Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 8/2016

06.05.2016 | Original Article

Time Sequence Evaluation of Biliary Stent Occlusion by Dissection Analysis of Retrieved Stents

verfasst von: Chang-Il Kwon, Mark A. Gromski, Stuart Sherman, Jeffrey J. Easler, Ihab I. El Hajj, James Watkins, Evan L. Fogel, Lee McHenry, Glen A. Lehman

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and Aims

Multiple factors can affect the occlusion of plastic stents. Previous data demonstrate that side holes may induce more biofilm formation probably via microturbulence and bile flow disturbances that could lead to occlusion. These results, however, have not been replicated in subsequent clinical studies with different methods. The objective of this study is to evaluate the physical characteristics of plastic stent occlusion over time.

Methods

This is a plastic stent sequential analysis study. Biliary stents removed via ERCP from February 24, 2015, to June 2, 2015, were included. One hundred and forty-eight retrieved straight-type plastic stents were longitudinally cut by a custom-made cutting device. These dissected stents were then evaluated in detail with regard to the location of stent occlusion and the stent patency period. Location of stent occlusive debris was the primary outcome in this study.

Results

Biofilm formations and occlusions by debris were sequentially but separately tallied. Biofilm formations were initially seen around the side hole areas within 30 days and spread to the entire stent by 60 days. Then, occlusion process by debris was mainly initiated by 80 days and progressed to full occlusion by median of 90 days. Although some occlusions were also observed around the side hole areas within 30 days, affected areas were more widely observed after biofilm formation.

Conclusions

This study is the first to attempt to describe the distribution of stent occlusions over time. These observations may help guide future stent development.
Literatur
1.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kadakia SC, Starnes E. Comparison of 10 french gauge stent with 11.5 french gauge stent in patients with biliary tract diseases. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38:454–459.CrossRefPubMed Kadakia SC, Starnes E. Comparison of 10 french gauge stent with 11.5 french gauge stent in patients with biliary tract diseases. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38:454–459.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagh MS, de Bellis M, Fogel EL, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of 10-french versus 11.5-french plastic stents for malignant biliary obstruction. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2013;2013:891915.PubMedPubMedCentral Wagh MS, de Bellis M, Fogel EL, et al. Multicenter randomized trial of 10-french versus 11.5-french plastic stents for malignant biliary obstruction. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2013;2013:891915.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Berkel AM, Boland C, Redekop WK. A prospective randomized trial of Teflon versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Endoscopy. 1998;30:681–686.CrossRefPubMed Berkel AM, Boland C, Redekop WK. A prospective randomized trial of Teflon versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Endoscopy. 1998;30:681–686.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat England RE, Martin DF, Morris J. A prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing 10 Fr Teflon Tannenbaum stents with 10 Fr polyethylene Cotton-Leung stents in patients with malignant common duct strictures. Gut. 2000;46:395–400.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral England RE, Martin DF, Morris J. A prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing 10 Fr Teflon Tannenbaum stents with 10 Fr polyethylene Cotton-Leung stents in patients with malignant common duct strictures. Gut. 2000;46:395–400.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Terruzzi V, Comin U, De Grazia F, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing Tannenbaum Teflon and standard polyethylene stents in distal malignant biliary stenosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:23–27.CrossRefPubMed Terruzzi V, Comin U, De Grazia F, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing Tannenbaum Teflon and standard polyethylene stents in distal malignant biliary stenosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:23–27.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Guaglianone E, Cardines R, Vuotto C, et al. Microbial biofilms associated with biliary stent clogging. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010;59:410–420.CrossRefPubMed Guaglianone E, Cardines R, Vuotto C, et al. Microbial biofilms associated with biliary stent clogging. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010;59:410–420.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung JW, Liu Y, Chan RC, et al. Early attachment of anaerobic bacteria may play an important role in biliary stent blockage. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:725–729.CrossRefPubMed Leung JW, Liu Y, Chan RC, et al. Early attachment of anaerobic bacteria may play an important role in biliary stent blockage. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:725–729.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat van Berkel AM, van Marle J, Groen AK, et al. Mechanisms of biliary stent clogging: confocal laser scanning and scanning electron microscopy. Endoscopy. 2005;37:729–734.CrossRefPubMed van Berkel AM, van Marle J, Groen AK, et al. Mechanisms of biliary stent clogging: confocal laser scanning and scanning electron microscopy. Endoscopy. 2005;37:729–734.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rey JF, Maupetit P, Greff M. Experimental study of biliary endoprosthesis efficiency. Endoscopy. 1985;17:145–148.CrossRefPubMed Rey JF, Maupetit P, Greff M. Experimental study of biliary endoprosthesis efficiency. Endoscopy. 1985;17:145–148.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Speer AG, Cotton PB, Rode J, et al. Biliary stent blockage with bacterial biofilm. A light and electron microscopy study. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:546–553.CrossRefPubMed Speer AG, Cotton PB, Rode J, et al. Biliary stent blockage with bacterial biofilm. A light and electron microscopy study. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:546–553.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung JW, Ling TK, Kung JL, et al. The role of bacteria in the blockage of biliary stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;34:19–22.CrossRefPubMed Leung JW, Ling TK, Kung JL, et al. The role of bacteria in the blockage of biliary stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;34:19–22.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Seitz U, Vadeyar H, Soehendra N. Prolonged patency with a new-design Teflon biliary prosthesis. Endoscopy. 1994;26:478–482.CrossRefPubMed Seitz U, Vadeyar H, Soehendra N. Prolonged patency with a new-design Teflon biliary prosthesis. Endoscopy. 1994;26:478–482.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Binmoeller KF, Seitz U, Seifert H, et al. The Tannenbaum stent: a new plastic biliary stent without side holes. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:1764–1768.PubMed Binmoeller KF, Seitz U, Seifert H, et al. The Tannenbaum stent: a new plastic biliary stent without side holes. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:1764–1768.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Catalano MF, Geenen JE, Lehman GA, et al. “Tannenbaum” Teflon stents versus traditional polyethylene stents for treatment of malignant biliary stricture. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:354–358.CrossRefPubMed Catalano MF, Geenen JE, Lehman GA, et al. “Tannenbaum” Teflon stents versus traditional polyethylene stents for treatment of malignant biliary stricture. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:354–358.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schilling D, Rink G, Arnold JC, et al. Prospective, randomized, single-center trial comparing 3 different 10F plastic stents in malignant mid and distal bile duct stricture. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:54–58.CrossRefPubMed Schilling D, Rink G, Arnold JC, et al. Prospective, randomized, single-center trial comparing 3 different 10F plastic stents in malignant mid and distal bile duct stricture. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:54–58.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikenberry SO, Sherman S, Hawes RH, et al. The occlusion rate of pancreatic stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:611–613.CrossRefPubMed Ikenberry SO, Sherman S, Hawes RH, et al. The occlusion rate of pancreatic stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:611–613.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sung JY, Shaffer EA, Lam K, et al. Hydrophobic bile salt inhibits bacterial adhesion on biliary stent material. Dig Dis Sci. 1994;39:999–1006.CrossRefPubMed Sung JY, Shaffer EA, Lam K, et al. Hydrophobic bile salt inhibits bacterial adhesion on biliary stent material. Dig Dis Sci. 1994;39:999–1006.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat John SF, Hillier VF, Handley PS, et al. Adhesion of staphylococci to polyurethane and hydrogel-coated polyurethane catheters assayed by an improved radiolabelling technique. J Med Microbiol. 1995;43:133–140.CrossRefPubMed John SF, Hillier VF, Handley PS, et al. Adhesion of staphylococci to polyurethane and hydrogel-coated polyurethane catheters assayed by an improved radiolabelling technique. J Med Microbiol. 1995;43:133–140.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Jansen B, Goodman LP, Ruiten D. Bacterial adherence to hydrophilic polymer-coated polyurethane stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:670–673.CrossRefPubMed Jansen B, Goodman LP, Ruiten D. Bacterial adherence to hydrophilic polymer-coated polyurethane stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:670–673.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat McAllister EW, Carey LC, Brady PG, et al. The role of polymeric surface smoothness of biliary stents in bacterial adherence, biofilm deposition, and stent occlusion. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:422–425.CrossRefPubMed McAllister EW, Carey LC, Brady PG, et al. The role of polymeric surface smoothness of biliary stents in bacterial adherence, biofilm deposition, and stent occlusion. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:422–425.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Costamagna G, Mutignani M, Rotondano G, et al. Hydrophilic hydromer-coated polyurethane stents versus uncoated stents in malignant biliary obstruction: a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:8–11.CrossRefPubMed Costamagna G, Mutignani M, Rotondano G, et al. Hydrophilic hydromer-coated polyurethane stents versus uncoated stents in malignant biliary obstruction: a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:8–11.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat van Berkel AM, Bruno MJ, Bergman JJ, et al. A prospective randomized study of hydrophilic polymer-coated polyurethane versus polyethylene stents in distal malignant biliary obstruction. Endoscopy. 2003;35:478–482.CrossRefPubMed van Berkel AM, Bruno MJ, Bergman JJ, et al. A prospective randomized study of hydrophilic polymer-coated polyurethane versus polyethylene stents in distal malignant biliary obstruction. Endoscopy. 2003;35:478–482.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dua KS, Reddy ND, Rao VG, et al. Impact of reducing duodenobiliary reflux on biliary stent patency: an in vitro evaluation and a prospective randomized clinical trial that used a biliary stent with an antireflux valve. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:819–828.CrossRefPubMed Dua KS, Reddy ND, Rao VG, et al. Impact of reducing duodenobiliary reflux on biliary stent patency: an in vitro evaluation and a prospective randomized clinical trial that used a biliary stent with an antireflux valve. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:819–828.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Time Sequence Evaluation of Biliary Stent Occlusion by Dissection Analysis of Retrieved Stents
verfasst von
Chang-Il Kwon
Mark A. Gromski
Stuart Sherman
Jeffrey J. Easler
Ihab I. El Hajj
James Watkins
Evan L. Fogel
Lee McHenry
Glen A. Lehman
Publikationsdatum
06.05.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4135-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.