Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 1/2018

27.04.2018 | Original Article

Timing is everything: intraperitoneal chemotherapy after primary or interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer

verfasst von: Jessica Lee, John P. Curtin, Franco M. Muggia, Bhavana Pothuri, Leslie R. Boyd, Stephanie V. Blank

Erschienen in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the outcomes of intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IP) compared with those of intravenous chemotherapy (IV) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) or primary debulking surgery (PDS).

Methods

Patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma treated with PDS or NACT and IDS from 2006 to 2015 were identified. Comparative statistics were used to evaluate covariates, and survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with log-rank tests.

Results

Sixty-six patients received NACT followed by IDS with residual disease of ≤ 1 cm; 42 of these patients (63.6%) received IP therapy; and 24 patients (36.3%) had IV therapy only after IDS. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.0 months in the IP group and 13.5 months in the IV group (p = 0.13). The estimated median overall survival (OS) was 64.0 months with IP and 50.0 months with IV (p = 0.44). During the same study period, 149 patients underwent optimal PDS after which 93 patients (62.4%) received IP and 56 patients (37.6%) were given IV chemotherapy. Patients after IP demonstrated improved survival outcomes when compared to patients after IV therapy. The median PFS was 28.0 months after IP and 16.5 months after IV (p = 0.0006), and the median OS was not reached for IP and 50.0 months after IV (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Although IP chemotherapy after PDS is associated with improved survival, IP therapy after NACT and IDS, despite high rates of completion, may not have the same degree of survival advantage over IV therapy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoskins WJ, McGuire WP, Brady MF et al (1994) The effect of diameter of largest residual disease on survival after primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with suboptimal residual epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170(4):974–980CrossRefPubMed Hoskins WJ, McGuire WP, Brady MF et al (1994) The effect of diameter of largest residual disease on survival after primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with suboptimal residual epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170(4):974–980CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Winter WE III, Maxwell GL, Tian C et al (2007) Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 25(24):3621–3627CrossRefPubMed Winter WE III, Maxwell GL, Tian C et al (2007) Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 25(24):3621–3627CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Vergote I, Trope CG, Amant F et al (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 363(10):943–953CrossRefPubMed Vergote I, Trope CG, Amant F et al (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 363(10):943–953CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M et al (2015) Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 386:249–257CrossRefPubMed Kehoe S, Hook J, Nankivell M et al (2015) Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 386:249–257CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hinchcliff EM, Melamed M, Clemmer JT et al (2016) Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a National Cancer Data Base study. Gynecol Oncol 141(Suppl 1):28CrossRef Hinchcliff EM, Melamed M, Clemmer JT et al (2016) Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a National Cancer Data Base study. Gynecol Oncol 141(Suppl 1):28CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Alberts DS, Liu PY, Hannigan EV et al (1996) Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 335(26):1950–1955CrossRefPubMed Alberts DS, Liu PY, Hannigan EV et al (1996) Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 335(26):1950–1955CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Markman M, Bundy BN, Alberts DS et al (2001) Phase III trial of standard-dose intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus moderately high-dose carboplatin followed by intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in small-volume stage III ovarian carcinoma: an intergroup study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Southwestern Oncology Group, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 19(4):1001–1007CrossRefPubMed Markman M, Bundy BN, Alberts DS et al (2001) Phase III trial of standard-dose intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus moderately high-dose carboplatin followed by intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in small-volume stage III ovarian carcinoma: an intergroup study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Southwestern Oncology Group, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 19(4):1001–1007CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L et al (2006) Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 354(1):34–43CrossRefPubMed Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L et al (2006) Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 354(1):34–43CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker J, Brady MF, DiSilvestro PA et al (2016) A phase III trial of bevacizumab with IV versus IP chemotherapy for ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma: an NRG Oncology Study. Gynecol Oncol 141(Suppl 1):208 Walker J, Brady MF, DiSilvestro PA et al (2016) A phase III trial of bevacizumab with IV versus IP chemotherapy for ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma: an NRG Oncology Study. Gynecol Oncol 141(Suppl 1):208
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright A, Cronin A, Milne DE et al (2015) Use and effectiveness of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment of ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 33(26):2841–2847CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wright A, Cronin A, Milne DE et al (2015) Use and effectiveness of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment of ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 33(26):2841–2847CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Le T, Latifah H, Jolicoeur L et al (2011) Does intraperitoneal chemotherapy benefit optimally debulked epithelial ovarian cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Gynecol Oncol 121(3):451–454CrossRefPubMed Le T, Latifah H, Jolicoeur L et al (2011) Does intraperitoneal chemotherapy benefit optimally debulked epithelial ovarian cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Gynecol Oncol 121(3):451–454CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Al Mutairi NJ, Le T (2014) Does modality of adjuvant chemotherapy after interval surgical debulking matter in epithelial ovarian cancer? Int J Gynecol Cancer 24(3):461–467CrossRefPubMed Al Mutairi NJ, Le T (2014) Does modality of adjuvant chemotherapy after interval surgical debulking matter in epithelial ovarian cancer? Int J Gynecol Cancer 24(3):461–467CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mueller JJ, Kelly A, Zhou Q et al (2016) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy after interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: feasibility and outcomes at a comprehensive cancer center. Gynecol Oncol 143(3):496–503CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mueller JJ, Kelly A, Zhou Q et al (2016) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy after interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: feasibility and outcomes at a comprehensive cancer center. Gynecol Oncol 143(3):496–503CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mackay HJ, Gallagher CJ, Parulekar WR et al (2016) OV21/PETROC: a randomized gynecologic cancer intergroup (GCIG) phase II study of intraperitoneal (IP) versus intravenous (IV) chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and optimal debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In: Oral presentation presented at 2016 ASCO annual meeting, Chicago, IL Mackay HJ, Gallagher CJ, Parulekar WR et al (2016) OV21/PETROC: a randomized gynecologic cancer intergroup (GCIG) phase II study of intraperitoneal (IP) versus intravenous (IV) chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and optimal debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In: Oral presentation presented at 2016 ASCO annual meeting, Chicago, IL
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuo K, Eno ML, Im DD et al (2010) Chemotherapy time interval and development of platinum and taxane resistance in ovarian, fallopian, and peritoneal carcinoma. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281(2):325–328CrossRefPubMed Matsuo K, Eno ML, Im DD et al (2010) Chemotherapy time interval and development of platinum and taxane resistance in ovarian, fallopian, and peritoneal carcinoma. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281(2):325–328CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tewari D, Java JJ, Salani R et al (2015) Long-term survival advantage and prognostic factors associated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment in advanced ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 33(13):1460–1466CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tewari D, Java JJ, Salani R et al (2015) Long-term survival advantage and prognostic factors associated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy treatment in advanced ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 33(13):1460–1466CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Suidan RS, Zhou Q, Iasonos A et al (2015) Prognostic significance of the number of postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy cycles for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25(4):599–606CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Suidan RS, Zhou Q, Iasonos A et al (2015) Prognostic significance of the number of postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy cycles for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25(4):599–606CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Katsumata N, Yasuda M, Takahashi F et al (2009) Dose-dense paclitaxel once a week in combination with carboplatin every 3 weeks for advanced ovarian cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374(9698):1331–1338CrossRefPubMed Katsumata N, Yasuda M, Takahashi F et al (2009) Dose-dense paclitaxel once a week in combination with carboplatin every 3 weeks for advanced ovarian cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374(9698):1331–1338CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Timing is everything: intraperitoneal chemotherapy after primary or interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer
verfasst von
Jessica Lee
John P. Curtin
Franco M. Muggia
Bhavana Pothuri
Leslie R. Boyd
Stephanie V. Blank
Publikationsdatum
27.04.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-018-3591-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.