Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 1/2008

Open Access 01.12.2008 | Research

Traditional zootherapeutic studies in India: a review

verfasst von: Madan Mohan Mahawar, DP Jaroli

Erschienen in: Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine | Ausgabe 1/2008

Abstract

The present study aims to review the zootherapeutic practices of the different ethnic communities of India. This work is also an attempt to present a list of animals' use for medicinal purposes by different communities of India. Data were gathered from 15 published research papers of various authors on zootherapeutic studies in India from 2000 to 2007. Approximately 109 animals and their 270 uses are reported in traditional medicine in different parts of India. Of these, the highest numbers of animal species (42, 38.5%) with 50 (18.5%) uses have been reported for the treatment of Respiratory system related problems. Rheumatic and other pains are treated with 32 species (29.4%) in 34 (12.9%) uses. Gastric problems are reported to be treated with 22 (20.2%) species in 26 (9.9%) uses. The mammals constitute the highest number of animals used for medicinal purposes. 44 (40%) mammals, 24 (22%) invertebrates, 18 (17%) birds, 12 (11%) reptiles, nine (8%) fishes and two (2%) amphibians have been reported for medicinal purposes. Of the total 109 animal species reported, 76(70%) are included in IUCN red data list and 36 (33%) animal species are listed in CITES appendix I, II, and III. This work will be helpful in biodiversity conservation in India and also give a clue to investigate bio-active compound in these animal raw materials.

Background

The world health organization estimates that as many as 80% of the world's more then six billion people rely primarily on animal and plant based medicine [1]. In modern societies, zootherapy constitutes an important alternative among many other known therapies practiced worldwide. Wild and domestic animals and their byproducts (e.g. hooves, skin, bones, feathers and tusks) form important ingredients in the preparation of curative, protective and preventive medicine [2]. For example, in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) more then 1500 animal species have been recorded to be some medicinal use [3]. Of the 252 essential chemicals that have been selected by the World Health Organization, 11.1% come from plants, and 8.7% from animals [4]. And of the 150 prescription drugs currently in use in the United States of America, 27 have animal origin [5]. In India nearly 15–20 percent of the Ayurvedic medicine is based on animal-derive substance [6]. In Unani system of medicines about 200 drug of animal origin are described which are claimed to be beneficial for the treatment of the various ailments [7]. In Bahia state, in the northeast of Brazil, over 180 medicinal animals have been recorded [8]. In Pakistan 31 substances were listed (animal parts and products), constituting 9% of all the medicinal substances in the inventory of traditional medicines [9].
In India, since times immemorial, great work was done in this field and documented in works like Ayurveda and charaka Samhita. Additionally immense knowledge has come down to modern times through folklore as various practices became a part of tradition amongst various groups. We can find that people still use various animal products and by-products for cure of various diseases. For example, honey is used as expectorant, cattle urine has been used as a therapeutic. All this knowledge has once again come to the limelight, as there has been a sort of disillusionment with the current allopathic cure, as it has got its own side effect and in fact has no cure for various diseases. Therefore people are looking for traditional remedies for the treatment of ailments. But in India this traditional knowledge is fast eroding due to modernization. Thus there is an urgent need to inventorise and record all ethnobiological information among the different ethnic communities before the traditional cultures are completely lost [10]. Therefore, ethnobiologist have a greater responsibility not only in inventorising the traditionally used biological resources but also in conserving and revitalizing the traditionally beliefs, so that the age-old cultures are not lost. The studies on the therapeutic uses of animals and their parts have been neglected, when compare to plants [11]. Thus there is an urgent need to make such study in the field of ethnozoology and document it, so that it can be put to the welfare of human kind.
Many ethnobiologist are collected zootherapeutic information from different ethnic groups or tribes in India. S.K. Sharma describes use of animals to cure ailments of human beings and domestic cattle by Bhil tribe of Rajasthan. [12]. Jamir and Lal describe the traditional method of treating various kinds of ailments using twenty six animal species and their products by different Naga tribes [13]. Patil found that the tribals of Nandurbar district (Maharashtra) have been use wild animal parts as medicines along with plants. This study assesses 15 species of animals used by the tribals like Bhils, Gamits, Koknas and Pawaras as medicine [14]. Ranjit Singh et al describe the Ethno-entomological practices in Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu. In this investigation, 11 species of insects used to prepare traditional medicine [15]. Banerjee et al describe that Honey, as a product from bees, has multiple properties, and is being therapeutically used since time immemorial. It's antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and wound healing properties are promising [16]. Gupta et al describe the traditional knowledge of local communities in district Kachchh and listed about 34 animal species, which are used in primary health care needs of human beings and livestock [17]. Kalita et al study the plant and animal based folk medicine used by people of Dibrugarh district, Assam for treatment of eleven different diseases. In this study, information on utility of 19 plant species and four animal species is collected [18]. Solavan A et al carried out a study among nine tribes spread over four districts of Tamil Nadu, India and identified the traditional therapeutic uses of sixteen different animal's species, consisting of six mammals, five birds, two reptiles, two arthropod and one annelid for the treatment of over 17 kinds of ailments [10]. Mahawar and Jaroli carried out a study among the inhabitants, whose are living surrounding the Ranthambhore National Park, India and identified a total of 15 animals were used comprising 20 therapeutic purposes [19]. Mahawar and Jaroli [2007] carried out a study among the Saharia tribe and identified a total of 15 animal species were recorded and they are used for different ethnomedical purposes, including cough, asthma, tuberculosis, paralysis, earache, herpes, weakness, muscular pain, etc [20]. The Chakhesang tribe of Nagaland also uses twelve mammals, one bird, one reptile, two amphibians, one fish, one mollusk, one annelid and four arthropods for treatment of various ailments [21]. Kakati and Doulo studied Ao tribe of Nagaland and identified twenty five different vertebrate species for traditional therapeutic use, of which, some have become rare [22]. Oudhia describe three animal's medicinal uses, which are reported by traditional healers and natives of Bhopalpatnam region, Chhattisgarh, India. These native have rich traditional medicinal knowledge about common herbs insects and other animals [23]. Oudhia also describe the traditional Medicinal knowledge about excreta of ten animals used to treat many common diseases in Chhattisgarh, India [24]. Insects, mites, and spiders are used as medicines to cure both common and complicated ailments in Chhattisgarh, India. For example, the oil from the red velvet mite (Trombidium grandissimum (Koch, 1867) is useful for paralysis. Also due to its ability to increase the sexual desire, these mites are named as Indian Viagra [25].
This study deals to summarized and review on the zootherapeutic practices by the different ethnic communities of India. This work is also an attempt to present a list of animal's uses for medicinal purposes by different communities of India. The authors hope that this work will be helpful in biodiversity conservation in India and also give a clue to investigate bio-active compound in these animal raw materials.

Methods

Data were gathered from 15 published research papers of various authors on zootherapeutic studies in India from 2000 to 2007 (Table 1). The majority of these papers contain English name, scientific name, area or tribe reported, part or product or raw material name and mode of preparation, etc. All the medicinal uses of animals are classified in 14 major disease categories i.e. Antidote, Burn, Eye and Ear, Gastric disorder, Gynecological problems, Impotency, Nervous System, Pains, Respiratory Problem, Skin related Problem, Urinary Problem, Weakness and Wound healing. These categories are forms to show all related health problems in a major group. For example asthma, cough, cold, tuberculosis or any other respiratory problems are presented into a major disease category called respiratory system related problems.
Table 1
List of published research works on Ethnomedicinal uses of animals in different parts of India.
Tribes/Ethnic Groups/Region/
Indigenous people
Number of
animals
reported
Authors
Chakhesang of Nagaland
23
Kakati and Doulo (2000)
Bhil of Rajasthan
17
Sharma S K (2002)
Bhil, Gamit, Kokna, etc of Maharastra
15
Patil S H (2003)
Bhopalpatnam (chhattisgarh)
3
Oudhia P (2003a)
Chhattisgarh
10
Oudhia P (2003b)
Chhattisgarh
7
Oudhia P (2005)
Kachch (Gujrat)
34
Gupta Leena et al (2003)
Irular, Kurimba of Tamilnadu
26
Solvan A et al (2004)
Kanikar, Paliyar of Taminadu
11
Ranjit Singh ASA (2004)
Naga tribe of Nagaland
26
Jamir N S et al (2005)
Dibrugarh (Assam)
4
Dilip Kalita (2005)
Ao tribe of Nagaland
25
Kakati L N et al (2006)
Mogya, Meena, Bawaria of Rajasthan
15
Mahawar, Jaroli (2006)
Shoka tribe of Uttaranchal
36
Negi and palyal (2007)
Saharia of Rajasthan
15
Mahawar, Jaroli (2007)
We summarized all the medicinal information in 14 disease categories table. Each disease category table contains information in the following pattern: English name, scientific name, area or tribe reported, part or product or raw material name, mode of preparation and reference of the authors (additional file 1).
The valid scientific names with author's names of the animal's species were included in the database. Many times authors have given synonyms of animal species in their publications. These data are updated according to the ITIS Catalogue of Life, Annual Checklist (2007) and NCL Centre for Biodiversity Informatics (NCBI) [26, 27] (Table 2). The conservation status of the animal species follows IUCN (2007) and CITES (2007) [28, 29].
Table 2
List of animals uses as medicinal purposes in different parts of India.
S. N.
Category
Scientific name
English name
Red data list
CITES
1.
Invertebrate
Apis cerana indica – (Fabricius 1798)
Honey bee
  
2.
Invertebrate
Apis dorsata (Fabricius, 1793)
(Rock bee)
  
3.
Invertebrate
Apis florea (Fabricius, 1787)
(Little bee)
  
4.
Invertebrate
Blatta orientalis Linnaeus, 1758 – valid – blatte orientale, oriental cockroach
Cockroach
  
5.
Invertebrate
Bombyx mori (Linnaeus)
Silkworm
  
6.
Invertebrate
Cancer pagurus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Crab
  
7.
Invertebrate
Cimex lectularius (Linnaeus, 1758)
Bed Bug
  
8.
Invertebrate
Cimex rotundatus (Signoret, 1852)
Bed Bug
  
9.
Invertebrate
Dactylopius coccus (Costa, 1835)
Cochineal insect
  
10.
Invertebrate
Dasymutilla occidentalis (Linnaeus)
Velvet ant
  
11.
Invertebrate
Dorylus labiatus Shuckard, 1840
Ant
  
12.
Invertebrate
Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner, 1805)
Pod Borer
  
13.
Invertebrate
Heterometrus swammerdami (Simon, 1872) Synonym – Palamnaeus swammerdami
Scorpion
  
14.
Invertebrate
Kerria lacca (Kerr, 1782)
Lac insect
  
15.
Invertebrate
Macrobrachium malcolmsonii (H. Milne-Edwards, 1844)
Prawn
  
16.
Invertebrate
Matuta planipes (Fabricius, 1798) Synonym-Matuta victor
Sandy shore Crab
  
17.
Invertebrate
Musca domestica nebulo (Fabricius. 1784)
Housefly
  
18.
Invertebrate
Nephotettix nigropictus (Stal), 1870
Green Leafhopper (GLH)
  
19.
Invertebrate
Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius, 1775)
Weaver ant
  
20.
Invertebrate
Pheretima posthuma (L. Vaillant) 1868
Earthworm
  
21.
Invertebrate
Photuris lucicrescens (Barber, 1951)
Lightening Beetles or Fireflies or Lighting bugs
  
22.
Invertebrate
Pila globosa (Swainson, 1822)
Apple Snail
  
23.
Invertebrate
Trombidium grandissimum (Koch, 1867)
Red Velvet Mite
  
24.
Invertebrate
Uca pugnax
Hermit Crab
  
25.
Pisces
Amphipnous cuchia (Hamilton, 1822).
Eel
  
26.
Pisces
Monopterus cuchia (Hamilton, 1822)
cuchia eel
  
27.
Pisces
Schizothorax richardsonii (Gray, 1832)
Fish
  
28.
Pisces
Monopterus albus (Zuiew, 1793)
Eel Fish
Data deficient
 
29.
Pisces
Tor putitora (Hamilton, 1822)
Fish
Endangered
 
30.
Pisces
Channa punctata (Bloch, 1793) Synonym-Channa punctatus Linn.
Channa
Least concern
 
31.
Pisces
Labeo gonius (Hamilton, 1822)
carp fish
Least concern
 
32.
Pisces
Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822)
Labeo
Least concern
 
33.
Pisces
Eusphyra blochii (Cuvier, 1816) Synonym-Zygaena blochii
Hammer head shark
Near threatened
 
34.
Amphibian
Fejervarya limnocharis synonym-Lymnonecties limnorcharis
Frog
Vulnerable
 
35.
Amphibian
Hoplobatrachus tigerinus (Daudin, 1803) synonym-Rana tigrina
Frog
Vulnerable
II
36.
Reptile
Gloydius himalayanus (Günther, 1864) Synonym-Ancistrodon himalayans
Snakes
Data Deficient
 
37.
Reptile
Eryx johnii (Russell, 1801)
Earth Boa
Least concern
II
38.
Reptile
Naja naja (Linnaeus, 1758)
Cobra
Near threatened
II
39.
Reptile
Calotes versicolor (Fitzinger, 1826)
Common Garden Lizard
Near threatened
 
40.
Reptile
Lissemys punctata (Lacépède, 1788)
Indian Flap shell turtle
Near threatened
II
41.
Reptile
Ptyas mucosus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Snakes
Near threatened
II
42.
Reptile
Python reticulatus (Schneider, 1801)
python
Near threatened
II
43.
Reptile
Daboia russelii (Shaw & Nodder, 1797) Synonym-Vipera russelli
Snakes
Near threatened
III
44.
Reptile
Varanus bengalensis (Daudin, 1758)
Monitor
Vulnerable
I
45.
Reptile
Kachuga tentoria (Gray, 1834)
Hard shelled Turtle.
Vulnerable
II
46.
Reptile
Uromastyx hardwickii (Gray, 1827)
Spiny tailed lizard
Vulnerable
II
47.
Reptile
Varanus salvator (Laurenti, 1768)
Monitor
Vulnerable
II
48.
Aves
Acridotheres ginginianus (Latham, 1790)
Bank myna
Least concern
 
49.
Aves
Centropus sinensis (Stephens, 1815)
Crow-pheasant
Least concern
 
50.
Aves
Coracias benghalensis (Linnaeus, 1758)
Indian Roller
Least concern
 
51.
Aves
Corvus splendens (Vieillot, 1817)
Crow
Least concern
 
52.
Aves
Gallus gallus domesticus
hen
Least concern
 
53.
Aves
Halcyon smyrnensis (Linnaeus, 1758)
White-breasted Kingfisher
Least concern
 
54.
Aves
Passer domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758)
House sparrow
Least concern
 
55.
Aves
Pavo cristatus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Indian Peafowl
Least concern
 
56.
Aves
Pseudibis papillosa (Temminck, 1824)
Black ibis
Least concern
 
57.
Aves
Streptopelia decaocto (Frivaldszky, 1838)
Collared dove
Least concern
 
58.
Aves
Vanellus indicus (Boddaert, 1783)
Red-wattled bird
Least concern
 
59.
Aves
Aquila rapax (Temminck, 1828)
Eagle
Least concern
II
60.
Aves
Gallus sonneratii (Temminck, 1813)
Jungle fowl
Least concern
II
61.
Aves
Strix aluco nivicolum (Blyth, 1845)
Owl
Least concern
II
62.
Aves
Tyto alba (Scopoli, 1769)
Barn or Screech Owl
Least concern
II
63.
Aves
Columba livia (Gmelin, 1789)
Pigeon
Least concern
III
64.
Aves
Martes flavigula (Boddaert, 1785)
Martens bird
Least concern
III
65.
Aves
Catreus wallichii (Hardwicke, 1827)
Chir pheasant
Vulnerable
I
66.
Mammal
Myotis lucifugus (LeConte, 1831)
Bat
Conservation Dependent
 
67.
Mammal
Bison bison (Linnaeus, 1758)
Bison
Conservation Dependent
II
68.
Mammal
Equus asinus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Donkey Indian
  
69.
Mammal
Panthera tigris (Linnaeus, 1758)
Tiger
Endangered
I
70.
Mammal
Bubalus bubalis (B. arnee) (Linnaeus, 1758)
Buffalo
  
71.
Mammal
Capra falconeri (Wagner, 1839)
goat
Endangered
I
72.
Mammal
Camelus dromedarius (Linnaeus, 1758)
Camel
Least concern
 
73.
Mammal
Capra sibirica (Pallas, 1776)
goat
Least concern
 
74.
Mammal
Cervus unicolor (Kerr, 1792)
Sambhar
Least concern
 
75.
Mammal
Cynopterus sphinx (Vahl, 1797)
Bat
Least concern
 
76.
Mammal
Felis catus (Linnaeus, 1758) Synonym-Felis domesticus
Cat
Least concern
 
77.
Mammal
Funambulus pennantii (Wroughton, 1905)
Five Striped Palm Squirrel
Least concern
 
78.
Mammal
Hystrix indica (Kerr, 1792)
Porcupine
Least concern
 
79.
Mammal
Lepus nigricollis (F. Cuvier, 1823)
Hare
Least concern
 
80.
Mammal
Muntiacus muntjak (Zimmermann, 1780)
Barking deer
Least concern
 
81.
Mammal
Oryctolagus cuniculus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Hare
Least concern
 
82.
Mammal
Paraechinus micropus (Blyth, 1846)
hedgehog
Least concern
 
83.
Mammal
Petaurista petaurista (Pallas, 1766)
Flying squirrel
Least concern
 
84.
Mammal
Pseudois nayaur (Hodgson, 1833)
Bharal
Least concern
 
85.
Mammal
Rattus rattus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Rat
Least concern
 
86.
Mammal
Sus scrofa cristatus
Indian Wild Boar
Least concern
 
87.
Mammal
Sus scrofa domestica
Domesticated pig
Least concern
 
88.
Mammal
Semnopithecus entellus (Dufresne, 1797) Synomym-Presbytis entellus
Hanuman Monkey
Least concern
I
89.
Mammal
Ursus thibetanus (G. Cuvier, 1823) Synonym-Selenarctos thibetanus
Himalayan black bear
Least concern
I
90.
Mammal
Macaca mulatta (Zimmermann, 1780)
Rhesus Macaque
Least concern
II
91.
Mammal
Canis aureus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Jackal
Least concern
III
92.
Mammal
Herpestes edwardsii (É. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1818)
Mongoose
Least concern
III
93.
Mammal
Paradoxurus hermaphroditus (Pallas, 1777)
Common Palm Civet, Toddy Cat
Least concern
III
94.
Mammal
Bos taurus (Linnaeus, 1758) Synonym-Bos indicus
Cattle
  
95.
Mammal
Equus caballus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Horse
  
96.
Mammal
Homo sapiens (Linnaeus, 1758)
Human
  
97.
Mammal
Canis lupus familiaris (Linnaeus, 1758) Synonym-Canis familiaris
Dog
  
98.
Mammal
Hemitragus jemlahicus (H. Smith, 1826)
Himalayan Thar
Near threatened
 
99.
Mammal
Hyaena hyaena (Linnaeus, 1758)
Striped Hyena
Near threatened
 
100.
Mammal
Manis crassicaudata (Gray, 1827)
Indian Pangolin
Near threatened
II
101.
Mammal
Pteropus giganteus (Brünnich, 1782)
Indian flying fox
Near threatened
II
102.
Mammal
Equus onager khur (Lesson, 1827) Synonym-Equus hemionus khur (Lesson, 1827)
Indian wild ass
Endangered
I
103.
Mammal
Bos gaurus (H. Smith, 1827) Synonym-Bos frontalis
Mithun
Vulnerable
 
104.
Mammal
Elephas maximus indicus (Cuvier, 1798)
elephant
Vulnerable
I
105.
Mammal
Melursus ursinus (Shaw, 1791)
Sloth Bear
Vulnerable
I
106.
Mammal
Moschus moschiferus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Musk deer
Vulnerable
I
107.
Mammal
Panthera pardus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Leopard
Vulnerable
I
108.
Mammal
Equus hemionus (Pallas, 1775)
Indian wild ass
Vulnerable
II
109.
Mammal
Semnopithecus johnii Synonym-Presbytis johni
Black monkey
Vulnerable
II

Result

Approximately 109 animals are reported in traditional medicine in different parts of India. The mammals constitute the highest number of animals used for medicinal purposes. 44 (40%) mammals, 24 (22%) invertebrates, 18 (17%) birds, 12 (11%) reptiles, nine (8%) fishes and two (2%) amphibians have been reported for medicinal purposes (Table 3, figure 1). Approximately 270 medicinal uses of these animals are reported in different diseases in India. Many animals were used for the treatment of multiple ailments. Of these, the highest numbers of animal species (42, 38.5%) with 50 (18.5%) uses have been reported for the treatment of Respiratory system related problems. Rheumatic and other pains are treated with 32 species (29.4%) in 34 (12.9%) uses. Gastric problems are reported to be treated with 22 (20.2%) species in 26(9.9%) uses. Skin related Problems are treated with 16 species (14.7%) in 19 (7%) uses. 20 species (18.4%) are reported in 20 (7.6%) uses in Eye and Ear disease category. Impotency, aphrodisiac and birth control category is reported to be treated with 16 species (14.7%) in 20 (7.6%) uses. 26 (23.9%) animal species are reported in 31 (11.5%) uses in miscellaneous disease category (table 4, figure 2 and 3). Of the total 109 animal species reported, 76 (70%) are included in IUCN red data list (Table 5, figure 4). 36 (33%) animal species are listed in CITES appendix I, II, and III (Table 6).
Table 3
No. of animals species of different classes reported for medicinal purposes in India.
Name of animal class
No. of species
% of Total animals
Mammals
44
40%
Aves
18
17%
Reptiles
12
11%
Amphibians
2
2%
Pisces
9
8%
Invertebrates
24
22%
Total
109
 
Table 4
No. of animal species and their medicinal uses reported in different disease categories in India.
Disease Categories
No. of
animal
species
Uses
% of total
109 animals
uses
No. of
medicinal
applications
of animals
%
Antidote
06
5.5%
07
2.7%
Burn
10
9.2%
10
3.8%
Eye and Ear
20
18.4%
20
7.6%
Gastric disorder
22
20.2%
26
9.9%
Gynecological problems
06
5.5%
06
2.3%
Impotency, aphrodisiac, birth control
16
14.7%
20
7.6%
Miscellaneous
26
23.9%
31
11.5%
Nervous System
12
11%
15
5.7%
Rheumatic and other pains
32
29.4%
34
12.9%
Respiratory Problem
42
38.5%
50
18.5%
Skin related Problem
16
14.7%
19
7%
Urinary Problem
8
7.3%
8
3%
Weakness
13
11.9%
13
5%
Wound healing
10
9.2%
11
4%
   
270
 
Table 5
Conservation status of animal species reported for medicinal purposes in India according to IUCN Red List or Red Data List.
Conservation status
No. of animal species
% of total 109 animal
species reported
Endangered
04
3.7%
Vulnerable
14
12.4%
Conservation Dependent
2
1.8%
Near threatened
11
10.1%
Least concern
43
39.4%
Data Deficient
2
1.8%
Not evaluated
33
 
Total
109
70%
Table 6
Conservation status of animal species reported for medicinal purposes in India according to CITES.
Appendix
CITES
% of the total animal
used
I
11
10%
II
19
17.5%
III
6
5.5%
Total
36
33%

Animal body part or product use as raw material

All animal body part or products use as raw materials are categorized in following three categories (Table 7, figure 5). (1) The flesh, fat, organs, bile blood, whole body and ash are those raw materials, which are always collected with injury to animal life. (2) But Excreta, urine, by-products (Honey, milk, mucous, wax, shellac, cocoon, musk, egg) are those raw materials, which are collected without injury to animal's life. (3) However some raw material like scale, antler, feather, teeth and bones can be collected with injury to animal life or some time these raw materials can be collected from natural dead animals.
Table 7
Raw material collected with or without injury to animal life for medicinal uses in India.
Injury status
No. of medicinal uses
% of animal uses
With injury to animal life
170
63%
With or without injury to animal life
27
10%
without injury to animal life
73
27%
Total
270
100%
The raw materials are used in 170 medicinal preparations is always injured to animal life (flesh in 62 preparations, fat in 24 preparations, organs and bile in 25 preparations, blood in 19 preparations, whole body and ash in 40 preparations). The number of raw materials collected for medicinal preparation with injury to animal's life is very high (Table 8, figure 6). However in 73 medicinal uses, the raw materials are collected without injury to animal life (byproducts uses in 34 preparations, excreta uses in 27 preparations and urine uses in 12 preparations). Others 27 medicinal uses, the raw materials are collected with or without injury to animal life (scale, antler, feather, teeth are uses in 14 preparation and bones are uses in 13 preparations).
Table 8
Animal part or products uses for medicinal purposes in different parts of India.
Medicinal uses without injury to animal
Medicinal uses
with/without injury to animal
Medicinal uses with injury to animals
Disease
By-products
(Honey,
milk,
mucous,
wax, shellac,
cocoon, musk,
egg)
Excreta
Urine
scale/antler/
Feather/teeth
Bones
/carapace
Flesh
/meat
Fat
Blood
Organs/
bile
Whole
body/ash
/powder
Antidote
      
2
 
4
1
Burn
    
1
 
4
2
3
2
Eye and Ear
3
 
2
3
2
6
  
2
2
Gastric disorder
3
8
2
2
1
2
  
6
2
Gynecological problems
1
1
  
1
2
   
1
Impotency
1
4
 
1
1
12
  
1
 
Miscellaneous
4
5
1
2
1
4
3
1
3
6
Nervous System
 
1
1
  
4
 
4
1
4
Pain
7
2
1
  
5
12
3
2
3
Respiratory Problem
7
4
2
3
2
16
 
5
3
9
Skin related Problem
3
1
1
3
2
2
2
  
4
Urinary Problem
 
2
  
1
3
   
2
Weakness
2
 
1
  
5
 
2
 
3
Wound healing
3
 
1
 
1
1
1
2
 
1
Total-270
34
27
12
14
13
62
24
19
25
40
% of total-
13%
10%
4%
5%
5%
23%
8.9%
7%
9%
15%

Respiratory system Problems

The damp conditions in local homes, leading to high mold counts, as well as insufficient air circulation account for the prevalence of respiratory problems. Many houses in rural areas still have wooden stoves, with smoke causing constant irritation to the pulmonary system.
42 animal species with 50 uses is reported for the treatment of Respiratory related problems like asthma, cough, cold, tuberculosis in different part of India. Of the total 50 Respiratory uses, 32 uses are only for the treatment of asthma. In 16 uses, flesh of animal is reported as raw material for the treatment of respiratory problems. Because mostly ethnic communities eat flash of various animals to control asthma, so there can be a relation between animal flash and asthma.

Gastric system Problems

Stomach disorders, liver problems, constipation, cholera, dysentery, etc are included in the gastric system problem category. 22 (20.2%) animal species are reported in 26 (9.9%) medicinal uses to treat gastric problems. Gastric problems treated include liver problems (2 uses); stomach problems (7 uses); constipation (2 uses); dysentery (3 uses); cholera (1 uses) and other gastric problems (2 uses).
The animal raw materials reported are urine, excreta, dung, feaces, Gall bladder bile, etc.

Rheumatic and other pains

The housing conditions already described, as well as difficult working conditions, leads to a wide spectrum of pains. 34 uses (12.9%) of 32 animal species (29.4%) are fall into this illness category. Body pain, Sprain, Rheumatism, Muscle pain, Headache, Sprain, Bone fracture, Arthritis, Internal Pain, etc are included in this disease category. Animal raw materials are reported for the treatment of arthritis and rheumatic pain in the 23 uses. Mostly fat is uses as raw material in the pain related problems. Of the total 34 uses, fat is reported as raw material in 12 uses of this category. So there can be a relation between animal fat and pains.
Skin infections, either fungal or bacterial, as well as sunspots, moles, pockmarks and acne can be observed frequently in India. Traditional healers are consequently consulted to treat these problems. 16 species (14.7%) are reported in 19 uses (7%) to treat skin problems. Fungal infections are particularly difficult to treat in the context of Western medicine, and the use of animal raw materials to alleviate such infections is thus of particular interest. Leprosy, Acne, leucoderma, Scabies, Spots, Itching, eczema, ringworm infections and to improve the fairness, etc are included in this disease category.
20 (18.4%) animal species are reported for 20 (7.6%) uses to treat eye and ear related Problem. Eye-ache, Conjunctivitis, Night blindness, Cataract, Earache and pus in ear are included in this disease category. Legs of Pavo cristatus (Linnaeus, 1758) is used for ear infection is reported in many parts of India.

Impotency, Aphrodisiac, Birth control

16 (14.7%) animal species are reported in 20 (7.6%) uses to treat Impotency and birth control related Problem in various part of India. This disease category included aphrodisiac, increase sexual desire and efficacy, birth control measure, male impotency and to attain early puberty. 19 uses are reported for increase sexual potency and two uses are for birth control measures. Four uses are for remove to male impotency. Sex organs mainly penis, excreta, flesh, etc are main animal raw materials uses in this category. Of the total 20 uses, 12 times flesh is reported as raw material in this disease category.

Gynecological Problem

Gynecological problems are among the important medical problems treated by different ethnic communities of India. Infections of ovaries, uterus, and vagina as well as post partum infections were very common conditions for which women sought the help of healers. Six (5.5%) animal species are reported in six (2.3%) uses of Gynecological Problem in the various part of the India. Menstruation problem, Facilitates delivery, leucorrhoea, gonorrhea, etc are included in this disease category.

Nervous System

The enormous role that traditional healer play in the area of treatment of psychosomatic and nervous system problems. 12 (11%) animal species are reported for 15 (5.7%) uses of nervous system disorders in the various part of the India. Epilepsy, paralysis migraine, nervous disorder, etc are main ailments that are included in this disease category. Of the total 15 uses, nine uses are reported for paralysis and four uses for epilepsy in this disease category.

Weakness

13 (11.9%) animal species are reported in 13(5%) uses to treat weakness in the various part of the India. General weakness, anemia, malnutrition are main ailments, that are included in this disease category. In 13 uses, milk, flesh and blood are main raw materials reported in this category.

Wound healing

Wound infections from accidents are very common in India, and are a major concern especially in rural areas. 10 (9.2%) animal species are reported for 11 (4%) uses of wound healing in the various parts of the India. small cuts, ulcers, wounds and mouth ulcers are included in this disease category.

Urinary Problem

Eight (7.3%) animal species are reported for eight (3%) medicinal uses of urinary problems in the various parts of the India.

Antidote

Six (5.5%) animal species are reported in seven (2.7%) uses to treat antidotes in the various parts of the India. Snake bite, spider bite, poisoning are included in this category. Bile duct, intestine, fat are reported as raw materials for antidote.

Burn

10 (9.2%) animal species are reported for 10 (3.38%) medicinal uses of burn problems in the various parts of the India. Fat is mostly uses as raw material in burn wounds.

Miscellaneous

26 (23.9%) animal species are reported for 31 (11.5%) uses of miscellaneous purposes in the various parts of the India. The rare disorders included are diabetes, Cancer, carbuncle, haematoma, eosinophilia, Enuresis (bed wetting), Internal tumours, Obesity, alcoholic drinks, Stammering, contracted limbs, hiccups, etc in this category.

Discussion

It is widely accepted that plants, animals and their by-products used as a source of folk or traditional medicines indicate the presence of a biologically active constituent(s) in them. A significant portion of the currently available non-synthetic and/or semi-synthetic pharmaceuticals in clinical use is comprised of drugs derived from plants, animal, microbial, and mineral products [3032]. Although today much is known about the phytochemistry and phytopharmacology of many traditional plant remedies, but real bio-scientific evaluations of remedies of animal origin are still quite rare in the literature [33]. However many animals have been methodically tested by pharmaceutical companies as sources of drugs to the modern medical science [34].
Approximately 109 animals and their 270 uses are reported in folk medicine in different part of India. The number of animals reported for medicinal purposes in different parts of India is enough to feel a need to discuss on the use of animals and their products, as medicines. In order to stress how important animals were, are and can be as sources of pharmacological substances and discussion on the use of the animals and their products, as medicines in conservation biology and sustainable use.
42 animal species with 50 uses is reported for the treatment of Respiratory problems like asthma, cough, cold, tuberculosis in different part of India. Of the total 50 Respiratory uses, 32 uses are only for the treatment of asthma. In 16 uses flesh of animal is reported as raw material for the use of respiratory problems. So there can be a relation between animal flash and asthma, because mostly ethnic communities reported flash of various animals is uses for asthma.
Kadrobova et al. (1996) reported that low selenium (Se) levels were observed in patients with asthma when compared to a group of patients without asthma. The researchers concluded that Se supplementation may be beneficial to patients with intrinsic asthma, who may be at risk of Se deficiency [35]. Selenium occurs in various chemical forms (selenite or selenate) in plants and animals. It is in an inorganic form such as selenomethionine or other selenium-containing amino acids [36]. The meat and fish group which include quantities of dry fish (Tilapia nicotilus), cray fish (Procambaris clarkii), snail (Achatina fulica) and albino rat was richest in selenium. Although snail and rat contained little or none [37].
In Brazil, Alves et al reported the medicinal uses of 283 animal species, 96% of which are wild caught and 27% of which are on one or more lists of endangered species [38]. Alves et al also demonstrate that at least 165 reptile species are used in traditional folk medicine around the world. Some species are used as sources of drugs for modern medical science. Of the reptiles recorded, 53% are included on lists of endangered species [39].
109 animal species are uses in India, of which 76 (70%) are included in IUCN red data list and 36 (33%) animal species are listed in CITES appendix I, II, and III and the Raw materials are used in 170 medicinal preparations is always injured to animal life. All these data is very high to affect biodiversity. Many protected animal species like peacock (Pavo cristatus (Linnaeus, 1758), hard shelled turtle (Kachuga tentoria (Gray, 1834)), sambhar (Cervus unicolor (Kerr, 1792)), Spiny-tailed lizard (Uromastyx hardwickii (Gray, 1827)), and collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto (Frivaldszky, 1838)) are mentioned as important medicinal resources in India. The Kanjar community girls eat flesh of collared dove for attain puberty in early age in the surrounding areas of Ranthambhore national park [19]. Now collared dove facing a serious problem due to this activity in this area. It's suggested that this kind of neglected traditional knowledge should be included into the strategies of conservation and management of faunistic resources in the investigated areas.

Conclusion

We have summarized and analyses the data collected by various authors in 15 published research works on zootherapeutic practices in different part of India. Some important points are outcome of this work.
1. Approximately 109 animals and their 270 medicinal uses are reported in traditional medicine in different parts of India.
2. Of the total 109 animal species reported, 76 (70%) are included in IUCN red data list. 36 (33%) animal species are listed in CITES appendix I, II, and III.
3. The mammals constitute the highest number of animals used for medicinal purposes. 44 (40%) mammals, 24 (22%) invertebrates, 18 (17%) birds, 12 (11%) reptiles, 9 (8%) fishes and two (2%) amphibians have been reported for medicinal purposes.
4. The highest numbers of animal species (42, 38.5%) with 50 (18.5%) uses have been reported for the treatment of Respiratory system related problems, like asthma, cough, cold, tuberculosis in different part of India. Of the total 50 Respiratory uses, 32 uses are only for the treatment of asthma. In 16 uses, flesh of animal is reported as raw material for the treatment of respiratory problems. Because mostly ethnic communities eat flash of various animals to control asthma, so there can be a relation between animal flash and asthma.
5. Rheumatic and other pains are reported to be treated with 32 species (29.4%) for 34 (12.9%) uses in different part of India.
6. Gastric problems are reported with 22(20.2%) for 26 (9.9%) uses in different part of India.
7. Skin related Problems are treated with 16 species (14.7%) for 19 (7%) uses in different part of India.
8. 20 species (18.4%) are used in 20 uses (7.6%) in eye and ear related diseases in different part of India.
9. Impotency, aphrodisiac and birth control is reported with 16 species (14.7%) for 20(19) (7.6%) uses in different part of India.
10. Raw materials are used in 170 medicinal preparations is always injured to animal life (flesh in 62 preparations, fat in 24 preparations, organs and bile in 25 preparations, blood in 19 preparations, whole body and ash in 40 preparations).
11. In 73 medicinal uses, the raw materials are collected without injury to animal life (byproducts uses in 34 preparations, excreta uses in 27 preparations and urine uses in 12 preparations). However in 27 medicinal uses, the raw materials are collected with or without injury to animal life (scale, antler, feather, teeth are uses in 14 preparation and bones are uses in 13 preparations).
12. Flesh is reported for maximum (62, 23%) uses as animal raw material in Indian ethnic communities.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Adeola MO: Importance of wild Animals and their parts in the culture, religious festivals, and traditional medicine, of Nigeria. Environmental Conservation. 1992, 19 (2): 125-134.CrossRef Adeola MO: Importance of wild Animals and their parts in the culture, religious festivals, and traditional medicine, of Nigeria. Environmental Conservation. 1992, 19 (2): 125-134.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat China National Corporation of Traditional and Herbal Medicine: Materia medica commonly used in China. 1995, Beijing: Science Press China National Corporation of Traditional and Herbal Medicine: Materia medica commonly used in China. 1995, Beijing: Science Press
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Marques JGW: Fauna medicinal: Recurso do ambiente ou ameaça à biodiversidade?. Mutum. 1997, 1 (1): 4- Marques JGW: Fauna medicinal: Recurso do ambiente ou ameaça à biodiversidade?. Mutum. 1997, 1 (1): 4-
5.
Zurück zum Zitat World Resources Institute: People and ecosystems the fraying web of life. World Resources Report 2000–2001. 2000, Washington D C: World Resources Institute, 389- World Resources Institute: People and ecosystems the fraying web of life. World Resources Report 2000–2001. 2000, Washington D C: World Resources Institute, 389-
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Unnikrishnan PM: Animals in Ayurveda. Amruth. 1998, 1-15. Suppl 1 Unnikrishnan PM: Animals in Ayurveda. Amruth. 1998, 1-15. Suppl 1
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma MP: Drugs of animal origin in Unani medicine: The need for scientific evaluation. Ethnobiology in Human Welfare. Edited by: Jain SK. 1996, New Delhi: Deep Publications, 206- Sharma MP: Drugs of animal origin in Unani medicine: The need for scientific evaluation. Ethnobiology in Human Welfare. Edited by: Jain SK. 1996, New Delhi: Deep Publications, 206-
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ali SAM, Mahdihassan S: Bazaar medicines of Karachi: The drugs of animal origin. Bazaar Drugs and Folk Medicine in Pakistan. Edited by: Mahdihassan S. 1984, Hamdard, 69-73. Ali SAM, Mahdihassan S: Bazaar medicines of Karachi: The drugs of animal origin. Bazaar Drugs and Folk Medicine in Pakistan. Edited by: Mahdihassan S. 1984, Hamdard, 69-73.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Trivedi PC: Ethnobotany: An overview. Ethnobotany. 2002, Jaipur: AAveshkar publisher, 1- Trivedi PC: Ethnobotany: An overview. Ethnobotany. 2002, Jaipur: AAveshkar publisher, 1-
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma SK: A Study on Ethnozoology of Southern Rajasthan. Ethnobotany. Edited by: Trivedi PC. 2002, Jaipur: AAveshkar Publisher, 239-253. Sharma SK: A Study on Ethnozoology of Southern Rajasthan. Ethnobotany. Edited by: Trivedi PC. 2002, Jaipur: AAveshkar Publisher, 239-253.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Banerjee P, Sahoo KN, Biswas TK, Basu SK, Chatterjee J, Hui AK, Chakraborty N, Debnath PK: Bees make medicine for mankind. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge. 2003, 2 (1): 22-26. Banerjee P, Sahoo KN, Biswas TK, Basu SK, Chatterjee J, Hui AK, Chakraborty N, Debnath PK: Bees make medicine for mankind. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge. 2003, 2 (1): 22-26.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakati LN, Doulo V: Indigenous knowledge system of zootherapeutic use by Chakhesang tribe of Nagaland, India. J. Hum. Ecol. 2002, 13 (6): 419-423. Kakati LN, Doulo V: Indigenous knowledge system of zootherapeutic use by Chakhesang tribe of Nagaland, India. J. Hum. Ecol. 2002, 13 (6): 419-423.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Farnsworth NR, Morris RW: Higher plants: the sleeping giant for drug development. Am J Pharm. 1976, 148: 46-52.PubMed Farnsworth NR, Morris RW: Higher plants: the sleeping giant for drug development. Am J Pharm. 1976, 148: 46-52.PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Farnsworth NR, Soejarto DD: Potential consequence of plant extinction in the United States on the current and future availability of prescription drugs. Econ Bot. 1985, 39 (3): 31-40.CrossRef Farnsworth NR, Soejarto DD: Potential consequence of plant extinction in the United States on the current and future availability of prescription drugs. Econ Bot. 1985, 39 (3): 31-40.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Soejarto DD: Biodiversity prospecting and benefit-sharing: perspectives from the field. J Ethnopharmacology. 1996, 51: 1-15. 10.1016/0378-8741(95)01345-8. [doi:10.1016/0378-8741(95)01345-8]CrossRefPubMed Soejarto DD: Biodiversity prospecting and benefit-sharing: perspectives from the field. J Ethnopharmacology. 1996, 51: 1-15. 10.1016/0378-8741(95)01345-8. [doi:10.1016/0378-8741(95)01345-8]CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Pieroni A, Grazzini A, Giusti ME: Animal remedies in the folk medical practices of the upper part of the Lucca and Pistoia Provinces, Central Italy. Proceeding of the 4th European colloquium of Ethnopharmacology, Paris, France. 2002, 371-375. Pieroni A, Grazzini A, Giusti ME: Animal remedies in the folk medical practices of the upper part of the Lucca and Pistoia Provinces, Central Italy. Proceeding of the 4th European colloquium of Ethnopharmacology, Paris, France. 2002, 371-375.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kunin WE, Lawton JH: Does biodiversity matter? Evaluating the case for conserving species. Biodiversity: a biology of numbers and differences. Edited by: Gaston KJ. 1996, Oxford: Blackwell Science, 283-308. Kunin WE, Lawton JH: Does biodiversity matter? Evaluating the case for conserving species. Biodiversity: a biology of numbers and differences. Edited by: Gaston KJ. 1996, Oxford: Blackwell Science, 283-308.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Vinson JA, Bose P: Comparison of the toxicity of inorganic and natural selenium. Selenium in biology and medicine. Part A. Edited by: Combs GF, Levander OA, Spallholz JE, Oldfield EJ. 1984, New York: AVI Publishers Vinson JA, Bose P: Comparison of the toxicity of inorganic and natural selenium. Selenium in biology and medicine. Part A. Edited by: Combs GF, Levander OA, Spallholz JE, Oldfield EJ. 1984, New York: AVI Publishers
Metadaten
Titel
Traditional zootherapeutic studies in India: a review
verfasst von
Madan Mohan Mahawar
DP Jaroli
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2008
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine / Ausgabe 1/2008
Elektronische ISSN: 1746-4269
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-4-17

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2008

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 1/2008 Zur Ausgabe