nach oben

Supportive Care in Cancer

Erschienen in:

16.06.2018 | Review Article

The use of eHealth to promote physical activity in cancer survivors: a systematic review

verfasst von: Ciarán Haberlin, Tom O’Dwyer, David Mockler, Jonathan Moran, Dearbhaile M. O’Donnell, Julie Broderick

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 10/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Achieving adequate levels of physical activity (PA) and avoiding sedentary behaviour are particularly important in cancer survivors. eHealth, which includes, but is not limited to, the delivery of health information through Internet and mobile technologies, is an emerging concept in healthcare which may present opportunities to improve PA in cancer survivors. The aim of this systematic review was to explore the effects of eHealth in the promotion of PA among cancer survivors.

Methods

Suitable articles were searched using PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychInfo, Web of Science and SCOPUS databases using a combination of keywords and medical subject headings. Articles were included if they described an eHealth intervention designed to improve PA in cancer survivors. Two reviewers screened studies for inclusion.

Results

In total, 1065 articles were considered. Ten studies met eligibility criteria. A variety of platforms designed to increase PA were described in these studies: web application (app) (n = 5), web and mobile application (n = 2), mobile app (n = 1), website only (n = 1), e-mail based (n = 1). All studies measured PA using self-report outcome measures with the exception of one study which measured steps using a Fitbit. Meta-analysis was not performed because of variations in study design and interventions. All studies reported improvements in PA, with 8/10 studies reporting statistically significant changes.

Conclusion

The use of eHealth to promote PA in cancer survivors is a relatively new concept, which is supported by the recent emergent evidence described in this review. eHealth shows promise as a means of promoting and increasing daily PA, but further high-quality, longer term studies are needed to establish the feasibility and effectiveness of eHealth platforms aimed at that goal.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Stewart BW, Wild C. World cancer report 2014. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014

de Moor JS, Mariotto AB, Parry C, Alfano CM, Padgett L, Kent EE, Forsythe L, Scoppa S, Hachey M, Rowland JH (2013) Cancer survivors in the United States: prevalence across the survivorship trajectory and implications for care. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers Prevention : a Publication Am Assoc Cancer Res, Cosponsored Am Soc Preventive Oncology 22(4):561–570. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1356 CrossRef

Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Meyerhardt J, Courneya KS, Schwartz AL, Bandera EV, Hamilton KK, Grant B, McCullough M, Byers T, Gansler T (2012) Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin 62(4):242–274. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21142 CrossRef

Lynch BM, Dunstan DW, Winkler E, Healy GN, Eakin E, Owen N (2011) Objectively assessed physical activity, sedentary time and waist circumference among prostate cancer survivors: findings from the National Health and nutrition examination survey (2003-2006). Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 20(4):514–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2010.01205.x CrossRef

Broderick JM, Ryan J, O'Donnell DM, Hussey J (2014) A guide to assessing physical activity using accelerometry in cancer patients. Supportive Care Cancer : Official J Multinational Assoc Supportive Care Cancer 22(4):1121–1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2102-2 CrossRef

eHealth-Factsheet for European Parliament. World Health Organisation-Regional Office for Europe 2014. (accessed May 18, 2018).http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/261694/6.-eHealth,-Factsheet-for-European-Parliament.pdf

Griffiths F, Lindenmeyer A, Powell J, Lowe P, Thorogood M (2006) Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? A systematic review of the published literature. J Med Internet Res 8(2):e10. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.2.e10 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS (2010) A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med 51(3–4):214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Davies CA, Spence JC, Vandelanotte C, Caperchione CM, Mummery WK (2012) Meta-analysis of internet-delivered interventions to increase physical activity levels. Int J Behavioral Nutrition Physical Activity 9(52):52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-52 CrossRef

10.

Foster C, Richards J, Thorogood M, Hillsdon M (2013) Remote and web 2.0 interventions for promoting physical activity. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 9:Cd010395. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010395.pub2 PubMedCrossRef

11.

Aalbers T, Baars MA, Rikkert MG (2011) Characteristics of effective internet-mediated interventions to change lifestyle in people aged 50 and older: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev 10(4):487–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2011.05.001 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Connelly J, Kirk A, Masthoff J, MacRury S (2013) The use of technology to promote physical activity in type 2 diabetes management: a systematic review. Diabetic Medicine : J British Diabetic Assoc 30(12):1420–1432. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12289 CrossRef

13.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):1006–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter AC, Tugwell P, Moher D, Bouter LM (2007) Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-10 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett DR Jr, Tudor-Locke C, Greer JL, Vezina J, Whitt-Glover MC, Leon AS (2011) 2011 compendium of physical activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43(8):1575–1581. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Galvao DA, Pinto BM, Irwin ML, Wolin KY, Segal RJ, Lucia A, Schneider CM, von Gruenigen VE, Schwartz AL (2010) American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42(7):1409–1426. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e0c112 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Downs SH, Black N (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 52(6):377–384CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savović J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JAC (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Lee MK, Yun YH, Park HA, Lee ES, Jung KH, Noh DY (2014) A web-based self-management exercise and diet intervention for breast cancer survivors: pilot randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 51(12):1557–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.04.012 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Hatchett A, Hallam JS, Ford MA (2013) Evaluation of a social cognitive theory-based email intervention designed to influence the physical activity of survivors of breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology 22(4):829–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3082 CrossRefPubMed

21.

O'Carroll Bantum E, Albright CL, White KK, Berenberg JL, Layi G, Ritter PL, Laurent D, Plant K, Lorig K, Bantum EOC (2014) Surviving and thriving with cancer using a web-based health behavior change intervention: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 16(2):e54–e54. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3020 CrossRefPubMedCentral

22.

Uhm KE, Yoo JS, Chung SH, Lee JD, Lee I, Kim JI, Lee SK, Nam SJ, Park YH, Lee JY, Hwang JH (2017) Effects of exercise intervention in breast cancer patients: is mobile health (mHealth) with pedometer more effective than conventional program using brochure? Breast Cancer Res Treat 161(3):443–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4065-8 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Kanera IM, Willems RA, Bolman CA, Mesters I, Verboon P, Lechner L (2017) Long-term effects of a web-based cancer aftercare intervention on moderate physical activity and vegetable consumption among early cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 14(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0474-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Sturgeon KM, Dean LT, Heroux M, Kane J, Bauer T, Palmer E, Long J, Lynch S, Jacobs L, Sarwer DB, Leonard MB, Schmitz K (2017) Commercially available lifestyle modification program: randomized controlled trial addressing heart and bone health in BRCA1/2+ breast cancer survivors after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. J Cancer Survivorship : Res Practice 11(2):246–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0582-z CrossRef

25.

Short CE, Rebar A, James EL, Duncan MJ, Courneya KS, Plotnikoff RC, Crutzen R, Vandelanotte C (2017) How do different delivery schedules of tailored web-based physical activity advice for breast cancer survivors influence intervention use and efficacy? J Cancer Survivorship : Res Practice 11(1):80–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0565-0 CrossRef

26.

Hong YA, Goldberg D, Ory MG, Towne SD Jr, Forjuoh SN, Kellstedt D, Wang S (2015) Efficacy of a mobile-enabled web app (iCanFit) in promoting physical activity among older Cancer survivors: a pilot study. JMIR Cancer 1(1):e7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

McCarroll ML, Armbruster S, Pohle-Krauza RJ, Lyzen AM, Min S, Nash DW, Roulette GD, Andrews SJ, von Gruenigen VE (2015) Feasibility of a lifestyle intervention for overweight/obese endometrial and breast cancer survivors using an interactive mobile application. Gynecol Oncol 137(3):508–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.025 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Hooke MC, Gilchrist L, Tanner L, Hart N, Withycombe JS (2016) Use of a fitness tracker to promote physical activity in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer 63(4):684–689. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.25860 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Hooper P, Jutai JW, Strong G, Russell-Minda E (2008) Age-related macular degeneration and low-vision rehabilitation: a systematic review. Canadian J Ophthalmology J Canadien d'ophtalmologie 43(2):180–187. https://doi.org/10.3129/i08-001 CrossRef

30.

Michie S, Yardley L, West R, Patrick K, Greaves F (2017) Developing and evaluating digital interventions to promote behavior change in health and health care: recommendations resulting from an international workshop. J Med Internet Res 19(6):e232. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7126 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Duff OM, Walsh DM, Furlong BA, O'Connor NE, Moran KA, Woods CB (2017) Behavior change techniques in physical activity eHealth interventions for people with cardiovascular disease: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 19(8):e281. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7782 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Pham Q, Wiljer D, Cafazzo JA (2016) Beyond the randomized controlled trial: a review of alternatives in mHealth clinical trial methods. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 4(3):e107. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5720 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Harvey J, Dittus K, Mench E (2017) eHealth and behavioral weight loss interventions for female cancer survivors: A review. Women's health (London, England):1745505717731012. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745505717731012

34.

Agarwal S, LeFevre AE, Lee J, L'Engle K, Mehl G, Sinha C, Labrique A (2016) Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist. BMJ (Clinical Res ed) 352:i1174. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1174 CrossRef

35.

Oosterveen E, Tzelepis F, Ashton L, Hutchesson MJ (2017) A systematic review of eHealth behavioral interventions targeting smoking, nutrition, alcohol, physical activity and/or obesity for young adults. Prev Med 99:197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.01.009 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: The use of eHealth to promote physical activity in cancer survivors: a systematic review
verfasst von: Ciarán Haberlin
Tom O’Dwyer
David Mockler
Jonathan Moran
Dearbhaile M. O’Donnell
Julie Broderick
Publikationsdatum: 16.06.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4305-z

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

25.04.2024 | Nierenkarzinom | Nachrichten

Springer Medizin

The use of eHealth to promote physical activity in cancer survivors: a systematic review

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Update Onkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2018

Cancer care in regional Australia from the health professional’s perspective

Predictors of outpatients’ request for palliative care service at a medical oncology clinic of a German comprehensive cancer center

Advanced imaging and hospice use in end-of-life cancer care

The association between fatigue and pain symptoms and decreased physical activity after cancer

Health-related quality of life among cancer patients in their last year of life: results from the PROFILES registry

Clinicians’ perceptions of medication errors with opioids in cancer and palliative care services: a priority setting report

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Update Onkologie