nach oben

European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Erschienen in:

27.03.2019 | Original Contribution

Trajectories of change of youth depressive symptoms in routine care: shape, predictors, and service-use implications

verfasst von: Elisa Napoleone, Chris Evans, Praveetha Patalay, Julian Edbrooke-Childs, Miranda Wolpert

Erschienen in: European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry | Ausgabe 11/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Depression is one of the main reasons for youth accessing mental health services, yet we know little about how symptoms change once youth are in routine care. This study used multilevel modeling to examine the average trajectory of change and the factors associated with change in depressive symptoms in a large sample of youth seen in routine mental health care services in England. Participants were 2336 youth aged 8–18 (mean age 14.52; 77% females; 88% white ethnic background) who tracked depressive symptoms over a period of up to 32 weeks while in contact with mental health services. Explanatory variables were age, gender, whether the case was closed, total length of contact with services, and baseline severity in depression scores. Faster rates of improvement were found in older adolescents, males, those with shorter time in contact with services, closed cases, and those with more severe symptoms at baseline. This study demonstrates that when youth self-report their depressive symptoms during psychotherapy, symptoms decrease in a linear trajectory. Attention should be paid to younger people, females, and those with lower than average baseline scores, as their symptoms decrease at a slower pace compared to others.

We conducted a sensitivity analysis on the uncensored sample. The results were broadly similar, the only notable difference being the fixed main effect of total length of contact being significant in the uncensored sample, which we attribute to the larger variability in this variable that followed from including the top 10% of contact lengths.

Model building was also approached including all scores from baseline in the outcome variable, and the results were similar.

Pseudo R² = 1 − (Final model intercept variance/model 2b intercept variance).

Pseudo R² = 1 − (Final model slope variance/model 2b slope variance).

Pseudo R² = 1 − (Final model within-subjects residual/model 1 within-subjects residual).

Saunders R, Cape J, Fearon P, Pilling S (2016) Predicting treatment outcome in psychological treatment services by identifying latent profiles of patients. J Affect Disord 197:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.011 CrossRefPubMed

Lutz W, Rubel J, Schiefele A-K, Zimmermann D, Böhnke JR, Wittmann WW (2015) Feedback and therapist effects in the context of treatment outcome and treatment length. Psychother Res 25(6):647–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1053553 CrossRefPubMed

Owen JJ, Adelson J, Budge S, Kopta SM, Reese RJ (2016) Good-enough level and dose-effect models: variation among outcomes and therapists. Psychother Res 26(1):22–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2014.966346 CrossRefPubMed

Percevic R, Lambert MJ, Kordy H (2006) What is the predictive value of responses to psychotherapy for its future course? Empirical explorations and consequences for outcome monitoring. Psychother Res 16(3):364–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300500485524 CrossRef

Rubel J, Lutz W, Kopta SM, Köck K, Minami T, Zimmermann D, Saunders SM (2015) Defining early positive response to psychotherapy: an empirical comparison between clinically significant change criteria and growth mixture modeling. Psychol Assess 27(2):478–488. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000060 CrossRefPubMed

Baldwin SA, Berkeljon A, Atkins DC, Olsen JA, Nielsen SL (2009) Rates of change in naturalistic psychotherapy: contrasting dose–effect and good-enough level models of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 77(2):203–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015235 CrossRefPubMed

Howard KI, Kopta SM, Krause MS, Orlinsky DE (1986) The dose–effect relationship in psychotherapy. Am Psychol 41(2):159–164CrossRef

Barkham M, Connell J, Stiles WB, Miles JNV, Margison F, Evans C, Mellor-Clark J (2006) Dose–effect relations and responsive regulation of treatment duration: the good enough level. J Consult Clin Psychol 74(1):160–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.74.1.160 CrossRefPubMed

De Jong K, Timman R, Hakkaart-Van Roijen L, Vermeulen P, Kooiman K, Passchier J, Busschbach JV (2014) The effect of outcome monitoring feedback to clinicians and patients in short and long-term psychotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Psychother Res 24(6):629–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.871079 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Hayes AM, Feldman GC, Beevers CG, Laurenceau J-P, Cardaciotto L, Lewis-Smith J (2007) Discontinuities and cognitive changes in an exposure-based cognitive therapy for depression. J Consult Clin Psychol 75(3):409–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.75.3.409 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Singer JD, Willett JB (2003) Applied longitudinal data analysis: modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef

12.

Cannon JAN, Warren JS, Nelson PL, Burlingame GM (2010) Change trajectories for the Youth Outcome Questionnaire self-report: identifying youth at risk for treatment failure. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 39(3):289–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374411003691727 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Warren JS, Nelson PL, Burlingame GM (2009) Identifying youth at risk for treatment failure in outpatient community mental health services. J Child Fam Stud 18(6):690–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-009-9275-9 CrossRef

14.

Warren JS, Nelson PL, Burlingame GM, Mondragon SA (2012) Predicting patient deterioration in youth mental health services: community mental health vs. managed care settings. J Clin Psychol 68(1):24–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20831 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Nelson PL, Warren JS, Gleave RL, Burlingame GM (2013) Youth psychotherapy change trajectories and early warning system accuracy in a managed care setting: youth outcomes and warning system accuracy. J Clin Psychol 69(9):880–895. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21963 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Burlingame GM, Wells MG, Lambert MJ, Cox JC (2004) Youth Outcome Questionnaire. In: Maruish M (ed) The use of psychological tests for treatment planning and outcome assessment, vol 2, 3rd edn. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 235–274

17.

Children’s Commissioner for England (2017) Briefing: Children’s mental healthcare in England. Children’s Commissioner, London

18.

Wolpert M, Jacob J, Napoleone E, Whale A, Calderon A, Edbrooke-Childs J (2016) Child- and parent-reported outcomes and experience from child and young people’s mental health services 2011–2015. CAMHS Press, London

19.

Bear H, Edbrooke-Childs JH, Norton S, Krause K, Wolpert M (2018) Treatment response following routine mental health care among children and adolescents with anxiety and/or depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (Submitted)

20.

Weersing VR, Weisz JR (2002) Community clinic treatment of depressed youth: benchmarking usual care against CBT clinical trials. J Consult Clin Psychol 70(2):299–310. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.70.2.299 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Lima NNR, do Nascimento VB, de Carvalho SMF, de Abreu LC, Neto MLR, Brasil AQ, Celestino Júnior FT, de Oliveira GF, Reis AOA (2013) Childhood depression: a systematic review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 78:1417. https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s42402 CrossRef

22.

Dekker MC, Ferdinand RF, van Lang NDJ, Bongers IL, van der Ende J, Verhulst FC (2007) Developmental trajectories of depressive symptoms from early childhood to late adolescence: gender differences and adult outcome. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 48(7):657–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01742.x CrossRefPubMed

23.

Department of Health (2015) Future in mind: promoting, protecting and improving out children and young people’s mental health and wellbeing. Department of Health and NHS England, London

24.

Bickman L, Douglas SR, De Andrade ARV, Tomlinson M, Gleacher A, Olin S, Hoagwood K (2016) Implementing a measurement feedback system: a tale of two sites. Adm Policy Mental Health Mental Health Serv Res 43(3):410–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-015-0647-8 CrossRef

25.

Reese RJ, Toland MD, Hopkins NB (2011) Replicating and extending the good-enough level model of change: considering session frequency. Psychother Res 21(5):608–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2011.598580 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Green H, McGinnity A, Meltzer H, Ford T, Goodman R (2005) Mental health of children and young people in Great Britain 2004. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRef

27.

Barnes D, Wistow R, Dean R, Foster B (2006) National child and adolescent mental health service mapping exercise 2005. Durham University, School of Applied Social Sciences, Durham

28.

Chorpita BF, Yim L, Moffitt C, Umemoto LA, Francis SE (2000) Assessment of symptoms of DSM-IV anxiety and depression in children: a revised child anxiety and depression scale. Behav Res Ther 38(8):835–855CrossRef

29.

Chorpita BF, Moffitt CE, Gray J (2005) Psychometric properties of the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale in a clinical sample. Behav Res Ther 43(3):309–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.02.004 CrossRefPubMed

30.

Law D (2012) A practical guide to using service user feedback and outcome tools to inform clinical practice in child and adolescent mental health. Accessed 26 Aug 2014

31.

Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon, Boston

32.

Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ (2012) Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling, 2nd edn. Sage Publishers, London

33.

Core Team R (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, 3.3.2 edn. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

34.

Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Team RC (2016) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-128

35.

Becker BJ (1988) Synthesizing standardized mean-change measures. Br J Math Stat Psychol 41(2):257–278CrossRef

36.

Jacobson NS, Truax P (1991) Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 59(1):12CrossRef

37.

Edbrooke-Childs JH, Wolpert M, Zamperoni V, Napoleone E, Bear H (2018) Evaluation of reliable improvement rates in depression and anxiety at the end of treatment in adolescents. BJPsych Open 4(4):250–255. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2018.31 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Jackson DS, Keir SS, Sender M, Mueller CW (2017) Reliable change and outcome trajectories across levels of care in a mental health system for youth. Adm Policy Mental Health Mental Health Serv Res 44(1):141–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-015-0690-5 CrossRef

39.

Patalay P, Fitzsimons E (2016) Correlates of mental illness and wellbeing in children: are they the same? Results from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 55(9):771–783CrossRef

40.

Weisz JR, Kuppens S, Ng MY, Eckshtain D, Ugueto AM, Vaughn-Coaxum R, Jensen-Doss A, Hawley KM, Krumholz Marchette LS, Chu BC, Weersing VR, Fordwood SR (2017) What five decades of research tells us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: a multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice. Am Psychol 72(2):79–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040360 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Queen AH, Barlow DH, Ehrenreich-May J (2014) The trajectories of adolescent anxiety and depressive symptoms over the course of a transdiagnostic treatment. J Anxiety Disord 28(6):511–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.05.007 CrossRefPubMed

42.

Lutz W, Leach C, Barkham M, Lucock M, Stiles WB, Evans C, Noble R, Iveson S (2005) Predicting change for individual psychotherapy clients on the basis of their nearest neighbors. J Consult Clin Psychol 73(5):904–913. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.73.5.904 CrossRefPubMed

43.

Boswell JF, Kraus DR, Miller SD, Lambert MJ (2015) Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: benefits, challenges, and solutions. Psychother Res 25(1):6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.817696 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Trajectories of change of youth depressive symptoms in routine care: shape, predictors, and service-use implications
verfasst von: Elisa Napoleone
Chris Evans
Praveetha Patalay
Julian Edbrooke-Childs
Miranda Wolpert
Publikationsdatum: 27.03.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry / Ausgabe 11/2019
Print ISSN: 1018-8827
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-165X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01317-5

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

23.04.2024 | Demenz | Nachrichten

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Trajectories of change of youth depressive symptoms in routine care: shape, predictors, and service-use implications

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

Update Psychiatrie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2019

Does maternal somatic anxiety in pregnancy predispose children to hyperactivity?

Somatic comorbidity in children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders

Brief report: a comparison of child mental health inequalities in three UK population cohorts

Maternal pre-pregnancy weight status and health care use for mental health conditions in the offspring

Outcomes of young people who reach the transition boundary of child and adolescent mental health services: a systematic review

Relative age and ADHD symptoms, diagnosis and medication: a systematic review

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

Update Psychiatrie