Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 9/2016

30.11.2015 | Breast

The Yield of Pre-operative Breast MRI in Patients According to Breast Tissue Density

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To determine the yield of pre-operative breast MRI according to breast tissue density.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of 665 consecutive patients who underwent breast MRI in 2012 for pre-operative staging of biopsy-proven breast cancer, 582 of whom had digital mammograms available within 6 months of the MRI were evaluated for breast tissue density and additional lesions seen on breast MRI not identified on mammography. Lesions that could change surgical management if positive were confirmed by percutaneous biopsy.

Results

MRI identified additional lesions changing surgical management in 19 of 61 patients (31%) with fat density, 94/269 (35%) with scattered fibroglandular parenchyma, 89/210 (42%) with heterogeneously dense breasts, and 26/42 (62%) with dense breasts. There was a significant difference between breast density and number of additional findings on MRI (p<0.0001). Patients with dense breasts were 5.1x more likely to have additional findings on MRI in comparison to patients with fat density breasts (95% CI 2.2-12.1, p=0.0001).

Conclusion

Patients with dense breasts are more likely to have additional findings on pre-operative breast MRI in comparison to patients with fat tissue density breasts; if selective use of pre-operative MRI is necessary, patients with dense breast tissue density seem to show the maximal benefit.

Highlights

Preoperative MRI detects many additional lesions not seen on mammography.
Increased breast density correlates with more findings on preoperative breast MRI (p<0.0001).
Extremely dense breasts are more likely to have additional findings on MRI.
Increased breast density is associated with more MRI findings that changed management.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 292:2735–2742CrossRefPubMed Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 292:2735–2742CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kriege M, Brekelmans CTM, Boetes C et al (2004) Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Eng J Med 351:427–437CrossRef Kriege M, Brekelmans CTM, Boetes C et al (2004) Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Eng J Med 351:427–437CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C et al (2006) Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Cancer 106:2318–2326CrossRefPubMed Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C et al (2006) Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Cancer 106:2318–2326CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476CrossRefPubMed Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:8469–8476CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Leach MO, Boggis CRM, Dixon AK et al (2005) Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365:1769–1778CrossRefPubMed Leach MO, Boggis CRM, Dixon AK et al (2005) Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365:1769–1778CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Le-Petross HT, Whitman GJ, Atchley DP et al (2011) Effectiveness of alternating mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for screening women with deleterious BRCA mutations at high risk of breast cancer. Cancer 117:3900–3907CrossRefPubMed Le-Petross HT, Whitman GJ, Atchley DP et al (2011) Effectiveness of alternating mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for screening women with deleterious BRCA mutations at high risk of breast cancer. Cancer 117:3900–3907CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lord SJ, Lei W, Craft P et al (2007) A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 43:1905–1917CrossRefPubMed Lord SJ, Lei W, Craft P et al (2007) A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 43:1905–1917CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sardanelli F, Podo F, Santoro F et al (2011) Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high breast cancer risk Italian 1 study): final results. Invest Radiol 46:94–105CrossRefPubMed Sardanelli F, Podo F, Santoro F et al (2011) Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high breast cancer risk Italian 1 study): final results. Invest Radiol 46:94–105CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D (2008) Systematic review: Using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 148:671–679CrossRefPubMed Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D (2008) Systematic review: Using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 148:671–679CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA et al (2004) Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292:1317–1325CrossRefPubMed Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA et al (2004) Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292:1317–1325CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Anastassiades O, Iakovou E, Stavridou N, Gogas J, Karameris A (1993) Multicentricity in breast cancer: a study of 366 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 99:238–243CrossRefPubMed Anastassiades O, Iakovou E, Stavridou N, Gogas J, Karameris A (1993) Multicentricity in breast cancer: a study of 366 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 99:238–243CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, Hendriks JH (1985) Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas: implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 56:979–990CrossRefPubMed Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, Hendriks JH (1985) Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas: implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 56:979–990CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz GF, Patchefsky AS, Feig SA, Shaber GS, Schwartz AB (1980) Clinically occult breast cancer: multicentricity and implications for treatment. Ann Surg 191:8–12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schwartz GF, Patchefsky AS, Feig SA, Shaber GS, Schwartz AB (1980) Clinically occult breast cancer: multicentricity and implications for treatment. Ann Surg 191:8–12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz GF, Patchesfsky AS, Feig SA, Shaber GS, Schwartz AB (1980) Multicentricity of non-palpable breast cancer. Cancer 45:2913–2916CrossRefPubMed Schwartz GF, Patchesfsky AS, Feig SA, Shaber GS, Schwartz AB (1980) Multicentricity of non-palpable breast cancer. Cancer 45:2913–2916CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberman L, Morris E, Dershaw D, Abramson A, Tan L (2002) MR Imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR 180:901–910CrossRef Liberman L, Morris E, Dershaw D, Abramson A, Tan L (2002) MR Imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR 180:901–910CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Esserman L, Wolverton D, Hylton N (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging for primary breast cancer management: current role and new applications. Endocr Relat Cancer 9:141–153CrossRefPubMed Esserman L, Wolverton D, Hylton N (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging for primary breast cancer management: current role and new applications. Endocr Relat Cancer 9:141–153CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of MRI in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248–3258CrossRefPubMed Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of MRI in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248–3258CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Gutierrez L, Ness Aiver MS et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830–849CrossRefPubMed Berg WA, Gutierrez L, Ness Aiver MS et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830–849CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Dao TN, Lamont JP, Knox SM (2007) Clinical utility of breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients presenting with primary breast cancer. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 20:227–230 Dao TN, Lamont JP, Knox SM (2007) Clinical utility of breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients presenting with primary breast cancer. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 20:227–230
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiener JI, Schilling KJ, Adami C, Obuchowski NA (2005) Assessment of suspected breast cancer by MRI: a prospective clinical trial using a combined kinetic and morphologic analysis. AJR 184:878–886CrossRefPubMed Wiener JI, Schilling KJ, Adami C, Obuchowski NA (2005) Assessment of suspected breast cancer by MRI: a prospective clinical trial using a combined kinetic and morphologic analysis. AJR 184:878–886CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ et al (2003) MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology 226:773–778CrossRefPubMed Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ et al (2003) MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology 226:773–778CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman CD, Blume JD, Thickman D et al (2005) Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) trial. J Surg Oncol 92:9–15CrossRefPubMed Lehman CD, Blume JD, Thickman D et al (2005) Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) trial. J Surg Oncol 92:9–15CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK et al (2007) MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:1295–1303CrossRefPubMed Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK et al (2007) MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:1295–1303CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria K, Cambic A, Hanse N et al (2007) Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arachnol Surg 142(5):441–445CrossRef Bilimoria K, Cambic A, Hanse N et al (2007) Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arachnol Surg 142(5):441–445CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Braun M, Polcher M, Schrading S et al (2008) Influence of preoperative MRI on the surgical management of patients with operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 111:179–187CrossRefPubMed Braun M, Polcher M, Schrading S et al (2008) Influence of preoperative MRI on the surgical management of patients with operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 111:179–187CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Tuner R, Macaskill P, et al. (2014) An individual person data meta-analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol Houssami N, Tuner R, Macaskill P, et al. (2014) An individual person data meta-analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrow M, Walters J, Morris E (2011) MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet 378:1804–1811CrossRefPubMed Morrow M, Walters J, Morris E (2011) MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet 378:1804–1811CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Turbull L, Brown S, Olivier C et al (2010) Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 375:563–571CrossRef Turbull L, Brown S, Olivier C et al (2010) Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 375:563–571CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sung JS, Li J, Da Costa G et al (2014) Preoperative Breast MRI for early-stage breast cancer: effect on surgical and long-term outcomes. AJR 202:1376–1382CrossRefPubMed Sung JS, Li J, Da Costa G et al (2014) Preoperative Breast MRI for early-stage breast cancer: effect on surgical and long-term outcomes. AJR 202:1376–1382CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA et al (2003) BI-RADS: Mammography, 4th edition. In: D’Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM (eds) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS – Breast Imaging Atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA et al (2003) BI-RADS: Mammography, 4th edition. In: D’Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM (eds) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS – Breast Imaging Atlas. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Freer PE (2015) Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening. Radiographics 35(2):302–315CrossRefPubMed Freer PE (2015) Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening. Radiographics 35(2):302–315CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Girardi V, Carbognin G, Camera L (2011) Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: breast MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Radiol Med 116:1226–1238CrossRefPubMed Girardi V, Carbognin G, Camera L (2011) Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: breast MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Radiol Med 116:1226–1238CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Gutierrez R, DeMartini W, Silbergeld J et al (2011) High Cancer Yield and Positive Predictive Value: Outcomes at a Center Routinely Using Preoperative Breast MRI for Staging. AJR 196:W93–W99CrossRefPubMed Gutierrez R, DeMartini W, Silbergeld J et al (2011) High Cancer Yield and Positive Predictive Value: Outcomes at a Center Routinely Using Preoperative Breast MRI for Staging. AJR 196:W93–W99CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA et al (2005) MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883. J Surg Oncol 92:32–38CrossRefPubMed Schnall MD, Blume J, Bluemke DA et al (2005) MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883. J Surg Oncol 92:32–38CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P (2004) Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR 183(4):1149–1157CrossRefPubMed Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P (2004) Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR 183(4):1149–1157CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang N, Schiller DE, Crystal P et al (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: Its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 16(11):3000–3009CrossRefPubMed Hwang N, Schiller DE, Crystal P et al (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: Its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 16(11):3000–3009CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkinson LS, Given-Wilson R, Hall T, Potts H, Sharma AK, Smith E (2005) Increasing the diagnosis of multifocal primary breast cancer by the use of bilateral whole-breast ultrasound. Clin Radiol 60(5):573–578CrossRefPubMed Wilkinson LS, Given-Wilson R, Hall T, Potts H, Sharma AK, Smith E (2005) Increasing the diagnosis of multifocal primary breast cancer by the use of bilateral whole-breast ultrasound. Clin Radiol 60(5):573–578CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon WK, Noh DY, Im JG (2002) Multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast cancers: bilateral whole-breast US in the preoperative evaluation of patients. Radiology 224(2):569–576CrossRefPubMed Moon WK, Noh DY, Im JG (2002) Multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast cancers: bilateral whole-breast US in the preoperative evaluation of patients. Radiology 224(2):569–576CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Gilbreath PL (2000) Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation. Radiology 214(1):59–66CrossRefPubMed Berg WA, Gilbreath PL (2000) Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation. Radiology 214(1):59–66CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Debald M, Abramian A, Nemes L et al (2015) Who may benefit from preoperative breast MRI? A single-center analysis of 1102 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 153(3):531–537CrossRefPubMed Debald M, Abramian A, Nemes L et al (2015) Who may benefit from preoperative breast MRI? A single-center analysis of 1102 consecutive patients with primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 153(3):531–537CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Philpotts et al. (2011) Optimizing Use of Preoperative Breast MRI. RSNA oral presentation Philpotts et al. (2011) Optimizing Use of Preoperative Breast MRI. RSNA oral presentation
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Biglia N, Bounous VE, Martincich L et al (2011) Role of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) versus conventional imaging for breast cancer presurgical staging in young women or with dense breast. Euro J Surg Oncol 37(3):199–204CrossRef Biglia N, Bounous VE, Martincich L et al (2011) Role of MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) versus conventional imaging for breast cancer presurgical staging in young women or with dense breast. Euro J Surg Oncol 37(3):199–204CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicholson BT, LoRusso AP, Smolkin M et al (2006) Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions. Acad Radiol 13(9):1143–1149CrossRefPubMed Nicholson BT, LoRusso AP, Smolkin M et al (2006) Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions. Acad Radiol 13(9):1143–1149CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The Yield of Pre-operative Breast MRI in Patients According to Breast Tissue Density
Publikationsdatum
30.11.2015
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4118-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2016

European Radiology 9/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.