Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 10/2020

27.06.2020 | Original Article

Traditional McCall culdoplasty compared to a modified McCall technique with double ligament suspension: anatomical and clinical outcomes

verfasst von: Silvia Parisi, Antonia Novelli, Elena Olearo, Alessandro Basile, Andrea Puppo

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 10/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This study compared anatomical and clinical outcomes of traditional McCall culdoplasty versus a modified McCall technique with double ligament suspension (DLS).

Methods

This retrospective study presents outcomes of 68 patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy and vaginal suspension for apical prolapse ≥ stage II according to the POP-Q score system, at, between January 2016 and February 2018. In 34 women vaginal cuff suspension was obtained with traditional McCall culdoplasty (McCall group), while in 34 women we performed a modified McCall, which consists of a double ligament suspension (DLS group), suspending the vaginal cuff to uterosacral ligaments and also to adnexal peduncles. Primary outcome was prolapse recurrence ≥ stage II according to the POP-Q system. Fisher’s, Mann-Whitney U and Student’s t tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results

There were no statistical differences among patients’ preoperative characteristics, operative time, blood loss or postoperative complications. Follow-up mean duration was 23.2 ± 6.7 and 22.4 ± 8.7 months in the McCall and DLS group, respectively. Prolapse recurrence occurred in 11 (32.3%) women in the McCall group versus 2 (5.9%) women in the DLS group (p < 0.05): among them, 2 patients (5.9%) in the McCall group and 1 (2.9%) in the DLS group required further treatment. Total vaginal length was 6.1 ± 0.9 cm in the McCall group versus 6.9 ± 0.7 cm in the DLS group (p < 0.001). No statistical difference in quality of life assessment was observed.

Conclusions

DLS group patients had better anatomical outcomes and lower recurrence rates than McCall group patients, without increasing operative time or complications. A prospective study with more cases is needed to confirm our data.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4–20.CrossRef Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4–20.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Khunda A, Vashisht A, Cutner A. New procedures for uterine prolapse. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(3):363–79.CrossRef Khunda A, Vashisht A, Cutner A. New procedures for uterine prolapse. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(3):363–79.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–6.CrossRef Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–6.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fialkow MF, Newton KM, Lentz GM, Weiss NS. Lifetime risk of surgical management for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:437–40.CrossRef Fialkow MF, Newton KM, Lentz GM, Weiss NS. Lifetime risk of surgical management for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:437–40.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS. Cost of pel- Vic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:646–51.PubMed Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS. Cost of pel- Vic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:646–51.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Oversand SH, Staff AC, Spydslaug AE, Svennings S, Borstad E. Long-term follow-up after native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urgynecol J. 2014;25:81–9.CrossRef Oversand SH, Staff AC, Spydslaug AE, Svennings S, Borstad E. Long-term follow-up after native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urgynecol J. 2014;25:81–9.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Price N, Slack A, Jwarah E, Jackson S. The incidence of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse: an 11-year experience. Menopause Int. 2008;14(4):145–8.CrossRef Price N, Slack A, Jwarah E, Jackson S. The incidence of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse: an 11-year experience. Menopause Int. 2008;14(4):145–8.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Jha S, Moran P. The UK national prolapse survey: 5 years on. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(5):517–28.CrossRef Jha S, Moran P. The UK national prolapse survey: 5 years on. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(5):517–28.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Vanspauwen R, Seman E, Dwyer P. Survey of current management of prolapse in Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50(3):262–7.CrossRef Vanspauwen R, Seman E, Dwyer P. Survey of current management of prolapse in Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;50(3):262–7.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheon C, Maher C. Economics of pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1873–6.CrossRef Cheon C, Maher C. Economics of pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1873–6.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Milani R, Salvatore S, Soligo M, Pifarotti P, Meschia M, Cortese M. Functional and anatomical outcome of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh. BJOG. 2005;112:107–11.CrossRef Milani R, Salvatore S, Soligo M, Pifarotti P, Meschia M, Cortese M. Functional and anatomical outcome of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh. BJOG. 2005;112:107–11.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Julian TM. The efficacy of Marlex mesh in the repair of severe, recurrent vaginal prolapse of the anterior midvaginal wall. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;186:1472–5.CrossRef Julian TM. The efficacy of Marlex mesh in the repair of severe, recurrent vaginal prolapse of the anterior midvaginal wall. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;186:1472–5.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Spelzini F, Frigerio M, Manodoro S, Interdonato ML, Cesana MC, Verri D, et al. Modified McCall culdoplasty versus Shull suspension in pelvic prolapse primary repair: a retrospective study. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(1):65–71.CrossRef Spelzini F, Frigerio M, Manodoro S, Interdonato ML, Cesana MC, Verri D, et al. Modified McCall culdoplasty versus Shull suspension in pelvic prolapse primary repair: a retrospective study. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(1):65–71.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiavi MC, Savone D, Di Mascio D, Di Tucci C, Perniola G, Zullo MA, et al. Long-term experience of vaginal vault prolapse prevention at hysterectomy time by modified McCall culdoplasty or Shull suspension: clinical, sexual and quality of life assessment after surgical intervention. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;223:113–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.02.025.CrossRefPubMed Schiavi MC, Savone D, Di Mascio D, Di Tucci C, Perniola G, Zullo MA, et al. Long-term experience of vaginal vault prolapse prevention at hysterectomy time by modified McCall culdoplasty or Shull suspension: clinical, sexual and quality of life assessment after surgical intervention. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;223:113–8. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ejogrb.​2018.​02.​025.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.CrossRef Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat McCall ML. Posterior culdeplasty; surgical correction of enterocele during vaginal hysterectomy; a preliminary report. Obstet Gynecol. 1957;10:595–602.CrossRef McCall ML. Posterior culdeplasty; surgical correction of enterocele during vaginal hysterectomy; a preliminary report. Obstet Gynecol. 1957;10:595–602.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:103–13.CrossRef Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:103–13.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Yazdany T, Bhatia N. Uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension: anatomy, outcome and surgical considerations. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;20(5):484–8.CrossRef Yazdany T, Bhatia N. Uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension: anatomy, outcome and surgical considerations. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;20(5):484–8.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Silva WA, Pauls RN, Segal JL, et al. Uterosacral ligament vault suspension: five-year outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:255–63.CrossRef Silva WA, Pauls RN, Segal JL, et al. Uterosacral ligament vault suspension: five-year outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:255–63.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Baden WF, Walker T. Surgical repair of vaginal defects. Philadelphia: The Lippincott Company Ed.; 1992. Baden WF, Walker T. Surgical repair of vaginal defects. Philadelphia: The Lippincott Company Ed.; 1992.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cosma S, Petruzzelli P, Chiadò Fiorio Tin M, Parisi S, Olearo E, Fassio F, Zizzo R, Danese S, Benedetto C. Simplified laparoscopic sacropexy avoiding deep vaginal dissection. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018;143(2):239–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12632. Cosma S, Petruzzelli P, Chiadò Fiorio Tin M, Parisi S, Olearo E, Fassio F, Zizzo R, Danese S, Benedetto C. Simplified laparoscopic sacropexy avoiding deep vaginal dissection. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018;143(2):239–245. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​ijgo.​12632.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Deo G, Bernasconi DP, Cola A, Palmieri S, Spelzini F, Milani R, et al. Long-term outcomes and five-year recurrence-free survival curves after native-tissue prolapse repair. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;147:238–45.CrossRef Deo G, Bernasconi DP, Cola A, Palmieri S, Spelzini F, Milani R, et al. Long-term outcomes and five-year recurrence-free survival curves after native-tissue prolapse repair. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;147:238–45.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Manodoro S, Frigerio M, Milani R, Spelzini F. Tips and tricks for uterosacral ligament suspension: how to avoid ureteral injury. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:161–3.CrossRef Manodoro S, Frigerio M, Milani R, Spelzini F. Tips and tricks for uterosacral ligament suspension: how to avoid ureteral injury. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:161–3.CrossRef
26.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Morgan DM, Rogers MA, Huebner M, Wei JT, Delancey JO. Heterogeneity in anatomic outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation for prolapse: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1424–33.CrossRef Morgan DM, Rogers MA, Huebner M, Wei JT, Delancey JO. Heterogeneity in anatomic outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation for prolapse: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1424–33.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Traditional McCall culdoplasty compared to a modified McCall technique with double ligament suspension: anatomical and clinical outcomes
verfasst von
Silvia Parisi
Antonia Novelli
Elena Olearo
Alessandro Basile
Andrea Puppo
Publikationsdatum
27.06.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04403-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2020

International Urogynecology Journal 10/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.