Background
Methods
Searching of studies
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Research data extraction and analysis
Study |
N
| Male | Female | Age (average) | Resource of tumor | Volume of MPE(N) | Quality of Life (KPS) | End point | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NSCLC | SCLC | Gastrointestinal tumor | Breast cancer | Lymphoma | Others | ||||||||
Changjie H 2001 [15] | 60 | 44 | 16 | 30–76 | 27 | 4 | 11 | 10 | 8 | Moderate-large | > 60 | ORR, DCR, AEs | |
Xiuzhi Y 2001 [16] | 60 | 24 | 36 | 40–75 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | – | – | ORR, DCR, AEs | |
Zhuo S 2004 [17] | 62 | – | – | – | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | – | > 50 | ORR, DCR, QOL, AEs | |
Junyan W 2005 [18] | 82 | 57 | 25 | 33–78 | 68 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 4 | – | > 50 | ORR, DCR, AEs | |
Haiying X 2009 [19] | 63 | 35 | 28 | 35–71 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | > 60 | ORR, DCR, AEs | |
Xiaoxia H 2009 [20] | 72 | – | – | – | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | Small (8) Moderate (39) Large (25) | > 60 | ORR, DCR, QOL, AEs | |
Lizheng C 2009 [21] | 86 | 62 | 24 | 25–75 | 23 | 0 | 27 | 17 | 8 | 11 | Large(29) Moderate(57) | > 60 | ORR, DCR, AEs |
Jinguang C 2009 [22] | 62 | 28 | 34 | 41–77 | 52 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | > 60 | ORR, DCR, AEs |
Junfeng W 2010 [23] | 82 | 48 | 34 | 30–80 | 54 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 13 | Large(56) Moderate(26) | > 60 | ORR, DCR, AEs | |
Jingping Z 2010 [24] | 124 | 80 | 44 | 47–73 | 124 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Large(84) Moderate(40) | > 60 | ORR, DCR, AEs | |
Cheng X 2010 [25] | 62 | 28 | 34 | 19–81 | 40 | 0 | 9 | 13 | – | > 70 | ORR, DCR, AEs | ||
Fang S 2011 [26] | 60 | 31 | 29 | 38–76 | 41 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 0 | Large(34) Moderate(17) | > 40 | ORR, DCR, QOL, AEs |
Xueling L 2011 [27] | 68 | 40 | 28 | 30–75 | 40 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 10 | – | > 60 | ORR, DCR, AEs | |
Yan Q 2011 [28] | 76 | 45 | 31 | 46–77 | 76 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | > 60 | ORR, DCR, AEs | |
Li J 2013 [29] | 73 | 40 | 33 | 35–74 | 31 | 16 | 26 | 0 | 0 | Large(41) Moderate(32) | > 60 | ORR, DCR, QOL, AEs | |
Lijie H 2014 [30] | 60 | 38 | 22 | 39–78 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Large | > 50 | ORR, DCR, QOL, AEs | |
Miao H 2016 [31] | 61 | 40 | 21 | 38–75 | 42 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 5 | Large | > 60 | ORR, DCR, AEs | |
Baohua Y 2017 [32] | 66 | 35 | 31 | 42–76 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | > 60 | RR, DCR |
Efficacy evaluation criteria for treating MPE used in the included studies
The implementation process of intervention
Study | Trial group (N) | Control Group(N) | Interventions (Groups) | Treatment cycle | Termination of treatment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin alone | |||||
Changjie H 2001 [15] | 30 | 30 | Cisplatin: 50 mg + NS 50 mL IL-2: 2 million units+NS 30 mL | Cisplatin 50 mg + NS 50 mL | 1/week | > 2 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Xiuzhi Y 2001 [16] | 40 | 20 | Cisplatin: 40 mg + NS 50 mL IL-2: 2 million units+NS 30 mL | Cisplatin 40 mg + NS 50 mL | 1/week | > 2 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Zhuo S 2004 [17] | 32 | 30 | Cisplatin: 60 mg + NS 30 mL IL-2: 2 million units+NS 30 mL | Cisplatin 60 mg + NS 30 mL | 1/week | > 2 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Junyan W 2005 [18] | 48 | 34 | Cisplatin: 80-100 mg + NS 30 mL IL-2: 2–3 million units+NS 30 mL | Cisplatin 80-100 mg + NS 30 mL | 1/week | > 3 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Haiying X 2009 [19] | 35 | 28 | Cisplatin: 60 mg + NS 40 mL IL-2: 2 million units+NS 20 mL | Cisplatin 60 mg + NS 40 mL | 1/week | > 2 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Xiaoxia H 2009 [20] | 37 | 35 | Cisplatin: 100 mg + NS 50 mL IL-2: 1 million units+NS 30 mL | Cisplatin 100 mg + NS 50 mL | 1/week | > 2 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Lizheng C 2009 [21] | 46 | 40 | Cisplatin: 50 mg + NS 50 mL IL-2: 2–3 million units+NS 50 mL | Cisplatin 50 mg + NS 50 mL | 1/week | > 2 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Jinguang C 2009 [22] | 31 | 31 | Cisplatin: 60 mg + NS 50 mL IL-2: 2 million units+NS 50 mL | Cisplatin 60 mg + NS 50 mL | 1/week | > 3 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Junfeng W 2010 [23] | 41 | 41 | Cisplatin: 60-80 mg + NS 50 mL IL-2: 2–3 million units+NS 50 mL | Cisplatin 60-80 mg + NS 50 mL | 1/week | > 3 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Jingping Z 2010 [24] | 63 | 61 | Cisplatin: 40-60 mg + NS 50 mL IL-2: 1 million units+NS 40 mL | Cisplatin 40–60 + NS 40 mL | 1/week | > 3 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Cheng X 2010 [25] | 31 | 31 | Cisplatin: 60-100 mg + NS 50 mL IL-2: 1–2 million units+NS 50 mL | Cisplatin 60-100 mg + NS 50 mL | 1/week | > 1 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Fang S 2011 [26] | 30 | 30 | Cisplatin: 60 mg + NS 40 mL IL-2: 2 million units+NS 40 mL | Cisplatin 60 mg + NS 40 mL | 1/week | > 3 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Xueling L 2011 [27] | 34 | 34 | Cisplatin: 60 mg + NS 50 mL IL-2: 2 million units+NS 50 mL | Cisplatin 60 mg + NS 50 mL | 1/week | > 3 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Yan Q 2011 [28] | 41 | 35 | Cisplatin: 60 mg + NS 40 mL IL-2: 2 million units+NS 40 mL | Cisplatin 60 mg + NS 40 mL | 1/week | > 3 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Li J 2013 [29] | 38 | 35 | Cisplatin: 60-80 mg + NS 50 mL IL-2: 1–2 million units+NS 20 mL | Cisplatin 60-80 mg + NS 50 mL | 1/week | > 3 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Lijie H 2014 [30] | 30 | 30 | Cisplatin: 40-60 mg + NS 50 mL IL-2: 2 million units+NS 50 mL | Cisplatin 40-60 mg + NS 50 mL | 1/week | > 2 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Miao H 2016 [31] | 31 | 30 | Cisplatin: 60 mg + NS 50 mL IL-2: 2–3 million units+NS 30 mL | Cisplatin 60 mg + NS 50 mL | 1/week | > 3 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
Baohua Y 2017 [32] | 33 | 33 | Cisplatin: 70-80 mg + NS 50 mL IL-2: 2–3 million units+NS 30 mL | Cisplatin 70-80 mg + NS 50 mL | 1/week | > 3 cycles, or pleural effusion disappeared |
The overall quality evaluation of included studies
Statistical methods and analysis
Results
A total of 18 studies were recruited in this meta-analysis
General characteristics of included studies reflected the balance of various parameters between the two groups
Included studies showed a good consistency and comparability in administration and implementation of study
Quality evaluation showed that included studies had a moderate to high study quality
Study | Region | Sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blind | Outcome data | Selective outcome reporting | Other sources of bias | ITT | Risk of bias |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Changjie H 2001 [15] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Xiuzhi Y 2001 [16] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Zhuo S 2004 [17] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Junyan W 2005 [18] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Haiying X 2009 [19] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Xiaoxia H 2009 [20] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Lizheng C 2009 [21] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Jinguang C 2009 [22] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Junfeng W 2010 [23] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Jingping Z 2010 [24] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Cheng X 2010 [25] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Fang S 2011 [26] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Xueling L 2011 [27] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Yan Q 2011 [28] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Li J 2013 [29] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Lijie H 2014 [30] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Miao H 2016 [31] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Unclear risk of bias |
Baohua Y 2017 [32] | Single center | Random number table | Unclear | Clear | Yes | No | Clear | Yes | Low risk of bias |
Included studies did not show a significant heterogeneity
Thoracic injection of cisplatin plus IL-2 showed a higher ORR as compared with cisplatin alone
Study | Study size (N) | Study design | Efficacy of therapy | Improvement of QOL (N; %) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 1 | Group 2 | |||||||||||
Group 1 | Group 2 | CR | PR | SD | PD | CR | PR | SD | PD |
N
| % |
N
| % | |||
Changjie H 2001 [15] | 30 | 30 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 16 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 16 | – | – | – | – | ||
Xiuzhi Y 2001 [16] | 40 | 20 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 17 | 19 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 5 | – | – | – | – | ||
Zhuo S 2004 [17] | 32 | 30 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 14 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 20 | 63 | 11 | 37 |
Junyan W 2005 [18] | 48 | 34 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 25 | 14 | 9 | 12 | 8 | 14 | – | – | – | – | ||
Haiying X 2009 [19] | 35 | 28 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 10 | 18 | 7 | 3 | 12 | 13 | – | – | – | – | ||
Xiaoxia H 2009 [20] | 37 | 35 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 15 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 7 | 9 | 29 | 78.3 | 19 | 54.3 |
Lizheng C 2009 [21] | 46 | 40 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 26 | 13 | 7 | 13 | 10 | 17 | – | – | – | – | ||
Jinguang C 2009 [22] | 31 | 31 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 12 | 17 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 11 | – | – | – | |||
Junfeng W 2010 [23] | 41 | 41 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 29 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 15 | 3 | 16 | – | – | – | – |
Jingping Z 2010 [24] | 63 | 61 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 25 | 30 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 22 | 4 | 23 | – | – | – | – |
Cheng X 2010 [25] | 41 | 41 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 21 | 17 | 3 | 13 | 8 | 20 | – | – | – | – | ||
Fang S 2011 [26] | 30 | 30 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 9 | 17 | 4 | 7 | 14 | 9 | 26 | 86.7 | 24 | 80 | ||
Xueling L 2011 [27] | 34 | 34 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 19 | 11 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 16 | – | – | – | – | ||
Yan Q 2011 [28] | 41 | 35 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 12 | 24 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 12 | 4 | 13 | – | – | – | – |
Li J 2013 [29] | 38 | 35 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 12 | 13 | 13 | 4 | 11 | 20 | 27 | 71.1 | 17 | 48.6 | ||
Lijie H 2014 [30] | 30 | 30 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 12 | 13 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 13 | 26 | 86.7 | 19 | 63.3 | ||
Miao H 2016 [31] | 31 | 30 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 11 | 15 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 13 | – | – | – | – | ||
Baohua Y 2017 [32] | 33 | 33 | Cisplatin+IL-2 | Cisplatin | 11 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 14 | 6 | 5 | – | – | – | – |
Thoracic injection of cisplatin plus IL-2 displayed a higher DCR as compared with cisplatin alone
NRR of cisplatin alone was higher than that of cisplatin plus IL-2 through thoracic injection for treating MPE
Thoracic injection of cisplatin plus IL-2 improved the QOL of patients with MPE compared with cisplatin alone
Cisplatin plus IL-2 displayed the same incidence rate on myelotoxicity, nausea/vomiting and chest pain compared with cisplatin alone
Study | Study size (N) | Myelotoxicity | Nausea/vomiting | Chest pain | Fever | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 1 | Group 2 | |||||||||||
Group 1 | Group 2 |
N
| % |
N
| % |
N
| % |
N
| % |
N
| % |
N
| % |
N
| % |
N
| % | |
Changjie H 2001 [15] | 30 | 30 | – | – | – | – | 13 | 43.3 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | 10 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 |
Xiuzhi Y 2001 [16] | 40 | 20 | 14 | 35 | 11 | 55 | 5 | 12.5 | 5 | 25 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Zhuo S 2004 [17] | 32 | 30 | 3 | 9.3 | 3 | 10 | 5 | 15.6 | 4 | 13.3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Junyan W 2005 [18] | 48 | 34 | – | – | – | – | 12 | 25 | 8 | 23.5 | – | – | – | – | 18 | 37.5 | 11 | 32.4 |
Haiying X 2009 [19] | 35 | 28 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 28.6 | 8 | 22.9 | 9 | 32.1 | – | – | – | – | 12 | 36.4 | 1 | 4 |
Xiaoxia H 2009 [20] | 37 | 35 | 13 | 35.1 | 10 | 25 | 11 | 29.7 | 11 | 31.4 | – | – | – | – | 4 | 10.8 | 3 | 8.6 |
Lizheng C 2009 [21] | 46 | 40 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12 | 26.1 | 4 | 10 | – | – | – | – |
Jinguang C 2009 [22] | 31 | 31 | – | – | – | – | 6 | 20 | 8 | 26 | 5 | 16 | 3 | 10 | 6 | 19 | 2 | 6 |
Junfeng W 2010 [23] | 41 | 41 | – | – | – | – | 19 | 46.4 | 21 | 51.2 | 6 | 14.6 | 8 | 19.5 | 21 | 51.2 | 15 | 36.3 |
Jingping Z 2010 [24] | 63 | 61 | 4 | 6.3 | 3 | 4.9 | 7 | 11.1 | 2 | 3.3 | 12 | 19.5 | 9 | 14.8 | 13 | 20.6 | 4 | 6.6 |
Cheng X 2010 [25] | 41 | 41 | 6 | 19.4 | 8 | 25.8 | 11 | 35.5 | 7 | 26.6 | 7 | 22.6 | 4 | 12.9 | 9 | 29 | 7 | 26.6 |
Fang S 2011 [26] | 30 | 30 | 2 | 6.6 | 3 | 10 | 4 | 13.3 | 6 | 20 | 7 | 23.3 | 5 | 16.6 | 12 | 40 | 9 | 30 |
Yan Q 2011 [28] | 34 | 34 | 2 | 4.8 | 2 | 5.7 | 2 | 4.8 | 3 | 8.6 | 5 | 12.2 | 6 | 17.1 | 3 | 7.3 | 4 | 11.4 |
Li J 2013 [29] | 41 | 35 | 16 | 42.1 | 13 | 37.1 | 9 | 23.7 | 8 | 22.8 | 6 | 15.8 | 4 | 11.4 | 2 | 7.1 | 3 | 8.5 |
Lijie H 2014 [30] | 38 | 35 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 4 | 13.3 | 3 | 10 | 6 | 20 | 3 | 10 |
Miao H 2016 [31] | 30 | 30 | 4 | 12.9 | 5 | 16.6 | 11 | 35.5 | 10 | 33.3 | 24 | 77.4 | 20 | 66.6 | – | – | – | – |
P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | P < 0.05 |