nach oben

Erschienen in:

19.11.2020 | Original Paper

The V-shaped subscapularis tenotomy for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

verfasst von: Daniel J. H. Henderson, Thomas J. Christensen, Austin Vo, Johannes E. Plath, Ion-Andrei Popescu, Laurent Lafosse

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Management of the subscapularis tendon during anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) remains controversial. In our unit, subscapularis tenotomy is the preferred technique; however, the potential for tendon gapping and failure is recognised. The purpose of this study is to describe and provide early clinical results of a novel, laterally based V-shaped tenotomy (VT) technique hypothesised to provide greater initial repair strength and resistance to gapping than a transverse tenotomy (TT), with both clinically and radiologically satisfactory post-operative tendon healing and function.

Methods

A retrospective study of patients who underwent primary TSA with VT over a three year period was performed using shoulder and subscapularis-specific outcome scores, radiographs, and ultrasound. A separate cohort of patients who underwent TSA using a subscapularis sparing approach was also reviewed to provide comparative clinical outcomes of a group with TSA and an un-violated subscapularis.

Results

Eighteen patients were reviewed at mean 30.4 months (± 11.7). Constant (78.2 ± 12.3), UCLA (8.4 ± 1.5), pain VAS (2.3 ± 2.8), and strength in internal rotation were no different from the comparison group. Likewise, neither were the clinical outcomes of range-of-motion, belly-press, lift-off, and shirt-tuck tests. One patient (5.5%) was found to have a failed subscapularis repair on ultrasound.

Conclusion

VT during TSA appears to provide healing rates at least equal to those reported for TT, and not dissimilar from those of lesser tuberosity osteotomy. Clinical outcomes are comparable to reported results in the literature for alternative techniques, and not different from those observed here in a comparison cohort with TSA performed without violating the subscapularis tendon.

VT therefore potentially offers a more effective and secure tendon repair than a traditional TT, with at least comparable clinical outcomes.

Wirth MA, Loredo R, Garcia G, Rockwood CA Jr, Southworth C, Iannotti JP (2012) Total shoulder arthroplasty with an all-polyethylene pegged bone-ingrowth glenoid component: a clinical and radiographic outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(3):260–267. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01400CrossRefPubMed

Wright TW, Flurin PH, Crosby L, Struk AM, Zuckerman JD (2015) Total shoulder arthroplasty outcome for treatment of osteoarthritis: a multicenter study using a contemporary implant. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 44(11):523–526

Deshmukh AV, Koris M, Zurakowski D, Thornhill TS (2005) Total shoulder arthroplasty: long-term survivorship, functional outcome, and quality of life. J Shoulder Elb Surg 14(5):471–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.02.009CrossRef

Miller S, Hazrati Y, Klepss S, Chiang A, Flatow E (2003) Loss of subscapularis function after total shoulder replacement: a seldom recognized problem. J Shoulder Elb Surg 1:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2003.128195CrossRef

Miller BS, Joseph TA, Noonan TJ, Horan MP, Hawkins RJ (2005) Rupture of the subscapularis tendon after shoulder arthroplasty: diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. J Shoulder Elb Surg 14(5):492–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.02.013CrossRef

Budge MD, Nolan EM, Wiater JM (2011) Lesser tuberosity osteotomy versus subscapularis tenotomy: technique and rationale. Oper Tech Orthop 21:39–43. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.oto.2010.09.010CrossRef

Moeckel B, Altchek D, Warren R, Wickiewicz T, Dines D (1993) Instability of the shoulder after arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:492–497PubMed

Lapner P, Pollock JW, Zhang T, Ruggiero S, Momoli F, Sheikh A, Athwal GS (2020) A randomized controlled trial comparing subscapularis tenotomy with peel in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 29(2):225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.09.028CrossRef

Ameziane Y, Schneider KN, Gosheger G, Mischke A, Schorn D, Rickert C, Liem D (2020) Single-row vs. double-row refixation of the subscapularis tendon after primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery:28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03423-5

10.

Virk MS, Aiyash SS, Frank RM, Mellano CS, Shewman EF, Wang VM, Romeo AA (2019) Biomechanical comparison of subscapularis peel and lesser tuberosity osteotomy for double-row subscapularis repair technique in a cadaveric arthroplasty model. J Orthop Surg 14(1):391. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1372-xCrossRef

11.

Levine WN, Munoz J, Hsu S, Byram IR, Bigliani LU, Ahmad CS, Kongmalai P, Shillingford JN (2019) Subscapularis tenotomy versus lesser tuberosity osteotomy during total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elb Surg 28(3):407–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.11.057CrossRef

12.

Buckley T, Miller R, Nicandri G, Lewis R, Voloshin I (2014) Analysis of subscapularis integrity and function after lesser tuberosity osteotomy versus subscapularis tenotomy in total shoulder arthroplasty using ultrasound and validated clinical outcomes. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:1309–1317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.009CrossRef

13.

Caplan J, Whitfield B, Neviaser R (2009) Subscapularis function after primary tendon to tendon repair in patients after replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19:193–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.10.019CrossRef

14.

DeFranco M, Higgins L, Warner J (2010) Subscapularis management in open shoulder surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18:707–717. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-201012000-00001CrossRefPubMed

15.

Gerber C, Yian E, Pfirrmann C, Zumstein M, Werner C (2005) Subscapularis muscle function and structure after total shoulder replacement with lesser tuberosity osteotomy and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1739–1745. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02788CrossRefPubMed

16.

Giuseffi SA, Wongtriratanachai P, Omae H, Cil A, Zobitz ME, An K-N, Sperling JW, Steinmann SP (2012) Biomechanical comparison of lesser tuberosity osteotomy versus subscapularis tenotomy in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21(8):1087–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.008CrossRef

17.

Jackson J, Cil A, Smith J, Steinmann S (2010) Integrity and function of the subscapularis after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19:1085–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.001CrossRef

18.

Jandhyala S, Unnitha A, Hughes S, Hong T (2011) Subscapularis tenotomy versus lesser tuberosity osteotomy during total shoulder replacement: a comparison of patient outcomes. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20:1102–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.03.019CrossRef

19.

Krishnan S, Stewart D, Reineck J, Lin K, Buzzell J, Burkhead W (2009) Subscapularis repair after shoulder arthroplasty: biomechanical and clinical validation of a novel technique. J Shoulder Elb Surg 18:184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.09.009CrossRef

20.

Lafosse L, Schnaser E, Haag M, Gobezie R (2009) Primary total shoulder arthroplasty performed entirely thru the rotator interval: technique and minimum two-year outcomes. J Shoulder Elb Surg 18:864–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.017CrossRef

21.

Lapner P, Sabri E, Rakhra K, Bell K, Athwal G (2012) Comparison of lesser tuberosity osteotomy to subscapularis peel in shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:2239–2246. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01365CrossRefPubMed

22.

Lapner P, Sabri E, Rakhra K, Bell K, Athwal G (2013) Healing rates and subscapularis fatty infiltration after lesser tuberosity osteotomy versus subscapularis peel for exposure during shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:396–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.05.031CrossRef

23.

Leung K-S, Chong WS, Chow DHK, Zhang P, Cheung W-H, Wong MWN, Qin L (2015) A comparative study on the biomechanical and histological properties of bone-to-bone, bone-to-tendon, and tendon-to-tendon healing: an Achilles tendon-calcaneus model in goats. Am J Sports Med 43(6):1413–1421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515576904CrossRefPubMed

24.

Choate WS, Kwapisz A, Momaya AM, Hawkins RJ, Tokish JM (2018) Outcomes for subscapularis management techniques in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg 27(2):363–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.08.003CrossRef

25.

Shields E, Ho A, Wiater JM (2017) Management of the subscapularis tendon during total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26(4):723–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.006CrossRef

26.

Peltz TS, Haddad R, Scougall PJ, Nicklin S, Gianoutsos MP, Oliver R, Walsh WR (2015) Structural failure mechanisms of common flexor tendon repairs. Hand Surg 20(3):369–379. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218810415400092CrossRefPubMed

27.

Barrie KA, Tomak SL, Cholewicki J, Wolfe SW (2000) The role of multiple strands and locking sutures on gap formation of flexor tendon repairs during cyclical loading. J Hand Surg [Am] 25(4):714–720

28.

Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164

29.

Amstutz H, Sew Hoy A, Clarke I (1981) UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 155:7–20

30.

Barth JR, Burkhart SS, De Beer JF (2006) The bear-hug test: a new and sensitive test for diagnosing a subscapularis tear. Arthroscopy 22(10):1076–1084PubMed

31.

Tokish JM, Decker MJ, Ellis HB, Torry MR, Hawkins RJ (2003) The belly-press test for the physical examination of the subscapularis muscle: electromyographic validation and comparison to the lift-off test. J Shoulder Elb Surg 12(5):427–430

32.

Gerber C, Krushell R (1991) Isolated rupture of the tendon of the subscapularis muscle: clinical features in 16 cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 73:389–394

33.

Warren R, Coleman S, Dines J (2002) Instability after arthroplasty: the shoulder. J Arthroplasty 17(4 Suppl. 1):28–31. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.32543CrossRefPubMed

34.

Sacevich N, Athwal G, Lapner P (2015) Subscapularis management in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Hand Surg [Am] 40:1009–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.01.032CrossRef

35.

Schrock JB, Kraeutler MJ, Crellin CT, McCarty EC, Bravman JT (2017) How should I fixate the subscapularis in total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review of pertinent subscapularis repair biomechanics. Should Elb 9(3):153–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573217700833CrossRef

36.

Savoie FH 3rd, Charles R, Casselton J, O'Brien MJ, Hurt JA 3rd (2015) The subscapularis-sparing approach in humeral head replacement. J Shoulder Elb Surg 24(4):606–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.07.020CrossRef

37.

Qureshi S, Hsiao A, Klug R, Lee E, Braman J, Flatow E (2008) Subscapularis function after total shoulder replacement: results with lesser tuberosity osteotomy. J Shoulder Elb Surg 17:68–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.018CrossRef

38.

Schrock JB, Kraeutler MJ, Houck DA, Provenzano GG, McCarty EC, Bravman JT (2016) Lesser tuberosity osteotomy and subscapularis tenotomy repair techniques during total shoulder arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of cadaveric studies. Clin Biomech 40:33–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.10.013CrossRef

39.

Armstrong A, Lashgari C, Teefey S, Menendez J, Yamaguchi K, Galatz L (2006) Ultrasound evaluation and clinical correlation of subscapularis repair after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 15:541–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.018CrossRef

40.

Ponce B, Ahluwalia R, Mazzocca A, Gobezie R, Warner J, Millett P (2005) Biomechanical and clinical evaluation of a novel lesser tuberosity repair technique in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(Suppl 2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00441CrossRefPubMed

41.

Van den Berghe G, Nguyen B, Patil S, D'Lima D, Mahar A, Pedowitz R, Hoenecke H (2008) A biomechanical evaluation of three surgical techniques for subscapularis repair. J Shoulder Elb Surg 17:156–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.016CrossRef

42.

Scalise J, Ciccone J, Iannotti J (2010) Clinical, radiographic, and ultrasonographic comparison of subscapularis tenotomy and lesser tuberosity osteotomy for total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010(92):1627–1634. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01461CrossRef

43.

Viinikainen AK, Goransson H, Huovinen K, Kellomaki M, Tormala P, Rokkanen P (2009) Bioabsorbable poly-L/D-lactide (PLDLA) 96/4 triple-stranded bound suture in the modified Kessler repair: an ex vivo static and cyclic tensile testing study in a porcine extensor tendon model. J Mater Sci Mater Med 20(9):1963–1969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-009-3747-8CrossRefPubMed

44.

Trail IA, Powell ES, Noble J (1989) An evaluation of suture materials used in tendon surgery. Hand Surg Br 14(4):422–427

45.

Thurman RT, Trumble TE, Hanel DP, Tencer AF, Kiser PK (1998) Two-, four-, and six-strand zone II flexor tendon repairs: an in situ biomechanical comparison using a cadaver model. J Hand Surg [Am] 23(2):261–265

Titel: The V-shaped subscapularis tenotomy for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
verfasst von: Daniel J. H. Henderson
Thomas J. Christensen
Austin Vo
Johannes E. Plath
Ion-Andrei Popescu
Laurent Lafosse
Publikationsdatum: 19.11.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04880-8

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

23.04.2024 | Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

The V-shaped subscapularis tenotomy for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Prevalence and risk factors of scapular stress fracture after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a multicentric retrospective study

The outcomes of stand alone polyetheretherketone cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Letter to the editor regarding “Comparison of clinical outcomes between arthroscopic debridement and conservative treatment of primary adhesive capsulitis of the hip”

The Ponseti method of treatment for neuromuscularand syndromic (non-idiopathic) clubfeet: evaluation of a programme-based approach at a mean follow-up of 5.8 years

Factors affecting outcome in the treatment of streptococcal periprosthetic joint infections: results from a single-centre retrospective cohort study

Extended curettage versus en bloc resection for the treatment of grade 3 giant cell tumour of the knee with pathologic fracture: a retrospective study

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie