Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 4/2018

16.04.2018 | Original Article

Three-dimensional skeletal, dentoalveolar and temporomandibular joint changes produced by Twin Block functional appliance

verfasst von: Assistant Professor Hanem Younes Elfeky, Professor Mona Salah Fayed, Assistant Professor Maged Sultan Alhammadi, Professor Sanaa Abou Zeid Soliman, Professor Dalia Mohamed El Boghdadi

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study was to three-dimensionally analyze the net skeletal, dental, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) treatment changes using Twin Block functional therapy in comparison to untreated subjects.

Materials and methods

The study (Twin Block) group comprised 22 female patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrusion. A total of 18 skeletal Class II untreated female subjects were included as controls. Skeletal, dental, and TMJ changes were evaluated using pre- and posttreatment/observational by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. The treatment changes were compared with the growth changes observed in the control group using independent t‑tests.

Results

Compared to the changes induced by normal growth, the effective mandibular length, ramus, and corpus lengths increased by 3.19, 3.47, and 2.69 mm (P < 0.001 for all), respectively. The maxillary and mandibular incisors inclination and position were significantly reduced and increased, respectively (P < 0.001). The maxillary first molars were significantly moved distally and intruded by 1 and 0.36 mm, respectively, while the lower first molars moved mesially and intruded by 2.18 and 0.59 mm, respectively. There was a significant change in the condylar dimensions: increase in length, width, and height by 1.28, 0.88, 1.59 on the right and by 1.60, 0.53, and 1.10 mm on the left sides, respectively. There was significant forward positioning of the right and left condyle by 1.5 and 1.3 mm, respectively.

Conclusions

Treatment with the Twin Block functional appliance results in significant skeletal, dentoalveolar, and condylar changes in both dimensions and positions.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Saleh M, Alsufyani N, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Major P (2015) Changes in temporomandibular joint morphology in class II patients treated with fixed mandibular repositioning and evaluated through 3D imaging: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 18:185–201CrossRefPubMed Al-Saleh M, Alsufyani N, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Major P (2015) Changes in temporomandibular joint morphology in class II patients treated with fixed mandibular repositioning and evaluated through 3D imaging: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 18:185–201CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Alhammadi M, Fayed M, Labib A (2017) Three-dimensional assessment of condylar position and joint spaces after maxillary first premolar extraction in skeletal class II malocclusion. Orthod Craniofac Res 20:71–78CrossRefPubMed Alhammadi M, Fayed M, Labib A (2017) Three-dimensional assessment of condylar position and joint spaces after maxillary first premolar extraction in skeletal class II malocclusion. Orthod Craniofac Res 20:71–78CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Alhammadi MS, Fayed MS, Labib A (2016) Three-dimensional assessment of temporomandibular joints in skeletal class I, class II, and class III malocclusions: cone beam computed tomography analysis. J World Fed Orthod 5:80–86 Alhammadi MS, Fayed MS, Labib A (2016) Three-dimensional assessment of temporomandibular joints in skeletal class I, class II, and class III malocclusions: cone beam computed tomography analysis. J World Fed Orthod 5:80–86
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Alhammadi MS, Shafey AS, Fayed MS, Mostafa YA (2014) Temporomandibular joint measurements in normal occlusion: a three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography analysis. J World Fed Orthod 3:155–162 Alhammadi MS, Shafey AS, Fayed MS, Mostafa YA (2014) Temporomandibular joint measurements in normal occlusion: a three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography analysis. J World Fed Orthod 3:155–162
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, McNamara JA (2000) Treatment timing for twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118:159–170CrossRefPubMed Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, McNamara JA (2000) Treatment timing for twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118:159–170CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowen L, Yanmin W, Fang S, Min L, Ying D, Li Z (2013) Cone-beam CT evaluation of the changes in the temporomandibular joint of patients with class II division 1 subdivision malocclusion before and after Twin-block treatment. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 31:610–614 Bowen L, Yanmin W, Fang S, Min L, Ying D, Li Z (2013) Cone-beam CT evaluation of the changes in the temporomandibular joint of patients with class II division 1 subdivision malocclusion before and after Twin-block treatment. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 31:610–614
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chavan SJ, Bhad WA, Doshi UH (2014) Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in twin block and bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Prog Orthod 15:57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chavan SJ, Bhad WA, Doshi UH (2014) Comparison of temporomandibular joint changes in twin block and bionator appliance therapy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Prog Orthod 15:57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark W (2014) Twin block functional therapy. JP Medical Ltd, London Clark W (2014) Twin block functional therapy. JP Medical Ltd, London
9.
Zurück zum Zitat De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen G (2009) Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:609–625CrossRefPubMed De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen G (2009) Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:609–625CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehsani S, Nebbe B, Normando D, Lagravere MO, Flores-Mir C (2014) Short-term treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 37:170–176CrossRefPubMed Ehsani S, Nebbe B, Normando D, Lagravere MO, Flores-Mir C (2014) Short-term treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 37:170–176CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Elkordy SA, Abouelezz AM, Salah Fayed MM, Attia KH, Rahman Ishaq RA, Mostafa YA (2015) Three-dimensional effects of the mini-implant—anchored forsus fatigue resistant device: a randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod 86:292–305CrossRefPubMed Elkordy SA, Abouelezz AM, Salah Fayed MM, Attia KH, Rahman Ishaq RA, Mostafa YA (2015) Three-dimensional effects of the mini-implant—anchored forsus fatigue resistant device: a randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod 86:292–305CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Frazão DC, McNamara JA Jr, Manzi FR (2011) Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans. Angle Orthod 81:26–35CrossRefPubMed Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Frazão DC, McNamara JA Jr, Manzi FR (2011) Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans. Angle Orthod 81:26–35CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Henry R (1957) A classification of class II, division I malocclusion. Angle Orthod 27:83–92 Henry R (1957) A classification of class II, division I malocclusion. Angle Orthod 27:83–92
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ivorra-Carbonell L, Montiel-Company J‑M, Almerich-Silla J‑M, Paredes-Gallardo V, Bellot-Arcís C (2016) Impact of functional mandibular advancement appliances on the temporomandibular joint—a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 21:e565–e572PubMedPubMedCentral Ivorra-Carbonell L, Montiel-Company J‑M, Almerich-Silla J‑M, Paredes-Gallardo V, Bellot-Arcís C (2016) Impact of functional mandibular advancement appliances on the temporomandibular joint—a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 21:e565–e572PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H (2005) Orthopedic and orthodontic effects of twin-block appliance. J Clin Pediatr Dent 29:225–230CrossRefPubMed Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H (2005) Orthopedic and orthodontic effects of twin-block appliance. J Clin Pediatr Dent 29:225–230CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H (2006) Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of class II malocclusion: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:594–602CrossRefPubMed Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H (2006) Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of class II malocclusion: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:594–602CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat LeCornu M, Cevidanes LH, Zhu H, Wu C‑D, Larson B, Nguyen T (2013) Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144:818–830CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral LeCornu M, Cevidanes LH, Zhu H, Wu C‑D, Larson B, Nguyen T (2013) Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144:818–830CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lund DI, Sandler PJ (1998) The effects of twin blocks: a prospective controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113:104–110CrossRefPubMed Lund DI, Sandler PJ (1998) The effects of twin blocks: a prospective controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113:104–110CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Jr McNamara JA (1981) Components of class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod 51:177–202PubMed Jr McNamara JA (1981) Components of class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod 51:177–202PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mills CM, McCulloch KJ (1998) Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114:15–24CrossRefPubMed Mills CM, McCulloch KJ (1998) Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114:15–24CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mills CM, McCulloch KJ (2000) Posttreatment changes after successful correction of class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118:24–33CrossRefPubMed Mills CM, McCulloch KJ (2000) Posttreatment changes after successful correction of class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118:24–33CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris DO, Illing HM, Lee RT (1998) A prospective evaluation of bass, Bionator and twin block appliances. Eur J Orthod 20:663–684CrossRefPubMed Morris DO, Illing HM, Lee RT (1998) A prospective evaluation of bass, Bionator and twin block appliances. Eur J Orthod 20:663–684CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Moyers RE, Riolo ML, Guire KE, Wainright RL, Bookstein FL (1980) Differential diagnosis of class II malocclusions: part 1. Facial types associated with class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 78:477–494CrossRefPubMed Moyers RE, Riolo ML, Guire KE, Wainright RL, Bookstein FL (1980) Differential diagnosis of class II malocclusions: part 1. Facial types associated with class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 78:477–494CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, Birnie D, Hammond M (2003) Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:234–243CrossRefPubMed O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, Birnie D, Hammond M (2003) Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:234–243CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinheiro F (2015) Twin block functional therapy: applications in dentofacial orthopedics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 147:636CrossRef Pinheiro F (2015) Twin block functional therapy: applications in dentofacial orthopedics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 147:636CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Proffit WR, Fields H Jr, Moray L (1997) Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 13:97–106 Proffit WR, Fields H Jr, Moray L (1997) Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 13:97–106
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruf S, Baltromejus S, Pancherz H (2001) Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Angle Orthod 71:4–11PubMed Ruf S, Baltromejus S, Pancherz H (2001) Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Angle Orthod 71:4–11PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Saikoski LZ, Cançado RH, Valarelli FP, KMSd F (2014) Dentoskeletal effects of class II malocclusion treatment with the twin block appliance in a Brazilian sample: a prospective study. Dental Press J Orthod 19:36–45CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saikoski LZ, Cançado RH, Valarelli FP, KMSd F (2014) Dentoskeletal effects of class II malocclusion treatment with the twin block appliance in a Brazilian sample: a prospective study. Dental Press J Orthod 19:36–45CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma A, Sachdev V, Singla A, Kirtaniya B (2012) Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of twin block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 30:218–226CrossRefPubMed Sharma A, Sachdev V, Singla A, Kirtaniya B (2012) Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of twin block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 30:218–226CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Sidlauskas A (2005) The effects of the twin-block appliance treatment on the skeletal and dentolaveolar changes in class II division 1 malocclusion. Medicina (Kaunas) 41:392–400 Sidlauskas A (2005) The effects of the twin-block appliance treatment on the skeletal and dentolaveolar changes in class II division 1 malocclusion. Medicina (Kaunas) 41:392–400
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh G, Hodge M (2002) Bimaxillary morphometry of patients with class II division 1 malocclusion treated with twin block appliances. Angle Orthod 72:402–409PubMed Singh G, Hodge M (2002) Bimaxillary morphometry of patients with class II division 1 malocclusion treated with twin block appliances. Angle Orthod 72:402–409PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Toth LR, McNamara JA (1999) Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116:597–609CrossRefPubMed Toth LR, McNamara JA (1999) Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116:597–609CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Trenouth M (2000) Cephalometric evaluation of the twin-block appliance in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 117:54–59CrossRefPubMed Trenouth M (2000) Cephalometric evaluation of the twin-block appliance in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 117:54–59CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Trenouth M (2002) Proportional changes in cephalometric distances during twin block appliance therapy. Eur J Orthod 24:485–491CrossRefPubMed Trenouth M (2002) Proportional changes in cephalometric distances during twin block appliance therapy. Eur J Orthod 24:485–491CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Varlık SK, Gültan A, Tümer N (2008) Comparison of the effects of twin block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile. Eur J Orthod 30:128–134CrossRefPubMed Varlık SK, Gültan A, Tümer N (2008) Comparison of the effects of twin block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile. Eur J Orthod 30:128–134CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Vedavathi H, Chirag A (2016) Comparative assessment of condylar changes in patients treated with twin block appliance: a cone-beam computed tomography study. J Dent Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS) 15:1–7 Vedavathi H, Chirag A (2016) Comparative assessment of condylar changes in patients treated with twin block appliance: a cone-beam computed tomography study. J Dent Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS) 15:1–7
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Yildirim E, Karacay S, Erkan M (2014) Condylar response to functional therapy with twin-block as shown by cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 84:1018–1025CrossRefPubMed Yildirim E, Karacay S, Erkan M (2014) Condylar response to functional therapy with twin-block as shown by cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 84:1018–1025CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Three-dimensional skeletal, dentoalveolar and temporomandibular joint changes produced by Twin Block functional appliance
verfasst von
Assistant Professor Hanem Younes Elfeky
Professor Mona Salah Fayed
Assistant Professor Maged Sultan Alhammadi
Professor Sanaa Abou Zeid Soliman
Professor Dalia Mohamed El Boghdadi
Publikationsdatum
16.04.2018
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-018-0137-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Mitteilungen DGKFO

Mitteilungen DGKFO

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.