Upon invasion of HSV-1 and -2, viral glycoproteins including gH and gL are recognized by TLR2 [
107]. TLR2 is located on the dendritic cell surface and hetero-dimerizes with TLR6 or TLR1 to recognize viral glycoproteins [
108]. Once HSV-2 has invaded the host, TLR4 recognizes the short-hairpin DNA from HSV on the cell surface [
109]. Villalba et al. reported that TLR2 and TLR4 expression occurs as early as 1 h after HSV-1 infection and increase the levels of IRF3, IRF7, INF-β, and IL-6 [
110]. The activation of TLR2 or TLR4 launches the MyD88-dependent signaling cascades and assembles macrophages and natural killer cells [
109,
111]. MyD88 recruits IL-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK1), then activates tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF6) [
112‐
115]. Subsequently, transforming growth factor-β-activated protein kinase-1-binding protein-2 (TA
B2) and transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase-1 (TAK1) are recruited to stimulate the inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase (IKK) complex which comprises IκB kinase α (IKKα), IKKβ, and IKKγ (NEMO) [
113,
116,
117]. IKKα serves as a stimulator of NF-κB in the IKK complex. In contrast, IKKβ phosphorylates and degrades the inhibitor of NF-κB (IκB) to release NF-κB [
118,
119]. Alternatively, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are triggered by TAK1 to allow AP-1 into the nucleus [
120‐
124]. NF-κB and AP-1 enable immune cells to secrete IL-15, TNF-α, and IFN to defend against HSV and counteract viral absorption. In addition, studies have demonstrated that the expression of chemokines, such as chemokine (C–C motif) ligands 7, 8, and 9, as well as chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligands 1, 2, 4, and 5, which play important roles in the innate immune response against HSV [
125,
126]. Surprisingly, when activated via the TLR4-MyD88 axis, AP-1 upregulates TLR4 expression by feedback in genital epithelial cells to enhance immunity in humans [
127]. A study has also shown that Sp1 has a significant effect as a major transcription factor involved in TLR2 promoter activity [
107,
128].
Moreover, Kurt-Jones et al. demonstrated that neonates produce more pro-inflammatory cytokines than adults, which may explain the sepsis syndrome that is seen with HSV-1 and -2 [
129]. This result is in accord with the finding that TLR2-deficient mice are more likely to survive HSV-1 than wild-type mice [
105]. Besides the cytokine response, TLR2 signaling generates reactive oxygen species and induces oxidative stress, which cause damage in wild-type microglial cell cultures; but this does not occur in cells from TLR2-deficient mice. The consequences of oxidative stress are associated with reduced activation of the MAPK pathway [
130]. These results suggest that the immune response mediated by TLR-2 can be not only beneficial but also detrimental to the host [
105]. Surprisingly, TLR2 and TLR9 synergistically activate the innate antiviral response defense against HSV-1 and -2, showing a protective effect [
106]. Compared to TLR2, TLR3 seems to have a protective effect [
131,
132].