Introduction
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is considered to become the third-leading cause of death worldwide by 2020, is currently recognized as a major global public health challenge. In COPD, the major mechanisms underlying chronic airflow limitation are the perpetual loss of alveolar structure, which causes airspace enlargement, and the destruction of the lung parenchyma and the loss of elastic recoil [
1]. The loss of alveolar structure and airspace enlargement are key pathological changes in COPD [
2], as a result of the development and progression of pulmonary airflow limitation. In the progression of COPD, a critical role is played by the apoptosis of lung epithelial cells, which results in the destruction of the alveolar structure and in emphysema [
3]. However, no effective treatment is available for preventing the decline of pulmonary function in patients with COPD. Therefore, the key to treating COPD is to repair damaged lung tissue and regenerate the lost alveoli.
In mammals, the alveolar epithelium is composed of type I alveolar epithelial cells (AECI) and type II alveolar epithelial cells (AECII). AECII are multifunctional secretory cells that are characterized by the presence of morphological lamellar bodies containing pulmonary surfactant proteins (SPs) and lipids. AECII can differentiate into AECI in the alveoli and proliferate to maintain their own number through mitosis [
4]. As progenitors of AECI, AECII play vital roles in synthesizing and secreting lung surfactants, which include SPA, SPB, SPC, and SPD, reducing the surface tension of the alveoli, maintaining normal alveolar homeostasis and gas exchange, and improving lung tissue repair [
4],[
5].
Stem cell therapy has attracted considerable attention because of its potential for application in the treatment of COPD, pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis, and other respiratory diseases [
6]-[
8]. By serving as the source of new epithelial cell populations, the resident lung progenitor cells can repair the injured lung epithelium
in vivo[
9]. However, the regenerative capacity of the lung is widely recognized to decline with aging and as a result of extensive damage such as that in COPD; this extensive lung damage might not be repaired appropriately by the endogenous stem niches [
10]. Moreover, no evidence is available to suggest that endogenous stem cells can function in alleviating chronic lung disease. However, over the past decade, major breakthroughs in the research on exogenous stem cells have brought new hope for the treatment of COPD. Currently, the exogenous stem cells used mainly include embryonic stem cells (ESCs), bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BMMSCs), and amniotic fluid-derived stromal cells (AFSCs). ESCs are pluripotent stem cells that can be induced to differentiate into various types of cells and ESCs exhibit substantial capacity to proliferate indefinitely [
11],[
12]. For example, ESCs can be induced to differentiate into AECII both
in vitro and
in vivo[
13],[
14]. Similarly, BMMSCs alleviate the destruction of lung tissues by also differentiating into AECII
in vivo[
15],[
16]. However, the challenges involved in acquiring large numbers of BMMSCs from the bone marrow and the low efficiency of their differentiation have restricted research on the use of BMMSCs in regenerative medicine.
Another potential source of cells for lung regeneration
in vivo are mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), which include BMMSCs, amniotic fluid-derived MSCs (AFMSCs), adipose-derived MSCs, and cord blood-derived MSCs; this is because MSCs exhibit the capacity to differentiate into alveolar epithelial cells [
17]-[
19]. MSCs have previously been shown to exert beneficial effects on various animal models of respiratory diseases because the cells possess immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory abilities; the effects of MSCs have been demonstrated in diseases such as COPD [
20],[
21] and asthma [
22],[
23] and in lung fibrosis caused by interstitial lung disease [
24] and lung injury caused by acute respiratory distress syndrome [
25]. Huh
et al.[
21] reported that MSC-based cell therapy repaired cigarette smoke-induced emphysema in rats after the injection of cells for 2 months. Recently, a placebo-controlled, randomized trial of MSC treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD was published; after the infusion of allogeneic MSCs in COPD patients, no deaths, toxicity, or serious adverse reactions related to the MSC therapy occurred, but the circulating levels of C-reactive protein in the patients were markedly decreased [
26].
De Coppi
et al.[
27] reported for the first time that AFSCs can be obtained from discarded amniocentesis specimens and that these cells possess the potential to differentiate widely into neural cells, adipocytes, osteocytes, endotheliocytes, hepatocytes, and cardiomyocytes [
28]-[
30]. Thus, AFSCs are recognized as new multipotent stem cells that can be used in regenerative medicine without raising concerns regarding ethical problems or tumorigenesis [
31],[
32]. Furthermore, Carraro
et al.[
33] showed that AFSCs integrated into the embryonic lung tissues of mice, differentiated into lung epithelial cells, and expressed thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF1) after lung injury
in vivo. AFMSCs exhibit the characteristics of MSCs
in vitro, by expressing molecules such as CD73, CD90, CD105, and CD166 [
34],[
35]. AFMSCs were previously shown to be capable of differentiating into AECII-like cells
in vitro, which indicated that AFMSCs can potentially be used in lung-tissue regenerative therapy [
35]. Moreover, rat AFMSCs (rAFMSCs) were shown to secrete neurotrophic factors and thereby promote the regeneration of the injured sciatic nerve [
36] and to over-express the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and thus improve hepatic function
in vivo in rats with fulminant hepatic failure [
37]. However, whether rAFMSCs can exert therapeutic effects on lung injury caused by emphysema is unknown. In this study, we transplanted rAFMSCs into rats with emphysema and then investigated whether the rAFMSCs integrated into lung tissue, expressed AECII-specific markers, inhibited AECII apoptosis, and alleviated lung injury caused by emphysema.
Materials and methods
Animals
We purchased 15 pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats (body weight, 300 ~ 350 g, at 12–14 days of pregnancy) and 60 female Sprague-Dawley rats (body weight, 180–200 g) from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). All animal protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital.
Isolation and culture of rAFMSCs
We isolated rAFMSCs from pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats as described by Pan
et al.[
36]. The rats were deeply anesthetized using 10.0% chloral hydrate, and then 15 independent amniotic fluid samples (2 mL each) were harvested from fetal male rats by using 22-gauge needles. Each sample was filtered through a 200-mesh filter and centrifuged for 10 min at 1,500 rpm. The cells were resuspended in low-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) and 4 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and then maintained in 6-well plates and grown in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO
2. To remove non-adherent cells, the supernatants were replaced for the first time after 5 days of culture. The adherent cell clones that exhibited spindle-shaped growth were detached using cell scrapers and transferred to new 6-well plates. When the cells reached 70%-80% confluence, they were detached using 0.25% trypsin (Sigma) and cultivated in 25-cm
2 culture flasks (Corning Inc.-Life Science, Oneonta, NY, USA) and labeled as P1 (passage 1). We used P3 cells to conduct the experiments described next. To measure the expression of octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (
Oct-4) mRNA, we used reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Rat lung fibroblasts (RFL-6; ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were used as the negative control.
Flow cytometry analysis
We used flow cytometry in order to detect the specific surface antigens of rAFMSCs (P3). Cells in suspension were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated antibodies against CD14, CD19, CD34, CD44, CD45, and CD90, and phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated antibodies against CD29, CD73, CD105, and CD166 (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) at 4°C for 1.5 h. Thereafter, the cells were analyzed using a flow cytometer (Guava EasyCyte; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA); the related isotype controls were used as the negative control.
Differentiation potential of rAFMSCs
To induce rAFMSCs to differentiate into adipogenic and osteogenic cell lineages, cells were cultured for 3 weeks in either an adipogenic medium [α-modified minimum essential medium (α-MEM; Gibco) containing 10% FBS and 1μmol/L dexamethasone, 5μg/mL insulin, 0.5 mmol/L isobutylmethylxanthine, and 60μmol/L indomethacin (all 4 reagents from Sigma)], or an osteogenic medium (α-MEM containing 10% FBS and 0.1μmol/L dexamethasone, 10 mmol/L β-glycerol phosphate, and 50μmol/L ascorbate; Sigma). In the case of adipogenic differentiation, intracellular accumulation of lipid droplets was examined by means of Oil Red O staining, whereas in the case of osteogenic differentiation, alizarin red staining was used to observe calcium mineralization.
Chromosomal analysis
We prepared P3 and P15 rAFMSCs for the purpose of chromosomal analysis, as previously described [
38]. The rAFMSCs were treated with 0.1 mg/mL colchicine (Sigma) at 37°C for 3 h and then incubated with 0.06 mol/L KCl at 37°C for 30 min. Next, metaphase chromosomes were analyzed using G banding and Giemsa staining; we examined a minimum of 20 metaphases in each sample by using an 80i microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and then analyzed them by using Genikon software (Nikon).
Animal model and rAFMSC transplantation
We maintained 60 female Sprague-Dawley rats at 21°C-25°C and 40%-60% relative humidity in a 12-h light/dark cycle and provided them with water and food ad libitum. After 1 week of conditioning, the rats were randomly sorted into 4 groups (15 rats/group), control (group I), emphysema (group II), emphysema + rAFMSC transplantation for 20 days (group III), and emphysema + rAFMSC transplantation for 40 days (group IV).
A custom-designed cigarette-smoke chamber [
39] and lipopolysaccharide (LPS; Sigma) stimuli were used for generating the rat model of emphysema [
40]. In this study, we used commercially available cigarettes (XiongShi; China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial. Co., LTD, China) that contained 0.7 mg of nicotine and 8 mg of tar per cigarette. We performed the cigarette-smoke exposure and intratracheal LPS instillation as follows, rats in groups II, III, and IV were placed in the cigarette-smoke chamber (60°cm × 50°cm × 40°Cm), and after the rats had settled, the smoke of 5 cigarettes was successively delivered in 12 min. After an interval of 10 min, the smoke of 5 new cigarettes was delivered into the chamber. The rats were exposed to 20 cigarettes over 90 min once a day for each smoke exposure and for 7 days per week for 12 weeks. During the exposure, the concentration of carbon monoxide was maintained almost constant, after 30, 60, and 90 min exposures, the concentrations were 402 ± 19, 399 ± 12, and 408 ± 14 ppm, respectively, as measured using a carbon monoxide detector (CTB-999; INDUSTRIAL SCIENTIFIC. Co., LTD, Shanghai, China). On the last day of the 4
th and 8
th weeks, each rat in groups II, III, and IV was temporarily anesthetized with 5.0% isoflurane, after which the rats were intratracheally instilled with 200μL of 1μg/μL LPS in sterile phosphate-buffered solution (PBS). The rats in group I received clean air throughout the experimental period.
Y-chromosome-positive rAFMSCs were transplanted into the rats of the emphysema groups. Each rat in groups III and IV was intratracheally instilled with rAFMSCs (4 × 106 in 200μL of PBS), and after transplantation for 20 days and 40 days, the rats were sacrificed by intraperitoneal injection of 10.0% chloral hydrate. The left lungs were removed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for use in histological examinations and immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining. The right lungs were stored at -80°C for use in PCR and western blotting analyses.
Histological examinations
The left lungs were perfused intratracheally with 4% paraformaldehyde at a constant pressure of 25°Cm H
2O for 1 h, and then immersed in paraformaldehyde for 24 h to fix them completely. After fixation, the left-lung blocks were embedded in paraffin and cut into 4-μm-thick sections. Three discontinuous paraffin-embedded sections of each lung-tissue sample were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) in order to assess the morphological changes in the lungs. We examined 5 fields of view in each of the 3 sections from each lung sample by using a light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and we avoided selecting fields containing bronchi and large blood vessels. We obtained the mean linear intercept (MLI), which indicates the average distance between opposing walls of a single alveolus and is a measure of pulmonary airspace enlargement [
41]. Moreover, we obtained the mean alveolar airspace (MAA), which is also a measure of pulmonary airspace enlargement [
39].
Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from each right-lung sample by using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The final RNA purity and concentrations were determined using a spectrophotometer. Next, cDNA was synthesized from the total RNA by using the PrimeScript
TM RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Otsu, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis was performed using previously described parameters [
35] and real-time PCR amplification equipment (MX3000P; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The following primers were used (Invitrogen),
SPA (GenBank, NM_001270647.1), 5'-TCGGTGTCCCAGGATTTAG-3' (forward) and 5'-CAGGGTGGCTGCTGTTAGT-3' (reverse);
SPC (GenBank, NM_017342.2), 5'-CAGACACCATCGCTACCTT-3' (forward) and 5'-TAGCCAAAGCCTCAAGACT-3' (reverse);
TTF1 (GenBank, XM_006233882.1), 5'-CATCAGATTCTGCAAACAATGG-3' (forward) and 5'-AGGAGTCTGGCCTTCAATCA-3' (reverse);
GAPDH (GenBank, NM_017008.4), 5'-GTTCAACGGCACAGTCAAG-3' (forward) and 5'-GCCAGTAGACTCCACGACAT-3' (reverse). All analyses were performed in triplicate. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (
GAPDH) was used as a reference gene. The relative expression of
SPA,
SPC, and
TTF1 mRNAs was calculated using the 2
-ΔΔCt method.
Immunohistochemistry
We performed immunohistochemical staining in order to examine the expression of SPA and SPC proteins in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of each left-lung sample. Sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated using a graded series of ethanol, and this was followed by a high-pressure antigen-retrieval step. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubating sections with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 15 min. The sections were next blocked with 10% goat serum (ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China) for 1 h, incubated (overnight, 4°C) with rabbit anti-rat SPA or SPC primary antibodies (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA), and then stained with an anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (SP-9000 kit; ZSGB-BIO) and 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB; ZSGB-BIO). Hematoxylin was used for counterstaining. To calculate the percentages of SPA- and SPC-positive cells, we used a light microscope and counted the SPA- and SPC-positive cells present among a total of 400 cells in 10 different lung samples, and we used 10 randomly selected alveolus fields in the case of each lung sample.
Western blotting
Proteins were extracted from each right-lung sample by homogenizing the samples in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mmol/L Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 1% sodium deoxycholate, and 1% Triton X-100; Invitrogen) containing a protease-inhibitor cocktail (1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mg/L leupeptin, and 1 mg/L aprotinin; Beyotime, Nantong, China). The homogenates were centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000 rpm and the supernatants were collected. The protein concentration in samples was determined by using a micro BCA protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Next, equal amounts of protein (20μg) from each sample were heated at 100°C for 5 min and then separated by electrophoresing them on 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. The separated proteins were electrotransferred to nitrocellulose membranes and blocked with Tris-buffered saline containing Tween-20 (TBS-T) and 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 2 h at room temperature. The membranes were then incubated with primary antibodies against SPA and SPC (1:200 in TBS-T; Santa Cruz) and β-actin (1:1000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) overnight at 4°C on an orbital shaker. After washing 3 times for 10 min each in TBS-T, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (Pierce) for 1 h at room temperature on an orbital shaker. After washing 5 times with TBS-T, immunoreactive bands on the membrane were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence solution (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, UK), visualized by means of X-ray-film exposure, and analyzed using an UVP-GDS8000 gel-analysis system (Ultra-Violet Products Ltd., Cambridge, UK). Protein expression levels were analyzed by performing densitometry and the values were normalized relative to those measured for β-actin, which was used as the loading control.
Reverse-transcription PCR
Total RNA was extracted from each right-lung sample as described above and PCR was performed using previously described parameters [
42] and PCR amplification equipment (MJ-PTC200; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The following primers were used,
Oct-4 (GenBank, NM_001009178.2), 5'-GAAGGATGTGGTCCGAGTGT-3' (forward) and 5'-GTGAAGTGAGGGCTCCCATA-3' (reverse); Sex determining region Y (
Sry) (GenBank, NM_012772.1), 5'-GCAATGGGACAACAACCTAC-3' (forward) and 5'-TGTTTCTGCTGTAGTGGGTATC-3' (reverse);
GAPDH (GenBank, NM_017008.4), 5'-GTTCAACGGCACAGTCAAG-3' (forward) and 5'-GCCAGTAGACTCCACGACAT-3' (reverse).
GAPDH was amplified for the purpose of normalizing the target genes in each group. The
Oct-4,
Sry, and
GAPDH PCR products were 183, 138, and 136 bp long, respectively. The amplified PCR products were electrophoretically separated on 1.5% agarose gels, and the band densities were determined using the UVP-GDS8000 gel-analysis system.
TUNEL/SPC immunofluorescence staining
AECII apoptosis in each group was detected using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP-mediated nick-end labeling (TUNEL; Beyotime)/SPC double-staining as described [
43]. Paraffin-embedded left-lung sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated and then subjected to the high-pressure antigen-retrieval step and proteinase K (20μg/mL) treatment for 20 min. The sections were next incubated with the rabbit anti-rat SPC primary antibody (1:300; Santa Cruz) overnight at 4°C and then with the FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:500; Santa Cruz) for 1 h at 37°C, and this was followed by incubation with 50μL of the TUNEL reaction mixture at 37°C for 1 h in a humidified chamber. Lastly, the sections were counterstained with 4',6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma) and examined using a fluorescence microscope (Axio vert; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). We randomly selected 100 images from 10 different lung samples, and then chose 10 discontinuous areas of each lung sample for the analysis. The percentage of AECII apoptosis was determined by dividing the number of apoptotic AECII, which were positive for both TUNEL and SPC, by the total number of DAPI-positive cells.
In situ hybridization and immunofluorescence
Fluorescence
in situ hybridization (FISH) for Y chromosome (Y-FISH) was performed as described [
33] by using the
Sry mRNA
in situ hybridization detection kit (BOSTER, Wuhan, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Paraffin-embedded left-lung sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated, blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min, and digested with proteases (diluted using 3% citric acid) for 15 min at room temperature. The sections were rinsed 3 times in PBS, and then 20μL of the prehybridization solution was incubated with each section for 4 h at 42°C in a humidified chamber; to perform hybridization, we incubated 20μL of
Sry oligonucleotide probes with the sections overnight at 42°C, with the samples being sealed with coverslips (BOSTER). After removing the coverslips, the sections were immersed sequentially in 2× standard saline citrate (SSC; BOSTER) for 10 min, 0.5× SSC for 15 min, 0.2× SSC for 30 min (all at 37°C), and then incubated with cy3-conjugated rat IgG streptavidin-biotin complex (SABC-cy3; Eton Bioscience Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) for 45 min at 37°C. Lastly, the sections were counterstained with DAPI and examined using an IX71 fluorescence microscope (Olympus). To combine this hybridization with immunostaining for SPC, sections were incubated with the anti-rat SPC primary antibody (1:500; Santa Cruz) overnight at 4°C and then with the FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:500; Santa Cruz) for 1 h at room temperature. We randomly selected 100 images from 10 different lung samples and analyzed 10 discontinuous areas in each lung sample. The percentage of differentiation was determined by counting the cells that were positive for both Y-FISH and SPC and dividing this number by the total number of DAPI-positive cells.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as means ± SEM and were analyzed for statistical significance by means of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent-sample t-tests. Multiple comparisons in ANOVA were performed using the Student-Newman-Keuls test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Discussion
No drugs are currently available for reversing the progression of COPD and the chronic airflow limitation and emphysema associated with it. Therefore, novel techniques that can be used for effectively treating COPD must be explored. Cigarette smoking is the primary risk factor for COPD, which is related to the inflammatory reactions of lung tissues [
44]. LPS, which is a structural component of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria, plays key roles in injuring the epithelium and activating inflammatory cells to secrete inflammatory factors and proteases, which contribute to the pathogenesis of chronic bronchitis and emphysema [
45]. In this study, emphysema was induced in rats by exposure to cigarette smoke and LPS.
Over the past few decades, stem cells have been used in regenerative medicine [
27],[
33],[
36],[
46]. Previously, AFSCs were shown to differentiate into lung epithelial cells after implantation into lung tissue
in vivo[
33]. AFMSCs, which can be readily isolated from amniotic fluid, are multipotent stem cells that exhibit the characteristics of MSCs [
35],[
36]. In this study, we isolated and identified rAFMSCs, which were derived from fetal male rats, and we showed that after transplantation, rAFMSCs could alleviate the lung injury caused by emphysema.
We isolated and purified rAFMSCs and analyzed their phenotypic characteristics, and the results revealed that the rAFMSCs did not express the surface antigens CD14, CD19, CD34, and CD45, but strongly expressed CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, and CD166; this agrees with the results of Pan et al. [
36]. Oct-4, a POU transcription factor, is a marker of pluripotent stem cells [
47] that disappears quickly after cells differentiate [
48]. Oct-4 has been reported to be expressed in embryonal carcinoma cells, ESCs, embryonic germ cells, and amniotic fluid stem cells, and to play a vital role in determining the fate of stem cells [
49]-[
51]. Here,
Oct-4 mRNA was expressed in rAFMSCs at considerably higher levels than in rat lung fibroblasts, which revealed that rAFMSCs exhibit the stem cells’ characteristics for differentiation. The isolated rAFMSCs could be induced to differentiate into adipocytes and osteocytes, which demonstrated that the differentiation potential of rAFMSCs was similar to that of AFSCs [
28],[
29].
We transplanted rAFMSCs into rats for 20 and 40 days by means of intratracheal instillation and then examined the morphological changes in lung tissue. The results revealed that the MLI and MAA measured in lung tissues were markedly improved in groups III and IV when compared with group II (emphysema group). Thus, we hypothesize that rAFMSC transplantation can be used for repairing the lung injury caused by emphysema, and that this transplantation stimulates the expression of pulmonary SPs in rats with emphysema.
SPs include SPA, SPB, SPC, and SPD and are synthesized and secreted by AECII in lung tissue. SPA and SPC, which are secreted specifically by AECII [
52],[
53], play critical roles in reducing the surface tension of alveoli. In this study, lung tissues expressed both SPA and SPC mRNAs and proteins after rAFMSC transplantation (groups III and IV) at levels markedly higher than those in the emphysema group (group II), which agreed with the morphological changes observed. TTF1 is vital for the induction of respiratory cells, including AECII, and it is expressed in lung tissues after AFSC transplantation [
33],[
54]. Here, the
TTF1 mRNA level in groups III and IV was considerably higher than that in group II.
Sry is the Y-chromosome-specific gene that determines the sex of animals [
33]. Our results showed that
Sry mRNA was strongly expressed after rAFMSC transplantation (groups III and IV), but it was not expressed in the absence of transplantation (groups I and II), which indicated that the transplanted rAFMSCs had integrated into lung tissues. Moreover, when we examined AECII apoptosis, the results showed that the percentage of TUNEL and SPC double-positive cells (apoptotic AECII) after rAFMSC integration was substantially lower than the percentage in the emphysema group.
To locate and count the AECII-like cells that were differentiated from the rAFMSCs in lung tissues, we performed immunostaining and observed SPC expression by rAFMSCs, and the identity of these cells was confirmed by means of Y-FISH in the lung tissues. The results indicated that rAFMSCs in the lung tissues might be able to differentiate into AECII-like cells or induce local regeneration of the lung alveolar epithelium after transplantation.
Authors’ contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments, YQL, CG, WLX, JPY. Performed the experiments, YQL, CG, WLX, JPY, YJX, XJH, HQT. Analyzed the data, JPY, CC, YYM, YJX. Wrote the paper, YQL, CG. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.