Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

06.09.2018 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories: a French national survey

verfasst von: Thomas Boueilh, Arnaud Reignier, Paul Barriere, Thomas Freour

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 12/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Although the clinical value of time-lapse imaging (TLI) systems in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles is still debated, its prevalence worldwide seems to be expanding. The situation of TLI in the USA has been recently surveyed, but these results might not be transposable to other countries with different IVF regulation and funding such as France. This study evaluated the TLI situation in French IVF laboratories.

Methods

An anonymous online cross-sectional survey was sent by email to 210 embryologists in September and October 2017. Laboratories, demographics, TLI clinical use, purchasing plan, and embryologists’ opinions were analyzed using logistic regression to calculate odds ratio.

Results

Of the 210 lab directors surveyed, 78 responded (37.1%), 43 (55%) working in private IVF laboratories and 35 (45%) in public hospitals. Thirty (38.5%) were TLI users. The odds of TLI possession were not statistically different according to laboratory sector or size. Most embryologists (n = 21, 70%) used TLI for unselected patients. Cost was the main reason given by non-users for not implementing TLI (n = 24, 50%). Most respondents were convinced that TLI is superior to standard morphology (n = 52, 73.2%) and that TLI improves culture conditions (n = 62, 84.9%). However, half (n = 39, 54.9%) indicated that evidence was still lacking to assert TLI clinical usefulness.

Conclusion

The prevalence of TLI systems and embryologists’ opinion in France was slightly different from the American situation. The different regulation and funding policy might account for some differences in terms of TLI use and perception.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat ESHRE Guideline Group on Good Practice in IVF Labs, De los Santos MJ, Apter S, Coticchio G, Debrock S, Lundin K, et al. Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories (2015). Hum Reprod. 2016;31(4):685–6.CrossRef ESHRE Guideline Group on Good Practice in IVF Labs, De los Santos MJ, Apter S, Coticchio G, Debrock S, Lundin K, et al. Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories (2015). Hum Reprod. 2016;31(4):685–6.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Capmany G, Taylor A, Braude PR, Bolton VN. The timing of pronuclear formation, DNA synthesis and cleavage in the human 1-cell embryo. Mol Hum Reprod. 1996;2(5):299–306.CrossRef Capmany G, Taylor A, Braude PR, Bolton VN. The timing of pronuclear formation, DNA synthesis and cleavage in the human 1-cell embryo. Mol Hum Reprod. 1996;2(5):299–306.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzales DS, Boatman DE, Bavister BD. Kinematics of trophectoderm projections and locomotion in the peri-implantation hamster blastocyst. Dev Dyn. 1996;205(4):435–44.CrossRef Gonzales DS, Boatman DE, Bavister BD. Kinematics of trophectoderm projections and locomotion in the peri-implantation hamster blastocyst. Dev Dyn. 1996;205(4):435–44.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Payne D, Flaherty SP, Barry MF, Matthews CD. Preliminary observations on polar body extrusion and pronuclear formation in human oocytes using time-lapse video cinematography. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:532–41.CrossRef Payne D, Flaherty SP, Barry MF, Matthews CD. Preliminary observations on polar body extrusion and pronuclear formation in human oocytes using time-lapse video cinematography. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:532–41.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Alhelou Y, Mat Adenan NA, Ali J. Embryo culture conditions are significantly improved during uninterrupted incubation: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Biol. 2018;18(1):40–5.CrossRef Alhelou Y, Mat Adenan NA, Ali J. Embryo culture conditions are significantly improved during uninterrupted incubation: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Biol. 2018;18(1):40–5.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Desai N, Goldberg JM, Austin C, Falcone T. Are cleavage anomalies, multinucleation, or specific cell cycle kinetics observed with time-lapse imaging predictive of embryo developmental capacity or ploidy? Fertil Steril. 2018;109(4):665–74.CrossRef Desai N, Goldberg JM, Austin C, Falcone T. Are cleavage anomalies, multinucleation, or specific cell cycle kinetics observed with time-lapse imaging predictive of embryo developmental capacity or ploidy? Fertil Steril. 2018;109(4):665–74.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirkegaard K, Hindkjaer JJ, Grøndahl ML, Kesmodel US, Ingerslev HJ. A randomized clinical trial comparing embryo culture in a conventional incubator with a time-lapse incubator. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(6):565–72.CrossRef Kirkegaard K, Hindkjaer JJ, Grøndahl ML, Kesmodel US, Ingerslev HJ. A randomized clinical trial comparing embryo culture in a conventional incubator with a time-lapse incubator. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29(6):565–72.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirkegaard K, Ahlström A, Ingerslev HJ, Hardarson T. Choosing the best embryo by time lapse versus standard morphology. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(2):323–32.CrossRef Kirkegaard K, Ahlström A, Ingerslev HJ, Hardarson T. Choosing the best embryo by time lapse versus standard morphology. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(2):323–32.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Martínez-Granados L, Serrano M, González-Utor A, Ortíz N, Badajoz V, Olaya E, et al. Inter-laboratory agreement on embryo classification and clinical decision: conventional morphological assessment vs. time lapse. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183328.CrossRef Martínez-Granados L, Serrano M, González-Utor A, Ortíz N, Badajoz V, Olaya E, et al. Inter-laboratory agreement on embryo classification and clinical decision: conventional morphological assessment vs. time lapse. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183328.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sundvall L, Ingerslev HJ, Breth Knudsen U, Kirkegaard K. Inter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(12):3215–21.CrossRef Sundvall L, Ingerslev HJ, Breth Knudsen U, Kirkegaard K. Inter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(12):3215–21.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Zaninovic N, Irani M, Meseguer M. Assessment of embryo morphology and developmental dynamics by time-lapse microscopy: is there a relation to implantation and ploidy? Fertil Steril. 2017;108(5):722–9.CrossRef Zaninovic N, Irani M, Meseguer M. Assessment of embryo morphology and developmental dynamics by time-lapse microscopy: is there a relation to implantation and ploidy? Fertil Steril. 2017;108(5):722–9.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen M, Wei S, Hu J, Yuan J, Liu F. Does time-lapse imaging have favorable results for embryo incubation and selection compared with conventional methods in clinical in vitro fertilization? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178720.CrossRef Chen M, Wei S, Hu J, Yuan J, Liu F. Does time-lapse imaging have favorable results for embryo incubation and selection compared with conventional methods in clinical in vitro fertilization? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178720.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fishel S, Campbell A, Montgomery S, Smith R, Nice L, Duffy S, et al. Live births after embryo selection using morphokinetics versus conventional morphology: a retrospective analysis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35(4):407–16.CrossRef Fishel S, Campbell A, Montgomery S, Smith R, Nice L, Duffy S, et al. Live births after embryo selection using morphokinetics versus conventional morphology: a retrospective analysis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35(4):407–16.CrossRef
14.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Paulson RJ, Reichman DE, Zaninovic N, Goodman LR, Racowsky C. Time-lapse imaging: clearly useful to both laboratory personnel and patient outcomes versus just because we can doesn't mean we should. Fertil Steril. 2018 Apr;109(4):584–91.CrossRef Paulson RJ, Reichman DE, Zaninovic N, Goodman LR, Racowsky C. Time-lapse imaging: clearly useful to both laboratory personnel and patient outcomes versus just because we can doesn't mean we should. Fertil Steril. 2018 Apr;109(4):584–91.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Pribenszky C, Nilselid AM, Montag M. Time-lapse culture with morphokinetic embryo selection improves pregnancy and live birth chances and reduces early pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35(5):511–20.CrossRef Pribenszky C, Nilselid AM, Montag M. Time-lapse culture with morphokinetic embryo selection improves pregnancy and live birth chances and reduces early pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35(5):511–20.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Racowsky C, Kovacs P, Martins WP. A critical appraisal of time-lapse imaging for embryo selection: where are we and where do we need to go? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:1025–30.CrossRef Racowsky C, Kovacs P, Martins WP. A critical appraisal of time-lapse imaging for embryo selection: where are we and where do we need to go? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:1025–30.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Racowsky C, Martins WP. Effectiveness and safety of time-lapse imaging for embryo culture and selection: it is still too early for any conclusions? Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):450–2.CrossRef Racowsky C, Martins WP. Effectiveness and safety of time-lapse imaging for embryo culture and selection: it is still too early for any conclusions? Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):450–2.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Reignier A, Lammers J, Barriere P, Freour T. Can time-lapse parameters predict embryo ploidy? A systematic review. Reprod BioMed Online. 2018;36(4):380–7.CrossRef Reignier A, Lammers J, Barriere P, Freour T. Can time-lapse parameters predict embryo ploidy? A systematic review. Reprod BioMed Online. 2018;36(4):380–7.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolinko AV, Farland LV, Kaser DJ, Missmer S, Racowsky C. National survey on use of time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(9):1167–72.CrossRef Dolinko AV, Farland LV, Kaser DJ, Missmer S, Racowsky C. National survey on use of time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(9):1167–72.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaulov T, Belisle S, Dahan MH. Public health implications of a North American publicly funded in vitro fertilization program; lessons to learn. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(9):1385–93.CrossRef Shaulov T, Belisle S, Dahan MH. Public health implications of a North American publicly funded in vitro fertilization program; lessons to learn. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(9):1385–93.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Vélez MP, Connolly MP, Kadoch IJ, Phillips S, Bissonnette F. Universal coverage of IVF pays off. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1313–9.CrossRef Vélez MP, Connolly MP, Kadoch IJ, Phillips S, Bissonnette F. Universal coverage of IVF pays off. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1313–9.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Dieke AC, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Nangia AK, Warner L, Boulet SL. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection use in states with and without insurance coverage mandates for infertility treatment, United States, 2000–2015. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(4):691–7.CrossRef Dieke AC, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Nangia AK, Warner L, Boulet SL. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection use in states with and without insurance coverage mandates for infertility treatment, United States, 2000–2015. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(4):691–7.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Storr A, Venetis CA, Cooke S, Kilani S, Ledger W. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(2):307–14.CrossRef Storr A, Venetis CA, Cooke S, Kilani S, Ledger W. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(2):307–14.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruiz de Assin R, Clavero A, Gonzalvo MC, Rosales A, Zamora S, Martinez L, et al. Reducing inter-observer variability in embryo evaluation by means of training courses. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(11):1129–33.CrossRef Ruiz de Assin R, Clavero A, Gonzalvo MC, Rosales A, Zamora S, Martinez L, et al. Reducing inter-observer variability in embryo evaluation by means of training courses. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(11):1129–33.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Meseguer M, Herrero J, Tejera A, Hilligsoe KM, Ramsing NB, Remohi J. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryoimplantation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(10):2658–71.CrossRef Meseguer M, Herrero J, Tejera A, Hilligsoe KM, Ramsing NB, Remohi J. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryoimplantation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(10):2658–71.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubio I, Galan A, Larreategui Z, Ayerdi F, Bellver J, Herrero J, et al. Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection bymorphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the embryoscope. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(5):1287–1294.e5.CrossRef Rubio I, Galan A, Larreategui Z, Ayerdi F, Bellver J, Herrero J, et al. Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection bymorphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the embryoscope. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(5):1287–1294.e5.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaser DJ, Racowsky C. Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: asystematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(5):617–31.CrossRef Kaser DJ, Racowsky C. Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: asystematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(5):617–31.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Armstrong S, Arroll N, Cree LM, Jordan V, Farquhar C. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2:CD011320. Armstrong S, Arroll N, Cree LM, Jordan V, Farquhar C. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2:CD011320.
Metadaten
Titel
Time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories: a French national survey
verfasst von
Thomas Boueilh
Arnaud Reignier
Paul Barriere
Thomas Freour
Publikationsdatum
06.09.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 12/2018
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1302-6

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Einer von sieben Frauen macht die Menopause sehr zu schaffen

Von mäßigen bis schweren vasomotorischen Beschwerden sind 14,7% der Frauen in der Postmenopause betroffen. Das haben kanadische Forscherinnen in einer Subgruppenanalyse der WARM-Studie herausgefunden.

Die elektronische Patientenakte kommt: Das sollten Sie jetzt wissen

Am 15. Januar geht die „ePA für alle“ zunächst in den Modellregionen an den Start. Doch schon bald soll sie in allen Praxen zum Einsatz kommen. Was ist jetzt zu tun? Was müssen Sie wissen? Wir geben in einem FAQ Antworten auf 21 Fragen.

Keine eingeschränkten Kassenleistungen bei Schwangerschaft nach IVF

Nach privat bezahlter In-vitro-Fertilisation muss die gesetzliche Krankenkasse ein Arzneimittel zum Erhalt der Schwangerschaft bezahlen, so ein Urteil des Sozialgerichts in München.

Medikamente verändern wohl Nährstoffzusammensetzung der Muttermilch

Einige Medikamente wie selektive Serotonin-Wiederaufnahmehemmer können offenbar die Makronährstoffzusammensetzung der Muttermilch verändern. Das birgt möglicherweise gesundheitliche Risiken für manche gestillte Kinder.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.