Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 1/2012

Open Access 01.10.2012 | Meeting abstract

Training medical students to conduct motivational interviewing: a randomized controlled trial

verfasst von: Jean-Bernard Daeppen, Cristiana Fortini, Nicolas Bertholet, Raphael Bonvin, Alexandre Berney, Pierre-André Michaud, Carine Layat, Jacques Gaume

Erschienen in: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice | Sonderheft 1/2012

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Motivational interviewing (MI) is increasingly used to address unhealthy behaviors. We examined the effectiveness of MI training for medical students to improve counseling of patients with unhealthy behaviors, including risky alcohol use. All students (N = 131) in year five of a six-year curriculum at Lausanne University Medical School in Switzerland were randomized into an experimental group (n = 66) or control group (n = 65). After training of all students in basic communication skills in years two and three (control condition), an eight-hour MI training workshop was completed by students in the experimental group. One week after the training, students in both groups were invited to meet for 15 minutes with two standardized patients. Motivational-interviewing skills were coded by four blinded research assistants using the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) coding system, version 3.0. Superior performance was shown among trained versus control students as demonstrated by higher mean (standard deviation [SD]) scores (range, 1-5) for empathy (4.0 [0.6] versus 3.4 [0.7]; p < 0.001) and MI spirit (4.0 [0.6] versus 3.3 [0.6]; p < 0.001). Mean scores were similar between groups for direction, indicating that students in both groups invited the patient to talk about behavior change. Behavior-counts assessment demonstrated better performance in MI among trained versus control students regarding occurrences of MI-adherent behavior (mean [SD], 5.6 [2.5] versus 3.7 [1.7]; p < 0.001), MI nonadherent behavior (1.9 [2.3] versus 5.1 [3.7]; p < 0.001), closed questions (15.5 [5.3] versus 21.3 [6.9], p < 0.001), open questions (7.8 [2.9] versus 5.6 [2.1]; p = 0.001), simple reflections (13.2 [5.1] versus 11.1 [5.3], p = 0.03), and complex reflections (4.3 [2.1] versus 2.7 [2.0]; p < 0.001). Occurrences were similar between groups regarding giving information. In sum, an eight-hour training workshop was associated with improved MI performance, lending support for the implementation of MI training in medical schools.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
Metadaten
Titel
Training medical students to conduct motivational interviewing: a randomized controlled trial
verfasst von
Jean-Bernard Daeppen
Cristiana Fortini
Nicolas Bertholet
Raphael Bonvin
Alexandre Berney
Pierre-André Michaud
Carine Layat
Jacques Gaume
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2012
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2012
Elektronische ISSN: 1940-0640
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1940-0640-7-S1-A96

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2012

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe