons learned from failures and opportunities for the future. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;24:2013–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2016.07.017.CrossRef

72.

Brandt KD, Mazzuca SA, Katz BP, Lane KA, Buckwalter KA, Yocum DE, et al. Effects of doxycycline on progression of osteoarthritis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:2015–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21122.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: The Use of Biologics for Hip Preservation
verfasst von: Toufic R. Jildeh
Muhammad J. Abbas
Patrick Buckley
Kelechi R. Okoroha
Publikationsdatum: 23.01.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine / Ausgabe 2/2021
Elektronische ISSN: 1935-9748
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-021-09695-7

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

23.04.2024 | Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

The Use of Biologics for Hip Preservation

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

The Benefits and Harms of Early Mobilization and Supervised Exercise Therapy after Non-surgically Treated Proximal Humerus or Distal Radius fracture: A systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Augmented Reality in Orthopedic Surgery Is Emerging from Proof of Concept Towards Clinical Studies: a Literature Review Explaining the Technology and Current State of the Art

Orthopedic Surgery and Telemedicine in Times of COVID-19 and Beyond: a Review

Interval Return to Play Programs for the Tennis Athlete

Validity and Reliability of Interactive Virtual Reality in Assessing the Musculoskeletal System: a Systematic Review

Triquetral Fractures Overview

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie