Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
European Radiology
Erschienen in: European Radiology 9/2006

01.09.2006 | Oncology

Total-body MR-imaging in oncology

verfasst von: Juergen F. Schaefer, Heinz-Peter W. Schlemmer

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Although MRI is an effective modality in oncology, state-of-the-art total-body MRI (TB-MRI) in the past was infeasible in the diagnostic work-up, due to the need for repeated examinations with repositioning and separate surface coils to cover all body parts. To overcome this limitation, either a moving table platform in combination with the body-coil or a special designed rolling table platform with one body phased-array coil have been implemented with promising results for both tumor staging and metastases screening. Since 2004, state-of-the-art TB-MR imaging with high spatial resolution has become feasible using a newly developed 1.5 Tesla TB-MRI system with multiple receiver channels. This review gives an overview based on the recent literature as well as our own experience concerning the possibilities, challenges, and limitations of TB-MRI in oncology, emphasizing both oncological staging and early tumor detection in asymptomatic subjects.
Literatur
1.
Eustace S, Tello R, De CV, Carey J, Wroblicka J, Melhem E, Yucel E (1997) A comparison of whole-body turboSTIR MR imaging and planar 99 mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1655–1661PubMed
2.
Eustace S, Walker R, Blake M, Yucel E (1999) Whole-body MR imaging. Practical issues, clinical applications, and future directions. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 7:209–236PubMed
3.
Steinborn MM, Heuck AF, Tiling R, Bruegel M, Gauger L, Reiser MF (1999) Whole-body bone marrow MRI in patients with metastatic disease to the skeletal system. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:123–129PubMedCrossRef
4.
Ruehm S, Goyen M, Quick H, Schleputz M, Schleputz H, Bosk S, Barkhausen J, Ladd M, Debatin J (2000) Whole-body MRA on a rolling table platform (AngioSURF). Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 172:670–674PubMedCrossRef
5.
Walker R, Kessar P, Blanchard R, Dimasi M, Harper K, DeCarvalho V, Yucel EK, Patriquin L, Eustace S (2000) Turbo STIR magnetic resonance imaging as a whole-body screening tool for metastases in patients with breast carcinoma: preliminary clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 11:343–350PubMedCrossRef
6.
Barkhausen J, Quick HH, Lauenstein T, Goyen M, Ruehm SG, Laub G, Debatin JF, Ladd ME (2001) Whole-body MR imaging in 30 seconds with real-time true FISP and a continuously rolling table platform: feasibility study. Radiology 220:252–256PubMed
7.
Gohde S, Goyen M, Forsting M, Debatin J (2002) Prevention without radiation–a strategy for comprehensive early detection using magnetic resonance tomography. Radiologe 42:622–629PubMedCrossRef
8.
Goyen M, Quick HH, Debatin JF, Ladd ME, Barkhausen J, Herborn CU, Bosk S, Kuehl H, Schleputz M, Ruehm SG (2002) Whole-body three-dimensional MR angiography with a rolling table platform: initial clinical experience. Radiology 224:270–277PubMedCrossRef
9.
Lauenstein T, Freudenberg L, Goehde S, Ruehm S, Goyen M, Bosk S, Debatin J, Barkhausen J (2002) Whole-body MRI using a rolling table platform for the detection of bone metastases. Eur Radiol 12:2091–2099PubMed
10.
Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Herborn CU, Treder W, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF, Barkhausen J (2002) Three-dimensional volumetric interpolated breath-hold MR imaging for whole-body tumor staging in less than 15 minutes: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:445–449PubMed
11.
Antoch G, Vogt F, Freudenberg L, Nazaradeh F, Goehde S, Barkhausen J, Dahmen G, Bockisch A, Debatin J, Ruehm S (2003) Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology. JAMA 290:3199–3206PubMedCrossRef
12.
Engelhard K, Hollenbach HP, Wohlfart K, von Imhoff E, Fellner FA (2004) Comparison of whole-body MRI with automatic moving table technique and bone scintigraphy for screening for bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 14:99–105 Epub 2003 Jul 2005PubMedCrossRef
13.
Gohde S, Debatin J, Hunold P, Vogt F, Ajaj M, Ruehm S (2004) Whole body MR screening for cardiovascular and malignant disease: feasibility and initial experience in 300 subjects. Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, III: Radiological Society of North America 493
14.
Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Herborn CU, Goyen M, Oberhoff C, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG, Barkhausen J (2004) Whole-body MR imaging: evaluation of patients for metastases. Radiology 233:139–148 Epub 2004 Aug 2018PubMedCrossRef
15.
Daldrup-Link HE, Franzius C, Link TM, Laukamp D, Sciuk J, Jurgens H, Schober O, Rummeny EJ (2001) Whole-body MR imaging for detection of bone metastases in children and young adults: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:229–236PubMed
16.
Lauenstein TC, Freudenberg LS, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Bosk S, Debatin JF, Barkhausen J (2002) Whole-body MRI using a rolling table platform for the detection of bone metastases. Eur Radiol 12:2091–2099 Epub 2002 Mar 2098PubMed
17.
Antoch G, Vogt FM, Freudenberg LS, Nazaradeh F, Goehde SC, Barkhausen J, Dahmen G, Bockisch A, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG (2003) Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology. Jama 290:3199–3206PubMedCrossRef
18.
Iizuka-Mikami M, Nagai K, Yoshida K, Sugihara T, Suetsugu Y, Mikami M, Tamada T, Imai S, Kajihara Y, Fukunaga M (2004) Detection of bone marrow and extramedullary involvement in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma by whole-body MRI: comparison with bone and 67Ga scintigraphies. Eur Radiol 14:1074–1081 Epub 2004 Feb 1018PubMedCrossRef
19.
Goehde SC, Hunold P, Vogt FM, Ajaj W, Goyen M, Herborn CU, Forsting M, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG (2005) Full-body cardiovascular and tumor MRI for early detection of disease: feasibility and initial experience in 298 subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:598–611PubMed
20.
Schlemmer HP, Schafer J, Pfannenberg C, Radny P, Korchidi S, Muller-Horvat C, Nagele T, Tomaschko K, Fenchel M, Claussen CD (2005) Fast whole-body assessment of metastatic disease using a novel magnetic resonance imaging system: initial experiences. Invest Radiol 40:64–71PubMedCrossRef
21.
Schmidt GP, Baur-Melnyk A, Herzog P, Schmid R, Tiling R, Schmidt M, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO (2005) High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance image tumor staging with the use of parallel imaging versus dual-modality positron emission tomography-computed tomography: experience on a 32-channel system. Invest Radiol 40:743–753PubMedCrossRef
22.
Tausig A, Manthey N, Berger F, Sommer H, Pfluger T, Hahn K (2000) Advantages and limitations of whole-body bone marrow MRI using Turbo-STIR sequences in comparison to planar bone scans. Nuklearmedizin 39:174–179PubMed
23.
Engelhard K, Hollenbach H, Wohlfart K, Von IE, Fellner F (2004) Comparison of whole-body MRI with automatic moving table technique and bone scintigraphy for screening for bone metastases in patients with breast cancer [In Process Citation]. Eur Radiol 14:99–105PubMedCrossRef
24.
Ghanem N, Kelly T, Altehoefer C, Winterer J, Schafer O, Bley TA, Moser E, Langer M (2004) Whole-body MRI in comparison to skeletal scintigraphy for detection of skeletal metastases in patients with solid tumors. Radiologe 44:864–873PubMedCrossRef
25.
Baur A, Stabler A, Nagel D, Lamerz R, Bartl R, Hiller E, Wendtner C, Bachner F, Reiser M (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging as a supplement for the clinical staging system of Durie and Salmon? Cancer 95:1334–1345PubMedCrossRef
26.
Baur A, Stabler A, Arbogast S, Duerr HR, Bartl R, Reiser M (2002) Acute osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compression fractures: fluid sign at MR imaging. Radiology 225:730–735PubMedCrossRef
27.
Ghanem N, Uhl M, Brink I, Schafer O, Kelly T, Moser E, Langer M (2005) Diagnostic value of MRI in comparison to scintigraphy, PET, MS-CT and PET/CT for the detection of metastases of bone. Eur J Radiol 55:41–55PubMedCrossRef
28.
Nakai T, Okuyama C, Kubota T, Yamada K, Ushijima Y, Taniike K, Suzuki T, Nishimura T (2005) Pitfalls of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of osteoblastic bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32:1253–1258 Epub 2005 Aug 1220PubMedCrossRef
29.
Baur A, Bartl R, Pellengahr C, Baltin V, Reiser M (2004) Neovascularization of bone marrow in patients with diffuse multiple myeloma: a correlative study of magnetic resonance imaging and histopathologic findings. Cancer 101:2599–2604PubMedCrossRef
30.
Ghanem N, Altehoefer C, Hogerle S, Schafer O, Winterer J, Moser E, Langer M (2002) Comparative diagnostic value and therapeutic relevance of magnetic resonance imaging and bone marrow scintigraphy in patients with metastatic solid tumors of the axial skeleton. Eur J Radiol 43:256–261PubMedCrossRef
31.
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC (2003) Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Radiology 226:24–28PubMedCrossRef
32.
Muller-Horvat C, Radny P, Eigentler TK, Schafer J, Pfannenberg C, Horger M, Khorchidi S, Nagele T, Garbe C, Claussen CD, Schlemmer HP (2006) Prospective comparison of the impact on treatment decisions of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. Eur J Cancer 42(3):342–350PubMedCrossRef
33.
Mazumdar A, Siegel MJ, Narra V, Luchtman-Jones L (2002) Whole-body fast inversion recovery MR imaging of small cell neoplasms in pediatric patients: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1261–1266PubMed
34.
Mentzel HJ, Kentouche K, Sauner D, Fleischmann C, Vogt S, Gottschild D, Zintl F, Kaiser WA (2004) Comparison of whole-body STIR-MRI and 99 mTc-methylene-diphosphonate scintigraphy in children with suspected multifocal bone lesions. Eur Radiol 14:2297–2302 Epub 2004 Jul 2299PubMedCrossRef
35.
Kellenberger CJ, Epelman M, Miller SF, Babyn PS (2004) Fast STIR whole-body MR imaging in children. Radiographics 24:1317–1330PubMedCrossRef
36.
Kellenberger CJ, Miller SF, Khan M, Gilday DL, Weitzman S, Babyn PS (2004) Initial experience with FSE STIR whole-body MR imaging for staging lymphoma in children. Eur Radiol 14:1829–1841 Epub 2004 Sep 1829PubMedCrossRef
37.
38.
Boyle P, Ferlay J (2005) Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004. Ann Oncol 16:481–488 Epub 2005 Feb 2017PubMedCrossRef
39.
40.
Gray J (1997) Evidence based health care: how to make healthy policy and management decisions. Churchill Livingstone, New York, NY
41.
Obuchowski NA, Modic MT (2005) Screening with multisection CT: unmasking the benefit. Radiology 237:401–403PubMedCrossRef
42.
Gohagan JK, Marcus PM, Fagerstrom RM, Pinsky PF, Kramer BS, Prorok PC, Ascher S, Bailey W, Brewer B, Church T, Engelhard D, Ford M, Fouad M, Freedman M, Gelmann E, Gierada D, Hocking W, Inampudi S, Irons B, Johnson CC, Jones A, Kucera G, Kvale P, Lappe K, Manor W, Moore A, Nath H, Neff S, Oken M, Plunkett M, Price H, Reding D, Riley T, Schwartz M, Spizarny D, Yoffie R, Zylak C (2005) Final results of the Lung Screening Study, a randomized feasibility study of spiral CT versus chest X-ray screening for lung cancer. Lung Cancer 47:9–15PubMedCrossRef
43.
Gohagan J, Marcus P, Fagerstrom R, Pinsky P, Kramer B, Prorok P (2004) Baseline findings of a randomized feasibility trial of lung cancer screening with spiral CT scan vs chest radiograph: the Lung Screening Study of the National Cancer Institute. Chest 126:114–121PubMedCrossRef
44.
Garg K, Keith RL, Byers T, Kelly K, Kerzner AL, Lynch DA, Miller YE (2002) Randomized controlled trial with low-dose spiral CT for lung cancer screening: feasibility study and preliminary results. Radiology 225:506–510PubMedCrossRef
45.
Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Hayes RB, Kramer BS (2000) The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status. Control Clin Trials 21:251S–272SPubMedCrossRef
46.
Henschke CI (2005) CT screening for lung cancer: update 2005. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 14:761–776PubMedCrossRef
47.
48.
Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, Midthun DE, Mandrekar SJ, Hillman SL, Sykes AM, Aughenbaugh GL, Bungum AO, Allen KL (2005) CT screening for lung cancer: five-year prospective experience. Radiology 235:259–265 Epub 2005 Feb 2004PubMedCrossRef
49.
Feuerstein IM, Jicha DL, Pass HI, Chow CK, Chang R, Ling A, Hill SC, Dwyer AJ, Travis WD, Horowitz ME et al (1992) Pulmonary metastases: MR imaging with surgical correlation–a prospective study. Radiology 182:123–129PubMed
50.
Kersjes W, Mayer E, Buchenroth M, Schunk K, Fouda N, Cagil H (1997) Diagnosis of pulmonary metastases with turbo-SE MR imaging. Eur Radiol 7:1190–1194PubMedCrossRef
51.
Lutterbey G, Leutner C, Gieseke J, Rodenburg J, Elevelt A, Sommer T, Schild H (1998) Detection of focal lung lesions with magnetic resonance tomography using T2-weighted ultrashort turbo-spin-echo-sequence in comparison with spiral computerized tomography. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 169:365–369PubMedCrossRef
52.
Biederer J, Schoene A, Freitag S, Reuter M, Heller M (2003) Simulated pulmonary nodules implanted in a dedicated porcine chest phantom: sensitivity of MR imaging for detection. Radiology 227:475–483 Epub 2003 Mar 2020PubMedCrossRef
53.
Biederer J, Both M, Graessner J, Liess C, Jakob P, Reuter M, Heller M (2003) Lung morphology: fast MR imaging assessment with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold technique: initial experience with patients. Radiology 226:242–249PubMedCrossRef
54.
Schafer JF, Vollmar J, Schick F, Seemann MD, Kamm P, Erdtmann B, Claussen CD (2005) Detection of pulmonary nodules with breath-hold magnetic resonance imaging in comparison with computed tomography. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 177:41–49PubMedCrossRef
55.
Vogt FM, Herborn CU, Hunold P, Lauenstein TC, Schroder T, Debatin JF, Barkhausen J (2004) HASTE MRI versus chest radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules: comparison with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:71–78PubMed
56.
Schroeder T, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF, Ladd ME, Barkhausen J, Goehde SC (2005) Detection of pulmonary nodules using a 2D HASTE MR sequence: comparison with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:979–984PubMedCrossRef
57.
Chen Q, Stock KW, Prasad PV, Hatabu H (1999) Fast magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Eur J Radiol 29:90–100PubMedCrossRef
58.
Bergin C, Glover G, Pauly J (1991) Lung parenchyma: magnetic susceptibility in MR imaging. Radiology 180:845–848PubMed
59.
MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, Herold CJ, Jett JR, Naidich DP, Patz EF Jr, Swensen SJ (2005) Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 237:395–400PubMedCrossRef
60.
Brenner DJ (2004) Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology 231:440–445PubMedCrossRef
61.
Ohno Y, Hatabu H, Takenaka D, Adachi S, Kono M, Sugimura K (2002) Solitary pulmonary nodules: potential role of dynamic MR imaging in management initial experience. Radiology 224:503–511PubMedCrossRef
62.
Schaefer JF, Vollmar J, Schick F, Vonthein R, Seemann MD, Aebert H, Dierkesmann R, Friedel G, Claussen CD (2004) Solitary pulmonary nodules: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging–perfusion differences in malignant and benign lesions. Radiology 232:544–553 Epub 2004 Jun 2023PubMedCrossRef
63.
Kim JH, Kim HJ, Lee KH, Kim KH, Lee HL (2004) Solitary pulmonary nodules: a comparative study evaluated with contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging and CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:766–775PubMedCrossRef
64.
Goyen M, Goehde S, Herborn C, Hunold P, Vogt F, Gizewski E, Lauenstein T, Ajaj W, Forsting M, Debatin J, Ruehm S (2004) MR-based full-body preventative cardiovascular and tumor imaging: technique and preliminary experience [In Process Citation]. Eur Radiol 14:783–791PubMedCrossRef
65.
Harewood GC, Lieberman DA (2004) Colonoscopy practice patterns since introduction of medicare coverage for average-risk screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:72–77PubMedCrossRef
66.
Pickhardt P, Choi J, Hwang I, Butler J, Puckett M, Hildebrandt H, Wong R, Nugent P, Mysliwiec P, Schindler W (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Eng J Med 349:2191–2200CrossRef
67.
Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Clark DW, Helper DJ, Lehman GA, Mark DG (1997) Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112:24–28PubMedCrossRef
68.
Sonnenberg A, Delco F, Bauerfeind P (1999) Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol 94:2268–2274PubMedCrossRef
69.
Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, Dachman AH, Fenlon HM, Ferrucci JT, Glick SN, Laghi A, Macari M, McFarland EG, Morrin MM, Pickhardt PJ, Soto J, Yee J (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236:3–9PubMedCrossRef
70.
Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, Marincek B, Fried M, Debatin J (2000) Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology 216:383–388PubMed
71.
Saar B, Heverhagen J, Obst T, Berthold L, Kopp I, Klose K, Wagner H (2000) Magnetic resonance colonography and virtual magnetic resonance colonoscopy with the 1.0-T system: a feasibility study. Invest Radiol 35:521–526PubMedCrossRef
72.
Ajaj W, Pelster G, Treichel U, Vogt F, Debatin J, Ruehm S, Lauenstein T (2003) Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology. Gut 52:1738–1743PubMedCrossRef
73.
Steidle G, Schafer J, Schlemmer HP, Claussen CD, Schick F (2004) Two-dimensional parallel acquisition technique in 3D MR colonography. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 176:1100–1105PubMedCrossRef
74.
Iannaccone R, Catalano C, Mangiapane F, Murakami T, Lamazza A, Fiori E, Schillaci A, Marin D, Nofroni I, Hori M, Passariello R (2005) Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies. Radiology 237:927–937PubMedCrossRef
75.
76.
Brown J, Smith RC, Lee CH (2001) Incidental enhancing lesions found on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:1249–1254PubMed
77.
Gibbs P, Liney GP, Lowry M, Kneeshaw PJ, Turnbull LW (2004) Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1 cm breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Breast 13:115–121PubMedCrossRef
78.
Nakashima J, Tanimoto A, Imai Y, Mukai M, Horiguchi Y, Nakagawa K, Oya M, Ohigashi T, Marumo K, Murai M (2004) Endorectal MRI for prediction of tumor site, tumor size, and local extension of prostate cancer. Urology 64:101–105PubMedCrossRef
79.
Kurhanewicz J, Swanson MG, Nelson SJ, Vigneron DB (2002) Combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging approach to molecular imaging of prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:451–463PubMedCrossRef
80.
Togashi K (2003) Ovarian cancer: the clinical role of US, CT, and MRI. Eur Radiol 13(4):L87–L104PubMedCrossRef
81.
Fink C, Grenacher L, Hansmann H, Dux M, Leipold R, Spielhaupter E, Kauffmann G, Richter G (2001) Prospective study to compare high-resolution computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of pancreatic neoplasms: use of intravenous and oral MR contrast media. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 173:724–730PubMedCrossRef
82.
Dux M, Grenacher L, Lubienski A, Schipp A, Richter G, Hansmann J (2000) Carcinoma of the stomach. Role of imaging for primary diagnosis and preoperative tumor staging. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 172:661–669PubMedCrossRef
83.
Stashuk G (2003) Gastric magnetic resonance study (methods, semiotics). Vestn Rentgenol Radiol 2003:32–41
84.
Filipas D, Spix C, Schulz-Lampel D, Michaelis J, Hohenfellner R, Roth S, Thuroff J (2003) Screening for renal cell carcinoma using ultrasonography: a feasibility study. BJU Int 91:595–599PubMedCrossRef
85.
Kreft BP, Muller-Miny H, Sommer T, Steudel A, Vahlensieck M, Novak D, Muller BG, Schild HH (1997) Diagnostic value of MR imaging in comparison to CT in the detection and differential diagnosis of renal masses: ROC analysis. Eur Radiol 7:542–547PubMedCrossRef
86.
Hara A, Johnson C, MacCarty R, Welch T (2000) Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 215:353–357PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Total-body MR-imaging in oncology
verfasst von
Juergen F. Schaefer
Heinz-Peter W. Schlemmer
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2006
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2006
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0199-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2006

European Radiology 9/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Musculoskeletal

Image-guided percutaneous biopsy of intramedullary lytic bone lesions: utility of aspirated blood clots

Calendar of Events

Calendar of Events

Cardiac

Contrast agents and cardiac MR imaging of myocardial ischemia: from bench to bedside

Neuro

Modern cross-sectional imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up of intracranial aneurysms

Gastrointestinal

Initial experience with magnetic resonance fluoroscopy in the evaluation of oesophageal motility disorders. Comparison with manometry and barium fluoroscopy

Vascular-Interventional

MR-guided biopsies with a newly designed cordless coil in an open low-field system: Initial findings

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

18.04.2024 | Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin | Nachrichten

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

08.04.2024 | Andrologie | Nachrichten

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

29.03.2024 | Diagnostische Radiologie | Nachrichten

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

26.03.2024 | Koronare Herzerkrankung | Nachrichten

Quantitative Angiografie könnte IVUS-Alternative darstellen
weitere anzeigen

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen