Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 7/2017

17.11.2016 | Original Article

Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal humeral and glenoid geometry using MicroScribe 3D digitizer

verfasst von: Wejdan H. Owaydhah, Mohammad A. Alobaidy, Abdulrahman S. Alraddadi, Roger W. Soames

Erschienen in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | Ausgabe 7/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To understand the geometry of the proximal humerus and glenoid fossa to facilitate the design of components used in shoulder arthroplasty. The aim is to evaluate the geometry of the proximal humerus and glenoid fossa and their relationship using a MicroScribe 3D digitizer.

Methods

Scans and measurements were obtained from 20 pairs of dry proximal humeri and scapulae [10 female and 10 male cadavers: median age 81 years (range 70–94 years)] using a MicroScribe 3D digitizer and Rhinoceros software.

Results

Means (±SD) of humeral inclination, medial wall angle of the bicipital groove, and radius of the humeral head values were 135 ± 11°, 39 ± 19°, and 14 ± 3 mm, respectively. Means (±SD) of glenoid height and width were 35 ± 4 and 26 ± 4 mm, while the means (±SD) of the angles of glenoid inclination, retroversion, and rotation were 87 ± 32°, 96 ± 10°, and 9 ± 6°, respectively. A significant difference in glenoid height (P ≤ 0.002) and width (P ≤ 0.0001) was observed between males and females, despite them having almost an identical radius of the humeral head, glenoid inclination, retroversion, and angle of rotation. There was also a significant difference (P ≤ 0.01) in the angle of glenoid retroversion between the right and left sides.

Conclusions

Using a MicroScribe 3D digitizer, the glenoid fossa was observed to be significantly smaller in females than males; furthermore, there was a difference in glenoid retroversion between the right and left sides.
Literatur
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cone R, Danzig L, Resnick D, Goldman A (1983) The bicipital groove: radiographic, anatomic, and pathologic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 141:781–788CrossRefPubMed Cone R, Danzig L, Resnick D, Goldman A (1983) The bicipital groove: radiographic, anatomic, and pathologic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 141:781–788CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat George D, Mallery P (2003) SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference, 4th edn. Allyn & Bacon, Boston George D, Mallery P (2003) SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference, 4th edn. Allyn & Bacon, Boston
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hitchcock H, Bechtol C (1948) Painful shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 30:263–273CrossRef Hitchcock H, Bechtol C (1948) Painful shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 30:263–273CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore K, Dalley A, Agur A (2006) Clinically oriented anatomy. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 671–709 Moore K, Dalley A, Agur A (2006) Clinically oriented anatomy. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 671–709
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Murlimanju B, Pai M, Kumar C, Prabhu L, Shreya M, Prashanth K, Rao C (2012) Anthropometric study of the bicipital groove in Indians and its clinical implications. Chang Gung Med J 35:155. doi:10.4103/2319-4170.106156 PubMed Murlimanju B, Pai M, Kumar C, Prabhu L, Shreya M, Prashanth K, Rao C (2012) Anthropometric study of the bicipital groove in Indians and its clinical implications. Chang Gung Med J 35:155. doi:10.​4103/​2319-4170.​106156 PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajput H, Vyas K, Shroff B (2012) A study of morphological patterns of glenoid cavity of scapula. Natl J Med Res 2:504–507 Rajput H, Vyas K, Shroff B (2012) A study of morphological patterns of glenoid cavity of scapula. Natl J Med Res 2:504–507
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson D, Yuan J, Bigliani L, Flatow E, Yamaguchi K (2000) Three dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1594CrossRefPubMed Robertson D, Yuan J, Bigliani L, Flatow E, Yamaguchi K (2000) Three dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: relevance to arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:1594CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Vettivel S, Indrasingh I, Chandi G, Chandi S (1992) Variations in the intertubercular sulcus of the humerus related to handedness. J Anat 180:321PubMedPubMedCentral Vettivel S, Indrasingh I, Chandi G, Chandi S (1992) Variations in the intertubercular sulcus of the humerus related to handedness. J Anat 180:321PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Wirth M, Ondrla J, Southworth C, Kaar K, Anderson B, Rockwood C III (2007) Replicating proximal humeral articular geometry with a third-generation implant: a radiographic study in cadaveric shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:111–116. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.008 CrossRef Wirth M, Ondrla J, Southworth C, Kaar K, Anderson B, Rockwood C III (2007) Replicating proximal humeral articular geometry with a third-generation implant: a radiographic study in cadaveric shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:111–116. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jse.​2006.​09.​008 CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal humeral and glenoid geometry using MicroScribe 3D digitizer
verfasst von
Wejdan H. Owaydhah
Mohammad A. Alobaidy
Abdulrahman S. Alraddadi
Roger W. Soames
Publikationsdatum
17.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Paris
Erschienen in
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy / Ausgabe 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-1038
Elektronische ISSN: 1279-8517
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-016-1782-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2017

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 7/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Anatomic Bases of Medical, Radiological and Surgical Techniques

Anatomy of the falcine sinus during the prenatal period

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.