Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 3/2019

19.06.2019 | Original Article

Tracheostomy: Open Surgical or Percutaneous? An Effort to Solve the Continued Dilemma

verfasst von: N. Ramakrishnan, Jitendra Kumar Singh, Salil Kumar Gupta, Vijay Bhalla, D. K. Singh, Sheetal Raina, Abha Kumari

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Due to lack of globally standardized guidelines and clarity on indications, patient selection, intra-operative preparations, technique, complications, postoperative care and decannulation protocols, percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) has come in vogue as compared to standard open surgical tracheostomy (OST). PercuTwist and guide wire dilatational method (GWDF), techniques of PT, offer lesser operative time and ease of surgery being a bedside procedure. There seems to be paucity of Indian literature on rising trend of increasing indications, post-operative care, management of complications and outcomes of tracheostomy. And thus, there arises a felt need to envisage a study in tertiary care setup targeting these issues and to question the so far unchallenged acceptance of new techniques and technology. Our aim is to study the recent trend of indications, complications, and outcomes of both OST and PT in a cohort of Indian patients who underwent tracheostomy. 80 patients with mean age of 59.0 ± 15 years underwent tracheostomy (OST: 48 (60%), PT: 32 (40%), and among PT, PercuTwist: 16 (50%), GWDF: 16 (50%)) for various indications with objectives to compare operative time, complications and decannulation rates of tracheostomy surgery, within the follow up period of 3 months. Most common indication of elective tracheostomy was prolonged ventilation, and for emergency ones, upper airway obstruction. Mean operative time taken by all the three techniques was comparable, i.e., 16.3 v/s 15 v/s 15.3 min (Open v/s PT GWDF v/s PT PercuTwist). Most common intra-operative complication of OST was haemorrhage (16.3%) and that of PT was false passage (8.8%). Early post-operative complications were haemorrhage (OST: 3.75%, PT: 1.25%) and tube blockage and dislodgement (equal distribution among OST and PT). Late post-operative complications were stomal granulations in PT: 7.5%. Outcomes of tracheostomy were significantly better with OST (36 (45%)) than PT (14 (17.5%)). In PT group, PercuTwist fared better than GWDF in terms of lesser complications (PercuTwist: 10%, GWDF: 18.6%) and better decannulation rates (PercuTwist: 13.6%, GWDF: 3.75%). Most common indication for tracheostomy remains prolonged intubation; complication of OST is intra and early post-operative haemorrhage and that of PT being tube dislodgement and blockage. Outcomes in form of successful decannulation are with OST.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Alabi B, Afolabi O, Dunmade A, Omokanye H, Ajayi I, Ayodele S, Busari N (2018) Indications and outcome of tracheostomy in Ilorin, North Central Nigeria: 10 years review. Ann Afr Med 17(1):1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alabi B, Afolabi O, Dunmade A, Omokanye H, Ajayi I, Ayodele S, Busari N (2018) Indications and outcome of tracheostomy in Ilorin, North Central Nigeria: 10 years review. Ann Afr Med 17(1):1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dulguerov P, Gysin C, Perneger TV, Chevrolet J-C (1999) Percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 27(8):1617–1625CrossRefPubMed Dulguerov P, Gysin C, Perneger TV, Chevrolet J-C (1999) Percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 27(8):1617–1625CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Toye FJ, Weinstein JD (1986) Clinical experience with percutaneous tracheostomy and cricothyroidotomy in 100 patients. J Trauma 26(11):1034–1040CrossRefPubMed Toye FJ, Weinstein JD (1986) Clinical experience with percutaneous tracheostomy and cricothyroidotomy in 100 patients. J Trauma 26(11):1034–1040CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Durbin CG (2005) Techniques for performing tracheostomy. Respir Care 50(4):488–496PubMed Durbin CG (2005) Techniques for performing tracheostomy. Respir Care 50(4):488–496PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman BD, Isabella K, Lin N, Buchman TG (2000) A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Chest 118(5):1412–1418CrossRefPubMed Freeman BD, Isabella K, Lin N, Buchman TG (2000) A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Chest 118(5):1412–1418CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Durbin CG (2005) Indications for and timing of tracheostomy. Respir Care 50(4):483–487PubMed Durbin CG (2005) Indications for and timing of tracheostomy. Respir Care 50(4):483–487PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Antonelli M, Michetti V, Di Palma A, Conti G, Pennisi MA, Arcangeli A, Montini L, Bocci MG, Bello G, Almadori G (2005) Percutaneous translaryngeal versus surgical tracheostomy: a randomized trial with 1-yr double-blind follow-up. Crit Care Med 33(5):1015–1020CrossRefPubMed Antonelli M, Michetti V, Di Palma A, Conti G, Pennisi MA, Arcangeli A, Montini L, Bocci MG, Bello G, Almadori G (2005) Percutaneous translaryngeal versus surgical tracheostomy: a randomized trial with 1-yr double-blind follow-up. Crit Care Med 33(5):1015–1020CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yurtseven N, Aydemir B, Karaca P, Aksoy T, Komurcu G, Kurt M, Ozkul V, Canik S (2007) PercuTwist: a new alternative to Griggs and Ciaglia’s techniques. Eur J Anaesthesiol 24(6):492–497CrossRefPubMed Yurtseven N, Aydemir B, Karaca P, Aksoy T, Komurcu G, Kurt M, Ozkul V, Canik S (2007) PercuTwist: a new alternative to Griggs and Ciaglia’s techniques. Eur J Anaesthesiol 24(6):492–497CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Tracheostomy: Open Surgical or Percutaneous? An Effort to Solve the Continued Dilemma
verfasst von
N. Ramakrishnan
Jitendra Kumar Singh
Salil Kumar Gupta
Vijay Bhalla
D. K. Singh
Sheetal Raina
Abha Kumari
Publikationsdatum
19.06.2019
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Elektronische ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01684-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.