Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 5/2014

01.05.2014 | Original Article

The value of vaginal packing in pelvic floor surgery: a randomised double-blind study

verfasst von: G. Thiagamoorthy, A. Khalil, L. Cardozo, S. Srikrishna, G. Leslie, D. Robinson

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 5/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of vaginal packing following pelvic floor surgery with regard to post-operative pain, bleeding and infection. This was a double-blind randomised study of women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy and/or pelvic floor repair at a tertiary urogynaecology unit.

Methods

The primary outcome of day 1 post-operative pain was assessed using the short-form McGill Pain score. Secondary outcomes were haematological and infective morbidity, evaluated using changes in full blood count, and cultures of midstream urine and high vaginal swabs. A transvaginal ultrasound scan to exclude pelvic haematoma was performed at 6 weeks in all women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with or without a pelvic floor repair.

Results

In total, 190 women were recruited: mean age 58.3 years (27–91 years), mean body mass index 27.4 kg/m2 and median parity 3. Women were randomised into the ‘pack’ (n = 86) and ‘no pack’ (n = 87) arms with no demographic differences between the groups. No statistically significant differences in the post-operative pain scores or secondary outcome measures were demonstrated. Incidence of haematoma formation (14.8 % no pack, 7.3 % pack, p = 0.204) was not statistically significant. There were three clinically significant complications in the no pack group and none in the pack group.

Conclusions

This is the first study to examine pain in association with post-operative vaginal packing. There is no evidence to suggest that packing increases pain scores or post-operative morbidity. A trend towards increased haematoma and significant complications was seen in the no pack group. As vaginal packing does no harm and may be of some benefit it may be argued that packing should be recommended as routine clinical practice.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V, Salvatore S (1997) A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:1374–1379PubMedCrossRef Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V, Salvatore S (1997) A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:1374–1379PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapoor DS, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Oliver R (2009) Conservative versus surgical management of prolapse: what dictates patient choice? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(10):1157–1161PubMedCrossRef Kapoor DS, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Oliver R (2009) Conservative versus surgical management of prolapse: what dictates patient choice? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(10):1157–1161PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89(4):501–506PubMedCrossRef Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89(4):501–506PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutton C (1997) Hysterectomy: a historical perspective. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 11(1):1–22PubMedCrossRef Sutton C (1997) Hysterectomy: a historical perspective. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 11(1):1–22PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Senn N (1895) The early history of vaginal hysterectomy. JAMA XXV(12):476–482CrossRef Senn N (1895) The early history of vaginal hysterectomy. JAMA XXV(12):476–482CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalogirou D, Antoniou G, Karakitsos P, Zioris C, Salampasis C (1996) Comparison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Study of complications. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 23(3):161–167PubMed Kalogirou D, Antoniou G, Karakitsos P, Zioris C, Salampasis C (1996) Comparison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Study of complications. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 23(3):161–167PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Conturso R, Radaelli L, Turtulici P, Alegente G, De Lalla F (1989) Prophylactic mezlocillin in vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized study. J Chemother 1(4 Suppl):1033–1034PubMed Conturso R, Radaelli L, Turtulici P, Alegente G, De Lalla F (1989) Prophylactic mezlocillin in vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized study. J Chemother 1(4 Suppl):1033–1034PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Engel K, Schmidt W, Sonntag HG, Kees F (1989) Comparative clinical and pharmacokinetic aspects of cefotetan versus cefoxitin plus metronidazole in vaginal hysterectomy. J Chemother 1(4 Suppl):1053–1056PubMed Engel K, Schmidt W, Sonntag HG, Kees F (1989) Comparative clinical and pharmacokinetic aspects of cefotetan versus cefoxitin plus metronidazole in vaginal hysterectomy. J Chemother 1(4 Suppl):1053–1056PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolling DR Jr, Plunkett GD (1973) Prophylactic antibiotics for vaginal hysterectomies. Obstet Gynecol 41(5):689–692PubMed Bolling DR Jr, Plunkett GD (1973) Prophylactic antibiotics for vaginal hysterectomies. Obstet Gynecol 41(5):689–692PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kauer FM, Wijma J, Manson WL (1990) Vaginal hysterectomy: cefuroxime, metronidazole or both? Pharm Weekbl Sci 12(6A):284–288PubMedCrossRef Kauer FM, Wijma J, Manson WL (1990) Vaginal hysterectomy: cefuroxime, metronidazole or both? Pharm Weekbl Sci 12(6A):284–288PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris WJ (1995) Early complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 50:795–805PubMedCrossRef Harris WJ (1995) Early complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 50:795–805PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider J, Benito R (1988) Extensive gynecologic surgical procedures upon patients more than 75 years of age. Surg Gynecol Obstet 167:497–500PubMed Schneider J, Benito R (1988) Extensive gynecologic surgical procedures upon patients more than 75 years of age. Surg Gynecol Obstet 167:497–500PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kjølhede P, Halili S, Löfgren M (2011) Vaginal cleansing and postoperative infectious morbidity in vaginal hysterectomy. A register study from the Swedish National Register for Gynecological Surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(1):63–71PubMedCrossRef Kjølhede P, Halili S, Löfgren M (2011) Vaginal cleansing and postoperative infectious morbidity in vaginal hysterectomy. A register study from the Swedish National Register for Gynecological Surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(1):63–71PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Batista CS, Osako T, Clemente EM, Batista FC, Osako MT (2012) Observational evaluation of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics in 117 Brazilian women without uterine prolapse undergoing vaginal hysterectomy. Int J Womens Health 4:505–510PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Batista CS, Osako T, Clemente EM, Batista FC, Osako MT (2012) Observational evaluation of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics in 117 Brazilian women without uterine prolapse undergoing vaginal hysterectomy. Int J Womens Health 4:505–510PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dane C, Dane B, Cetin A, Yayla M (2009) Sonographically diagnosed vault hematomas following vaginal hysterectomy and its correlation with postoperative morbidity. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2009:91708PubMed Dane C, Dane B, Cetin A, Yayla M (2009) Sonographically diagnosed vault hematomas following vaginal hysterectomy and its correlation with postoperative morbidity. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2009:91708PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomson AJ, Farquharson RG (2000) Vault haematoma and febrile morbidity after vaginal hysterectomy. Hosp Med 61(8):535–538PubMed Thomson AJ, Farquharson RG (2000) Vault haematoma and febrile morbidity after vaginal hysterectomy. Hosp Med 61(8):535–538PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Moustafa M, Elgonaid WE, Massouh H, Beynon WG (2008) Evaluation of closure versus non-closure of vaginal vault after vaginal hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol 28(8):791–794PubMedCrossRef Moustafa M, Elgonaid WE, Massouh H, Beynon WG (2008) Evaluation of closure versus non-closure of vaginal vault after vaginal hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol 28(8):791–794PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wood C, Maher P, Hill D (1997) Bleeding associated with vaginal hysterectomy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 37(4):457–461PubMedCrossRef Wood C, Maher P, Hill D (1997) Bleeding associated with vaginal hysterectomy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 37(4):457–461PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Daly LE, Bourke GJ (2000) Interpretation and uses of medical statistics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York Daly LE, Bourke GJ (2000) Interpretation and uses of medical statistics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Strand LI, Ljunggren AE, Bogen B, Ask T, Johnsen TB (2008) The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire as an outcome measure: test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change. Eur J Pain 12(7):917–925PubMedCrossRef Strand LI, Ljunggren AE, Bogen B, Ask T, Johnsen TB (2008) The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire as an outcome measure: test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change. Eur J Pain 12(7):917–925PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tincello DG (1998) Ultrasound detection of vault haematoma following vaginal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105(12):1336–1337PubMedCrossRef Tincello DG (1998) Ultrasound detection of vault haematoma following vaginal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105(12):1336–1337PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubin MR, Pletcher SD (2009) Postoperative packing after septoplasty: is it necessary? Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42(2):279–285PubMedCrossRef Dubin MR, Pletcher SD (2009) Postoperative packing after septoplasty: is it necessary? Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42(2):279–285PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bajaj Y, Kanatas AN, Carr S, Sethi N, Kelly G (2009) Is nasal packing really required after septoplasty? Int J Clin Pract 63(5):757–759PubMedCrossRef Bajaj Y, Kanatas AN, Carr S, Sethi N, Kelly G (2009) Is nasal packing really required after septoplasty? Int J Clin Pract 63(5):757–759PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyuron B (1989) Is packing after septorhinoplasty necessary? A randomized study. Plast Reconstr Surg 84(1):41–44, discussion 45–6PubMedCrossRef Guyuron B (1989) Is packing after septorhinoplasty necessary? A randomized study. Plast Reconstr Surg 84(1):41–44, discussion 45–6PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bugten V, Nordgård S, Skogvoll E, Steinsvåg S (2006) Effects of nonabsorbable packing in middle meatus after sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 116(1):83–88PubMedCrossRef Bugten V, Nordgård S, Skogvoll E, Steinsvåg S (2006) Effects of nonabsorbable packing in middle meatus after sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 116(1):83–88PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Glavind K, Mørup L, Madsen H, Glavind J (2007) A prospective, randomised, controlled trial comparing 3 hour and 24 hour postoperative removal of bladder catheter and vaginal pack following vaginal prolapse surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86(9):1122–1125PubMedCrossRef Glavind K, Mørup L, Madsen H, Glavind J (2007) A prospective, randomised, controlled trial comparing 3 hour and 24 hour postoperative removal of bladder catheter and vaginal pack following vaginal prolapse surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86(9):1122–1125PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The value of vaginal packing in pelvic floor surgery: a randomised double-blind study
verfasst von
G. Thiagamoorthy
A. Khalil
L. Cardozo
S. Srikrishna
G. Leslie
D. Robinson
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2014
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2264-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2014

International Urogynecology Journal 5/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.