Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 9/2020

04.12.2019 | Original Article

Time-frame comparison of hystero-preservation in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: a population-based nation-wide follow-up descriptive study, 2006–2013 versus 1997–2005

verfasst von: Yi-Lun Lin, Tsia-Shu Lo, Cheng-Yu Long, Kim-Seng Law, Chung-Han Ho, Ming-Ping Wu

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The purpose of our study was to describe the surgical trend and time-frame comparison between 1997–2005 (1stperiod) and 2006–2013 (2nd period) of hystero-preservation for uterine prolapse, based upon a nationwide population-based National Health Insurance (NHI) claim data in Taiwan.

Methods

Women, who underwent primary surgeries for uterine prolapse, either uterine suspension with hystero-preservation or hysterectomy during 1997–2013, were identified from National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD).We analyzed the related variables including surgical types (hystero-preservation or hysterectomy), patient age and concomitant anti-incontinence surgery, surgeon age, gender, and service volume; and hospital accreditation level, and service volume.

Results

We identified a total of 46,968 inpatients, 6629 (14.11%) hystero-preservation group, and 40,339 (85.89%) hysterectomy group. Hystero-preservation significantly increased during the 17 year follow-up study period (1997 to 2013) (P value =0.0147). The overall surgeries for uterine prolapse increased among patients ≥70 years, with concomitant anti-incontinence surgery, surgeons ≥45 years, high volume surgeons, and hospitals. Multiple logistic regression revealed hysterectomy was less used in 2nd period (OR 0.45, 95%, confidence interval (CI) 0.43–0.48). Hysterectomy was more often used in patient aged ≥50 years, surgeon aged ≥45 years, and low volume hospitals. In case of concomitant anti-incontinence surgery (OR 0.48, CI 0.45–0.52), high volume surgeons (more than 30 surgeries) and hospitals (more than 73 surgeries) hystero-preservation was more often used.

Conclusions

Time-frames, younger patients, concomitant anti-incontinence surgery, younger surgeons, and high volume surgeons and hospitals increase hystero-preservation for uterine prolapse. Surgeons and hospitals should be ready to respond to the wishes of female patients who want to preserve the uterus.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the women's health initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1160–6.PubMedCrossRef Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the women's health initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1160–6.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat de Oliveira SA, Fonseca MCM, Bortolini MAT, Girao M, Roque MT, Castro RA. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(11):1617–30.PubMedCrossRef de Oliveira SA, Fonseca MCM, Bortolini MAT, Girao M, Roque MT, Castro RA. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(11):1617–30.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurkijarvi K, Aaltonen R, Gissler M, Makinen J. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Finland from 1987 to 2009: a national register based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;214:71–7.PubMedCrossRef Kurkijarvi K, Aaltonen R, Gissler M, Makinen J. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Finland from 1987 to 2009: a national register based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;214:71–7.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:372–7.PubMedCrossRef Swift SE, Tate SB, Nicholas J. Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:372–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Blandon RE, Bharucha AE, Melton LJ 3rd, et al. Incidence of pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):664 e1–7.CrossRef Blandon RE, Bharucha AE, Melton LJ 3rd, et al. Incidence of pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):664 e1–7.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu MP, Long CY, Huang KH, Chu CC, Liang CC, Tang CH. Changing trends of surgical approaches for uterine prolapse: an 11-year population-based nationwide descriptive study. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(7):865–72.PubMedCrossRef Wu MP, Long CY, Huang KH, Chu CC, Liang CC, Tang CH. Changing trends of surgical approaches for uterine prolapse: an 11-year population-based nationwide descriptive study. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(7):865–72.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu MP, Wu CJ, Weng SF. The choice of reoperation after primary surgeries for uterine prolapse: a nationwide study. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2015;4(4):120–5.CrossRef Wu MP, Wu CJ, Weng SF. The choice of reoperation after primary surgeries for uterine prolapse: a nationwide study. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2015;4(4):120–5.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2016;11:CD004014.PubMed Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2016;11:CD004014.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Anglim B, O'Sullivan O, O'Reilly B. How do patients and surgeons decide on uterine preservation or hysterectomy in apical prolapse? Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(8):1075–9.PubMedCrossRef Anglim B, O'Sullivan O, O'Reilly B. How do patients and surgeons decide on uterine preservation or hysterectomy in apical prolapse? Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(8):1075–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang LY, Chu LC, Chiang HJ, Chuang FC, Kung FT, Huang KH. Medium-term comparison of uterus preservation versus hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse treatment with Prolift mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(7):1013–20.PubMedCrossRef Huang LY, Chu LC, Chiang HJ, Chuang FC, Kung FT, Huang KH. Medium-term comparison of uterus preservation versus hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse treatment with Prolift mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(7):1013–20.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Komisaruk BR, Frangos E, Whipple B. Hysterectomy improves sexual response? Addressing a crucial omission in the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18(3):288–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Komisaruk BR, Frangos E, Whipple B. Hysterectomy improves sexual response? Addressing a crucial omission in the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18(3):288–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kow N, Goldman HB, Ridgeway B. Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation. Current urology reports. 2013;14(5):395–402.PubMedCrossRef Kow N, Goldman HB, Ridgeway B. Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation. Current urology reports. 2013;14(5):395–402.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svardsudd KF. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(2 Pt 1):299–305.PubMedCrossRef Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svardsudd KF. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(2 Pt 1):299–305.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mowat A, Maher C, Ballard E. Surgical outcomes for low-volume vs high-volume surgeons in gynecology surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(1):21–33.PubMedCrossRef Mowat A, Maher C, Ballard E. Surgical outcomes for low-volume vs high-volume surgeons in gynecology surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(1):21–33.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bedford ND, Seman EI, O'Shea RT, Keirse MJ. Effect of uterine preservation on outcome of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(2):172–7.PubMedCrossRef Bedford ND, Seman EI, O'Shea RT, Keirse MJ. Effect of uterine preservation on outcome of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(2):172–7.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Glazener CM, Breeman S, Elders A, et al. Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT). Lancet. 2017;389(10067):381–92.PubMedCrossRef Glazener CM, Breeman S, Elders A, et al. Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT). Lancet. 2017;389(10067):381–92.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zucchi A, Lazzeri M, Porena M, Mearini L, Costantini E. Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7(11):626–33.PubMedCrossRef Zucchi A, Lazzeri M, Porena M, Mearini L, Costantini E. Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7(11):626–33.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Frick AC, Barber MD, Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Jelovsek JE, Walters MD. Attitudes toward hysterectomy in women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse. Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery. 2013;19(2):103–9.CrossRef Frick AC, Barber MD, Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Jelovsek JE, Walters MD. Attitudes toward hysterectomy in women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse. Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery. 2013;19(2):103–9.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu MP, Long CY, Liang CC, Weng SF, Tong YC. Trends in reoperation for female stress urinary incontinence: a nationwide study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(7):693–8.PubMedCrossRef Wu MP, Long CY, Liang CC, Weng SF, Tong YC. Trends in reoperation for female stress urinary incontinence: a nationwide study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(7):693–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat van IJsselmuiden NM, Detollenaere RJ, et al. Dutch women's attitudes towards hysterectomy and uterus preservation in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;220:79–83.PubMedCrossRef van IJsselmuiden NM, Detollenaere RJ, et al. Dutch women's attitudes towards hysterectomy and uterus preservation in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;220:79–83.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan AA, Eilber KS, Clemens JQ, Wu N, Pashos CL, Anger JT. Trends in management of pelvic organ prolapse among female Medicare beneficiaries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(4):463 e1–8.CrossRef Khan AA, Eilber KS, Clemens JQ, Wu N, Pashos CL, Anger JT. Trends in management of pelvic organ prolapse among female Medicare beneficiaries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(4):463 e1–8.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Korbly NB, Kassis NC, Good MM, et al. Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(5):470 e1–6.CrossRef Korbly NB, Kassis NC, Good MM, et al. Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(5):470 e1–6.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Costantini E, Porena M, Lazzeri M, Mearini L, Bini V, Zucchi A. Changes in female sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse repair: role of hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(9):1481–7.PubMedCrossRef Costantini E, Porena M, Lazzeri M, Mearini L, Bini V, Zucchi A. Changes in female sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse repair: role of hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(9):1481–7.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman D, Granath F, Cnattingius S, Falconer C. Hysterectomy and risk of stress-urinary-incontinence surgery: nationwide cohort study. Lancet. 2007;370(9597):1494–9.PubMedCrossRef Altman D, Granath F, Cnattingius S, Falconer C. Hysterectomy and risk of stress-urinary-incontinence surgery: nationwide cohort study. Lancet. 2007;370(9597):1494–9.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Richter HE, et al. Two-year outcomes after sacrocolpopexy with and without burch to prevent stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(1):49–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Richter HE, et al. Two-year outcomes after sacrocolpopexy with and without burch to prevent stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(1):49–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Anger JT, Rodriguez LV, Wang Q, Pashos CL, Litwin MS. The role of provider volume on outcomes after sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2007;177(4):1457–62.PubMedCrossRef Anger JT, Rodriguez LV, Wang Q, Pashos CL, Litwin MS. The role of provider volume on outcomes after sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2007;177(4):1457–62.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Healy MA, Mullard AJ, Campbell DA Jr, Dimick JB. Hospital and payer costs associated with surgical complications. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(9):823–30.PubMedCrossRef Healy MA, Mullard AJ, Campbell DA Jr, Dimick JB. Hospital and payer costs associated with surgical complications. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(9):823–30.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Time-frame comparison of hystero-preservation in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: a population-based nation-wide follow-up descriptive study, 2006–2013 versus 1997–2005
verfasst von
Yi-Lun Lin
Tsia-Shu Lo
Cheng-Yu Long
Kim-Seng Law
Chung-Han Ho
Ming-Ping Wu
Publikationsdatum
04.12.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04128-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

International Urogynecology Journal 9/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.