Background
Methods
1. | Waiting lists [Mesh Subject exploded] |
2. | Wait* time* or waitlist* or queue* [*Text words] |
3. | (wait* or await*) ADJ2 (list or lists or time*)[*Text words] |
4. | Awaiting [Title Word] |
5. | 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 |
6. | Transplantation or transplants or tissue donors or emergencies or emergency medical services or emergency service, hospital or emergency service, psychiatric [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
7. | 5 not 6 |
8. | Limit 7 to yr = ‘1990 – 2006’ |
9. | Limit 8 to abstracts |
10. | Limit 8 to English language |
11. | 9 or 10 |
12. | National health programs or local government [MeSH Subjects exploded] |
13. | Health services accessibility / organization & administration, legislation & jurisprudence, standards [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
14. | Health policy or social control policies or organizational policy or public policy or public opinion [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
15. | Health care rationing / organization & administration, legislation & jurisprudence [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
16. | Health priorities / organization & administration, legislation & jurisprudence [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
17. | Management information systems [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
18. | Health personnel / organization & administration [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
19. | Personnel management / organization & administration, legislation & jurisprudence, manpower [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
20. | Information systems / methods, organization & administration, legislation & jurisprudence, manpower [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
21. | Organizational policy or organizational innovation or efficiency, organizational or decision making, organizational or organizational objectives models, organizational or organizational culture [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
22. | Regional health planning or regional medical programs [MeSH Subjects exploded] |
23. | Delivery of healthcare / organization & administration, economics, legislation & jurisprudence [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
24. | ‘Organization and administration’ / economics, organization & administration, education, legislation and jurisprudence, methods [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
25. | Decision making or budgets or systems analysis or operations research [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
26. | Quality of healthcare / organization & administration, economics, legislation & jurisprudence, methods [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
27. | Economics [MeSH Major Subject] |
28. | Healthcare costs or costs and cost analysis or economics, medical [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
29. | State medicine / organization & administration, economics, standards, legislation & jurisprudence, manpower [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
30. | Resource allocation / organization & administration, economics, standards, supply & distribution, legislation & jurisprudence, manpower, methods [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
31. | Models, theoretical or computing methodologies or communication or Markov chains [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
32. | Professional practice / methods, organization & administration, education, standards, ethics, legislation & jurisprudence, manpower [MeSH Major Subject exploded] |
33. | 12 or 13 or 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 or 22 or 23 or 24 or 25 or 26 or 27 or 28 or 29 or 30 or 31 or 32 |
34. | 11 and 32 |
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Data extraction
Results
Systematic review
Types of research designs and countries of provenance
Characteristics of wait time management strategies
Phase of change | Level of introduction | Strategies | Article numbers |
---|---|---|---|
Implementation
|
Contextual level
| Booking systems | |
Maximum wait time guarantee | |||
Software development for WTM (includes simulation) | [29] | ||
Increases in capacity | [48] | ||
Pooled wait lists | [38] | ||
Standards or prioritization tools | |||
Improved data collection or data analysis | [45] | ||
Other (sending patients abroad, GP fund-holding, GP referral system) | |||
Local level
| Increases in capacity | ||
Work reorganizations | |||
Pre-operatory clinic | |||
Pooled wait lists | [36] | ||
Standards or prioritization tools | [41] | ||
Improved data collection or data analysis | [55] | ||
Software development for WTM (includes simulation) | |||
Sustainability
|
Contextual level
| Standards or prioritization tools | |
Local level
| Work reorganizations at the local level | ||
Booking system | [59] |
Frameworks on factors that can influence WTMS
Empirical factors influencing WTMS
Implementation | Sustainability | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Local level | Contextual level | Local level | Contextual level | |
Governance
| ▪ Reporting and monitoring structures [17,21 23-27,32,35,37,44,54] | |||
Culture
| ||||
▪ Interprofessional cooperation [22] | ||||
Resources
| ▪ Appropriate capacity (human resources) [24] | |||
▪ Innovative roles for health professionals [24] | ||||
▪ Alternative treatment options [27] | ||||
Tools
| ||||
▪ Training and support of human resources [55] | ▪ Standardized data [58] | |||
▪ Public websites [22] |
Implementation phase of WTMS: local-level factors
Governance
Culture
Resources
Tools
Implementation phase of WTMS: contextual-level factors
Governance
Culture
Resources
Tools
Sustainability phase of WTMS: local-level factors
Governance
Culture
Resources
Tools
Sustainability phase of WTMS: contextual-level factors
Governance
Culture
Resources
Tools
Workshop on WTMS
Implementation | Sustainability | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Local level | Contextual level | Local level | Contextual level | |
Governance
|
• Lack of coordination among provider groups
|
• Limited information sharing
|
• Lack of management of critical diagnostic, surgical and continuity of care interdependencies
|
• Limited information sharing
|
• Limited information sharing
|
• Competing health system priorities
|
• Lack of time allotted to WTM strategies
|
• Competing health system priorities
| |
• Lack of leadership for solutions | • Lack of leadership for solutions |
• Limited information sharing
|
• Lack of shared learning opportunities among jurisdictions
| |
• Lack of clinical-administrative partnerships
| ||||
Culture
|
• Competing cultures
|
• Lack of systematic approach to implement culture change
|
• Prevalence of a ‘blitz mentality’ among healthcare innovators
| -------- |
• Lack of evidence about value of WTM strategies
| • Resistance to change and uncertainty | |||
• Resistance to change and uncertainty | ||||
Resources
| • Lack of incentives (physician payment systems) | • Incentives (physician payment systems) | -------- | • Lack of funding |
• Insufficient number of administrative staff | • Lack of funding | |||
Tools
| • Poor resourcing of technology and staff | • Lack of standardized data | --------- | --------- |
• Lack of change management support and tools |
Best strategies | Practices |
---|---|
1. Greater alignment
| Align agendas across healthcare organizations; focus on the patient. |
2. Increased and strategic communications
| Increase communications among stakeholders, communicating at the right place and time and to the different levels of responsibilities. |
3. Strong data
| Establish a strong wait time management (WTM) data repository and ensure WTM data standardization; collect data about the impact of WTMS and identify gaps and goals; note that WTMS projects need to include change management, and that people, processes, and flows must be addressed. |
4. Clinical and administrative champion-partners
| Clinical and administrative WTMS champions must form a partnership; the system must identify who these champions are, define and resource their roles and actions, and enable them to implement an operational plan. |
5. Clear articulations of the value proposition for WTMS
| People involved in WTMS must feel that it is part of an integrated strategy and not a ‘stop-gap measure.’ |
6. Patient engagement
| Engage and activate patients; make the current system dysfunctions transparent so that patients understand there are differences in wait times among physicians, and provide them with the option of being seen by the first available physician. |
7. Health system trade-offs and patients’ options
| Talk about what the health system is for and what the trade-offs are for immediate access. |
8. Establish incentives
| Create a system with incentives for clinicians that involves paying them for their time. |
9. Leadership
| Leadership is required in partnership with payers. Make sure the ministries of healthcare are at the table; otherwise the lack of relationship with them can become a barrier. |
10. Expectations management
| As a parallel strategy, ‘expectations management’ is recommended around WTMS potential and limitations. |
Discussion
Factors | Actions/Activities |
---|---|
High level coordinating, reporting monitoring structures
| • Advisory Committee established, including VP of Acute Care, Directors, and Provincial Wait Time Manager, monthly meetings |
• Regular reporting of progress to Regional Surgical Services Leadership Team and Acute Care Directors Committee | |
• Quarterly updates provided to CEO, Board of Trustees and Ministry of Health | |
• Indicator added to organizational Strategic Plan and Scorecard for three-year cycle (April 2011-2013) | |
Stakeholder engagement
| • Numerous meetings and presentations to internal staff, including nurses, doctors, allied health and support staff |
• Presentation to Minister of Health | |
• Briefing note/budget submitted | |
• Regular meetings with Vice President | |
• Meeting with past President of NL Medical Association | |
• Presentations to Community Medical Advisory Committee | |
• Department of Health Sponsor / meetings with Wait Time Management Coordinator | |
Strong management and clinical leadership
| • Project Steering Committee established |
• Direct reporting to Vice President | |
• Director & Clinical Chief of Surgery - Project Sponsors | |
• Project Lead hired to support project | |
Dedicated and stable decision making and management structures
| • Advisory Committee established |
• Project Team | |
• Director & Clinical Chief members of Advisory Committee | |
Consultation with frontline actors
| • Presentation to Orthopedic Education Days and Surgical Rounds |
• Weekly meetings with frontline stakeholders to establish algorithm for new referral practice, including clerical staff, allied health disciplines and managers | |
• Monthly consultation and in-servicing to relevant program staff along the continuum | |
• Standard Referral Working Group | |
• Inpatient Working Group | |
• Orthopedic Charge Nurses, clinical staff participating in site visits | |
• Established formal orientation package for assessment by clinic staff | |
• Assessment clinic education day organized to facilitate clinical skills upgrading and clinical practice review | |
• Cross-site / multi-program working group | |
• Meetings with surgeons’ secretaries | |
Physician involvement
| • Presented at Surgical Teaching Rounds |
• Meeting with each surgeon individually | |
• Physician sponsors/ champions identified | |
• Developed a broad based communication strategy targeting multiple mediums to facilitate physician engagement and communicate planning including: | |
✓ Visits to urban and rural family physician clinics | |
✓ Family Physicians invited to participate in developing algorithm for changes to referral practices prior to development of referral tool | |
✓ Anesthetists / surgeons working group | |
✓ Teleconferences / site visit for anesthetist | |
• Surgeon Champion appointed to establish strong leadership and obtain buy-in for Central Intake Process | |
• Provincial Medical Association engagement: collaboration with the Communications team to communicate central intake information tools and updates to physicians via web-based media and provincial newsletters to membership | |
Funding levels and earmarked resources
| • Budget request for Project Team 2011/2012 - approved |
• Department of Health funding for Project Lead | |
• Health Canada funding obtained | |
Appropriate levels of dedicated staffing
| • Increased staffing to facilitate enhanced clinical capacity for assessment clinic and to establish formal interdisciplinary case management |
• Funding secured for two-year pilot with dedicated staff | |
• Project Lead - funded for additional year | |
• Clerical Position allocated for data collection | |
Flexible, adequate capacity
| • Orthopedic clinic space renovation: increased space for increased clinic capacity by nine half-day slots |
• Evaluation of existing clinical booking practice to redistribute patient ratios, improve efficiency, and increase capacity | |
• Additional orthopedic operating room capacity assigned (34% increase including dedicated trauma time) | |
• Additional inpatient bed capacity | |
Individual and unit/team incentives
| • Adult Orthopedic Team - CEO Award for Team Excellence |
• ‘Improving Access’ poster presentation selected for Taming of the Queue, 2012 – Ottawa. | |
• Key performance indicators collected and shared with team to support improvement | |
Central Registries (the collection and standardization of data)
| • Wait Time 1 defined |
• Data fields incorporated into standardized referral tool to collect Wait Time 1 | |
• Central Intake Registry established | |
• Orthopedic Wait List Data Value Stream Map Session: Full day event organized for all stakeholders | |
Standards and guidelines
| • Development of algorithms, pathways for central intake process |
• Evaluation Framework developed | |
• Guidelines for completion of standardized referral tool | |
• Definitions for Wait 1 and Wait 2 | |
Information Management Systems
| • Represented on working group |
• Meetings with IMT representative ongoing | |
• Site Visit (Holland Clinic, Toronto) for demonstration of | |
• Central Intake Booking System | |
Training and support
| • Site visits to Edmonton, Halifax, Toronto, and Vancouver |
• Participation in National Best Practice Initiative – Bone and Joint Canada: representation from all allied health disciplines, surgeons and medical staff. | |
• Best Practice Toolkit introduced: Bone and Joint Canada coordinators invited to participate in multisite education event |