Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

05.08.2023 | Original Research Article

Tislelizumab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Placebo Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Chinese Patients with Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

verfasst von: Shijie Lu, Yake Lou, Yi Rong, Zirui Huang, Xiaodan Lin, Junying Chen, Kongjia Luo

Erschienen in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Ausgabe 8/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a prevalent and highly malignant tumor with a poor prognosis. Recently, the RATIONALE-306 trial demonstrated that tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy provided overall survival benefits for these patients. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of this treatment approach in Chinese patients with advanced ESCC from the perspective of healthcare system.

Methods

A Markov model was constructed to assess the economic and health benefits associated with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy over a 10-year lifetime horizon, utilizing data from the RATIONALE-306 trial. The analysis encompassed the calculation of several key parameters, including the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), total cost, incremental cost, total effectiveness, and incremental effectiveness. Tislelizumab was considered cost-effective if the ICER obtained was below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$38,223 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY); otherwise, it would be deemed not cost-effective. To ensure the robustness of the findings, the results were subjected to one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA).

Results

In the base-case analysis, the incremental effectiveness and cost associated with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy, compared to chemotherapy alone, were determined to be 0.40 QALY and US$7604, respectively. This resulted in an ICER of US$18,846 per QALY, which is below the WTP threshold of US$38,223 per QALY. Furthermore, the results from the one-way sensitivity analysis and PSA indicated robustness of the findings.

Conclusion

Our lifetime simulation study demonstrated that, in the case of advanced ESCC, the combination of tislelizumab and chemotherapy offers increased effectiveness compared to chemotherapy alone, albeit at a higher cost. Moreover, considering the current WTP threshold in China, the addition of tislelizumab to chemotherapy is considered a cost-effective approach.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Blot WJ, Tarone RE. Esophageal cancer. In: Thun M, Linet MS, Cerhan JR, Haiman CA, Schottenfeld D, editors. Cancer epidemiology and prevention. 4th ed. Oxford University Press; 2018. p. 579–93. Blot WJ, Tarone RE. Esophageal cancer. In: Thun M, Linet MS, Cerhan JR, Haiman CA, Schottenfeld D, editors. Cancer epidemiology and prevention. 4th ed. Oxford University Press; 2018. p. 579–93.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Ren ZH, Yuan L, Xu SN, Yao ZH, Qiao L, et al. Paclitaxel plus cisplatin vs. 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin as first-line treatment for patients with advanced squamous cell esophageal cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2016;6(10):2345–50.PubMedPubMedCentral Liu Y, Ren ZH, Yuan L, Xu SN, Yao ZH, Qiao L, et al. Paclitaxel plus cisplatin vs. 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin as first-line treatment for patients with advanced squamous cell esophageal cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2016;6(10):2345–50.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo HY, Lu J, Bai YX, Mao T, Wang J, Fan QX, et al. Effect of camrelizumab vs placebo added to chemotherapy on survival and progression-free survival in patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the ESCORT-1st randomized clinical trial. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2021;326(10):916–25. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.12836.CrossRef Luo HY, Lu J, Bai YX, Mao T, Wang J, Fan QX, et al. Effect of camrelizumab vs placebo added to chemotherapy on survival and progression-free survival in patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the ESCORT-1st randomized clinical trial. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2021;326(10):916–25. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jama.​2021.​12836.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu Z, Wang J, Shu Y, Liu L, Kong L, Yang L, et al. Sintilimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy as first line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ORIENT-15): multicentre, randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2022;377:e068714. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068714. . Epub 2022/04/21. At http://ww.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from Innovent Biologics and Eli Lilly for the submitted work; LS reports receiving research funding from Innovent Biologics, Beijing Xiantong Biomedical Technology, Qilu Pharmaceutical, ZaiLab Pharmaceutical, Beihai Kangcheng (Beijing) Medical Technology, and Jacobio Pharmaceuticals; consultant fees from MSD, Merck, Mingji Biopharmaceutical, Haichuang Pharmaceutical, Herbour Biomed, and BI; honoraria from Hutchison Whampoa, Hengrui, ZaiLab, and CSTONE pharmaceutical; and serving as a consultant for Rongchang Pharmaceutical, ZaiLab, CSTONE Pharmaceutical, and BMS. AZ has participated in consulting boards, advisory boards, or both, for Amgen, Lilly, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Baxter, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Havas Life, Alira Health, and Zymeworks. Lu Z, Wang J, Shu Y, Liu L, Kong L, Yang L, et al. Sintilimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy as first line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ORIENT-15): multicentre, randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2022;377:e068714. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmj-2021-068714. . Epub 2022/04/21. At http://​ww.​icmje.​org/​coi_​disclosure.​pdf and declare: support from Innovent Biologics and Eli Lilly for the submitted work; LS reports receiving research funding from Innovent Biologics, Beijing Xiantong Biomedical Technology, Qilu Pharmaceutical, ZaiLab Pharmaceutical, Beihai Kangcheng (Beijing) Medical Technology, and Jacobio Pharmaceuticals; consultant fees from MSD, Merck, Mingji Biopharmaceutical, Haichuang Pharmaceutical, Herbour Biomed, and BI; honoraria from Hutchison Whampoa, Hengrui, ZaiLab, and CSTONE pharmaceutical; and serving as a consultant for Rongchang Pharmaceutical, ZaiLab, CSTONE Pharmaceutical, and BMS. AZ has participated in consulting boards, advisory boards, or both, for Amgen, Lilly, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Baxter, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Havas Life, Alira Health, and Zymeworks.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu J, Kato K, Raymond E, Hubner RA, Shu Y, Pan Y, et al. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (RATIONALE-306): a global, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00108-0. (Epub 2023/04/21).CrossRefPubMed Xu J, Kato K, Raymond E, Hubner RA, Shu Y, Pan Y, et al. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (RATIONALE-306): a global, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2023. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​s1470-2045(23)00108-0. (Epub 2023/04/21).CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamangar F, Nasrollahzadeh D, Safiri S, Sepanlou SG, Fitzmaurice C, Ikuta KS, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of oesophageal cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(6):582–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30007-8.CrossRef Kamangar F, Nasrollahzadeh D, Safiri S, Sepanlou SG, Fitzmaurice C, Ikuta KS, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of oesophageal cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(6):582–97. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​s2468-1253(20)30007-8.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu SL, Wu JH, Wu J, Dong CH, Li HC, Liu GE. China guidelines for pharmacoeconomic evaluations: Chinese-english version. 1st ed. Beijing: China Market Press; 2020. Hu SL, Wu JH, Wu J, Dong CH, Li HC, Liu GE. China guidelines for pharmacoeconomic evaluations: Chinese-english version. 1st ed. Beijing: China Market Press; 2020.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang L. Guidelines of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO), esophageal cancer 2022. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2022. p. 130. Wang L. Guidelines of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO), esophageal cancer 2022. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2022. p. 130.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma X. China Health Statistics Yearbook (2022): in Chinese. 1st ed. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press; 2022. p. 426. Ma X. China Health Statistics Yearbook (2022): in Chinese. 1st ed. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press; 2022. p. 426.
Metadaten
Titel
Tislelizumab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Placebo Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Chinese Patients with Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
verfasst von
Shijie Lu
Yake Lou
Yi Rong
Zirui Huang
Xiaodan Lin
Junying Chen
Kongjia Luo
Publikationsdatum
05.08.2023
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Ausgabe 8/2023
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-023-01295-2