Background
Owing to the worldwide concerns about lung cancer screening and the improvement of imaging modalities, the detection of small pulmonary nodules is increasing, especially the rate of simultaneous multiple nodules in a single patient [
1,
2]. In a study conducted by Marjolein et al. [
3], the baseline nodule count (the number of nodules per screen) was not associated with the probability of lung cancer and each nodule should be assessed separately.
For indeterminate nodules, excision biopsy, which removes the entire nodule at one setting, is an available solution either for patients or physicians, especially for anxious patients [
4]. Preoperative tumour localization can greatly improve the accuracy of resection and decrease the rate of conversion to thoracotomy [
5‐
14]. CT-guided microcoil localization of pulmonary nodule before video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has been considered as a safe and accurate technique with a high success rate and low complication rate [
5‐
14]. However, considering the procedure time, possible changes in body position, potential morbidity and complications, it is still a challenge to perform simultaneous localization of multiple nodules in one procedure.
Although the simultaneous localization has been performed or mentioned in prior studies [
15‐
19], few studies have focused on the microcoil utilization in simultaneous localization before VATS [
19]. Thus, we retrospectively summarized the experiences of CT-guided microcoil localization in lung nodules and evaluated the efficacy and safety of microcoil utility in simultaneous localization.
Results
The successful targeting, localization, and VATS rate for group A and B
For group A (multiple nodules per person), according to the CT scan obtained immediately after the marking procedure, two microcoils which were implanted on the pleural surface and did not reach the target parenchymal regions (one of the nodules was performed in early-stage without repeated puncture, the other was given repeated puncture), thus the successful targeting rate was 96.6% (56/58).Three microcoils dislodged into the thoracic cavity after initial deflation of the lung, thus the successful localization rate was 91.4% (53/58).
For group B (single nodule per person), four microcoils did not reach the target parenchymal region on CT scan and repeated punctures were performed immediately, thus the initial successful targeting rate was 98.2% (217/221). 12 microcoils dislodged into the thoracic cavity, 3 adhered to the parietal pleural and 1 fell on the diaphragmatic surface when the target lung collapsed, thus the successful localization rate was 91.0% (201/221).
For most of the nodules with failed targeting or localization mentioned above, subpleural haemorrhage or puckering of the visceral pleura combined with intraoperative palpation served as additional guidance for successful resection. Only two patients in group B were converted to open thoracotomy, one due to diffuse pleural adhesion, the other for inability to perform bronchoplasty after nodule resection with a video-assisted thoracoscope. The VATS success rate of group A and B was 100%, 99.1%, respectively.
Localization procedure time and procedure-related complication rates
Although the nodules in the patients of group A were all in the unilateral lung distribution, twelve patients (12/28; 42.9%) have changed body positions during interventional procedures. The procedure time of group A was significantly longer than that of group B (24 ± 7.5 vs. 13 ± 6 min, p < 0.001).
With respect to procedure-related complications, only minor complications (including localized pneumothorax and intrapulmonary haemorrhage; class A/B) were observed in the subjects of the two groups with no need for further treatment. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the rates of overall procedure-related complications between the two groups (32.8% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.771).
Pathological result
The detailed pathological results for the nodules were summarized in Table
3. Over half of the nodules in both groups were confirmed as malignant lesions (63.8% vs. 80.1%). The pathological results of multiple nodules in one same patient were inconsistent, which was revealed in half of the patients with multiple nodules (14/28).
Table 3
Summary of pathology in two groups
Malignant | | |
Invasive adenocarcinoma | 16 (27.6%) | 104 (47.1%) |
Minimally invasive adenocarcinoma | 15 (25.9%) | 58 (26.2%) |
Adenocarcinoma in situ | 3 (5.2%) | 10 (4.5%) |
Squamous cell carcinoma | 1 (1.7%) | 1(0.5%) |
Metastases | 0 | 3 (1.4%) |
Pulmonary carcinoid | 2 (3.4%) | 1(0.5%) |
Benign | | |
Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia | 6 (10.3%) | 10 (4.5%) |
Minute pulmonary meningothelial-like nodules | 0 | 2 (0.9%) |
Nodular lymphoid hyperplasia | 3 (5.2%) | 4 (1.8%) |
Benign intraparenchymal lymph node | 2 (3.4%) | 4 (1.8%) |
Localized pneumonitis | 3 (5.2%) | 13 (5.9%) |
Cryptococcosis | 2 (3.4%) | 3 (1.4%) |
Tuberculosis | 0 | 2(0.9%) |
Granulomas | 2 (3.4%) | 1(0.5%) |
Sclerosing hemangioma | 0 | 1 (0.5%) |
Fibrotic nodule | 3 (5.2%) | 4 (1.8%) |
Discussion
Results of the current study indicate that preoperative microcoil localization technology is a safe and effective method for simultaneous multiple nodules as well as a single pulmonary nodule, with similar successful targeting (96.6% vs. 98.2%) and localization rates (91.4% vs. 91.0%). Meanwhile, the rates of overall procedure-related complications showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups (32.8% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.771). The high success rate of final VATS further confirmed the feasibility of simultaneous microcoil preoperative localization of multiple nodules.
Actually, with respect to simultaneous localization of multiple pulmonary nodules, the potential challenges and problems have been well described in previous studies [
15‐
19], however, the authors adopted a hook-wire localization technique instead. The efficacy and safety of different localization techniques (including hook-wire, microcoil and lipiodol) for pulmonary nodules have been discussed and compared. Even though targeting success rates were similar amongst them, microcoil localization yielded the lowest complication rate [
11]. Compared to single localization, simultaneously targeting multiple nodules equates to repetitive procedures in a short time, which is not only associated with potential increased risk of failure and complication but also challenging for both operators and patients.
An integrated and ideal process of microcoil localization in our interventional unit is “one line with two dots”, which means two ends of the microcoil are tightly deployed in lung parenchyma and the pleural surface, respectively. In our opinion, the main reason for targeting failure may be attributed to the insufficient depth of insertion. The pleura tented towards nodule instead of clean penetration by puncture needle (as evidenced by pleural indentation). In such cases, the needle tip appears close to the nodule on imaging but has actually not reached the desired region. In other words, it is targeting failure. The flexibility of microcoil makes it easy to curl and retract once it is ejected from out of the puncture needle. If there is no enough distance between the two ends of the microcoil to resist its own elastic recoil force, it would retract into the parenchymal or deploy on the pleural surface. And in the latter situation, microcoil often dislodged from the pleural when the targeted lung collapsed, which is localization failure. In the current study, either” presence of pleural indentation” or, “pleura-microcoil distance” showed no significant differences between group A and B. Therefore, it is reasonable to observe similar success rates of targeting and localization in two groups (96.6% vs. 98.2%; 91.4% vs. 91.0%).
Smaller nodule size and lower GGO rate were observed in group A (multiple nodules group). However, microcoil was implanted adjacent to lesion rather than through it, nodule size or type seemed to rarely influence the progress of the procedure. Although it was suggested that priority should be given to the most clinically significant nodule (such as the lesion difficult to locate or with malignant features) [
15], we did not make such selection for puncture order when simultaneous localizations were performed. Although the rate of overall procedure-related complications was slightly higher in group A than that in group B (32.8% vs. 30.8%,
p = 0.771), only minor complications [
12] (including localized pneumothorax and intrapulmonary haemorrhage; class A/B) were developed in the two groups. There are two inevitable factors associated with the higher rate of complications in multiple nodules group: (1) multiple punctures in the ipsilateral lung [
22]; (2) patient’s body position changes during the procedure. Hence, to some degree, the complication rate varied within a reasonable range. In addition, microcoil’s flexibility flexible but firm quality avoids the occurrence of parenchyma tear and its thrombogenic fiber coating reduces the risk of haemorrhage [
13]. Therefore, in our opinion, it is a safe approach for simultaneous localization of multiple nodules.
Considering the nodule number and possible position changes needed during the procedures, it is not hard to understand that the duration of the localization procedures was longer for multiple nodules localization (24 ± 7.5 vs. 13 ± 6 min,
p < 0.001). However, the procedure time could be greatly reduced in unchanging patient positions (only 13 min needed in two patients with two-nodules each) during the process, and similar results were observed in Iguchi et al. [
15] study with hook wire system. On the other hand, even for a single nodule, the duration of the procedure would be delayed for variable factors, such as the shield of bone tissue nearby, irregular breathing pattern of patients. A much higher incidence of “the scapulae-covered” was observed in group B (42/221; 19.0%), resulting in 5 patients with a procedure time exceeding half an hour.
In addition, high rates of malignancy were demonstrated in both groups (63.8% [37/58] vs 80.5% [178/221]). Actually, most of the nodules were recommended for surgical treatment after the initial screening and follow-up period, which might account for the high malignant rate. Interestingly, it was observed that multiple nodules in the same patient showed inconsistent pathological results, and the ratio of such patients was up to 50% (14/28) in group A, which in turn emphasized the importance of separate assessment for lung nodules and necessity for simultaneous localization.
There are several limitations to the current study. First, it is a retrospective study that is limited to a single center. Second, the total number of patients with multiple nodules was relatively small. Third, there is a potential selection bias in the choice of patients with multiple nodules localization. Even though certain patients with multiple nodules would opt to have the most suspicious nodules localized rather than simultaneous localization for various reasons, we have not encountered that yet in our center. In other words, all the patients with multiple nodules we encountered selected simultaneous localization and radical resection. Fourth, occasionally, the proximal end of the microcoil detached from the visceral pleural surface and curled into the lung parenchyma. However, subpleural haemorrhage or puckering of the visceral pleura combined with intraoperative palpation served as additional guidance for successful resection. The results for those part of nodules were counted as successful localization in this study. Finally, only one localization technique was used in the study without comparison with other targeting techniques [
11], such as hook wire localization, percutaneous injection of dyes, or intraoperative imaging.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.