Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 4/2016

01.02.2016 | Original Article

Totally robotic rectal resection: an experience of the first 100 consecutive cases

verfasst von: J. Ahmed, M. Nasir, K. Flashman, J. Khan, A. Parvaiz

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Robotic surgery provides an alternative option for a minimal access approach. It provides a stable platform with high definition three-dimensional views and improved access, which enhances the capabilities for precise dissection in a narrow surgical field. These distinctive features have made it an attractive option for colorectal surgeons.

Aim

The aim of this study was to present a standardised technique for single-docking robotic rectal resection and to analyse clinical outcomes of the first 100 robotic rectal procedures performed in a single centre between May 2013 and April 2015.

Method

Prospectively collected data related to 100 consecutive patients who underwent single-docking robotic rectal surgery was analysed for surgical and oncological outcomes.

Results

Sixty-six patients were male, the median age was 67 years (range-24–92). Eighteen patients had neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy whilst 23 patients had BMI >30. Procedures performed included anterior resection (n = 74), abdominoperineal resection (n = 10), completion proctectomy (n = 9), restorative proctectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) (n = 5) and Hartmann’s procedure (n = 2). The median operating time was 240 min (range-135–456), and median blood loss was 10 ml (range 0–200). There was no conversion or intra-operative complication. Median length of stay was 7 days (range, 3–48) and readmission rate was 12 %. Thirty-day mortality was zero. Postoperatively, two patients had an anastomotic leak whilst two had small bowel obstruction. The median lymph node harvest was 18 (range, 6–43).

Conclusion

The single-docking robotic technique should be considered as an alternative option for rectal surgery. This approach is safe and feasible and in our study it has demonstrated favourable clinical outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimotoa T et al (2012) A meta-analysis of the short- and long term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. J Cancer 3:49–57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimotoa T et al (2012) A meta-analysis of the short- and long term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. J Cancer 3:49–57CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2006) Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and recto-sigmoid cancer. Color Dis 8:375–388CrossRef Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2006) Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and recto-sigmoid cancer. Color Dis 8:375–388CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Maggiori L, Panis Y (2013) Is it time for a paradigm shift: “laparoscopy is now the best approach for rectal cancer”? Transl G 2224–4778 Maggiori L, Panis Y (2013) Is it time for a paradigm shift: “laparoscopy is now the best approach for rectal cancer”? Transl G 2224–4778
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS et al (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS et al (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124CrossRefPubMed Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Delaney CP, Lynch AC, Senagore AJ, Fazio VW (2003) Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1633–1639CrossRefPubMed Delaney CP, Lynch AC, Senagore AJ, Fazio VW (2003) Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1633–1639CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cecil TD, Taffinder N, Gudgeon AM (2006) A personal view on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Color Dis 8:30–32CrossRef Cecil TD, Taffinder N, Gudgeon AM (2006) A personal view on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Color Dis 8:30–32CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Shearer R, Gale M, Aly OE, Aly EH (2013) Have early post- operative complications from laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery improved over the past 20 years? Color Dis 15:1211–1226CrossRef Shearer R, Gale M, Aly OE, Aly EH (2013) Have early post- operative complications from laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery improved over the past 20 years? Color Dis 15:1211–1226CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballantyne GH, Moll F (2003) The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg Clin N Am 83:1293–1304CrossRefPubMed Ballantyne GH, Moll F (2003) The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg Clin N Am 83:1293–1304CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim N-K, Kang J (2010) Optimal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the role of robotic surgery from an expert’s view. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 26:377–387CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim N-K, Kang J (2010) Optimal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the role of robotic surgery from an expert’s view. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 26:377–387CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A et al (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1689–1694, discussion 1695–1686 CrossRefPubMed Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A et al (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1689–1694, discussion 1695–1686 CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Zimmern A, Prasad L, Desouza A et al (2010) Robotic colon and rectal surgery: a series of 131 cases. World J Surg 34:1954–1958CrossRefPubMed Zimmern A, Prasad L, Desouza A et al (2010) Robotic colon and rectal surgery: a series of 131 cases. World J Surg 34:1954–1958CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Crawford DL (2006) Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 20:1713–1718CrossRefPubMed Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Crawford DL (2006) Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 20:1713–1718CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Deutsch GB, Sathyanarayana SA, Gunabushanam V, Mishra N et al (2012) Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience. Surg Endosc 26:956–963CrossRefPubMed Deutsch GB, Sathyanarayana SA, Gunabushanam V, Mishra N et al (2012) Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience. Surg Endosc 26:956–963CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sawada H, Egi H, Hattori M et al (2015) Initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case–control study. World J Surg Oncol 13:103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sawada H, Egi H, Hattori M et al (2015) Initial experiences of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, focusing on short-term outcomes: a matched case–control study. World J Surg Oncol 13:103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiomi A, Kinugasa Y, Yamaguchi T et al (2014) Robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: short-term outcomes for 113 consecutive patients. Int J Color Dis 29:1105–1111CrossRef Shiomi A, Kinugasa Y, Yamaguchi T et al (2014) Robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: short-term outcomes for 113 consecutive patients. Int J Color Dis 29:1105–1111CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Miskovic D, Foster J, Agha A et al (2015) Standardization of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a structured international expert consensus. Ann Surg 261:716–722CrossRefPubMed Miskovic D, Foster J, Agha A et al (2015) Standardization of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a structured international expert consensus. Ann Surg 261:716–722CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Morpurgo E et al (2010) Robotic right colon resection: evaluation of first 50 consecutive cases for malignant disease. Ann Surg Oncol 17:2856–2862CrossRefPubMed D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Morpurgo E et al (2010) Robotic right colon resection: evaluation of first 50 consecutive cases for malignant disease. Ann Surg Oncol 17:2856–2862CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellan M, Anderson C, Ellenhorn JDI et al (2007) Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:3168–3173CrossRefPubMed Hellan M, Anderson C, Ellenhorn JDI et al (2007) Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:3168–3173CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS et al (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1480–1487CrossRefPubMed Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS et al (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1480–1487CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hemandas A, Flashman KG, Farrow J et al (2011) Modular training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery maximizes training opportunities without clinical compromise. World J Surg 35:409–414CrossRefPubMed Hemandas A, Flashman KG, Farrow J et al (2011) Modular training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery maximizes training opportunities without clinical compromise. World J Surg 35:409–414CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Aly EH (2014) Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence. Int J Color Dis 29:1–8CrossRef Aly EH (2014) Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence. Int J Color Dis 29:1–8CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R et al (2008) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treat Rev 34:498–504CrossRefPubMed Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R et al (2008) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treat Rev 34:498–504CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kariv Y, Delaney CP (2005) Robotics in colorectal surgery. Minerva Chir 60:401–416PubMed Kariv Y, Delaney CP (2005) Robotics in colorectal surgery. Minerva Chir 60:401–416PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefPubMed Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Obias V, Sanches C, Nam A et al (2011) Totally robotic single-position ‘flip’ arm technique for splenic flexure mobilizations and low anterior resections. Int J Med Robot 7:123–126CrossRefPubMed Obias V, Sanches C, Nam A et al (2011) Totally robotic single-position ‘flip’ arm technique for splenic flexure mobilizations and low anterior resections. Int J Med Robot 7:123–126CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellan M, Stein H, Pigazzi A (2009) Totally robotic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Endosc 23:447–451CrossRefPubMed Hellan M, Stein H, Pigazzi A (2009) Totally robotic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Endosc 23:447–451CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Mackenzie H, Miskovic D, Ni M et al (2013) Clinical and educational proficiency gain of supervised laparoscopic colorectal surgical trainees. Surg Endosc 27:2704–2711CrossRefPubMed Mackenzie H, Miskovic D, Ni M et al (2013) Clinical and educational proficiency gain of supervised laparoscopic colorectal surgical trainees. Surg Endosc 27:2704–2711CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Jiménez-Rodríguez RM, Díaz-Pavón JM, de la Portilla de Juan F et al (2013) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Color Dis 28:815–821CrossRef Jiménez-Rodríguez RM, Díaz-Pavón JM, de la Portilla de Juan F et al (2013) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Color Dis 28:815–821CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY (2014) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons from a single surgeon’s experience. Dis Colon Rectum 57:1066–1074CrossRefPubMed Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY (2014) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons from a single surgeon’s experience. Dis Colon Rectum 57:1066–1074CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang Y, Wang F, Zhang P et al (2012) Robot assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19:3727–3736CrossRefPubMed Yang Y, Wang F, Zhang P et al (2012) Robot assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19:3727–3736CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Scarpinata R, Aly EH (2013) Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Dis Colon Rectum 56:253–262CrossRefPubMed Scarpinata R, Aly EH (2013) Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Dis Colon Rectum 56:253–262CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefPubMed van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Baek SJ, Kim SK, Cho JS et al (2012) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea. World J Surg 36:2722–2729CrossRefPubMed Baek SJ, Kim SK, Cho JS et al (2012) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea. World J Surg 36:2722–2729CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Tou S, Bergamaschi R, Heald RJ, Parvaiz A (2015) Structured training in robotic colorectal surgery. Color Dis 17:185CrossRef Tou S, Bergamaschi R, Heald RJ, Parvaiz A (2015) Structured training in robotic colorectal surgery. Color Dis 17:185CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Broholm M, Pommergaard HC, Gogenur I (2015) Possible benefits of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery regarding urological and sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis 17:375–381CrossRef Broholm M, Pommergaard HC, Gogenur I (2015) Possible benefits of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery regarding urological and sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Color Dis 17:375–381CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Totally robotic rectal resection: an experience of the first 100 consecutive cases
verfasst von
J. Ahmed
M. Nasir
K. Flashman
J. Khan
A. Parvaiz
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2503-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.